国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 59-63.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2018.01.012

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

锥形束电子计算机断层扫描在上颌前牙区牙槽骨的测量方法与分型标准中的应用

朱宸佑, 邓佳, 干洲杰, 刘浏, 王天璐, 曹聪, 屈依丽   

  1. 口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心 四川大学华西口腔医院种植科 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-18 修回日期:2017-08-20 发布日期:2018-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 屈依丽,副教授,博士,Email:qqyili@126.com
  • 作者简介:朱宸佑,学士,Email:tn00992786@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科学技术厅支撑项目(2014SZ0019)

The application of cone-beam computed tomography in implant surgery of maxillary anterior teeth area

Zhu Chenyou, Deng Jia, Gan Zhoujie, Liu Liu, Wang Tianlu, Cao Cong, Qu Yili   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Implantology, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2017-03-18 Revised:2017-08-20 Published:2018-01-15
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by Science and Technology Support Program of Sichuan Province (2014SZ0019).

摘要: 在牙种植领域,拔牙后牙槽骨的形态和尺寸对种植体的存活率有较大影响。其中,牙槽骨壁的高度和厚度是进行种植时重要的参考指标,锥形束电子计算机断层扫描常被用于获取牙槽骨的三维图像并进行测量,但由于牙槽骨三维结构较为复杂,形态多样,目前存在不同的测量方法和分型标准。上颌前牙区是进行牙种植手术的常见部位,本文主要综述了上颌前牙区牙槽骨的测量方法与分型标准的作用,为牙科种植手术术前方案设计和临床科研提供参考。

关键词: 锥形束电子计算机断层扫描, 上前牙, 种植, 测量

Abstract: In dental implantology, the changes of shapes and dimensions on the alveolar ridge have great impacts on the implant success rate. Moreover, the height and width of the alveolar ridge are crucial indexes in implant placement. Cone-beam computed tomography is usually used to obtain the 3-dimensional images and measurements of the alveolar ridge. However, the 3-dimentional structure of the alveolar ridge is complex and has shape diversity. Therefore, there are different methods of measurement and various standards of classification in the studies. The upper anterior teeth are common surgical sites in dental implant surgery. Therefore, in the present study we review several methods of measurement and classification of the upper anterior teeth,in order to provide a reference for proper planning before implantation and clinical research.

Key words: cone-beam computed tomography, maxillary anterior teeth, dental implant, measurement

中图分类号: 

  • R783.6
[1]Yim JH, Ryu DM, Lee BS, et al. Analysis of digi-talized panorama and conebeam computed tomo-graphic image distortion for the diagnosis of dental implantsurgery[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2011, 22(2): 669-673.
[2]Brief J, Edinger D, Hassfeld S, et al. Accuracy of image-guided implantology[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005, 16(4):495-501.
[3]Andersson JE, Svartz K. CT-scanning in the pre-operative planning of osseointegrated implants in the maxilla[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1988, 17(1): 33-35.
[4]Neugebauer J, Shirani R, Mischkowski RA, et al. Comparison of cone-beam volumetric imaging and combined plain radiographs for localization of the mandibular canal before removal of impacted lower third molars[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008, 105(5):633-643.
[5]Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, et al. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 1999, 28(4): 245-248.
[6]Aranyarachkul P, Caruso J, Gantes B, et al. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quan-titative cone-beam computerized tomography[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2005, 20(3):416-424.
[7]Draenert FG, Coppenrath E, Herzog P, et al. Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2007, 36(4):198-203.
[8]Wang D, Künzel A, Golubovic V, et al. Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing boneaugmentation material using cone beam com-puted tomography[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2013, 17 (6):1601-1609.
[9]Shiratori LN, Marotti J, Yamanouchi J, et al. Mea-surement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(7):797-804.
[10]Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, et al. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2003, 23(4):313-323.
[11]Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32(2):212-218.
[12]Wakimoto M, Matsumura T, Ueno T, et al. Bone quality and quantity of the anterior maxillary tra-becular bone in dental implant sites[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(11):1314-1319.
[13]Eufinger H, König S, Eufinger A. The role of alveolar ridge width in dental implantology[J]. Clin Oral In-vestig, 1997, 1(4):169-177.
[14]Karaca C, Er N, Gulsahi A, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation with a free gingival graft in the anterior maxilla: volumetric evaluation in a randomized clinical trial[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015, 44 (6):774-780.
[15]Braut V, Bornstein MM, Belser U, et al. Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall-a retrospec-tive radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2011, 31(2):125-131.
[16]Kan JY, Roe P, Rungcharassaeng K, et al. Classifica-tion of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary osseous housing for immediate implant placement: a cone beam computed tomography study [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2011, 26(4):873- 876.
[17]Garaicoa C, Suarez F, Fu JH, et al. Using cone beam computed tomography angle for predicting the out-come of horizontal bone augmentation[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17(4):717-723.
[18]Demircan S, Demircan E. Dental cone beam com-puted tomography analyses of the anterior maxillary bone thickness for immediate implant placement[J]. Implant Dent, 2015, 24(6):664-668.
[19]Zhang WJ, Skrypczak A, Weltman R. Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomo-graphy (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2015, 15(1):1-8.
[20]Lee SL, Kim HJ, Son MK, et al. Anthropometric analysis of maxillary anterior buccal bone of Korean adults using cone-beam CT[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2010, 2(3):92-96.
[21]Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, et al. Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh ex-traction sockets[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2006, 17 (6):615-624.
[22]Araújo MG, Wennström JL, Lindhe J. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bonewalls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation[J]. Clin Oral Im-plants Res, 2006, 17(6):606-614.
[23]Grütter L, Belser UC. Implant loading protocols for the partially edentulousesthetic zone[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24(Suppl):169-179.
[24]Tortamano P, Camargo LO, Bello-Silva MS, et al. Immediate implantplacement and restoration in the esthetic zone: a prospective study with 18 months of follow-up[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2010, 25(2):345-350.
[25]Agbaje JO, Jacobs R, Maes F, et al. Volumetric ana-lysis of extraction sockets using cone beam compu-ted tomography: a pilot studyon ex vivo jaw bone[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2007, 34(11):985-990.
[26]Jacobs R, Lambrichts I, Liang X, et al. Neurovas-cularization of the anterior jaw bones revisited using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2007, 103(5):683-693.
[27]Liang X, Jacobs R, Martens W, et al. Macro- and micro-anatomical, histological and computed tomo-graphy scan characterization of the nasopalatine canal[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2009, 36(7):598-603.
[28]Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations inthe anterior maxilla: ana-tomic and surgical considerations[J]. Int J Oral Ma-xillofac Implants, 2004, 19(Suppl):43-61.
[29]Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, Van Cleynenbreugel J, et al. The nasopalatine canal revisited using 2D and 3D CT imaging[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2004, 33 (6):396-402.
[30]Bornstein MM, Balsiger R, Sendi P, et al. Morpho-logy of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radiographic analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited cone-beam computed tomogra-phy[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(3):295-301.
[31]Ruppin J, Popovic A, Strauss M, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided sur-gery systems in dentalimplantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(7):709-716.
[32]Meitner SW, Tallents RH. Surgical templates for prosthetically guided implant placement[J]. J Pros-thet Dent, 2004, 92(6):569-574.
[33]Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2003, 18 (4):571-577.
[34]Ito K, Gomi Y, Sato S, et al. Clinical application of a newcompact CT system to assess 3-D images for the preoperative treatment planning of implants in the posterior mandible A case report[J]. Clin Oral Im-plants Res, 2001, 12(5):539-542.
[35]BouSerhal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, et al. Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of theliterature[J]. Clin Im-plant Dent Relat Res, 2002, 4(3):156-172.
[36]Katsoulis J, Pazera P, Mericske-Stern R. Prosthetically driven,computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2009, 11(3):238-245.
[37]Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Martens K, et al. An image-guided planning system for endosseous oral implants[J]. IEEE Trans Med Imag, 1998, 17 (5):842-852.
[1] 汤春波. 无牙颌患者种植治疗修复空间与修复方式的选择策略[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2024, 51(1): 1-9.
[2] 韩冲,何东宁,余飞燕,吴东潮. 口腔种植术后疼痛机制及治疗的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2024, 51(1): 99-106.
[3] 孙旭,邓振南,文才,赵颖. Er: YAG激光照射种植体表面微形貌变化的扫描电子显微镜观察[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(6): 669-673.
[4] 黄元鸿,彭显,周学东. 骨碎补在治疗口腔骨相关疾病的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(6): 679-685.
[5] 廖洪林,方仲瀚,张艳艳,刘飞,沈颉飞. 牙种植术后三叉神经创伤性神经病理性疼痛的诊断与防治[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(6): 729-738.
[6] 龚佳明,赵瑞敏,潘宏伟,郎鑫,余占海,李健学. 动态导航与静态导航对种植体准确性的Meta分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(5): 538-551.
[7] 刘云通,刘畅,高丽钞,罗瑜雪,曹钰彬,华成舸. 术后下牙槽神经功能障碍的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(4): 479-484.
[8] 朱可石,廖安琪,余优成. 机器学习在口腔种植学中的应用研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(4): 491-498.
[9] 陆倩,夏海斌,王敏. 种植体磨光整形术治疗种植体周围炎的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(2): 152-158.
[10] 朱叶玲,王茜,孙天瞳,王丽娜,何小明,李加志. 实现牙列前移新型推簧装置的改良应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(1): 82-90.
[11] 满毅, 黄定明. 美学区种植骨增量与邻牙慢性根尖周病的联合治疗策略(下):临床诊治流程及实践病例[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(6): 621-632.
[12] 满毅, 黄定明. 美学区种植骨增量与邻牙慢性根尖周病的联合治疗策略(上):应用基础及适应证[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(5): 497-505.
[13] 龚佳明,赵瑞敏,李婉昕,苏琳涵,余占海,李健学. 根盾技术对即刻种植临床效果的影响:基于随机对照研究的Meta分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(5): 537-547.
[14] 雒琪玥,柳叶语,罗依麟,满毅. 以正中关系为中心、面部美学及修复为导向的数字化无牙颌种植修复1例[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(4): 426-431.
[15] 赵喆,王富,郑秀丽,安娜,陈吉华. 功能载荷下牙移动测量方法的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(3): 362-366.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张新春. 桩冠修复与无髓牙的保护[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 王昆润. 长期单侧鼻呼吸对头颅发育有不利影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] 彭国光. 颈淋巴清扫术中颈交感神经干的解剖变异[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] 杨凯. 淋巴化疗的药物运载系统及其应用现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] 康非吾. 种植义齿下部结构生物力学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] 柴枫. 可摘局部义齿用Co-Cr合金的激光焊接[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] 孟姝,吴亚菲,杨禾. 伴放线放线杆菌产生的细胞致死膨胀毒素及其与牙周病的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] 费晓露,丁一,徐屹. 牙周可疑致病菌对口腔黏膜上皮的粘附和侵入[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] 赵兴福,黄晓晶. 变形链球菌蛋白组学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] 庞莉苹,姚江武. 抛光和上釉对陶瓷表面粗糙度、挠曲强度及磨损性能的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .