Int J Stomatol

Int J Stomatol ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1): 37-47.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2022027

• Orginal Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Data simulation optimization of root canal preparation sequence

Ji Xiao1(),Jing Fangqi1,Li Ya2,Xue Jing1()   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Cariology and En-dodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;
    2. West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2021-07-25 Revised:2021-10-18 Online:2022-01-01 Published:2022-01-07
  • Contact: Jing Xue E-mail:jixiao08@126.com;jing_xue_scu@163.com
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program of Sichuan University(201910611599)

RichHTML

267

PDF (PC)

2489

Abstract: Objective This study aims to evaluate the effect of existing nickel-titanium files in root canal preparation and explore the best root canal preparation sequence.Methods Excel 2016 was used to derive the formula for calculating the surface area and volume of the file with a specific diameter and taper. Numerical simulation was performed with the volume and surface area growth rate of the root canal taken as the main index, combining with line chart and taper coordinate chart.Results Among 26 products included, vTaper had the lowest average volume growth rate with the recommended preparation sequence. The best root canal preparation sequence corresponding to 1 glide path and 3 shaping files, 2 glide path and 3 shaping files, 1 glide path and 4 shaping files, 2 glide path and 4 shaping files were as follows: 2002—2003—2004—2504—3004, 2002—1803—1804—2004—2504—3004, 2002—1703—1704—2004—2504—3004,and 2002—1503—1703—1704—2004—2504—3004, individually.Conclusion According to data simulation, vTaper system with #20 K-file is the best sequence among the incorporated nickel-titanium file systems. The mean and variance of the root canal volume/surface area growth rates of the four optimal sequences are significantly lower than most existing systems. Results will provide a basis for subsequent experiments and help improve the success rate of root canal treatment and reduce complications.

Key words: root canal treatment, root canal file, nickel-titanium file, preparation sequence, numerical simulation


TrendMD: 

Fig 1

Schematic diagram of root canal file model"

Fig 2

Derivation formula of the surface area (S) and volume (V) of the root canal files"

Tab 1

Basic information of 29 products"

产品 生产
年份		 厂家 类型 预备顺序
Bassi Logic 2018 BassiEndo公司,美国 通道锉+
成形锉		 2501—2505
Hero Shaper 2002 Micro Mega公司,法国 成形锉 简单病例：3006（2/3WL）—3004
中等难度病例：2506（2/3WL）—2504—3004
困难病例：2006（2/3WL）—2004—2504—3004
Hero 642 1999 Micro Mega公司,法国 成形锉 2006—2004—2504—3004
Hyflex CM Coltene 2011 Coltene-Whaledent公司,瑞士 成形锉 2508—2004—2504—2006—3004—4006
IRace 2011 FKG公司,瑞士 成形锉 1506—2004—3004
K3 2001 Sybron Endo公司,美国 成形锉 2004—2504
2506—3504
M3 2016 2016 常州益锐医疗器材有限公司 成形锉 2004—2504—3004
M3 PRO 2017 常州益锐医疗器材有限公司 成形锉 1406—2504—2506—3504
M3 2018 2018 常州益锐医疗器材有限公司 成形锉 1805—2504—3004
Pathfile 2011 Dentsply Sirona公司,美国 通道锉 1302
1602
1902
ProDesign Logic 2014 Easy Equipamentos Odontologicos公司,巴西 通道锉+
成形锉		 2501（通道锉）—2506—3005—3505—4005
ProFile 1993 Dentsply Sirona公司,美国 成形锉 1504—2004—2504—2006
Proglider* 2014 Dentsply Sirona公司,美国 通道锉 1602
ProTaper* 2001 Dentsply Sirona公司,美国 成形锉 SX—S1—S2—F1—F2—F3
ProTaper Next* 2013 Dentsply Sirona公司,美国 成形锉 1704—2506—30075—40065—5006
ProTaper Gold 2013 Dentsply Sirona公司,美国 成形锉 1904—1802—2004—2007—2508—3009—4006—5005
Reciproc 2011 VDW公司,德国 成形锉 狭窄根管：2508
中等宽度根管：4006
宽大根管：5005
Reciproc Blue 2016 VDW公司,德国 成形锉 狭窄根管：2508
中等宽度根管：4006
宽大根管：5005
R-Pilot 2017 VDW公司,德国 通道锉 尖端直径：0.125 mm,锥度：0.04
S3 2017 成都市萨尼医疗器械有限公司 成形锉 2004—2506—3004
SC 2015 佛山市森川精密器械有限公司 成形锉 2004—2504—3004—3504
TF（R-phase） 2009 Sybron Endo公司,美国 成形锉 2506—2508—3006—3506—4004—5004
TruNatomy* 2019 Dentsply Sirona公司,美国 通道锉+
成形锉		 1602（通道锉）—2004—2604—3603
TRUShape 2015 Dentsply Sirona公司,美国 成形锉 2006—2506—3006—4006
vTaper* 2015 SS White公司,美国 成形锉 1704—2006—2207—2506—2506—3006—3008—3506—4006—
4506—5006
Wave One 2011 Dentsply公司,瑞士 成形锉 狭窄根管：2106
中等根管：2508
宽大根管：4008

Fig 3

Numerical simulation method of optimal root canal preparation sequence"

Tab 2

The mean and variance of volume/surface area growth rates of 6 systems with lowest average volume growth rate"

锉系列 体积增长率平均值 体积增长率方差 表面积增长率平均值 表面积增长率方差
vTaper（#20 K锉） 0.172 0.047 0.081 0.008
vTaper（#15 K锉） 0.205 0.059 0.097 0.011
vTaper（#10 K锉） 0.258 0.128 0.119 0.024
Hero Shaper复杂根管（困难病例）系列（#20 K锉） 0.333 0.054 0.161 0.004
ProTaper Gold（#20 K锉） 0.365 0.253 0.120 0.029
SC（#20 K锉） 0.398 0.216 0.178 0.032

Fig 4

Line chart of the volume growth rate (left) and surface area growth rate (right) during the root canal preparation with the top six products in evaluation (the calculation didn’t include products containing only glide path)"

Fig 5

Line chart of volume and surface area growth rates of the best root canal preparation sequences"

Fig 6

Schematic diagram of the best root canal preparation sequences"

Tab 3

The mean and variance of volume/surface area growth rates under optimal root canal preparation sequence"

模式 X0 A1 A2 X1 X2 X3 X4 体积增长率平均值 体积增长率方差 体积增长率平均值差×方差差 表面积增长率平均值 表面积增长率方差 表面积增长率平均值差×方差差
3+1 2002 2003 / 2004 2504 3004 / 0.237 0.008 0.382 0.152 0.013 0.012
3+2 2002 1803 1804 2004 2504 3004 / 0.252 0.009 0.113 0.116 0.001 0.005
4+1 2002 1703 / 1704 2004 2504 3004 0.255 0.018 0.267 0.116 0.002 0.012
4+2 2002 1503 1703 1704 2004 2504 3004 0.218 0.018 0.090 0.100 0.006 0.004
[1] 姜雨然, 朱琳虹, 张敬. 根管治疗后疾病的临床研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2020,36(2):373-377.
Jiang YR, Zhu LH, Zhang J. Clinical research of post-treatment endodontic disease[J]. J Pract Stomatol, 2020,36(2):373-377.
[2] Zhang C, Liu J, Liu L. The influence of ProTaper and WaveOne on apically extruded debris: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2018,21(5):474-480.
[3] 龙洋. 弯曲根管预备后镍钛锉的疲劳性和根管中心定位能力的研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古医科大学, 2019.
Long Y. Fatigue of nickel titanium file after the bending root tube was completed and research on the localization of root canal[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mong-olia Medical University, 2019.
[4] Sekiya M, Maeda M, Katsuumi I, et al. Evaluation of four instruments with different working motion using artificial plastic model with C-shaped single canal[J]. Odontology, 2018,106(4):422-428.
[5] Jungnickel L, Kruse C, Vaeth M, et al. Quality aspects of ex vivo root canal treatments done by undergraduate dental students using four different endodontic treatment systems[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 2018,76(3):169-174.
[6] Chauhan R, Tikku A, Chandra A. Detection of residual obturation material after root canal retreatment with three different techniques using a dental operating microscope and a stereomicroscope: an in vitro comparative evaluation[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2012,15(3):218-222.
[7] 王岩, 董岩, 赵颖, 等. 混合技术根管预备的临床应用[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2011,27(10):612-614.
Wang Y, Dong Y, Zhao Y, et al. Clinical evaluation of hybrid techniques in preparation of root canals[J]. J Clin Stomatol, 2011,27(10):612-614.
[8] 肖海波. 三种机用镍钛器械在根管治疗中的临床应用比较[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2010,26(6):353-354.
Xiao HB. Comparison of clinical application of three mechanical nickel titanium instruments in root canal therapy[J]. J Clin Stomatol, 2010,26(6):353-354.
[9] Elkholy MMA, Ha WN. An arithmetic crown-down dynamic tactile instrumentation technique: a case report of an S-shaped root canal[J]. J Endod, 2021,47(5):836-843.
[10] 赵奇, 楚小玉. 运用锥度坐标纸重识根管预备器械锥度[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2005,15(10):587-589.
Zhao Q, Chu XY. Keep abreast of root canal files with the help of taper coordinate[J]. Chin J Conserv Dent, 2005,15(10):587-589.
[11] Tavares SJO, Sarmento EB, Guimarães LDS, et al. The influence of kinematics of engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments on root canal shape assessed by micro-computed tomography: a systematic review[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 2019,77(5):347-358.
[12] 耿瑶. 镍钛锉对根管应力状态影响的三维有限元研究[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2017.
Geng Y. Three-deimensional finite element analysis on stress conditions of root canal prepared with nickel-titanium rotary instruments of different design[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2017.
[13] West J. Manual versus mechanical endodontic glidepath[J]. Dent Today, 2011, 30(1): 136, 138, 140.
[14] 孙晓玲. 期望与方差的应用[J]. 合肥师范学院学报, 2017,35(6):7-9, 24.
Sun XL. Application of mathematical expectation and variance-research on case teaching of micro lectures[J]. J Hefei Norm Univ, 2017,35(6):7-9, 24.
[15] Turpin YL, Chagneau F, Vulcain JM. Impact of two theoretical cross-sections on torsional and bending stresses of nickel-titanium root canal instrument models[J]. J Endod, 2000,26(7):414-417.
[16] Plotino G, Nagendrababu V, Bukiet F, et al. Influence of negotiation, glide path, and preflaring procedures on root canal shaping: terminology, basic concepts, and a systematic review[J]. J Endod, 2020,46(6):707-729.
[17] Generali L, Righi E, Todesca MV, et al. Canal shaping with WaveOne reciprocating files: influence of operator experience on instrument breakage and canal preparation time[J]. Odontology, 2014,102(2):217-222.
[18] Jonker CH, Van der Vyver PJ, De Wet FA. The influence of glide path preparation on the failure rate of WaveOne reciprocating instruments[J]. SADJ, 2014,69(6):266-269.
[19] Topçuoğlu HS, Topçuoğlu G, Kafdağ Ö, et al. Cyclic fatigue resistance of new reciprocating glide path files in 45- and 60-degree curved canals[J]. Int Endod J, 2018,51(9):1053-1058.
[20] Kwak SW, Ha JH, Cheung GS, et al. Effect of the glide path establishment on the torque generation to the files during instrumentation: an in vitro measurement[J]. J Endod, 2018,44(3):496-500.
[21] Dhingra A, Nagar N, Sapra V. Influence of the glide path on various parameters of root canal prepared with WaveOne reciprocating file using cone beam computed tomography[J]. Dent Res J (Isfahan), 2015,12(6):534-540.
[22] van der Vyver PJ, Paleker F, Vorster M, et al. Root canal shaping using nickel titanium, M-wire, and gold wire: a micro-computed tomographic comparative study of one shape, ProTaper next, and Wave-One gold instruments in maxillary first molars[J]. J Endod, 2019,45(1):62-67.
[23] Aydin U, Karataslioglu E. Evaluation of canal transportation after preparation with Reciproc single-file systems with or without glide path files[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2017,20(4):230.
[24] 韩宇, 侯惠敏, 程君卫, 等. 4种通畅锉制备S形根管通畅通道能力的研究[J]. 中华老年口腔医学杂志, 2019,17(4):209-214.
Han Y, Hou HM, Cheng JW, et al. Study on the preparation of s-shaped root canals with four kinds of nickel-titanium pathfinding instruments[J]. Chin J Geriatr Dent, 2019,17(4):209-214.
[25] 韩怡, 付宏宇, 侯晓玫. 大锥度通畅通道在模拟弯曲根管中对ProTaper Next成形能力的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019,35(1):89-93.
Han Y, Fu HY, Hou XM. Effect of tapered glide path on shaping ability of ProTaper next in simulated root canals[J]. J Oral Sci Res, 2019,35(1):89-93.
[26] Yilmaz A, Kucukay ES, Istektepe M, et al. Comparison of the shaping ability of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path in simulated curved S-shaped root canals[J]. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 2017,7(Suppl 1):S13-S17.
[27] 韩怡, 白雨豪, 侯晓玫. 机用镍钛通畅锉在模拟根管中成形能力的对比研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018,34(2):121-124.
Han Y, Bai YH, Hou XM. Glide path management of rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals[J]. J Oral Sci Res, 2018,34(2):121-124.
[28] Sousa-Neto MD, Silva-Sousa YC, Mazzi-Chaves JF, et al. Root canal preparation using micro-computed tomography analysis: a literature review[J]. Braz Oral Res, 2018,32(suppl 1):e66.
[29] Dagna A, El Abed R, Hussain S, et al. Comparison of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria by various glide-path establishing systems: an in vitro study[J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2017,42(4):316-323.
[30] Versiani MA, Carvalho KKT, Mazzi-Chaves JF, et al. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the shaping ability of XP-endo shaper, iRaCe, and EdgeFile systems in long oval-shaped canals[J]. J Endod, 2018,44(3):489-495.
[31] 辛悦, 杨健. XP-endo系列镍钛锉的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019,35(6):521-523.
Xin Y, Yang J. Advancement in XP-endo series nickel-titanium instruments[J]. J Oral Sci Res, 2019,35(6):521-523.
[32] Venino PM, Citterio CL, Pellegatta A, et al. A micro-computed tomography evaluation of the shaping ability of two nickel-titanium instruments, HyFlex EDM and ProTaper next[J]. J Endod, 2017,43(4):628-632.
[33] 陈晓燕, 马琰, 邱申彩, 等. 应用显微CT评估两种镍钛锉预备重度弯曲根管成形能力的实验研究[J]. 中国美容医学, 2019,28(1):122-125.
Chen XY, Ma Y, Qiu SC, et al. Experiment research on evaluating the shapping ability of two nickel-titanium instruments to prepare severely curved canals with micro-CT[J]. Chin J Aesthetic Med, 2019,28(1):122-125.
[34] Gavini G, Santos MD, Caldeira CL, et al. Nickel-titanium instruments in endodontics: a concise review of the state of the art[J]. Braz Oral Res, 2018,32(suppl 1):e67.
[35] 陈露. 三种不同横截面形状的镍钛根管器械弯曲和扭转性能的计算机模拟研究[D]. 广州: 南方医科大学, 2011.
Chen L. A computational analysis of bending and torsional properties of three nickel-titanium endod-ontic instruments with different cross-sections[D]. Guangzhou: Southern Medical University, 2011.
[1] Wang Luxuan,Hou Benxiang.. Effect of residual calcium hydroxide in root canal on root canal treatment [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(3): 367-372.
[2] He Rong,Liu Xuejun,Zhou Yukun. Systematic review on the effect of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming in endodontic irrigation [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(6): 644-655.
[3] Li Mixuezi,Zhang Chen. Clinical consideration on the application of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing endocrown in molar restoration after root canal therapy [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(3): 274-279.
[4] Tan Kaixuan,Li Fan,Zhang Lijuan,Li Shanshan,Lu Jie,Zhang Ying,Yang Fang. Root canal retreatment with subcutaneous emphysema: a case report [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(5): 563-566.
[5] Xu Qing’an,Fan Mingwen. Non-instrumental technique and multi-acoustic ultra-clean system for root-canal treatment [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2019, 46(5): 522-525.
[6] Huang Lidong, Gong Weiyu, Dong Yanmei.. Research progress on root canal irrigation [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(4): 465-472.
[7] Li Ruhuang, Wang Xiao.. Research progress on prognosis factors of endodontic surgery [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2016, 43(6): 721-724.
[8] Zou Huiru, Qin Zongchang. Research progress on root canal configuration of mandibular anterior teeth [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2016, 43(3): 325-328.
[9] Xie Kexian, Wang Xiao, Li Yuangao, Zhang Ping.. Treatment of internal root resorption with calcific mass deposition [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(6): 628-630.
[10] Tan Yongmei, Zhao Shaoping, Yan Wenjuan, Zhang Hailan, Lü Wenjie, Zhou Lijuan. Comparison of short period postoperative clinical efficacy between single-visit root canal treatment and two-visit root canal treatment [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(3): 277-280.
[11] Wu Xingchen, Zhu Yaqin. Characteristics and evaluation of the clinical application of a self-adjusting file [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(6): 764-768.
[12] Xu Meng, Li Yuhong, Fan Mingwen. . Distribution status of microorganisms in different infected root canal [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(2): 237-240.
[13] Meng Deting, Lin Zhiyong.. The factors influencing vertical root fracture during root canal treatment [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2012, 39(2): 205-207.
[14] REN Zhi-wei, ZHANG Yu, XU Ying. The compare of curative effect between AH Plus and CCQ iodoform paste and gutta a [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(6): 621-621～623.
[15] YU Gang, YE Ling, HUANG Dingming. Resear ch development of r adix entomolar is in mandibular fir st molar s [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(4): 390-390～392.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[10] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .