Int J Stomatol

Int J Stomatol ›› 2019, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 393-399.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2019071

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effectiveness of heat-activated Ni-Ti wires for orthodontic treatment: a systematic review

Gao Jie,Ma Rui,Ge Zhenlin()   

  1. Dept. of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2018-10-03 Revised:2019-03-12 Online:2019-07-01 Published:2019-07-12

RichHTML

15

PDF (PC)

499

Abstract:

Objective In this study, we aimed to conduct a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of heat-activated Ni-Ti (HANT) wires in orthodontic treatment.Methods A search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane library, Web of science, Embase, China Biology Medicine (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific and Technological Journal (VIP) and Wan Fang databases until 30 November 2017. Then, we collected the randomised controlled trials (RCT) about the clinical effectiveness of HANT wires versus other Ni-Ti wires. The extraction of data and risk of bias evaluation were conducted by two investigators independently. Then, RevMan 5.3.0 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis.Results We included 8 trials which recruited 456 participants. Four studies were statistically pooled in meta-analysis. Meta-analysis results showed that patients with HANT wires had significantly lower time of levelling, bracket shedding, total course and visual analogue scale scores than those with other Ni-Ti wires. Qualitative analysis results were consistent with meta-analysis findings. The differences in wire breaking was significant, but no differences were found in alignment efficiency.Conclusion HANT wires were more effective than other Ni-Ti wires in terms of the time of levelling, bracket shedding, total course, wire breaking and comfort in orthodontic treatment.

Key words: orthodontic treatment, heat-activated Ni-Ti wire, randomised controlled trial, systematic review, meta-analysis

CLC Number: 

  • R783.5

TrendMD: 

Tab 1

Search strategy of PubMed"

步骤 检索主题
#1 orthodontic therapy [Mesh] OR orthodontic therapy OR orthodontic treatment [Mesh] OR orthodontic treatment
#2 nickel-titanium orthodontic wire [Mesh] OR nickel-titanium orthodontic wire OR Ni-Ti arch wire
#3 Randomized Controlled Trial OR Randomized Controlled Trial [Mesh]
#4 #1 AND #2 AND #3

Fig 1

Flow diagram of literature retrieval and screening"

Tab 2

Characteristics of the studies"

样本量 年龄/岁# 性别 托槽 干预措施 对照措施 观察指标
（G/D） （G/D） （男/女） 系统
45/45[5] 13.5±0.3/ 46/44 MBT 采用热激活镍钛丝,弓丝更换顺 采用普通镍钛弓丝,更换 排齐整平时间、总疗程弓丝断、
13.6±0.4 矫治器 序照MBT直丝弓矫治系统的作者 顺序参照标准直丝弓矫治 裂次数、托槽脱落次数、VAS
推荐的更换顺序 系统的常规更换顺序 指数
40/40[11] - 40/40 MBT 采用热激活镍钛丝,弓丝更换顺 采用普通镍钛弓丝,更换顺 排齐整平时间、总疗程、弓丝断
矫治器 序按照MBT直丝弓矫治系统的作 序参照标准直丝弓矫治系统 裂次数、托槽脱落次数
者推荐的更换顺序 的常规更换顺序
37/37[12] 13.3±0.4/ 35/39 MBT 采用热激活镍钛丝,弓丝更换顺 采用普通镍钛弓丝,更换顺 排齐整平时间、弓丝断裂次数、托
13.5±0.8 矫治器 序按照MBT直丝弓矫治系统的作 序参照标准直丝弓矫治系统 槽脱落次数、复诊次数、炎症发生
者推荐的更换顺序 的常规更换顺序 率、肿胀发生率、毒性反应、过敏
21/21[13] 13.52±6.21/ 25/17 MBT 采用热激活镍钛丝,弓丝更换顺 采用普通镍钛弓丝,更换顺 排齐整平时间、总疗程、弓丝断
13.71±6.37 矫治器 序按照MBT直丝弓矫治系统的作 序参照标准直丝弓矫治系统 裂次数、托槽脱落次数、VAS
者推荐的更换顺序 的常规更换顺序 指数
20/24[8] 14±2.73/ 11/33 Smart-Clip 初始弓丝为0.356 mm热激活镍钛 初始弓丝为0.356 mm超弹 VAS指数、Little’s前牙不齐指数
14.71±2.58 自锁矫治器 弓丝 性镍钛弓丝
25/25/ 17.44±5.4/ 28/46 Roth 初始弓丝为0.356 mm热激活镍钛 初始弓丝为0.356 mm超弹 Little’s前牙不齐指数
24*[9] 19.36±4.5/ 矫治器 弓丝 性镍钛弓丝,普通镍钛弓
19.29±3.9 丝
15/15[14] 14.7±4.2/ 11/19 金属 初始弓丝为0.406 mm热激活镍钛 初始弓丝为0.406 mm超弹 VAS指数
14.7±3.4 矫治器 弓丝 性镍钛弓丝
11/11[10] 16.90±2.14/ - Roth 用热激活镍钛丝和普通镍钛弓丝, 采用普通镍钛弓丝,弓丝更 Little’s不齐指数
16.43±2.42 矫治器 弓丝更换顺序用Gugel的更换顺序 换顺序采用Gugel推荐顺序

Fig 2

Risk of bias summary: cross plot of judgment results for each item of each study"

Fig 3

Risk of bias graph: each risk of bias item presented as percenta-ges across all included studies"

Fig 4

Meta analysis of the time of leveling between the heat-activated nickel-titanium wires and the other nickel-titanium wires"

Fig 5

Meta analysis of the bracket shedding between the heat-activated nickel-titanium wires and the other nickel-titanium wires"

Fig 6

Meta analysis of the total course between the heat-activated nickel-titanium wires and the other nickel-titanium wires"

Fig 7

Meta analysis of the VAS scores between the heat-activated nickel-titanium wires and the other nickel-titanium wires"

[1] Chang HP, Tseng YC . A novel β-titanium alloy orthodontic wire[J]. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2018,34(4):202-206.
[2] Andreasen GF, Hilleman TB . An evaluation of 55 cobalt substituted Nitinol wire for use in orthodontics[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 1971,82(6):1373-1375.
[3] Mañosa L, Planes A . Mechanocaloric effects in shape memory alloys[J]. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci, 2016,374(2074). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0310.
[4] Khoo ZX, Liu Y, An J , et al. A review of selective laser melted NiTi shape memory alloy[J]. Materials (Basel), 2018,11(4). doi: 10.3390/ma11040519.
[5] 邓丽蓉 . 正畸治疗中应用热激活镍钛弓丝与普通镍钛丝的效果比较[J]. 现代医院, 2014,14(3):39-40.
Deng LR . Comparison of the effect of thermal activated nitinol and common nitinol in orthodontic therapy[J]. Mod Hosp, 2014,14(3):39-40.
[6] Ong E, Ho C, Miles P . Alignment efficiency and dis-comfort of three orthodontic archwire sequences: a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Orthod, 2011,38(1):32-39.
[7] 焦鑫, 田金徽, 杨克虎 , 等. 压膜保持器与Hawley保持器正畸保持效果的系统评价[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2012,12(5):596-601.
Jiao X, Tian JH, Yang KH , et al. Clinical effectiveness of vacuum-formed versus hawley retainers: a syste-matic review[J]. Chin J Evid Based Med, 2012,12(5):596-601.
[8] 任庆源 . 热激活镍钛弓丝与超弹镍钛弓丝的矫治效率与疼痛对比分析[D]. 吉林: 吉林大学, 2016.
Ren QY . A comparative analysis of the treatment ef- ficiency and pain of heat-activated nickel-titanium arch wire and superelastic nickel-titanium arch wire[D]. Jilin: Jilin University, 2016.
[9] Abdelrahman RSh, Al-Nimri KS, Al Maaitah EF . A clinical comparison of three aligning archwires in terms of alignment efficiency: a prospective clinical trial[J]. Angle Orthod, 2015,85(3):434-439.
[10] Serafim CM, Gurgel Jde A, Tiago CM , et al. Clinical efficiency of two sequences of orthodontic wires to correct crowding of the lower anterior teeth[J]. Sci World J, 2015,2015:690280.
[11] 吉利, 贺红, 钟小龙 , 等. 热激活镍钛弓丝与普通镍钛丝在正畸治疗中的评价[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2010,14(16):2929-2932.
Ji L, He H, Zhong XL , et al. Evaluation of heat-activated and common nickel-titanium wire for orthodontic treatment[J]. J Clin Rehabil Tissue Eng Res, 2010,14(16):2929-2932.
[12] 潘伟霞 . 热激活镍钛弓丝和普通镍钛弓丝在正畸治疗中的效果差异[J]. 华夏医学, 2016,29(4):94-96.
Pan WX . Different effect of heat-activated nickel-titanium arch wires and general nickel titanium arch in orthodontic treatment[J]. Acta Med Sinic, 2016,29(4):94-96.
[13] 陈了斐, 张合城, 廖武堂 . 热激活镍钛弓丝和普通镍钛弓丝在正畸治疗中的效果比较[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2017,28(14):2553-2555.
Chen LF, Zhang HC, Liao WT . Comparison of the effect of thermal activated nickel titanium wire and common nickel titanium wire in orthodontic treat-ment[J]. Modern Diagn Treat, 2017,28(14):2553-2555.
[14] Cioffi I, Piccolo A, Tagliaferri R , et al. Pain percep-tion following first orthodontic archwire placement: thermoelastic vs superelastic alloys: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Quintessence Int, 2012,43(1):61-69.
[15] Spini TS, Valarelli FP, Cançado RH , et al. Transition temperature range of thermally activated nickel-titanium archwires[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2014,22(2):109-117.
[16] Ghazal AR, Hajeer MY, Al-Sabbagh R , et al. An evaluation of two types of nickel-titanium wires in terms of micromorphology and nickel ions’ release following oral environment exposure[J]. Prog Orthod, 2015,16:9.
[17] Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S , et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement[J]. JAMA, 1996,276(8):637-639.
[1] Wang Nannan,He Hong,Hua Fang. Research progress on the risk factors of orthodontically induced enamel demineralization [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2024, 51(1): 91-98.
[2] Gong Jiaming,Zhao Ruimin,Pan Hongwei,Lang Xin,Yu Zhanhai,Li Jianxue. Meta-analysis of dynamic navigation versus static navigation in the accuracy of implant surgery [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(5): 538-551.
[3] Wang Lüya,Zhang Jingxin,Lin Jie.. Postoperative infection control effect of povidone iodine and chlorhexidine: a systematic review and analysis [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(4): 438-444.
[4] revascularization Meta-analysis of the efficacy comparison between endodontic,Zhuanzhuan apexification Li. OSID） [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(2): 177-185.
[5] Wang Qiqiu,Zhi Qinghui.. Research progress on treatments of enamel white spot lesions [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(6): 717-723.
[6] Gong Jiaming,Zhao Ruimin,Li Wanxin,Su Linhan,Yu Zhanhai,Li Jianxue. The socket-shield technique for immediate implant placement： a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(5): 537-547.
[7] Zhang Shan,Ge Xiaolei,Li Jie,Xie Xinyu,Chang Weiwei,Ma Wensheng.. Meta-analysis of the long-term effect of maxillary protraction on jaw growth and development [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(5): 548-555.
[8] Ma Yu,Zuo Yu,Zhang Xin. Photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to periodontitis: a meta-analysis [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(3): 305-316.
[9] Guo Ziyuan,Chang Xiao,Han Kaifang,Zhang Xizhong. Low-level laser therapy for acceleration of fixed orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(2): 163-172.
[10] Huang Xiaohui,Qi Benting,Yang Jie,Liu Yu,Sun Weibin. Effects of mechanical adjacent surface plaque control measures on periodontal nonsurgical treatment: a systematic review [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(6): 656-663.
[11] Zhou Wanhang,Li Yanfei,Xu Ricong,Wan Qijun. Effects of non-surgical periodontal treatment on risk factors of chronic kidney disease and systematic inflammatory levels in patients with chronic kidney disease and periodontal disease: a Meta-analysis [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(5): 528-535.
[12] Zhou Mengqi,Chen Xuepeng,Fu Baiping. Strategies for preventing alveolar-bone dehiscence and fenestration during orthodontic treatment [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(5): 600-608.
[13] Qin Xiaoru,Liu Mengyuan. Association between periodontal disease and myocardial infarction: a Meta-analysis of cohort studies [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(2): 165-172.
[14] Liu Ling,Gong Renguo,Dong Xiuhua,Liu Rumeng. Meta-analysis of the long-term stability of serious anterior skeletal open-bite malocclusion after orthodontic surgery [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(2): 173-179.
[15] Jin Zuolin. Craniofacial growth and development in early orthodontic and orthopedic treatment [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(1): 7-11.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[10] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .