Int J Stomatol

Int J Stomatol ›› 2023, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (6): 646-652.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2023102

• Orthodontics • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Progress in research into the long-term stability of maxillary protraction therapy in skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion

Xu Shukui(),Zhang Shan,Xie Xinyu,Ma Wensheng.()   

  1. Dept. of Orthodontics, Hebei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Hebei Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017, China
  • Received:2023-05-26 Revised:2023-08-17 Online:2023-11-01 Published:2023-10-24
  • Contact: Wensheng. Ma E-mail:xushukui0324@163.com;wsma02@sina.com
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation and Key Basic Research Project of Hebei Province(H2019206668)

RichHTML

28

PDF (PC)

310

Abstract:

Maxillary protraction is one of the common treatment methods for skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion. However, its long-term stability remains controversial. This article reviews the key factors in maintaining the long-term stability of maxillary protraction or relapse, methods for improving long-term outcomes, and the prediction and screening of skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion.

Key words: maxillary protraction, skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion, development, stability

CLC Number: 

  • R 783.5

TrendMD: 
1 Elnagar MH, Elshourbagy E, Ghobashy S, et al. Dentoalveolar and arch dimension changes in patients treated with miniplate-anchored maxillary protraction[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2017, 151(6): 1092-1106.
2 Clemente R, Contardo L, Greco C, et al. Class Ⅲ treatment with skeletal and dental anchorage: a review of comparative effects[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018: 7946019.
3 Rutili V, Nieri M, Giuntini V, et al. A multilevel analysis of craniofacial growth in subjects with untreated Class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2020, 23(2): 181-191.
4 Mandall N, Cousley R, DiBiase A, et al. Early class Ⅲ protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial[J]. J Orthod, 2016, 43(3): 164-175.
5 Palma JC, Tejedor-Sanz N, Oteo MD, et al. Long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion combined with chincup protraction followed by fixed appliances[J]. Angle Orthod, 2015, 85(2): 270-277.
6 Suresh S, Sundareswaran S, Sathyanadhan S. Effect of microimplant assisted rapid palatal expansion on bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a finite element analysis[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021, 160(4): 523-532.
7 Zhao TT, Hua F, He H. Alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (alt-RAMEC) may Be more effective than rapid maxillary expansion alone for protraction facial mask treatment[J]. J Evid Based Dent Pract, 2020, 20(2): 101408.
8 Jang YK, Chung DH, Lee JW, et al. A comparative evaluation of midfacial soft tissue and nasal bone changes with two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne vs skeletal-anchored facemasks[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2021, 24(): 5-12.
9 Zere E, Chaudhari PK, Sharan J, et al. Developing Class Ⅲ malocclusions: challenges and solutions[J]. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent, 2018, 10: 99-116.
10 Ngan P. Early treatment of Class Ⅲ malocclusion: is it worth the burden[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 129(4 ): S82-S85.
11 Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Janisse FN, et al. Long-term stability of Class Ⅲ treatment: rapid pa-latal expansion and protraction facemask vs LeFort Ⅰ maxillary advancement osteotomy[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007, 131(1): 7.e9-19.
12 Hu SS, An K, Peng YR. Comparative efficacy of the bone-anchored maxillary protraction protocols for orthopaedic treatment in skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion: a Bayesian network meta-analysis[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2022, 25(2): 243-250.
13 Lee WC, Shieh YS, Liao YF, et al. Long-term maxillary anteroposterior changes following maxillary protraction with or without expansion: a meta-analysis and meta-regression[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(2): e0247027.
14 Kwak HJ, Park HJ, Kim YJ, et al. Factors associa-ted with long-term vertical skeletal changes induced by facemask therapy in patients with Class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. Angle Orthod, 2018, 88(2): 157-162.
15 Pavoni C, Masucci C, Cerroni S, et al. Short-term effects produced by rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class Ⅲ patients with different vertical skeletal relationships[J]. Angle Orthod, 2015, 85(6): 927-933.
16 Franchi L, Pavoni C, Cerroni S, et al. Thin-plate spline analysis of mandibular morphological chan-ges induced by early class Ⅲ treatment: a long-term evaluation[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2014, 36(4): 425-430.
17 Kilic N, Catal G, Kiki A, et al. Soft tissue profile changes following maxillary protraction in Class Ⅲ subjects[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2010, 32(4): 419-424.
18 Lin YF, Guo RZ, Hou LY, et al. Stability of maxillary protraction therapy in children with Class Ⅲ malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2018, 22(7): 2639-2652.
19 Lin HY, Yang H, Lai EH, et al. Three-phase treatment concept for skeletal Class Ⅲ growing patients with severe space deficiency: a report of three cases with skeletally anchored maxillary protraction[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2020, 119(4): 869-878.
20 Cozza P, Baccetti T, Mucedero M, et al. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 138(3): 300-310.
21 Baccetti T, Franchi L, Mucedero M, et al. Treatment and post-treatment effects of facemask therapy on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in Class Ⅲ subjects[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2010, 32(3): 346-350.
22 Liang SR, Wang F, Chang Q, et al. Three-dimensional comparative evaluation of customized bone-anchored vs tooth-borne maxillary protraction in patients with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021, 160(3): 374-384.
23 Zhang W, Qu HC, Yu M, et al. The effects of maxillary protraction with or without rapid maxillary expansion and age factors in treating class Ⅲ malocclusion: a meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(6): e0130096.
24 Foersch M, Jacobs C, Wriedt S, et al. Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2015, 19(6): 1181-1192.
25 Tejedor N, Martín C, Alarcón JA, et al. Sexual dimorphism in the long-term stability (10 years) of ske-letal Class Ⅲ treatment[J]. Prog Orthod, 2021, 22(1): 13.
26 Rongo R, D’Antò V, Bucci R, et al. Skeletal and dental effects of Class Ⅲ orthopaedic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2017, 44(7): 545-562.
27 Meazzini MC, Torre C, Cappello A, et al. Long-term follow-up of late maxillary orthopedic advancement with the Liou-Alternate rapid maxillary expansion-constriction technique in patients with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021, 160(2): 221-230.
28 Westwood PV, McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T, et al. Long-term effects of Class Ⅲ treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003, 123(3): 306-320.
29 Gautam P, Valiathan A, Adhikari R. Skeletal response to maxillary protraction with and without maxillary expansion: a finite element study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009, 135(6): 723-728.
30 Occasi F, Perri L, Saccucci M, et al. Malocclusion and rhinitis in children: an easy-going relationship or a yet to be resolved paradox? A systematic literature revision[J]. Ital J Pediatr, 2018, 44(1): 100.
31 de Souza RA, Rino Neto J, de Paiva JB. Maxillary protraction with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask versus skeletal anchorage with mini-implants in class Ⅲ patients: a non-randomized clinical trial[J]. Prog Orthod, 2019, 20(1): 35.
32 Lee SH, Koh SD, Chung DH, et al. Comparison of skeletal anchorage and tooth-borne maxillary protraction followed by fixed appliance in Class Ⅲ mal-occlusion[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2020, 42(2): 193-199.
33 Angelopoulou MV, Koletsi D, Vadiakas G, et al. Induced ankylosis of a primary molar for skeletal anchorage in the mandible as alternative to mini-implants[J]. Prog Orthod, 2015, 16: 18.
34 Kim M, Li J, Kim S, et al. Individualized 3D-prin-ted bone-anchored maxillary protraction device for growth modification in skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. J Pers Med, 2021, 11(11): 1087.
35 Cornelis MA, Tepedino M, Riis NV, et al. Treatment effect of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in gro-wing patients compared to controls: a systematic review with meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2021, 43(1): 51-68.
36 Liu YY, Hou RY, Jin HR, et al. Relative effectiveness of facemask therapy with alternate maxillary expansion and constriction in the early treatment of Class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021, 159(3): 321-332.
37 Masucci C, Franchi L, Defraia E, et al. Stability of rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy: a long-term controlled study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011, 140(4): 493-500.
38 Paoloni V, De Razza FC, Franchi L, et al. Stability prediction of early orthopedic treatment in Class Ⅲ malocclusion: morphologic discriminant analysis[J]. Prog Orthod, 2021, 22(1): 34.
39 Ferro A, Nucci LP, Ferro F, et al. Long-term stability of skeletal Class Ⅲ patients treated with splints, Class Ⅲ elastics, and chincup[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003, 123(4): 423-434.
40 Choi YJ, Chang JE, Chung CJ, et al. Prediction of long-term success of orthopedic treatment in skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusions[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2017, 152(2): 193-203.
41 Yu HJ, Cho SR, Kim MJ, et al. Automated skeletal classification with lateral cephalometry based on artificial intelligence[J]. J Dent Res, 2020, 99(3): 249-256.
42 Mahto RK, Kafle D, Giri A, et al. Evaluation of fully automated cephalometric measurements obtained from web-based artificial intelligence driven platform[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2022, 22(1): 132.
43 Rousseau M, Retrouvey JM. Machine learning in orthodontics: automated facial analysis of vertical dimension for increased precision and efficiency[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2022, 161(3): 445-450.
44 Choi JW, Park H, Kim B S IH, et al. Surgery-first orthognathic approach to correct facial asymmetry: artificial intelligence-based cephalometric analysis[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2022, 149(3): 496e-499e.
45 Allareddy V, Rengasamy Venugopalan S, Nalliah RP, et al. Orthodontics in the era of big data analy-tics[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2019, 22(): 8-13.
46 Wang SY, Pershing S, Lee AY, et al. Big data requirements for artificial intelligence[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2020, 31(5): 318-323.
47 Grischke J, Johannsmeier L, Eich L, et al. Dentronics: towards robotics and artificial intelligence in dentistry[J]. Dent Mater, 2020, 36(6): 765-778.
48 Bzdok D, Altman N, Krzywinski M. Statistics versus machine learning[J]. Nat Methods, 2018, 15(4): 233-234.
49 Auconi P, Gili T, Capuani S, et al. The validity of machine learning procedures in orthodontics: what is still missing[J]. J Pers Med, 2022, 12(6): 957.
[1] Wang Jingnan,Deng Shuli.. Root dysplasia of teeth: a review [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(6): 639-645.
[2] Wang Luodan,Fan Hong. Morphological characteristics of sella turcica and its relationship with malocclusion [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(6): 653-660.
[3] Li Peitong,Shi Binmian,Xu Chunmei,Xie Xudong,Wang Jun.. Distribution and role of Gli1+ mesenchymal stem cells in teeth and periodontal tissues [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(1): 37-42.
[4] Zhang Yuning,Zeng Ni,Zhang Bei,Shi Bing,Zheng Qian.. A preliminary study of the effect of posterior pharyngeal flap surgery on the maxillofacial growth of patients after palatoplasty [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(1): 66-71.
[5] Zhang Shan,Ge Xiaolei,Li Jie,Xie Xinyu,Chang Weiwei,Ma Wensheng.. Meta-analysis of the long-term effect of maxillary protraction on jaw growth and development [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(5): 548-555.
[6] Zhao Manzhu,Song Jinlin. Research progress on expression distribution and regulation mechanism of clock genes in tooth development [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(4): 380-385.
[7] Yang Yunqi,Lin Yangyang,Hou Min. Research advances on jaw stability and influencing factors in surgery-first approach [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(2): 227-232.
[8] Jiang Duan,Shen Daonan,Zhao Lei,Wu Yafei. Research progress on the relationship between new anti-inflammatory factor developmental endothelial locus-1 and periodontitis [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(2): 244-248.
[9] Liu Jiacheng,Meng Zhaosong,Li Hongjie,Sui Lei. The role of follistatin in oral and maxillofacial development and its therapeutic application prospect [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(5): 556-562.
[10] Zhang Shizhen,Lai Wenli. Research progress on maxillary protraction methods and auxiliary maxillary expansion for skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(3): 354-361.
[11] Liu Ling,Gong Renguo,Dong Xiuhua,Liu Rumeng. Meta-analysis of the long-term stability of serious anterior skeletal open-bite malocclusion after orthodontic surgery [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(2): 173-179.
[12] Deng Shiyong,Gong Ping,Tan Zhen. Effects of brain and muscle aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like protein 1 gene on the regulation of oral and systemic bone metabolism [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(2): 198-204.
[13] Jin Zuolin. Craniofacial growth and development in early orthodontic and orthopedic treatment [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(1): 7-11.
[14] Cheng Xu,Huang Yixuan,Li Jingtao,Shi Bing. Research progress on orofacial muscle development and regeneration [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(1): 71-76.
[15] Shi Yu. The definition of skeletal stem cell in bone development [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(3): 249-256.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[10] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .