Int J Stomatol

Inter J Stomatol ›› 2018, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 59-63.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2018.01.012

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The application of cone-beam computed tomography in implant surgery of maxillary anterior teeth area

Zhu Chenyou, Deng Jia, Gan Zhoujie, Liu Liu, Wang Tianlu, Cao Cong, Qu Yili   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Implantology, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2017-03-18 Revised:2017-08-20 Published:2018-01-15
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by Science and Technology Support Program of Sichuan Province (2014SZ0019).

RichHTML

8

PDF (PC)

259

Abstract: In dental implantology, the changes of shapes and dimensions on the alveolar ridge have great impacts on the implant success rate. Moreover, the height and width of the alveolar ridge are crucial indexes in implant placement. Cone-beam computed tomography is usually used to obtain the 3-dimensional images and measurements of the alveolar ridge. However, the 3-dimentional structure of the alveolar ridge is complex and has shape diversity. Therefore, there are different methods of measurement and various standards of classification in the studies. The upper anterior teeth are common surgical sites in dental implant surgery. Therefore, in the present study we review several methods of measurement and classification of the upper anterior teeth,in order to provide a reference for proper planning before implantation and clinical research.

Key words: cone-beam computed tomography, maxillary anterior teeth, dental implant, measurement

CLC Number: 

  • R783.6

TrendMD: 
[1]Yim JH, Ryu DM, Lee BS, et al. Analysis of digi-talized panorama and conebeam computed tomo-graphic image distortion for the diagnosis of dental implantsurgery[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2011, 22(2): 669-673.
[2]Brief J, Edinger D, Hassfeld S, et al. Accuracy of image-guided implantology[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005, 16(4):495-501.
[3]Andersson JE, Svartz K. CT-scanning in the pre-operative planning of osseointegrated implants in the maxilla[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1988, 17(1): 33-35.
[4]Neugebauer J, Shirani R, Mischkowski RA, et al. Comparison of cone-beam volumetric imaging and combined plain radiographs for localization of the mandibular canal before removal of impacted lower third molars[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008, 105(5):633-643.
[5]Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, et al. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 1999, 28(4): 245-248.
[6]Aranyarachkul P, Caruso J, Gantes B, et al. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quan-titative cone-beam computerized tomography[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2005, 20(3):416-424.
[7]Draenert FG, Coppenrath E, Herzog P, et al. Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2007, 36(4):198-203.
[8]Wang D, Künzel A, Golubovic V, et al. Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing boneaugmentation material using cone beam com-puted tomography[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2013, 17 (6):1601-1609.
[9]Shiratori LN, Marotti J, Yamanouchi J, et al. Mea-surement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(7):797-804.
[10]Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, et al. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2003, 23(4):313-323.
[11]Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32(2):212-218.
[12]Wakimoto M, Matsumura T, Ueno T, et al. Bone quality and quantity of the anterior maxillary tra-becular bone in dental implant sites[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(11):1314-1319.
[13]Eufinger H, König S, Eufinger A. The role of alveolar ridge width in dental implantology[J]. Clin Oral In-vestig, 1997, 1(4):169-177.
[14]Karaca C, Er N, Gulsahi A, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation with a free gingival graft in the anterior maxilla: volumetric evaluation in a randomized clinical trial[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015, 44 (6):774-780.
[15]Braut V, Bornstein MM, Belser U, et al. Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall-a retrospec-tive radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2011, 31(2):125-131.
[16]Kan JY, Roe P, Rungcharassaeng K, et al. Classifica-tion of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary osseous housing for immediate implant placement: a cone beam computed tomography study [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2011, 26(4):873- 876.
[17]Garaicoa C, Suarez F, Fu JH, et al. Using cone beam computed tomography angle for predicting the out-come of horizontal bone augmentation[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17(4):717-723.
[18]Demircan S, Demircan E. Dental cone beam com-puted tomography analyses of the anterior maxillary bone thickness for immediate implant placement[J]. Implant Dent, 2015, 24(6):664-668.
[19]Zhang WJ, Skrypczak A, Weltman R. Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomo-graphy (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2015, 15(1):1-8.
[20]Lee SL, Kim HJ, Son MK, et al. Anthropometric analysis of maxillary anterior buccal bone of Korean adults using cone-beam CT[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2010, 2(3):92-96.
[21]Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, et al. Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh ex-traction sockets[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2006, 17 (6):615-624.
[22]Araújo MG, Wennström JL, Lindhe J. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bonewalls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation[J]. Clin Oral Im-plants Res, 2006, 17(6):606-614.
[23]Grütter L, Belser UC. Implant loading protocols for the partially edentulousesthetic zone[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24(Suppl):169-179.
[24]Tortamano P, Camargo LO, Bello-Silva MS, et al. Immediate implantplacement and restoration in the esthetic zone: a prospective study with 18 months of follow-up[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2010, 25(2):345-350.
[25]Agbaje JO, Jacobs R, Maes F, et al. Volumetric ana-lysis of extraction sockets using cone beam compu-ted tomography: a pilot studyon ex vivo jaw bone[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2007, 34(11):985-990.
[26]Jacobs R, Lambrichts I, Liang X, et al. Neurovas-cularization of the anterior jaw bones revisited using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2007, 103(5):683-693.
[27]Liang X, Jacobs R, Martens W, et al. Macro- and micro-anatomical, histological and computed tomo-graphy scan characterization of the nasopalatine canal[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2009, 36(7):598-603.
[28]Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations inthe anterior maxilla: ana-tomic and surgical considerations[J]. Int J Oral Ma-xillofac Implants, 2004, 19(Suppl):43-61.
[29]Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, Van Cleynenbreugel J, et al. The nasopalatine canal revisited using 2D and 3D CT imaging[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2004, 33 (6):396-402.
[30]Bornstein MM, Balsiger R, Sendi P, et al. Morpho-logy of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radiographic analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited cone-beam computed tomogra-phy[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(3):295-301.
[31]Ruppin J, Popovic A, Strauss M, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided sur-gery systems in dentalimplantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(7):709-716.
[32]Meitner SW, Tallents RH. Surgical templates for prosthetically guided implant placement[J]. J Pros-thet Dent, 2004, 92(6):569-574.
[33]Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2003, 18 (4):571-577.
[34]Ito K, Gomi Y, Sato S, et al. Clinical application of a newcompact CT system to assess 3-D images for the preoperative treatment planning of implants in the posterior mandible A case report[J]. Clin Oral Im-plants Res, 2001, 12(5):539-542.
[35]BouSerhal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, et al. Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of theliterature[J]. Clin Im-plant Dent Relat Res, 2002, 4(3):156-172.
[36]Katsoulis J, Pazera P, Mericske-Stern R. Prosthetically driven,computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2009, 11(3):238-245.
[37]Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Martens K, et al. An image-guided planning system for endosseous oral implants[J]. IEEE Trans Med Imag, 1998, 17 (5):842-852.
[1] Han Chong,He Dongning,Yu Feiyan,Wu Dongchao. Research progress on the mechanism and treatment of pain after oral implants [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2024, 51(1): 99-106.
[2] Liao Honglin,Fang Zhonghan,Zhang Yanyan,Liu Fei,Shen Jiefei.. Diagnosis and treatment of post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain after dental implantation [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(6): 729-738.
[3] Gong Jiaming,Zhao Ruimin,Pan Hongwei,Lang Xin,Yu Zhanhai,Li Jianxue. Meta-analysis of dynamic navigation versus static navigation in the accuracy of implant surgery [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(5): 538-551.
[4] Zhu Keshi,Liao Anqi,Yu Youcheng.. Research progress on the application of machine learning in dental implantology [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(4): 491-498.
[5] Lu Qian,Xia Haibin,Wang Min.. Research progress on implantoplasty in the treatment of peri-implantitis [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(2): 152-158.
[6] Man Yi, Huang Dingming. Combined treatment strategy of oral implantology and endodontics microsurgery: clinical protocol and practical cases (part 2) [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(6): 621-632.
[7] Man Yi, Huang Dingming. Combined treatment strategy of oral implantology and endodontic microsurgery for bone augmentation and en-dodontic diseases in aesthetic area (part 1): application basis and indications [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(5): 497-505.
[8] Wu Wenzhi,Feng Da-xing,Chen Chuizhuang,Zhou Lijuan.. Incidence and related factors of middle mesial canals in mandibular first molars in Haikou [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(4): 420-425.
[9] Zhao Zhe,Wang Fu,Zheng Xiuli,An Na,Chen Jihua.. Research progress on measuring methods of tooth movement under functional load [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(3): 362-366.
[10] Wang Yue,Wen Bing,Deng Mengting,Li Jianping. Research advances of low-level laser therapy on peri-implant tissue healing [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(6): 725-730.
[11] Tian Haonan,Lin Min,Xie Congman,Ren Aishu. Association between ponticulus posticus and maxillary palatally impacted canine: a cone-beam computed tomography study [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(5): 536-540.
[12] Zhu Xuanzhi,Zhao Lei. Research progress on the relationship between hypothyroidism and periodontitis [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(4): 380-384.
[13] Shi Danni,Yang Xin,Wu Jianyong. Research progress of reference coordinate system for three-dimensional cephalometric based on cone beam computed tomography [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(4): 398-404.
[14] Feng Lu,Meng Wenxia. Research progress on the problems of dental implant treatment in patients with common oral mucosal disease [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(2): 147-155.
[15] Ding Zhangfan,Guo Zhiyong,Miao Cheng,Li Chunjie,Xuan Ming,Wang Xiaoyi,Zhang Zhuang. Application of the cone-beam computed tomography-based three-dimensional visualization technology in the surgery of the jaw cystic lesion [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(2): 180-186.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .