Int J Stomatol

Int J Stomatol ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 297-304.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2021053

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative study on the shaping ability of thermally treated continuous rotating nickel-titanium systems for severely curved simulated canals

Wang Hongyuan1(),He Lu1,Zhang Ru1,Zheng Deqiang2,Li Hong1()   

  1. 1. Dept. of Endodontics, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
    2. School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
  • Received:2020-09-15 Revised:2020-12-29 Online:2021-05-01 Published:2021-05-14
  • Contact: Hong Li E-mail:949151831@qq.com;lihongdentist@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    Research and Cultivation Fund of Capital Medical University(PYZ19076)

RichHTML

84

PDF (PC)

1401

Abstract:

Objective This study aimed to compare the centring ability of three different thermally treated continuous rotating systems in severely curved simulated canals. Methods Sixty single-curved canals in resin blocks were prepared by using the Twisted File (group TF, R-phase),ProTaper Next (group PTN, M-wire), Hyflex CM (group HCM, CM-wire), and Mtwo (group Mtwo, traditional nickel-titanium alloy) systems (n=15), and the preparation time was recorded. The reduction in the working length after the preparation was measured. The weight change in the resin block was measured using an electronic balance. Images of pre- and post-instrumentation were recorded by digital camera and then superimposed by Photoshop. The amount of resin removed was measured by ImageJ. The differences between the groups were determined using one-way ANOVA, the Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc Bonferroni tests. Results No significant difference was observed in the changes in working length in the four groups (P>0.05). The weight change in the resin block was highest in the group Mtwo (P<0.05), and those of the three other groups were not significantly different (P>0.05). No significant difference was observed in the transportation of the canal at the apical foramen and in the coronal plane portion among four nickel-titanium instruments (P>0.05). In the apical part of the curvature, the group TF had the least root canal transportation (P<0.05), and the group Mtwo had higher root canal transportation than the three other groups in each measurement point (P<0.05). The Twisted File and the ProTaper Next could complete the preparation in a shorter time than the Mtwo and the Hyflex CM (P<0.05). Conclusion All tested files could prepare and maintain the original shape of severely curved canals effectively. This study showed that the Twisted file, ProTaper Next, and Hyflex CM systems had better centring ability than the Mtwo system and that the Twisted file system was demonstrated to have superior shaping ability compared with the others in the apical part.

Key words: shaping ability, curved canal, transportation, thermal treatment, continuous rotating nickel-titanium system

CLC Number: 

  • R781.05

TrendMD: 

Fig 1

Schematic diagram of the custom platform for resin simulated root canal"

Fig 2

The image of resin simulated root canal on the custom platform and schematic diagram of curvature"

Tab 1

The procedures of the four nickel-titanium systems"

组别 镍钛锉 马达（生产商） 预备程序 转速/（r·min-1） 扭矩/（N·cm）
TF Twisted File Sybron Endo（Sybron Endo公司,美国） （25#/0.04）→（25#/0.06） 500 1.5
HCM Hyflex CM VDW Silver （VDW公司,德国） （20#/0.04）→（20#/0.06）→
（25#/0.04）→（25#/0.06）		 500 2.5
PTN ProTaper Next X-Smart（Dentsply Maillefer公司,瑞士） （17#/0.04）→（25#/0.06） 300 2.0
Mtwo Mtwo VDW Silver （VDW公司,德国） （10#/0.04）→（15#/0.05）→
（20#/0.06）→（25#/0.06）		 280 1.2（10#/0.04）;1.3（15#/0.05）;
2.1（20#/0.06）;2.3（25#/0.06）

Tab 2

Working length and weight changes after pre-paration of four nickel-titanium systems n=15, x-±s"

组别 工作长度变化值/mm 树脂切削量/mg
TF 0.249±0.181 0.039 3±0.081 9
HCM 0.249±0.112 0.078 6±0.052 2
PTN 0.227±0.137 0.065 0±0.053 7
Mtwo 0.218±0.158 0.275 0±0.069 3

Fig 3

Representative images of resin simulated root canal before and after preparation using by four nickel-titanium systems"

Fig 4

A line chart demonstrating the direction and amount of canal deviation at the various measurement points of four nickel-titanium systems"

[1] Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal[J]. Dent Clin N Am, 1974,18(2):269-296.
[2] Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1971,32(2):271-275.
doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1
[3] Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape[J]. J Endod, 1975,1(8):255-262.
doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80037-9
[4] Reddy PJ, Kumar VS, Aravind K, et al. Canal sha-ping with one shape file and twisted files: a comparative study[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2014,8(12):ZF01-ZF03.
[5] Babu A, Rejula F, Christalin R, et al. Measure and compare the degree of root canal transportation and canal-centering ability of twisted, ProTaper, and conventional stainless steel K files using spiral compu-ted tomography: an in vitro study[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2017,18(6):463-469.
pmid: 28621275
[6] Zuolo ML, Zaia AA, Belladonna FG, et al. Micro-CT assessment of the shaping ability of four root canal instrumentation systems in oval-shaped canals[J]. Int Endod J, 2018,51(5):564-571.
doi: 10.1111/iej.12810 pmid: 28667674
[7] Versiani MA, Carvalho KKT, Mazzi-Chaves JF, et al. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the shaping ability of XP-endo shaper, iRaCe, and EdgeFile systems in long oval-shaped canals[J]. J Endod, 2018,44(3):489-495.
doi: S0099-2399(17)31086-5 pmid: 29273492
[8] Gu Y, Kum KY, Perinpanayagam H, et al. Various heat-treated nickel-titanium rotary instruments eva-luated in S-shaped simulated resin canals[J]. J Dent Sci, 2017,12(1):14-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2016.04.006
[9] Gergi R, Osta N, Bourbouze G, et al. Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography[J]. Int Endod J, 2015,48(2):162-170.
doi: 10.1111/iej.2014.48.issue-2
[10] Silva EJNL, Pacheco PT, Pires F, et al. Microcomputed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation and centring ability of ProTaper Next and Twisted File Adaptive systems[J]. Int Endod J, 2017,50(7):694-699.
doi: 10.1111/iej.12667 pmid: 27256247
[11] Ayar LR, Love RM. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals[J]. Int Endod J, 2004,37(9):593-601.
pmid: 15317562
[12] Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper next instruments with and without glide path[J]. J Endod, 2014,40(12):2053-2056.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.001 pmid: 25301350
[13] Saleh AM, Vakili Gilani P, Tavanafar S, et al. Sha-ping ability of 4 different single-file systems in simulated S-shaped canals[J]. J Endod, 2015,41(4):548-552.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.11.019
[14] Çelik G, Özdemir Kısacık F, Yılmaz EF, et al. A comparative study of root canal shaping using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary files in preclinical dental education[J]. Peer J, 2019,7:e7419.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.7419
[15] Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means[J]. Endod Top, 2005,10(1):30-76.
doi: 10.1111/etp.2005.10.issue-1
[16] Bürklein S, Stüber JP, Schäfer E. Real-time dyna-mic torque values and axial forces during preparation of straight root canals using three different endodontic motors and hand preparation[J]. Int Endod J, 2019,52(1):94-104.
doi: 10.1111/iej.12980 pmid: 29969837
[17] Muñoz E, Forner L, Llena C. Influence of operator’s experience on root canal shaping ability with a rotary nickel-titanium single-file reciprocating motion system[J]. J Endod, 2014,40(4):547-550.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.027
[18] Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Uslu G. Shaping ability of reciproc, WaveOne GOLD, and HyFlex EDM single-file systems in simulated S-shaped canals[J]. J Endod, 2017,43(5):805-809.
doi: S0099-2399(16)31056-1 pmid: 28292599
[19] Goldberg M, Dahan S, Machtou P. Centering ability and influence of experience when using WaveOne single-file technique in simulated canals[J]. Int J Dent, 2012,2012:1-7.
[20] 侯惠敏, 魏伦全, 韩宇, 等. 三种镍钛锉对弯曲根管成形效果的评价[J]. 中华老年口腔医学杂志, 2018,16(3):137-141.
Hou HM, Wei LQ, Han Y, et al. Evaluation of three nickel-titanium files for forming curved root canal[J]. Chin J Geriatr Dent, 2018,16(3):137-141.
[21] Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, et al. Comparison of single cone obturation performance of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems[J]. Acta Odontol S-cand, 2014,72(7):537-542.
[22] van der Vyver PJ, Paleker F, Vorster M, et al. Root canal shaping using nickel titanium, M-wire, and gold wire: a micro-computed tomographic comparative study of one shape, ProTaper next, and Wave-One gold instruments in maxillary first molars[J]. J Endod, 2019,45(1):62-67.
doi: S0099-2399(18)30657-5 pmid: 30446405
[23] Kumar BS, Pattanshetty S, Prasad M, et al. An in-vitro evaluation of canal transportation and centering ability of two rotary Nickel Titanium systems (Twis-ted Files and Hyflex files) with conventional stainless Steel hand K-flexofiles by using spiral compu-ted tomography[J]. J Int Oral Health, 2013,5(5):108-115.
[24] Marceliano-Alves MF, Sousa-Neto MD, Fidel SR, et al. Shaping ability of single-file reciprocating and heat-treated multifile rotary systems: a micro-CT stu-dy[J]. Int Endod J, 2015,48(12):1129-1136.
doi: 10.1111/iej.12412 pmid: 25400256
[25] 仇宁, 王楚瑜, 刘宇飞, 等. 3种机用镍钛器械预备模拟弯曲根管的成形能力比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016,25(2):191-194.
Qiu N, Wang CY, Liu YF, et al. Comparison of the shaping ability of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in the preparation of simulated curved root canals[J]. Shanghai J Stomatol, 2016,25(2):191-194.
[26] Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Assessment of the mecha-nical properties of ProTaper next nickel-titanium rotary files[J]. J Endod, 2014,40(11):1830-1834.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.011 pmid: 25129026
[27] Saber SEDM, Nagy MM, Schäfer E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals[J]. Int Endod J, 2015,48(2):131-136.
doi: 10.1111/iej.12291 pmid: 24697590
[28] 杨殷杰, 侯本祥, 侯晓玫. R-相热处理镍钛根管锉的力学性能和根管预备成形能力[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017,44(2):189-194.
Yang YJ, Hou BX, Hou XM. Mechanical properties and shaping ability of R-phase heat treatment nickel-titanium instruments[J]. Int J Stomatol, 2017,44(2):189-194.
[29] Kim HC, Kim HJ, Lee CJ, et al. Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals[J]. Int Endod J, 2009,42(7):593-602.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01553.x pmid: 19467053
[30] 于小青, 刘宇飞, 郭世博, 等. 5种机用镍钛锉预备根管成形能力的比较研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017,33(3):286-289.
Yu XQ, Liu YF, Guo SB, et al. Comparison of sha-ping ability of five Ni-Ti rotary instruments in simu-lated root canals[J]. J Oral Sci Res, 2017,33(3):286-289.
[31] Wu M, Fan B, Wesselink P. Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part Ⅰ: effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings[J]. J Endod, 2000,26(4):210-216.
doi: 10.1097/00004770-200004000-00003
[32] Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: part 1[J]. Int Endod J, 2000,33(3):248-254.
pmid: 11307443
[33] Radwański M, Łęski M, Pawlicka H. The influence of the manufacturing process of rotary files on the shaping of L-shaped canals[J]. Dent Med Probl, 2018,55(4):389-394.
doi: 10.17219/dmp/95201 pmid: 30444324
[1] Yang Yinjie1, Hou Benxiang1, Hou Xiaomei2. Mechanical properties and shaping ability of R-phase heat treatment nickel-titanium instruments [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(2): 189-194.
[2] ZHONG Sulan, YIN Shi-hai, CHEN Zhao-hui, JIE You-qiong, WANG Li. Evaluation of apical transportation after shaping different curved root canals by [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2009, 36(6): 657-660.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2004, 31(02): 126 -128 .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .