国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2): 152-158.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2023031

• 种植专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

种植体磨光整形术治疗种植体周围炎的研究进展

陆倩(),夏海斌,王敏()   

  1. 武汉大学口腔医院种植科 武汉 430079
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-15 修回日期:2022-12-26 出版日期:2023-03-01 发布日期:2023-03-14
  • 通讯作者: 王敏
  • 作者简介:陆倩,硕士,Email:2021283040041@whu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82071095)

Research progress on implantoplasty in the treatment of peri-implantitis

Lu Qian(),Xia Haibin,Wang Min.()   

  1. Dept. of Oral Implantology, Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
  • Received:2022-09-15 Revised:2022-12-26 Online:2023-03-01 Published:2023-03-14
  • Contact: Min. Wang
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(82071095)

摘要:

种植体周围炎是种植修复后最常见的生物学并发症之一。发生种植体周围炎后,种植体周骨组织丧失,牙龈退缩,使种植体表面螺纹暴露在口腔中,这种粗糙的表面较光滑表面更易积累菌斑。种植体磨光整形术是通过采用一系列打磨抛光器械机械性去除种植体裸露螺纹,并对种植体表面进行抗菌去污处理,以对种植体表面进行修饰。应用种植体磨光整形术不仅可去除种植体表面污染,还可以降低表面粗糙度,减少未来菌斑附着的程度,有利于种植体周围炎的控制。本文从种植体磨光整形术的治疗程序、疗效、术后问题及并发症等方面进行综述。

关键词: 种植体磨光整形术, 种植体周围炎, 牙种植体, 打磨抛光器械

Abstract:

Peri-implantitis is one of the most common biological complications after implant restoration. The implant threads are exposed due to the peri-implant bone loss and gingival recession. Exposed rough surfaces are more prone to plaque accumulation than smooth surfaces. Implantoplasty is the implant surface modification through the removal of exposed threads and antibacterial decontamination of the implant surface by using a series of rotary instruments. This me-thod has shown promising results in the treatment of peri-implantitis by removing the entire outmost infected layer of titanium and reduce the roughness and plaque adhesion of implant surface. This article reviews the treatment procedure, the-rapeutic effect, postoperative problems, and complications of implantoplasty.

Key words: implantoplasty, peri-implantitis, dental implant, rotary instruments

中图分类号: 

  • R 783

表 1

常用打磨抛光器械"

打磨抛光器械规格用途
金刚砂车针(diamond burs)106、40、15、8、4 μm粒度;花蕾状/蛋状去除种植体表面污物及螺纹
碳化钨车针(carbide cutting burs)红色(普通);白色(细)去除种植体表面污物及螺纹
碳化硅磨石(silicon carbide stones)绿色棒柱状去除种植体表面污物及螺纹
硅胶抛光器(silicone burs)Brownie(棕色锥状);Greenie(绿色锥状)进一步抛光平整种植体表面
阿肯色石(Arkansas stone)锥状/棒柱状/球状进一步抛光平整种植体表面
1 Anitua E, Piñas L, Begoña L, et al. Prognosis of dental implants immediately placed in sockets affected by peri-implantitis: a retrospective pilot study[J]. Int J Periodont Restorat Dent, 2017, 37(5): 713-719.
2 Schwarz F, Derks J, Monje A, et al. Peri-implantitis[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2018, 45: S246-S266.
3 Shimchuk AA, Weinstein BF, Daubert DM. The impact of a change in classification criteria on the prevalence of peri-implantitis: a cross-sectional ana-lysis[J]. J Periodontol, 2021, 92(9): 1339-1346.
4 Lozada JL, James RA, Boskovic M, et al. Surgical repair of peri-implant defects[J]. J Oral Implantol, 1990, 16(1): 42-46.
5 Sharon E, Shapira L, Wilensky A, et al. Efficiency and thermal changes during implantoplasty in relation to bur type[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2013, 15(2): 292-296.
6 de Souza JM Jr, Oliveira de Souza JG, Pereira Neto AL, et al. Analysis of effectiveness of different rotational instruments in implantoplasty[J]. Implant Dent, 2016, 25(3): 341-347.
7 Ramel CF, Lüssi A, Özcan M, et al. Surface roughness of dental implants and treatment time using six different implantoplasty procedures[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016, 27(7): 776-781.
8 Schwarz F, John G, Becker J. The influence of implantoplasty on the diameter, chemical surface composition, and biocompatibility of titanium implants[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2017, 21(7): 2355-2361.
9 Beheshti Maal M, Aanerød Ellingsen S, Reseland JE, et al. Experimental implantoplasty outcomes correlate with fibroblast growth in vitro [J]. BMC Oral Health, 2020, 20(1): 25.
10 Sahrmann P, Luso S, Mueller C, et al. Titanium implant characteristics after implantoplasty: an in vitro study on two different kinds of instrumentation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2019, 34(6): 1299-1305.
11 Bollen CM, Papaioanno W, van Eldere J, et al. The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1996, 7(3): 201-211.
12 Tawse-Smith A, Kota A, Jayaweera Y, et al. The effect of standardised implantoplasty protocol on titanium surface roughness: an in-vitro study[J]. Braz Oral Res, 2016, 30(1): e137.
13 Esteves Lima RP, Abreu LG, Belém FV, et al. Is implantoplasty efficacious at treating peri-implantitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021, 79(11): 2270-2279.
14 Bianchini MA, Galarraga-Vinueza ME, Apaza-Bedoya K, et al. Two to six-year disease resolution and marginal bone stability rates of a modified resective-implantoplasty therapy in 32 peri-implantitis cases[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019, 21(4): 758-765.
15 Bianchini M, Galarraga-Vinueza M, Bedoya K, et al. Implantoplasty enhancing peri-implant bone stability over a 3-year follow-up: a case series[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2020, 40(1): e1-e8.
16 Schwarz F, John G, Schmucker A, et al. Combined surgical therapy of advanced peri-implantitis eva-luating two methods of surface decontamination: a 7-year follow-up observation[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2017, 44(3): 337-342.
17 Khoury F, Keeve PL, Ramanauskaite A, et al. Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis-consensus report of working group 4[J]. Int Dent J, 2019, 69: 18-22.
18 Keeve PL, Koo KT, Ramanauskaite A, et al. Surgical treatment of periimplantitis with non-augmentative techniques[J]. Implant Dent, 2019, 28(2): 177-186.
19 Ravidà A, Siqueira R, Saleh I, et al. Lack of clinical benefit of implantoplasty to improve implant survi-val rate[J]. J Dent Res, 2020, 99(12): 1348-1355.
20 Lasserre JF, Brecx MC, Toma S. Implantoplasty versus glycine air abrasion for the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2020, 35(35): 197-206.
21 Pommer B, Haas R, Mailath-Pokorny G, et al. Periimplantitis treatment: long-term comparison of laser decontamination and implantoplasty surgery[J]. Implant Dent, 2016, 25(5): 646-649.
22 杨春山, 徐巍, 刘颖, 等. 种植体打磨抛光联合Er: YAG激光对种植体周围炎的长期临床疗效[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(7): 612-616.
Yang CS, Xu W, Liu Y, et al. Long-term clinical effect of implantoplasty combined with Er: YAG laser on peri-implantitis[J]. J Oral Sci Res, 2021, 37(7): 612-616.
23 Stavropoulos A, Bertl K, Eren S, et al. Mechanical and biological complications after implantoplasty-a systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019, 30(9): 833-848.
24 Schwarz F, Sahm N, Iglhaut G, et al. Impact of the method of surface debridement and decontamination on the clinical outcome following combined surgical therapy of peri-implantitis: a randomized controlled clinical study[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2011, 38(3): 276-284.
25 Azzola F, Ionescu AC, Ottobelli M, et al. Biofilm formation on dental implant surface treated by implantoplasty: an in situ study[J]. Dent J, 2020, 8(2): 40.
26 Toma S, Lasserre J, Brecx MC, et al. In vitro evaluation of peri-implantitis treatment modalities on Saos-2 osteoblasts[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016, 27(9): 1085-1092.
27 Bertl K, Isidor F, von Steyern PV, et al. Does implantoplasty affect the failure strength of narrow and regular diameter implants? A laboratory study[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2021, 25(4): 2203-2211.
28 Diéguez-Pereira M, Chávarri-Prado D, Viteri-Agustín I, et al. Effect of implantoplasty on the elastic limit of dental implants of different diameters[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2021, 7(1): 88.
29 Costa-Berenguer X, García-García M, Sánchez-Torres A, et al. Effect of implantoplasty on fracture resistance and surface roughness of standard diameter dental implants[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29(1): 46-54.
30 Gehrke S, Junior J, Dedavid B, et al. Analysis of implant strength after implantoplasty in three implant-abutment connection designs: an in vitro study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2016: e65-e70.
31 Camps-Font O, González-Barnadas A, Mir-Mari J, et al. Fracture resistance after implantoplasty in three implant-abutment connection designs[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2020, 25(5): e691-e699.
32 Suzuki H, Hata Y, Watanabe F. Implant fracture under dynamic fatigue loading: influence of embedded angle and depth of implant[J]. Odontology, 2016, 104(3): 357-362.
33 Leitão-Almeida B, Camps-Font O, Correia A, et al. Effect of crown to implant ratio and implantoplasty on the fracture resistance of narrow dental implants with marginal bone loss: an in vitro study[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2020, 20(1): 329.
34 Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Shibli JA, et al. In-fluence of implantoplasty on stress distribution of exposed implants at different bone insertion levels[J]. Braz Oral Res, 2017, 31: e96.
35 Sivolella S, Brunello G, Michelon F, et al. Implantoplasty: carbide burs vs diamond sonic tips. An in vitro study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2021, 32(3): 324-336.
36 Barrak FN, Li SW, Muntane AM, et al. Particle release from implantoplasty of dental implants and impact on cells[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2020, 6(1): 50.
37 Toledano-Serrabona J, Gil FJ, Camps-Font O, et al. Physicochemical and biological characterization of Ti6Al4V particles obtained by implantoplasty: an in vitro study. Part Ⅰ[J]. Materials, 2021, 14(21): 6507.
38 Wu XX, Cai CJ, Gil J, et al. Characteristics of particles and debris released after implantoplasty: a comparative study[J]. Materials (Basel), 2022, 15(2): 602.
39 Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T. Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1983, 50(1): 101-107.
40 Jorio IC, Stawarczyk B, Attin T, et al. Reduced fracture load of dental implants after implantoplasty with different instrumentation sequences. An in vitro study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2021, 32(8): 881-892.
[1] 曹正国. 修复治疗相关的牙周问题考量[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(1): 1-11.
[2] 郑桂婷,徐燕,吴明月. 种植体周围疾病治疗的专家共识及治疗方法的进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(6): 725-731.
[3] 童子安,姒蜜思. 种植体表面菌斑去污方式的体外研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(5): 589-594.
[4] 张敏,万浩元. 种植体周围炎药物治疗与激光治疗的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(4): 463-470.
[5] 吴秋月,李治邦. 药物辅助治疗种植体周围炎的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(4): 471-477.
[6] 青薇,黄丽娟,郑佳俊,任静,李成龙,庹嫱,任小华,牟雁东. 16S核糖体DNA高通量测序研究种植体龈沟液微生物的变化[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2019, 46(5): 532-539.
[7] 于婉琦,周延民,赵静辉. 口腔种植体新材料的研究现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2019, 46(4): 488-496.
[8] 曹焜,李家锋,孙玉华,鲍强,卢秋宁,唐巍. 下颌下窝的锥形束CT影像分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2019, 46(2): 209-212.
[9] 黄海霞, 兰玉燕, 张昊, 潘兰兰, 郭玲, 刘敏. 慢性牙周炎患者种植修复后种植体牙周指数及龈沟液炎性因子水平的变化研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(4): 396-402.
[10] 徐迅, 黄建生, 甘泽坤, 罗震. 上颌第一磨牙区腭侧骨板的锥形束CT测量结果及其临床意义[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(6): 686-690.
[11] 苟敏 蔡潇潇. 种植体—基台微间隙对种植体颈部周围骨的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2015, 42(6): 733-738.
[12] 孟令贤 班宇. 种植体表面去污联合手术疗法治疗种植体周围炎[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2015, 42(4): 458-461.
[13] 孙磊 夏荣. 钛基种植体表面抗菌改性的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2015, 42(4): 475-479.
[14] 孙志新,张云涛. 口腔种植体周围炎与白细胞介素间的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2015, 42(2): 221-224.
[15] 陈苏林 王家伟. 不翻瓣口腔种植的研究现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2014, 41(2): 187-190.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王昆润. 修补颌骨缺损的新型生物学相容材料[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 陆加梅. 不可复性关节盘移位患者术前张口度与关节镜术后疗效的相关性[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] 王昆润. 咀嚼口香糖对牙周组织微循环的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] 宋红. 青少年牙周炎外周血分叶核粒细胞的趋化功能[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] 高卫民,李幸红. 发达国家牙医学院口腔种植学教学现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[6] 侯锐. 正畸患者釉白斑损害的纵向激光荧光研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[7] 轩东英. 不同赋形剂对氢氧化钙抗菌效果的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[8] 房兵. 唇腭裂新生儿前颌骨矫正方法及对上颌骨生长发育的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[9] 杨美祥. 前牙厚度在预测上下颌牙量协调性中的作用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[10] 赵艳丽. 手术刀、电凝、CO_2和KTP激光对大鼠舌部创口的作用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .