Inter J Stomatol ›› 2018, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 59-63.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2018.01.012
• Original Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhu Chenyou, Deng Jia, Gan Zhoujie, Liu Liu, Wang Tianlu, Cao Cong, Qu Yili
CLC Number:
[1]Yim JH, Ryu DM, Lee BS, et al. Analysis of digi-talized panorama and conebeam computed tomo-graphic image distortion for the diagnosis of dental implantsurgery[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2011, 22(2): 669-673. [2]Brief J, Edinger D, Hassfeld S, et al. Accuracy of image-guided implantology[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005, 16(4):495-501. [3]Andersson JE, Svartz K. CT-scanning in the pre-operative planning of osseointegrated implants in the maxilla[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1988, 17(1): 33-35. [4]Neugebauer J, Shirani R, Mischkowski RA, et al. Comparison of cone-beam volumetric imaging and combined plain radiographs for localization of the mandibular canal before removal of impacted lower third molars[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008, 105(5):633-643. [5]Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, et al. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 1999, 28(4): 245-248. [6]Aranyarachkul P, Caruso J, Gantes B, et al. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quan-titative cone-beam computerized tomography[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2005, 20(3):416-424. [7]Draenert FG, Coppenrath E, Herzog P, et al. Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2007, 36(4):198-203. [8]Wang D, Künzel A, Golubovic V, et al. Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing boneaugmentation material using cone beam com-puted tomography[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2013, 17 (6):1601-1609. [9]Shiratori LN, Marotti J, Yamanouchi J, et al. Mea-surement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(7):797-804. [10]Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, et al. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2003, 23(4):313-323. [11]Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32(2):212-218. [12]Wakimoto M, Matsumura T, Ueno T, et al. Bone quality and quantity of the anterior maxillary tra-becular bone in dental implant sites[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(11):1314-1319. [13]Eufinger H, König S, Eufinger A. The role of alveolar ridge width in dental implantology[J]. Clin Oral In-vestig, 1997, 1(4):169-177. [14]Karaca C, Er N, Gulsahi A, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation with a free gingival graft in the anterior maxilla: volumetric evaluation in a randomized clinical trial[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015, 44 (6):774-780. [15]Braut V, Bornstein MM, Belser U, et al. Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall-a retrospec-tive radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2011, 31(2):125-131. [16]Kan JY, Roe P, Rungcharassaeng K, et al. Classifica-tion of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary osseous housing for immediate implant placement: a cone beam computed tomography study [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2011, 26(4):873- 876. [17]Garaicoa C, Suarez F, Fu JH, et al. Using cone beam computed tomography angle for predicting the out-come of horizontal bone augmentation[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17(4):717-723. [18]Demircan S, Demircan E. Dental cone beam com-puted tomography analyses of the anterior maxillary bone thickness for immediate implant placement[J]. Implant Dent, 2015, 24(6):664-668. [19]Zhang WJ, Skrypczak A, Weltman R. Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomo-graphy (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2015, 15(1):1-8. [20]Lee SL, Kim HJ, Son MK, et al. Anthropometric analysis of maxillary anterior buccal bone of Korean adults using cone-beam CT[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2010, 2(3):92-96. [21]Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, et al. Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh ex-traction sockets[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2006, 17 (6):615-624. [22]Araújo MG, Wennström JL, Lindhe J. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bonewalls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation[J]. Clin Oral Im-plants Res, 2006, 17(6):606-614. [23]Grütter L, Belser UC. Implant loading protocols for the partially edentulousesthetic zone[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24(Suppl):169-179. [24]Tortamano P, Camargo LO, Bello-Silva MS, et al. Immediate implantplacement and restoration in the esthetic zone: a prospective study with 18 months of follow-up[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2010, 25(2):345-350. [25]Agbaje JO, Jacobs R, Maes F, et al. Volumetric ana-lysis of extraction sockets using cone beam compu-ted tomography: a pilot studyon ex vivo jaw bone[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2007, 34(11):985-990. [26]Jacobs R, Lambrichts I, Liang X, et al. Neurovas-cularization of the anterior jaw bones revisited using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2007, 103(5):683-693. [27]Liang X, Jacobs R, Martens W, et al. Macro- and micro-anatomical, histological and computed tomo-graphy scan characterization of the nasopalatine canal[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2009, 36(7):598-603. [28]Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations inthe anterior maxilla: ana-tomic and surgical considerations[J]. Int J Oral Ma-xillofac Implants, 2004, 19(Suppl):43-61. [29]Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, Van Cleynenbreugel J, et al. The nasopalatine canal revisited using 2D and 3D CT imaging[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2004, 33 (6):396-402. [30]Bornstein MM, Balsiger R, Sendi P, et al. Morpho-logy of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radiographic analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited cone-beam computed tomogra-phy[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(3):295-301. [31]Ruppin J, Popovic A, Strauss M, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided sur-gery systems in dentalimplantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(7):709-716. [32]Meitner SW, Tallents RH. Surgical templates for prosthetically guided implant placement[J]. J Pros-thet Dent, 2004, 92(6):569-574. [33]Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2003, 18 (4):571-577. [34]Ito K, Gomi Y, Sato S, et al. Clinical application of a newcompact CT system to assess 3-D images for the preoperative treatment planning of implants in the posterior mandible A case report[J]. Clin Oral Im-plants Res, 2001, 12(5):539-542. [35]BouSerhal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, et al. Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of theliterature[J]. Clin Im-plant Dent Relat Res, 2002, 4(3):156-172. [36]Katsoulis J, Pazera P, Mericske-Stern R. Prosthetically driven,computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2009, 11(3):238-245. [37]Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Martens K, et al. An image-guided planning system for endosseous oral implants[J]. IEEE Trans Med Imag, 1998, 17 (5):842-852. |