Int J Stomatol ›› 2023, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4): 375-387.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2023061
• Expert Forum • Next Articles
CLC Number:
1 | Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Rodolfo B, Collares K, et al. Clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations after up to 33 years[J]. Dent Mater, 2022, 38(4): 680-688. |
2 | Montag R, Dietz W, Nietzsche S, et al. Clinical and micromorphologic 29-year results of posterior composite restorations[J]. J Dent Res, 2018, 97(13): 1431-1437. |
3 | Demarco FF, Cenci MS, Montagner AF, et al. Longevity of composite restorations is definitely not only about materials[J]. Dent Mater, 2023, 39(1): 1-12. |
4 | Laske M, Opdam NJM, Bronkhorst EM, et al. Longevity of direct restorations in Dutch dental practi-ces. Descriptive study out of a practice based research network[J]. J Dent, 2016, 46: 12-17. |
5 | Atlas AM, Behrooz E, Barzilay I. Can bite-force measurement play a role in dental treatment planning, clinical trials, and survival outcomes? A literature review and clinical recommendations[J]. Quintessence Int, 2022, 53(7): 632-642. |
6 | Albeshir EG, Alsahafi R, Albluwi R, et al. Low-shrinkage resin matrices in restorative dentistry-narrative review[J]. Materials, 2022, 15(8): 2951. |
7 | Peumans M, Politano G, van Meerbeek B. Effective protocol for daily high-quality direct posterior composite restorations. Cavity preparation and design[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2020, 22(6): 581-596. |
8 | Miao C, Yang XY, Wong MC, et al. Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2021, 5(5): CD009-858. |
9 | Falacho RI, Melo EA, Marques JA, et al. Clinical in situ evaluation of the effect of rubber dam isolation on bond strength to enamel[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2023, 35(1): 48-55. |
10 | 闵艺, 吴大明, 范伟. 橡皮障系统及其在新冠肺炎疫情传播控制中的作用[J]. 口腔医学, 2020, 40(7): 585-588. |
Min Y, Wu DM, Fan W. Rubber Dam system and its role in helping control the spread of novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP)[J]. Stomatology, 2020, 40(7): 585-588. | |
11 | Lynch CD, Opdam NJ, Hickel R, et al. Guidance on posterior resin composites: Academy of Operative Dentistry-European Section[J]. J Dent, 2014, 42(4): 377-383. |
12 | Foxton RM. Current perspectives on dental adhesion: (2) concepts for operatively managing carious lesions extending into dentine using bioactive and adhesive direct restorative materials[J]. Jpn Dent Sci Rev, 2020, 56(1): 208-215. |
13 | Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2008, 99(2): 131-140. |
14 | Forster A, Braunitzer G, Tóth M, et al. In vitro fracture resistance of adhesively restored molar teeth with different MOD cavity dimensions[J]. J Prosthodont, 2019, 28(1): e325-e331. |
15 | Schwendicke F, Stolpe M, Meyer-Lueckel H, et al. Cost-effectiveness of one- and two-step incomplete and complete excavations[J]. J Dent Res, 2013, 92(10): 880-887. |
16 | Schwendicke F, Walsh T, Lamont T, et al. Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2021, 7(7): CD-013039. |
17 | Elhennawy K, Finke C, Paris S, et al. Selective vs stepwise removal of deep carious lesions in primary molars: 12-months results of a randomized controlled pilot trial[J]. J Dent, 2018, 77: 72-77. |
18 | Cardoso M, Coelho A, Rui LM, et al. Efficacy and patient’s acceptance of alternative methods for ca-ries removal-a systematic review[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(11): 3407. |
19 | Soliman S, Preidl R, Karl S, et al. Influence of cavity margin design and restorative material on marginal quality and seal of extended Class Ⅱ resin composite restorations in vitro [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2016, 18(1): 7-16. |
20 | MacKenzie L, Banerjee A. Minimally invasive direct restorations: a practical guide[J]. Br Dent J, 2017, 223(3): 163-171. |
21 | Mirzaei M, Ghavam M, Rostamzadeh T. Reinforcement of unsupported enamel by restorative mate-rials and dentin bonding agents: an in vitro study[J]. J Dent, 2010, 7(2): 84-88. |
22 | Freeman R, Varanasi S, Meyers IA, et al. Effect of air abrasion and thermocycling on resin adaptation and shear bond strength to dentin for an etch-and-rinse and self-etch resin adhesive[J]. Dent Mater J, 2012, 31(2): 180-188. |
23 | Ouchi H, Takamizawa T, Tsubota K, et al. The effects of aluminablasting on bond durability between universal adhesives and tooth substrate[J]. Oper Dent, 2020, 45(2): 196-208. |
24 | Lima VP, Soares K, Caldeira VS, et al. Airborne-particle abrasion and dentin bonding: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Oper Dent, 2021, 46(1): E21-E33. |
25 | Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class Ⅱ composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures[J]. Am J Dent, 1999, 12(3): 123-130. |
26 | Lynch CD, O’Sullivan VR, Dockery P, et al. Hun-ter-Schreger Band patterns and their implications for clinical dentistry[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2011, 38(5): 359-365. |
27 | Tong HJ, Seremidi K, Stratigaki E, et al. Deep dentine caries management of immature permanent posterior teeth with vital pulp: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Dent, 2022, 124: 104214. |
28 | 周学东, 黄定明, 刘建国, 等. 牙髓损伤的活髓保存治疗[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017, 35(4): 339-347. |
Zhou XD, Huang DM, Liu JG, et al. Vital pulp the-rapy of damaged dental pulp[J]. West China J Stomatol, 2017, 35(4): 339-347. | |
29 | Cushley S, Duncan HF, Lappin MJ, et al. Efficacy of direct pulp capping for management of cariously exposed pulps in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int Endod J, 2021, 54(4): 556-571. |
30 | Duncan HF. Present status and future directions-vital pulp treatment and pulp preservation strategies[J]. Int Endodontic J, 2022, 55(S3): 497-511. |
31 | Garcia-Godoy F, Murray PE. Systemic evaluation of various haemostatic agents following local application prior to direct pulp capping[J]. Braz J Oral Sci, 2005, 4(14): 791-797. |
32 | Patrick R, Cully Jennifer L, Sarat T. Brief communication a retrospective evaluation of a program’s use of indirect pulp therapy for primary molars[J]. Pe-diatr Dent, 2023, 45(1): 16-19. |
33 | Davaie S, Hooshmand T, Ansarifard S. Different types of bioceramics as dental pulp capping mate-rials: a systematic review[J]. Ceram Int, 2021, 47(15): 20781-20792. |
34 | Salem-Milani A, Ghasemi S, Rahimi S, et al. The discoloration effect of white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA), calcium enriched mixture (CEM), and Portland cement (PC) on human teeth[J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2017, 9(12): e1397-e1401. |
35 | About I. Biodentine: from biochemical and bioactive properties to clinical applications[J]. Giornale Italiano Di Endodonzia, 2016, 30(2): 81-88. |
36 | Bakhtiar H, Nekoofar MH, Aminishakib P, et al. Human pulp responses to partial pulpotomy treatment with TheraCal as compared with biodentine and ProRoot MTA: a clinical trial[J]. J Endod, 2017, 43(11): 1786-1791. |
37 | Kunert M, Lukomska-Szymanska M. Bio-inductive materials in direct and indirect pulp capping-a review article[J]. Materials, 2020, 13(5): 1204. |
38 | Liu SY, Wang SN, Dong YM. Evaluation of a bio-ceramic as a pulp capping agent in vitro and in vivo [J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(5): 652-657. |
39 | Patras M, Doukoudakis S. Class Ⅱ composite restorations and proximal concavities: clinical implications and management[J]. Oper Dent, 2013, 38(2): 119-124. |
40 | Chuang SF, Su KC, Wang CH, et al. Morphological analysis of proximal contacts in Class Ⅱ direct restorations with 3D image reconstruction[J]. J Dent, 2011, 39(6): 448-456. |
41 | 薛晶. 邻面成形系统的发展和临床应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(6): 621-626. |
Xue J. Development and clinical application of proximal matrix system[J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(6): 621-626. | |
42 | Peumans M, Venuti P, Politano G, et al. Effective protocol for daily high-quality direct posterior composite restorations. the interdental anatomy of the class-2 composite restoration[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2021, 23(1): 21-34. |
43 | Bhatia HP, Sood S, Sharma N, et al. Comparative evaluation of clinical efficiency and patient acceptability toward the use of circumferential matrix and sectional matrix for restoration of Class Ⅱ cavities in primary molars: an in vivo study[J]. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2021, 14(6): 748-751. |
44 | de la Peña VA, García RP, García RP. Sectional matrix: step-by-step directions for their clinical use[J]. Br Dent J, 2016, 220(1): 11-14. |
45 | Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, et al. A clinical study on interdental separation techniques[J]. Oper Dent, 2007, 32(3): 207-211. |
46 | Shaalan OO. Evaluation of matrix band systems for posterior proximal restorations among Egyptian dentists: a cross-sectional survey[J]. Acta Stomatol Croa-t, 2020, 54(4): 392-400. |
47 | Kampouropoulos D, Paximada C, Loukidis M, et al. The influence of matrix type on the proximal contact in Class Ⅱ resin composite restorations[J]. Oper Dent, 2010, 35(4): 454-462. |
48 | Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, et al. The long-term effect of a composite resin restoration on proximal contact tightness[J]. J Dent, 2007, 35(2): 104-108. |
49 | Peumans M, van Meerbeek B, Asscherickx K, et al. Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts[J]. Dent Mater, 2001, 17(6): 533-541. |
50 | Wirsching E, Loomans BA, Klaiber B, et al. In-fluence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo [J]. J Dent, 2011, 39(5): 386-390. |
51 | Hahn B, Haubitz I, Krug R, et al. Influence of matrix type on marginal gap formation of deep Class Ⅱ bulk-fill composite restorations[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(9): 4961. |
52 | Peumans M, Politano G, Bazos P, et al. Effective protocol for daily high-quality direct posterior composite restorations: layering and finishing[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2020, 22(6): 597-613. |
53 | Eli I, Weiss E, Kozlovsky A, et al. Wedges in resto-rative dentistry: principles and applications[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 1991, 18(3): 257-264. |
54 | Cho SD, Browning WD, Walton KS. Clinical use of a sectional matrix and ring[J]. Oper Dent, 2010, 35(5): 587-591. |
55 | van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, van Landuyt K, et al. From buonocore’s pioneering acid-etch technique to self-adhering restoratives. A status perspective of rapidly advancing dental adhesive technology[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2020, 22(1): 7-34. |
56 | Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, et al. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the Ⅳ gene-ration to the universal type[J]. Ann Stomatol, 2017, 8(1): 1-17. |
57 | van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, et al. Origin of interfacial droplets with one-step adhesives[J]. J Dent Res, 2007, 86(8): 739-744. |
58 | Ahmed MH, Yao CM, van Landuyt K, et al. Extra bonding layer compensates universal adhesive’s thin film thickness[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2020, 22(5): 483-501. |
59 | Finger WJ, Balkenhol M. Practitioner variability ef-fects on dentin bonding with an acetone-based one-bottle adhesive[J]. J Adhesive Dent, 1999, 1(4): 311-314. |
60 | van Meerbeek B, van Landuyt K, De Munck J, et al. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives[J]. Dent Mater J, 2005, 24(1): 1-13. |
61 | Yamauchi K, Tsujimoto A, Jurado CA, et al. Etch-and-rinse vs self-etch mode for dentin bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives[J]. J Oral Sci, 2019, 61(4): 549-553. |
62 | Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, et al. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems[J]. J Dent, 2001, 29(1): 55-61. |
63 | De Munck J, Vargas M, Iracki J, et al. One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin[J]. Oper Dent, 2005, 30(1): 39-49. |
64 | Jin X, Han F, Wang Q, et al. The roles of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate and its cal-cium salt in preserving the adhesive-dentin hybrid layer[J]. Dent Mater, 2022, 38(7): 1194-1205. |
65 | Ebrahimi M, Janani A, Majidinia S, et al. Are self-etch adhesives reliable for primary tooth dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2018, 21(3): 243-250. |
66 | Barceleiro MO, Tardem C, Albuquerque EG, et al. Can composite packaging and selective enamel et-ching affect the clinical behavior of bulk-fill compo-site resin in posterior restorations? 24-month results of a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2023, 31: e20220323. |
67 | Peumans M, De Munck J, van Landuyt KL, et al. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching[J]. Dent Mater, 2010, 26(12): 1176-1184. |
68 | Borgia E, Baron R, Borgia JL. Quality and survival of direct light-activated composite resin restorations in posterior teeth: a 5- to 20-year retrospective longitudinal study[J]. J Prosthodont, 2019, 28(1): e195-e203. |
69 | Arbildo-Vega HI, Lapinska B, Panda S, et al. Clinical effectiveness of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Polymers, 2020, 12(8): 1786. |
70 | Shaalan OO, Abou-Auf E, El Zoghby AF. Clinical evaluation of flowable resin composite versus conventional resin composite in carious and noncarious lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2017, 20(6): 380-385. |
71 | Lazaridou D, Belli R, Petschelt A, et al. Are resin composites suitable replacements for amalgam? A study of two-body wear[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2015, 19(6): 1485-1492. |
72 | 薛晶. 大块充填树脂的临床应用影响因素[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(3): 237-243. |
Xue J. Factors influencing clinical application of bulk-fill composite resin[J]. West China J Stomatol, 2020, 38(3): 237-243. | |
73 | Veloso SRM, Lemos CAA, de Moraes SLD, et al. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2019, 23(1): 221-233. |
74 | Barutcigil Ç, Barutcigil K, Özarslan MM, et al. Co-lor of bulk-fill composite resin restorative materials[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2018, 30(2): E3-E8. |
75 | Tomaszewska IM, Tomaszewska IM, Kearns JO, et al. Bulk fill restoratives: to cap or not to cap-that is the question[J]. J Dent, 2015, 43(3): 309-316. |
76 | Bazos P, Magne P. Bio-emulation: biomimetically emulating nature utilizing a histo-anatomic approach; structural analysis[J]. Eur J Esthet Dent, 2011, 6(1): 8-19. |
77 | Pop-Ciutrila IS, Ghinea R, Colosi HA, et al. Dentin translucency and color evaluation in human incisors, canines, and molars[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 115(4): 475-481. |
78 | Sampaio CS, Chiu KJ, Farrokhmanesh E, et al. Microcomputed tomography evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of Class Ⅰ flowable resin composite restorations[J]. Oper Dent, 2017, 42(1): E16-E23. |
79 | Lawson NC, Janyavula S, Price RB. 2021 trends in restorative dentistry: composites, curing lights, and matrix bands[J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2021, 42(2): 93-94. |
80 | Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2002, 133(10): 1387-1398. |
81 | Strnad G, Kovacs M, Andras E, et al. Effect of cu-ring, finishing and polishing techniques on microhardness of composite restorative materials[J]. Procedia Technol, 2015, 19: 233-238. |
82 | Marigo L, Nocca G, Fiorenzano G, et al. Influences of different air-inhibition coatings on monomer re-lease, microhardness, and color stability of two composite materials[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2019, 2019: 4240264. |
83 | Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, et al. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on Class Ⅱ gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies[J]. J Dent, 2014, 42(5): 619-625. |
84 | Nie J, Yap AU, Wang XY. Influence of shrinkage and viscosity of flowable composite liners on cervical microleakage of Class Ⅱ restorations: a micro-CT analysis[J]. Oper Dent, 2018, 43(6): 656-664. |
85 | Karaman E, Keskin B, Inan U. Three-year clinical evaluation of Class Ⅱ posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2017, 21(2): 709-716. |
86 | van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U. Bulk-filled posterior resin restorations based on stress-decreasing resin technology: a randomized, controlled 6-year evaluation[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2017, 125(4): 303-309. |
87 | Pietrokovski Y, Zeituni D, Schwartz A, et al. Comparison of different finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of resin composite[J]. Materials, 2022, 15(21): 7415. |
88 | St-Pierre L, Martel C, Crépeau H, et al. Influence of polishing systems on surface roughness of compo-site resins: polishability of composite resins[J]. Oper Dent, 2019, 44(3): E122-E132. |
89 | Jaramillo-Cartagena R, López-Galeano EJ, Latorre-Correa F, et al. Effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid and nano-filling composite resins: a systematic review[J]. Dent J, 2021, 9(8): 95. |
[1] | Wang Luming,Cao Xiao,Wu Linyue,Li Yuncong,Lei Bo,Niu Lin. Effect of Zn-doped bioactive glass nanoparticles on the mechanical properties of modified composite resin [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(4): 404-411. |
[2] | Zhang Jingyi,Li Danwei,Sun Yu,Lei Yayan,Liu Tao,Gong Yu. In vitro cytotoxicity of composite resin and compomer and effect on osteogenic differentiation of osteoblasts [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(4): 412-419. |
[3] | Ding Jingyu,Tian Zilu,Wang Huimin,Zhu Xuanyan,Yang Yubin,Zhu Song. Advancement of immediate dentin sealing [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(1): 121-124. |
[4] | Liu Yuchen,Tian Min,Niu Lina,Fang Ming. Factors influencing the survival rates of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures and improvement measures [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(5): 585-591. |
[5] | Niu Ye,Zeng Yunting,Zeng Yuexiang,Zhang Zeyu,Xiao Liwei. Application of digital technology in indirect bonding of straight wire brackets [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(4): 491-496. |
[6] | Meng Xiuping,Hou Jianhua,Li Yiran,Sun Mengyao. Research progress on the selection and design of base materials in deep margin elevation [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(3): 280-286. |
[7] | Liu Enyan,Li Mingyun. Research progress on tea polyphenols in dentin adhesion [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(6): 732-738. |
[8] | Jiaojiao Qin,Shan Jiao,Chengkun Wang. Advances in research on the effects of Er:YAG and Nd:YAG lasers on the bonding strength of the bonding surface between dentine and porcelain prosthesis [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2019, 46(3): 361-366. |
[9] | Chen Jing, Huang Xiaofeng.. Development of laser applications in orthodontics [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(6): 712-716. |
[10] | Ding Hong, Chen Jifen, Wu Jianyong. Influence of different adhesive materials on the shear bond strength of metal brackets to porcelain surface [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(4): 430-432. |
[11] | Liang Jichao, Wang Fen, Zhang Zhenghua, Pang Fusheng, Hou Meijuan, Zhang Fengying. Clinical evaluation of interproximal caries restoration with orthodontic elastic separators [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(4): 440-444. |
[12] | Liao Wenting, Li Yan.. Influence of cysteine cathepsins on dentin bonding durability [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(3): 340-343. |
[13] | Yao Chenmin, Zhou Liqun, Huang Cui.. Selection of tooth-colored restorative material for worn anterior teeth [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(3): 363-367. |
[14] | Chen Xiwen, Zhou Jinru, Zhu Zhimin. Retention and relevant research progress of resin-bonded fixed bridges [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2016, 43(5): 537-541. |
[15] | Huo Huan, Yin Jiayue, Ai Hongjun. Application progress on resin cements in ceramic restorations [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2016, 43(5): 554-559. |