Int J Stomatol ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (1): 51-58.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2026206

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of topical cyclosporine in the treatment of oral lichen planus

Xing Wang(),Sha Li,Jincai Guo()   

  1. Dept. of Pharmacy, Changsha Stomatological Hospital; School of Stomatology, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410006, China
  • Received:2024-07-22 Revised:2025-08-28 Online:2026-01-01 Published:2025-12-31
  • Contact: Jincai Guo E-mail:342117383@qq.com;540009728@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    Nature Science Foundation of Hunan Province(2024JJ9532);Hunan University of Chinese Medicine Research Fund Project(2022XYLH134)

Abstract:

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical cyclosporine in the treatment of oral lichen planus (OLP) and to provide reference for clinicians. Methods Databases, such as Pubmed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP, were searched. The System for Information on Grey Li-terature in Europe (SIGLE) and ClinicalTrials websites were searched online to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cyclosporine for OLP from the establishment of the database to March 25, 2023. Two reviewers independently evalua-ted the study quality and extracted data, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan (version 5.4) and STATA (version 14.0) software. Results A total of seven RCT studies on cyclosporine in the treatment of OLP were included, including 317 patients. Among them, six compared cyclosporine with corticosteroid, and one compared cyclosporine with placebo. Meta-analysis results showed no statistically significant difference in clinical effectiveness between the cyclosporine and corticosteroid groups [risk ratio (RR)=0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-1.14, P=0.32]. After 4 weeks of treatment, no statistically significant difference was observed in the improvement of pain scores between the cyclosporine and corticosteroid groups (standardized mean difference=-0.23, 95%CI: -0.54-0.07, P=0.13). No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of adverse reactions between the cyclosporine and corticosteroid groups (RR=0.71, 95%CI: 0.18-2.79, P=0.62). Conclusion Current evidence shows that cyclosporine has no advantage over corticosteroid in terms of clinical efficacy, improvement in pain scores, and safety. More high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion due to limitations in the quantity and quality of included studies.

Key words: oral lichen planus, cyclosporine, systematic review, Meta-analysis

CLC Number: 

  • R781.5

TrendMD: 

Tab 1

The search strategy of PubMed"

步骤检索策略
1“Lichen Planus, Oral”[Mesh]
2(Oral Lichen Planus) OR (OLP)

3

4

5

6

1 OR 2

“Cyclosporine”[Mesh]

(((((((((((((((Cyclosporine A) OR (Cyclosporin A)) OR (Ciclosporin)) OR (Cyclosporin)) OR (Neoral)) OR (Sandimmun Neoral)) OR (CyA-NOF)) OR (CyA NOF)) OR (Sandimmune)) OR (Sandimmun)) OR (CsA-Neoral)) OR (CsA Neoral)) OR (CsANeoral)) OR (OL 27-400)) OR (OL 27 400)) OR (OL 27400)

3 AND (4 OR 5)

Fig 1

Literature screening process and results"

Tab 2

Characteristics of included studies"

纳入研究国家例数(T/C)

平均年龄/

(T/C,岁)

性别(男/女,例)干预措施疗程随访时间结局指标
TCTC
Georgaki 2022[6]希腊14/1859.6/61.85/94/14100 mg/mL环孢素漱口2 mg/5 mL地塞米松漱口4周5个月②③④
Conrotto 2006[7]意大利20/1963.4/67.959/115/141.5%环孢素软膏涂抹0.025%氯倍他索软膏涂抹2个月2个月①④
Yoke 2006[8]新加坡,韩国,印度,泰国66/7143.5/43.925/4320/51100 mg/mL环孢素涂抹0.1%曲安奈德8周1年①③④
Sieg 1995[9]德国6/751.35/8100 mg/mL环孢素漱口0.1%曲安奈德软膏6周1年②④
López López[10]西班牙10/10---10%环孢素溶液漱口0.1%曲安奈德水溶液8周1年
Eisen 1990[11]美国8/863/612/65/3100 mg/mL环孢素漱口安慰剂8周8个月

孙玉亮

2013[12]

中国30/3044.3/46.816/1412/18环孢素软胶囊涂抹氟轻松软膏6周3个月①③④

Tab 3

Quality assessment of included studies"

纳入研究随机方法分配隐藏对研究者和受试者施盲对结局测量者施盲

结果数据

的完整性

选择性报告研究结果其他偏倚来源
Georgaki 2022[6]不清楚不清楚不清楚完整不清楚不清楚
Conrotto 2006[7]计算机随机不清楚不清楚完整不清楚不清楚
Yoke 2006[8]不清楚电话或密闭信封不清楚不清楚完整不清楚不清楚
Sieg 1995[9]不清楚不清楚不清楚不清楚完整不清楚不清楚
López López 1995[10]不清楚不清楚不清楚完整不清楚不清楚
Eisen 1990[11]随机数字表不清楚不清楚完整不清楚不清楚
孙玉亮2013[12]随机数字表不清楚不清楚不清楚完整不清楚不清楚

Fig 2

Risk of bias assessment results of included RCT studies"

Fig 3

Forest plot of clinical efficacy of cyclosporine and corticosteroid in the treatment of OLP"

Fig 4

Forest plot of VAS between cyclosporine and corticosteroid in the treatment of OLP"

Fig 5

Forest plot of incidence of adverse reactions of cyclosporine and corticosteroid in the treatment of OLP"

[1] 中华口腔医学会口腔黏膜病学专业委员会, 中华口腔医学会中西医结合专业委员会. 口腔扁平苔藓诊疗指南(修订版)[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2022, 57(2): 115-121.
Society of Oral Medicine Chinese Stomatological Association, Chinese Stomatological Association; Society of Traditional Chinese Medicine Combined with Western Medicine, Chinese Stomatological Association. Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of oral lichen planus (revision)[J]. Chin J Stomatol, 2022, 57(2): 115-121.
[2] Carbone M, Goss E, Carrozzo M, et al. Systemic and topical corticosteroid treatment of oral lichen planus: a comparative study with long-term follow-up[J]. J Oral Pathol Med, 2003, 32(6): 323-329.
[3] Sun SL, Liu JJ, Zhong B, et al. Topical calcineurin inhibitors in the treatment of oral lichen planus: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Br J Dermatol, 2019, 181(6): 1166-1176.
[4] Elad S, Epstein JB, Yarom N, et al. Topical immunomodulators for management of oral mucosal conditions, a systematic review; part Ⅰ: calcineurin inhibitors[J]. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs, 2010, 15(4): 713-726.
[5] Monshi B, Ellersdorfer C, Edelmayer M, et al. Topical cyclosporine in oral lichen planus-a series of 21 open-label, biphasic, single-patient observations[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(22): 5454.
[6] Georgaki M, Piperi E, Theofilou VI, et al. A randomized clinical trial of topical dexamethasone vs. cyclosporine treatment for oral lichen planus[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2022, 27(2): e113-e124.
[7] Conrotto D, Carbone M, Carrozzo M, et al. Ciclosporin vs. clobetasol in the topical management of atrophic and erosive oral lichen planus: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial[J]. Br J Dermatol, 2006, 154(1): 139-145.
[8] Yoke PC, Tin GB, Kim MJ, et al. A randomized controlled trial to compare steroid with cyclosporine for the topical treatment of oral lichen planus[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2006, 102(1): 47-55.
[9] Sieg P, von Domarus H, von Zitzewitz V, et al. Topical cyclosporin in oral lichen planus: a controlled, randomized, prospective trial[J]. Br J Dermatol, 1995, 132(5): 790-794.
[10] López López J, Roselló Llabrés X. Cyclosporine A, an alternative to the oral lichen planus erosive treatment[J]. Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol, 1995, 38(1/2): 33-38.
[11] Eisen D, Ellis CN, Duell EA, et al. Effect of topical cyclosporine rinse on oral lichen planus. A double-blind analysis[J]. N Engl J Med, 1990, 323(5): 290-294.
[12] 孙玉亮, 赵今, 梁学萍, 等. 环孢素治疗糜烂型口腔扁平苔藓的随机对照试验[J]. 口腔医学, 2013, 33(10): 665-667.
Sun YL, Zhao J, Liang XP, et al. Cyclosporine for treatment of erosive oral lichen planus: a rando-mized controlled trial[J]. Stomatology, 2013, 33(10): 665-667.
[13] Ge Y, Xu Y, Sun W, et al. The molecular mechanisms of the effect of Dexamethasone and Cyclosporin A on TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway activation in oral lichen planus[J]. Gene, 2012, 508(2): 157-164.
[14] Kawai T, Akira S. Signaling to NF-kappaB by toll-like receptors[J]. Trends Mol Med, 2007, 13(11): 460-469.
[15] 冯锦虹, 孙玉亮, 赵今. 环孢素治疗口腔扁平苔藓的Meta分析[J].新疆医科大学学报, 2013, 36(9): 1310-1314.
Feng JH, Sun YL, Zhao J.Cyclosporine for oral lichen planus:a meta analysis[J]. J Xinjiang Med Univ, 2013, 36(9): 1310-1314.
[16] da Silva EL, de Lima TB, Rados PV, et al. Efficacy of topical non-steroidal immunomodulators in the treatment of oral lichen planus: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2021, 25(9): 5149-5169.
[17] Thongprasom K, Chaimusig M, Korkij W, et al. A randomized-controlled trial to compare topical cyclosporin with triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of oral lichen planus[J]. J Oral Pathol Med, 2007, 36(3): 142-146.
[18] 柳志文, 凌天牖, 贺建泽, 等. 复方环孢菌素A含漱液治疗口腔扁平苔藓的研究[J]. 湖南医科大学学报, 2000, 25(2): 183-184.
Liu ZW, Lin TY, He JZ, et al. Research of compound cyclosporin A mouthwash in the treatment of oral lichen planus[J]. Bull Hunan Med Univ, 2000, 25(2): 183-184.
[19] Georgaki M, Nikitakis N, al SDiamantiet. Clinical trial of dexamethasone vs. cyclosporine for oral lichen planus[J]. Oral Dis, 2010, 16(6): 543-544.
[20] Thongprasom K, Luangjarmekorn L, Sererat T, et al. Relative efficacy of fluocinolone acetonide compared with triamcinolone acetonide in treatment of oral lichen planus[J]. J Oral Pathol Med, 1992, 21(10): 456-458.
[1] Yizhi Zhang,Xueke Shi,Fanglong Wu,Hongmei Zhou. Potential targets of compound Danshen dripping pill in the treatment of oral lichen planus based on network pharmacology and molecular docking [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2025, 52(6): 771-782.
[2] Zhi Wei,Chang Liu,Yan Wang,Wenli Lai. Effects of initial archwires of different sizes and materials on initial pain during orthodontic treatment: a systema-tic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2025, 52(3): 366-379.
[3] Yanduo Yang,Hong Chen,Zuda Xu,Yuan Zhao. A meta-analysis of the efficacy between bioceramic material iRoot BP Plus and mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpo-tomy [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2024, 51(2): 176-186.
[4] Li Ran,Hu Yue,Zhang Ning,Gao Ruifang,Wang Xiangyu,Ge Xuejun. The correlation study between single nucleotide polymorphisms of Toll-like receptor and interleukin-17 and oral lichen planus [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2024, 51(1): 45-51.
[5] Wang Sujie,Tan Qin,Wei Yuan,Wang Jie,Fan Jie,Yue Erli.. Correlation analysis of serum angiopoietin-2 level with forkhead/winged helix transcription factor p3 regulatory T cells and disease activity in patients with oral lichen planus [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(6): 674-678.
[6] Gong Jiaming,Zhao Ruimin,Pan Hongwei,Lang Xin,Yu Zhanhai,Li Jianxue. Meta-analysis of dynamic navigation versus static navigation in the accuracy of implant surgery [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(5): 538-551.
[7] Wang Lüya,Zhang Jingxin,Lin Jie.. Postoperative infection control effect of povidone iodine and chlorhexidine: a systematic review and analysis [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(4): 438-444.
[8] He Jing,Hu Mingjia,Xiao Ning,Li Jia,Sun Wanxin,Ling Lü,Liu Fan. Investigation on the degree of psychological distress and its influencing factors in patients with oral lichen planus [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(3): 308-313.
[9] revascularization Meta-analysis of the efficacy comparison between endodontic,Zhuanzhuan apexification Li. OSID) [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(2): 177-185.
[10] Zhang Shenyi,Wang Xiangjian,Shi Liran,Shi Jiahong,Wang Yuhong,Zhou Hongmei. Oral beta-carotene in the treatment of non-erosive oral lichen planus: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(6): 633-640.
[11] Gong Jiaming,Zhao Ruimin,Li Wanxin,Su Linhan,Yu Zhanhai,Li Jianxue. The socket-shield technique for immediate implant placement: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(5): 537-547.
[12] Zhang Shan,Ge Xiaolei,Li Jie,Xie Xinyu,Chang Weiwei,Ma Wensheng.. Meta-analysis of the long-term effect of maxillary protraction on jaw growth and development [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(5): 548-555.
[13] Chen Siting,Zhong Xiong,Meng Wenxia.. Research progress on Nod-like receptor protein 3 inflammasome in oral mucosal diseases [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(4): 471-475.
[14] Ma Yu,Zuo Yu,Zhang Xin. Photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to periodontitis: a meta-analysis [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(3): 305-316.
[15] Guo Ziyuan,Chang Xiao,Han Kaifang,Zhang Xizhong. Low-level laser therapy for acceleration of fixed orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(2): 163-172.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!