国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 1-8.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2018.01.001

• 专家论坛 •    下一篇

氧化锆基台的研究现状和临床应用效果

万乾炳   

  1. 口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心 四川大学华西口腔医院修复1科 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-20 修回日期:2017-10-10 出版日期:2018-01-01 发布日期:2018-01-01
  • 通讯作者: 万乾炳,教授,博士,Email:champion@scu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:万乾炳,教授,博士生导师,国际牙医师学院(中国区)院士。现任四川大学华西口腔医院固定修复科主任,中华口腔医学会口腔修复学专业委员会常务委员,四川省医学会口腔修复学专业委员会副主任委员,四川省学术技术带头人后备人选,《国际口腔医学杂志》常务编委,《华西口腔医学杂志》、NANO等杂志审稿专家。主要从事口腔固定修复、全瓷修复材料和技术、种植固定修复与技术等的研究,承担国家级、省部级等各类课题10余项;在国内外学术期刊发表相关论文100余篇,其中被SCI数据库收录的论文30余篇;主编《全瓷修复技术》,参编《中华口腔科学》《口腔修复学》等10余部著作;获国家级教学成果二等奖1项,四川省科技进步三等奖1项。 万乾炳,教授,博士,Email:champion@scu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技计划项目(2015SZ0078)

Research status and clinical outcomes of zirconia abutments

Wan Qianbing   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Prosthodontics 1, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2017-03-20 Revised:2017-10-10 Online:2018-01-01 Published:2018-01-01
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by Science &Technology Program of Sichuan Province (2015SZ0078).

摘要: 随着生活要求和审美水平的不断提高,以及种植修复学、计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)机械切割技术的飞速发展,种植体-氧化锆基台支持的固定修复以其极佳的美学修复效果被临床医生和患者所认可。对比于其他的全瓷材料,氧化锆材料拥有更好的力学性能,且兼具美观、软组织反应及菌斑黏附少和生物相容性好等特点。本文综合国内外文献,就氧化锆基台的生物学反应、生物学评价、力学性能、美学效果以及临床效果等方面进行阐述,以供参考。

关键词: 氧化锆基台, 种植体, 内外连接, 美学修复

Abstract: With the increasing improvement of the living requirements and aesthetic level, as well as the rapid development of oral implantology and computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology, the fixed prosthesis which is supported by implant-zirconia abutments has been recognized widely by dentists and patients, due to its excellent aesthetic effect. Compared with the other all-ceramic materials, zirconia has better mechanical properties, except for aesthetic effect, less soft tissue reaction and plaque adhesion and good biocompatibility. Combining the literatures in China and abroad, this paper aims to discuss biological responses to zirconia abutments, clinical biological assessments, mechanical properties of zirconia abutments, aesthetic effect and clinical outcomes of zirconia abutments.

Key words: zirconia abutment, dental implant, internal/external connection, aesthetic prosthodontics

中图分类号: 

  • R783.4
[1]Yilmaz B, Salaita LG, Seidt JD, et al. Load to failure of different titanium abutments for an internal hexa-gon implant[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 114(4):513- 516.
[2]Sailer I, Sailer T, Stawarczyk B, et al. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24(5):850-858.
[3]Nothdurft FP, Fontana D, Ruppenthal S, et al. Dif-ferential behavior of fibroblasts and epithelial cells on structured implant abutment materials: a com-parison of materials and surface topographies[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17(6):1237- 1249.
[4]Okabe E, Ishihara Y, Kikuchi T, et al. Adhesion properties of human oral epithelial-derived cells to zirconia[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2016, 18 (5):906-916.
[5]Rutkunas V, Bukelskiene V, Sabaliauskas V, et al. Assessment of human gingival fibroblast interaction with dental implant abutment materials[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2015, 26(4):169.
[6]Kohal RJ, Weng D, Bächle M, et al. Loaded custom-made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: an animal experiment[J]. J Perio-dontol, 2004, 75(9):1262-1268.
[7]Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. The mu-cosal barrier at implant abutments of different mate-rials[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(7):635- 641.
[8]van Winkelhoff AJ, Goené RJ, Benschop C, et al. Early colonization of dental implants by putative periodontal pathogens in partially edentulous patients [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2000, 11(6):511-520.
[9]de Oliveira GR, Pozzer L, Cavalieri-Pereira L, et al. Bacterial adhesion and colonization differences be-tween zirconia and titanium implant abutments: an in vivo human study[J]. J Periodontal Implant Sci, 2012, 42(6):217-223.
[10]Rimondini L, Cerroni L, Carrassi A, et al. Bacterial colonization of zirconia ceramic surfaces: an in vitro and in vivo study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2002, 17(6):793-798.
[11]de Avila ED, Avila-Campos MJ, Vergani CE, et al. Structural and quantitative analysis of a mature anae-robic biofilm on different implant abutment surfaces [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 115(4):428-436.
[12]Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, et al. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zir-conium oxide disks: an in vivo human study[J]. J Periodontol, 2004, 75(2):292-296.
[13]Zembic A, Sailer I, Jung RE, et al. Randomized-controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions: 3-year results[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(8):802-808.
[14]Zembic A, Bösch A, Jung RE, et al. Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing zirconia and titanium abutments supporting single-implant crowns in canine and posterior regions[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013, 24(4):384-390.
[15]Sailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE, et al. Randomized con-trolled clinical trial of customized zirconia and ti-tanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(3):219-225.
[16]Hosseini M, Worsaae N, Schiodt M, et al. A 1-year randomised controlled trial comparing zirconia versus metal-ceramic implant supported single-tooth restorations[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2011, 4(4):347- 361.
[17]Hosseini M, Worsaae N, Schiødt M, et al. A 3-year prospective study of implant-supported, single-tooth restorations of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic mate-rials in patients with tooth agenesis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 24(10):1078-1087.
[18]Linkevicius T, Vaitelis J. The effect of zirconia or titanium as abutment material on soft peri-implant tissues: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(Suppl 11):139-147.
[19]Yucel MT, Aykent F, Avunduk MC. In vitro evalua-tion of the marginal fit of different all-ceramic crowns[J]. J Dent Sci, 2013, 8(3):225-230.
[20]Baldassarri M, Hjerppe J, Romeo D, et al. Marginal accuracy of three implant-ceramic abutment confi-gurations[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2012, 27(3):537-543.
[21]Khraisat A, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, et al. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2002, 88(6):604-610.
[22]Park JI, Lee Y, Lee JH, et al. Comparison of fracture resistance and fit accuracy of customized zirconia abutments with prefabricated zirconia abutments in internal hexagonal implants[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2013, 15(5):769-778.
[23]Chen YW, Moussi J, Drury JL, et al. Zirconia in biomedical applications[J]. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2016, 13(10):945-963.
[24]Fabbri G, Fradeani M, Dellificorelli G, et al. Clinical evaluation of the influence of connection type and restoration height on the reliability of zirconia abu-tments: a retrospective study on 965 abutments with a mean 6-year follow-up[J]. Int J Periodontics Res-torative Dent, 2017, 37(1):19-31.
[25]Truninger TC, Stawarczyk B, Leutert CR, et al. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abut-ments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(1):12-18.
[26]Foong JK, Judge RB, Palamara JE, et al. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2013, 109(5):304- 312.
[27]Klotz MW, Taylor TD, Goldberg AJ. Wear at the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a pilot study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2011, 26(5): 970-975.
[28]Rosentritt M, Hagemann A, Hahnel S, et al. In vitro performance of zirconia and titanium implant/abut-ment systems for anterior application[J]. J Dent, 2014, 42(8):1019-1026.
[29]Stimmelmayr M, Sagerer S, Erdelt K, et al. In vitro fatigue and fracture strength testing of one-piece zirconia implant abutments and zirconia implant abutments connected to titanium cores[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2013, 28(2):488-493.
[30]Kim JS, Raigrodski AJ, Flinn BD, et al. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abut-ments under static load[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2013, 109(4):255-263.
[31]Ferrari M, Tricarico MG, Cagidiaco MC, et al. 3- year randomized controlled prospective clinical trial on different CAD-CAM implant abutments[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2016, 18(6):1134-1141.
[32]Zandparsa R, Albosefi A. An in vitro comparison of fracture load of zirconia custom abutments with internal connection and different angulations and thicknesses: Part Ⅱ[J]. J Prosthodont, 2016, 25(2): 151-155.
[33]Att W, Hoischen T, Gerds T, et al. Marginal adapta-tion of all-ceramic crowns on implant abutments[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2008, 10(4):218-225.
[34]Nothdurft FP, Doppler KE, Erdelt KJ, et al. Fracture behavior of straight or angulated zirconia implant abutments supporting anterior single crowns[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2010, 15(2):157-163.
[35]Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry[J]. Im-plant Dent, 1999, 8(1):90.
[36]Sun Y, Kong L, Hu K, et al. Selection of the implant transgingival height for optimal biomechanical pro-perties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis [J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 47(5):393-398.
[37]Thoma DS, Ioannidis A, Cathomen E, et al. Dis-coloration of the peri-implant mucosa caused by zirconia and titanium implants[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2016, 36(1):39-45.
[38]Cosgarea R, Gasparik C, Dudea D, et al. Peri-implant soft tissue colour around titanium and zirconia abut-ments: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(5):537- 544.
[39]Bressan E, Paniz G, Lops D, et al. Influence of abutment material on the gingival color of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: a prospective multicenter study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(6):631-637.
[40]Lops D, Stellini E, Sbricoli L, et al. Influence of abutment material on peri-implant soft tissues in anterior areas with thin gingival biotype: a mul-ticentric prospective study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(10):1263-1268.
[41]Jung RE, Sailer I, Hämmerle CH, et al. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative ma-terials[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2007, 27(3):251-257.
[42]Carrillo de Albornoz A, Vignoletti F, Ferrantino L, et al. A randomized trial on the aesthetic outcomes of implant-supported restorations with zirconia or titanium abutments[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2014, 41 (12):1161-1169.
[43]Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A, et al. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2004, 17(3):285-290.
[44]Cooper LF, Stanford C, Feine J, et al. Prospective assessment of CAD/CAM zirconia abutment and lithium disilicate crown restorations: 2.4 year results [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 116(1):33-39.
[45]Zembic A, Philipp AO, Hämmerle CH, et al. Eleven-year follow-up of a prospective study of zirconia implant abutments supporting single all-ceramic crowns in anterior and premolar regions[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2014, 17:e417-e426.
[46]Blamphin CN, Brafield TR, Jobbins B, et al. A simple instrument for the measurement of maximum occ-lusal force in human dentition[J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 1990, 204(2):129-131.
[47]Luigi C, Patrizio M, Fabio M. Preliminary laboratory evaluation of bicomponent customized zirconia abut-ments[J]. Int J Prosthod, 2007(5):486-488.
[48]Rinke S, Lattke A, Eickholz P, et al. Practice-based clinical evaluation of zirconia abutments for anterior single-tooth restorations[J]. Quintessence Int, 2015, 46(1):19-29.
[49]Passos SP, Linke B, Larjava H, et al. Performance of zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth crowns in esthetic areas: a retrospective study up to 12-year follow-up[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016, 27(1):47-54.
[50]Lops D, Bressan E, Chiapasco M, et al. Zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implant prostheses after 5 years of function in posterior re-gions[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2013, 28 (1):281-287.
[1] 孙旭,邓振南,文才,赵颖. Er: YAG激光照射种植体表面微形貌变化的扫描电子显微镜观察[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(6): 669-673.
[2] 黄元鸿,彭显,周学东. 骨碎补在治疗口腔骨相关疾病的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(6): 679-685.
[3] 龚佳明,赵瑞敏,潘宏伟,郎鑫,余占海,李健学. 动态导航与静态导航对种植体准确性的Meta分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(5): 538-551.
[4] 陆倩,夏海斌,王敏. 种植体磨光整形术治疗种植体周围炎的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(2): 152-158.
[5] 满毅, 黄定明. 美学区种植骨增量与邻牙慢性根尖周病的联合治疗策略(上):应用基础及适应证[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(5): 497-505.
[6] 曾芳,王剑. 全锆冠美学修复效果的影响因素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(2): 233-238.
[7] 曹正国. 修复治疗相关的牙周问题考量[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(1): 1-11.
[8] 朱轩智,赵蕾. 甲状腺功能减退症与牙周炎相关性的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(4): 380-384.
[9] 路泊遥,杨大维,刘蔚晴,梁星. 超短种植体临床应用效果的影响因素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(3): 329-328.
[10] 朱俊瑾,王剑. 钛种植体表面银纳米颗粒负载方法的进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(3): 334-340.
[11] 郑桂婷,徐燕,吴明月. 种植体周围疾病治疗的专家共识及治疗方法的进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(6): 725-731.
[12] 童子安,姒蜜思. 种植体表面菌斑去污方式的体外研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(5): 589-594.
[13] 王欢,刘洋,戚孟春,李静怡,刘梦楠,孙红. 微弧氧化技术制备钛基种植体表面涂层的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(4): 439-444.
[14] 张敏,万浩元. 种植体周围炎药物治疗与激光治疗的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(4): 463-470.
[15] 吴秋月,李治邦. 药物辅助治疗种植体周围炎的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(4): 471-477.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张新春. 桩冠修复与无髓牙的保护[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 王昆润. 长期单侧鼻呼吸对头颅发育有不利影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] 彭国光. 颈淋巴清扫术中颈交感神经干的解剖变异[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] 杨凯. 淋巴化疗的药物运载系统及其应用现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] 康非吾. 种植义齿下部结构生物力学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] 柴枫. 可摘局部义齿用Co-Cr合金的激光焊接[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] 孟姝,吴亚菲,杨禾. 伴放线放线杆菌产生的细胞致死膨胀毒素及其与牙周病的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] 费晓露,丁一,徐屹. 牙周可疑致病菌对口腔黏膜上皮的粘附和侵入[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] 赵兴福,黄晓晶. 变形链球菌蛋白组学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] 庞莉苹,姚江武. 抛光和上釉对陶瓷表面粗糙度、挠曲强度及磨损性能的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .