Int J Stomatol

Inter J Stomatol ›› 2017, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 45-49.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2017.01.009

• ·Original Articles· • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of different surface treatments on the bonding strength of titanium and resin

Ma Zhiling, Liu Jie   

  1. 1.Dept. of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 400 , China;
    2. Dept. of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Hospital of, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China
  • Received:2016-05-12 Online:2017-01-01 Published:2017-01-01

RichHTML

6

PDF (PC)

524

Abstract: Ojective This study aims at assessing the effect of different surface treatment on bonding strength of titanium and resin. Methods Metal specimens were prepared to divide into six groups randomly like following: polishing(group A), etching(group B), sandblasting(group C), sand blasting and etching(group D), microare-oxidation(group E), TiN film(group F). According to the groups, to treat the metal specimens, and to take one from each group to measure the surface roughness with a roughness machine after that all the specimens were coated with crown and bridge composite resin to fixed area. The fracture surface morphology of the titanium-resin was observed using a scanning electron microscope(SEM) and the energy dispersive X spectrometer to analysis the elemental composition. The shear bond strengths of the specimens were evaluated by a Universal Testing Machine. Results The surface roughness of each group were (0.370±0.039) μm for group A, (1.456±0.044) μm for group B, (2.044±0.019) μm for group C, (1.970±0.047) μm for group D, (0.683±0.023) μm for group E, and (2.195±0.066) μm for group F. The shear bond strengths of each groups were (5.84±0.30) MPa for group A, (10.22±0.63) MPa for group B, (10.78±0.45) MPa for group C, (12.24±0.46) MPa for group D, (13.82±0.61) MPa for group E, and (16.81±0.74) MPa for group F. We can find polymerization porcelain remain on titanium porcelain metal surface of group B to group E, by watching through the results of SEM. Conclusion Sandblasting and etching together, microare-oxidation and TiN film can improve the bonding strength of titanium and crown and bridge composite. resin obviously.

Key words: titanium, resin, microare-oxidation, bond strength

CLC Number: 

  • R783.3

TrendMD: 
[1] de Almeida-Júnior AA, Fonseca RG, Haneda IG, et al. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of a resin cement to commercially pure titanium[J]. Braz Dent J, 2010, 21(2):111-116.
[2] Ban S, Taniki T, Sato H, et al. Acid etching of ti-tanium for bonding with veneering composite resins [J]. Dent Mater J, 2006, 25(2):382-390.
[3] NaBadalung DP, Powers JM, Connelly ME. Com-parison of bond strengths of three denture base resins to treated nickel-chromium-beryllium alloy[J]. J Pro-sthet Dent, 1998, 80(3):354-361.
[4] Mukai M, Fukui H, Hasegawa J. Relationship be-tween sandblasting and composite resin-alloy bond strength by a silica coating[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1995, 74(2):151-155.
[5] Chien CC, Liu KT, Duh JG, et al. Effect of nitride film coatings on cell compatibility[J]. Dent Mater, 2008, 24(7):986-993.
[6] Taira Y, Hai K, Matsumura H, et al. Adhesive bon-ding of titanium nitride-plated stainless steel for ma-gnetic attachments[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2001, 109(3): 204-207.
[1] Xue Jing, Yang Jing.. Key points of evidence-based practice for the Class Ⅱ cavity composite resin restoration [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(4): 375-387.
[2] Wang Gang,Chen Zhuo.. Reduction of the risk of caries after interproximal enamel reduction [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(4): 395-400.
[3] Zhang Qilin,Li Jun,Li Shuhui. Research progress on nickel-titanium instruments for root canal preparation machine [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(6): 663-669.
[4] Wang Qiqiu,Zhi Qinghui.. Research progress on treatments of enamel white spot lesions [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(6): 717-723.
[5] Wang Luming,Cao Xiao,Wu Linyue,Li Yuncong,Lei Bo,Niu Lin. Effect of Zn-doped bioactive glass nanoparticles on the mechanical properties of modified composite resin [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(4): 404-411.
[6] Zhang Jingyi,Li Danwei,Sun Yu,Lei Yayan,Liu Tao,Gong Yu. In vitro cytotoxicity of composite resin and compomer and effect on osteogenic differentiation of osteoblasts [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(4): 412-419.
[7] Ding Jingyu,Tian Zilu,Wang Huimin,Zhu Xuanyan,Yang Yubin,Zhu Song. Advancement of immediate dentin sealing [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(1): 121-124.
[8] Ji Xiao,Jing Fangqi,Li Ya,Xue Jing. Data simulation optimization of root canal preparation sequence [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(1): 37-47.
[9] Liu Yuchen,Tian Min,Niu Lina,Fang Ming. Factors influencing the survival rates of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures and improvement measures [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(5): 585-591.
[10] Meng Xiuping,Hou Jianhua,Li Yiran,Sun Mengyao. Research progress on the selection and design of base materials in deep margin elevation [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(3): 280-286.
[11] Wang Hongyuan,He Lu,Zhang Ru,Zheng Deqiang,Li Hong. Comparative study on the shaping ability of thermally treated continuous rotating nickel-titanium systems for severely curved simulated canals [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(3): 297-304.
[12] Zhu Junjin,Wang Jian.. Advances in the loading methods of silver nanoparticles on the surface of titanium implants [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(3): 334-340.
[13] Xue Jing. Development and clinical application of proximal matrix system [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(6): 621-626.
[14] Zhang Jingting,Pan Xudong,Zhang Wenyun. Effect of opaque-shade resin layer thickness on the color of polyetheretherketone-Crea.lign restoration [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(4): 418-423.
[15] Liu Chunxu,Lu Yuqing,Jia Luming,Dong Bo,Zhang Qianqian,Yu Haiyang. Comparative study of the retention force of titanium-alloy clasps fabricated through selective laser melting and casting [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(2): 152-158.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[10] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .