国际口腔医学杂志

国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (6): 646-652.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2023102

• 正畸学专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

上颌前方牵引矫治骨性Ⅲ类错畸形远期疗效稳定性的研究进展

徐书奎(),张珊,谢新宇,马文盛()   

  1. 河北医科大学口腔医院正畸科 河北省口腔医学重点实验室河北省口腔疾病临床医学研究中心 石家庄 050017
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-26 修回日期:2023-08-17 出版日期:2023-11-01 发布日期:2023-10-24
  • 通讯作者: 马文盛
  • 作者简介:徐书奎，硕士，Email：xushukui0324@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    河北省自然科学基金和重点基础研究专项(H2019206668)

Progress in research into the long-term stability of maxillary protraction therapy in skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion

Xu Shukui(),Zhang Shan,Xie Xinyu,Ma Wensheng.()   

  1. Dept. of Orthodontics, Hebei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Hebei Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017, China
  • Received:2023-05-26 Revised:2023-08-17 Online:2023-11-01 Published:2023-10-24
  • Contact: Wensheng. Ma
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation and Key Basic Research Project of Hebei Province(H2019206668)

RichHTML

28

PDF (PC)

325

摘要：

上颌前方牵引为临床治疗骨性Ⅲ类错畸形的常用治疗方法，但目前研究中对于该治疗方法在早期矫治中能否改善患者的Ⅲ类生长型而获得良好的远期稳定性仍存在许多争议。本文拟围绕维持上颌前方牵引治疗远期疗效稳定或造成远期效果不佳的关键因素、临床如何提高上颌前方牵引治疗的远期疗效，以及对骨性Ⅲ类错的疗效预测与复发病例筛查作一综述。

关键词: 上颌前方牵引, 骨性Ⅲ类错(牙合)畸形, 生长发育, 稳定性

Abstract:

Maxillary protraction is one of the common treatment methods for skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion. However, its long-term stability remains controversial. This article reviews the key factors in maintaining the long-term stability of maxillary protraction or relapse, methods for improving long-term outcomes, and the prediction and screening of skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion.

Key words: maxillary protraction, skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion, development, stability

中图分类号: 

  • R 783.5
1 Elnagar MH, Elshourbagy E, Ghobashy S, et al. Dentoalveolar and arch dimension changes in patients treated with miniplate-anchored maxillary protraction[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2017, 151(6): 1092-1106.
2 Clemente R, Contardo L, Greco C, et al. Class Ⅲ treatment with skeletal and dental anchorage: a review of comparative effects[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018: 7946019.
3 Rutili V, Nieri M, Giuntini V, et al. A multilevel analysis of craniofacial growth in subjects with untreated Class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2020, 23(2): 181-191.
4 Mandall N, Cousley R, DiBiase A, et al. Early class Ⅲ protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial[J]. J Orthod, 2016, 43(3): 164-175.
5 Palma JC, Tejedor-Sanz N, Oteo MD, et al. Long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion combined with chincup protraction followed by fixed appliances[J]. Angle Orthod, 2015, 85(2): 270-277.
6 Suresh S, Sundareswaran S, Sathyanadhan S. Effect of microimplant assisted rapid palatal expansion on bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a finite element analysis[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021, 160(4): 523-532.
7 Zhao TT, Hua F, He H. Alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (alt-RAMEC) may Be more effective than rapid maxillary expansion alone for protraction facial mask treatment[J]. J Evid Based Dent Pract, 2020, 20(2): 101408.
8 Jang YK, Chung DH, Lee JW, et al. A comparative evaluation of midfacial soft tissue and nasal bone changes with two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne vs skeletal-anchored facemasks[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2021, 24(): 5-12.
9 Zere E, Chaudhari PK, Sharan J, et al. Developing Class Ⅲ malocclusions: challenges and solutions[J]. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent, 2018, 10: 99-116.
10 Ngan P. Early treatment of Class Ⅲ malocclusion: is it worth the burden[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 129(4 ): S82-S85.
11 Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Janisse FN, et al. Long-term stability of Class Ⅲ treatment: rapid pa-latal expansion and protraction facemask vs LeFort Ⅰ maxillary advancement osteotomy[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007, 131(1): 7.e9-19.
12 Hu SS, An K, Peng YR. Comparative efficacy of the bone-anchored maxillary protraction protocols for orthopaedic treatment in skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion: a Bayesian network meta-analysis[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2022, 25(2): 243-250.
13 Lee WC, Shieh YS, Liao YF, et al. Long-term maxillary anteroposterior changes following maxillary protraction with or without expansion: a meta-analysis and meta-regression[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(2): e0247027.
14 Kwak HJ, Park HJ, Kim YJ, et al. Factors associa-ted with long-term vertical skeletal changes induced by facemask therapy in patients with Class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. Angle Orthod, 2018, 88(2): 157-162.
15 Pavoni C, Masucci C, Cerroni S, et al. Short-term effects produced by rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class Ⅲ patients with different vertical skeletal relationships[J]. Angle Orthod, 2015, 85(6): 927-933.
16 Franchi L, Pavoni C, Cerroni S, et al. Thin-plate spline analysis of mandibular morphological chan-ges induced by early class Ⅲ treatment: a long-term evaluation[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2014, 36(4): 425-430.
17 Kilic N, Catal G, Kiki A, et al. Soft tissue profile changes following maxillary protraction in Class Ⅲ subjects[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2010, 32(4): 419-424.
18 Lin YF, Guo RZ, Hou LY, et al. Stability of maxillary protraction therapy in children with Class Ⅲ malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2018, 22(7): 2639-2652.
19 Lin HY, Yang H, Lai EH, et al. Three-phase treatment concept for skeletal Class Ⅲ growing patients with severe space deficiency: a report of three cases with skeletally anchored maxillary protraction[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2020, 119(4): 869-878.
20 Cozza P, Baccetti T, Mucedero M, et al. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 138(3): 300-310.
21 Baccetti T, Franchi L, Mucedero M, et al. Treatment and post-treatment effects of facemask therapy on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in Class Ⅲ subjects[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2010, 32(3): 346-350.
22 Liang SR, Wang F, Chang Q, et al. Three-dimensional comparative evaluation of customized bone-anchored vs tooth-borne maxillary protraction in patients with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021, 160(3): 374-384.
23 Zhang W, Qu HC, Yu M, et al. The effects of maxillary protraction with or without rapid maxillary expansion and age factors in treating class Ⅲ malocclusion: a meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(6): e0130096.
24 Foersch M, Jacobs C, Wriedt S, et al. Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2015, 19(6): 1181-1192.
25 Tejedor N, Martín C, Alarcón JA, et al. Sexual dimorphism in the long-term stability (10 years) of ske-letal Class Ⅲ treatment[J]. Prog Orthod, 2021, 22(1): 13.
26 Rongo R, D’Antò V, Bucci R, et al. Skeletal and dental effects of Class Ⅲ orthopaedic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2017, 44(7): 545-562.
27 Meazzini MC, Torre C, Cappello A, et al. Long-term follow-up of late maxillary orthopedic advancement with the Liou-Alternate rapid maxillary expansion-constriction technique in patients with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021, 160(2): 221-230.
28 Westwood PV, McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T, et al. Long-term effects of Class Ⅲ treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003, 123(3): 306-320.
29 Gautam P, Valiathan A, Adhikari R. Skeletal response to maxillary protraction with and without maxillary expansion: a finite element study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009, 135(6): 723-728.
30 Occasi F, Perri L, Saccucci M, et al. Malocclusion and rhinitis in children: an easy-going relationship or a yet to be resolved paradox? A systematic literature revision[J]. Ital J Pediatr, 2018, 44(1): 100.
31 de Souza RA, Rino Neto J, de Paiva JB. Maxillary protraction with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask versus skeletal anchorage with mini-implants in class Ⅲ patients: a non-randomized clinical trial[J]. Prog Orthod, 2019, 20(1): 35.
32 Lee SH, Koh SD, Chung DH, et al. Comparison of skeletal anchorage and tooth-borne maxillary protraction followed by fixed appliance in Class Ⅲ mal-occlusion[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2020, 42(2): 193-199.
33 Angelopoulou MV, Koletsi D, Vadiakas G, et al. Induced ankylosis of a primary molar for skeletal anchorage in the mandible as alternative to mini-implants[J]. Prog Orthod, 2015, 16: 18.
34 Kim M, Li J, Kim S, et al. Individualized 3D-prin-ted bone-anchored maxillary protraction device for growth modification in skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. J Pers Med, 2021, 11(11): 1087.
35 Cornelis MA, Tepedino M, Riis NV, et al. Treatment effect of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in gro-wing patients compared to controls: a systematic review with meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2021, 43(1): 51-68.
36 Liu YY, Hou RY, Jin HR, et al. Relative effectiveness of facemask therapy with alternate maxillary expansion and constriction in the early treatment of Class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021, 159(3): 321-332.
37 Masucci C, Franchi L, Defraia E, et al. Stability of rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy: a long-term controlled study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011, 140(4): 493-500.
38 Paoloni V, De Razza FC, Franchi L, et al. Stability prediction of early orthopedic treatment in Class Ⅲ malocclusion: morphologic discriminant analysis[J]. Prog Orthod, 2021, 22(1): 34.
39 Ferro A, Nucci LP, Ferro F, et al. Long-term stability of skeletal Class Ⅲ patients treated with splints, Class Ⅲ elastics, and chincup[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003, 123(4): 423-434.
40 Choi YJ, Chang JE, Chung CJ, et al. Prediction of long-term success of orthopedic treatment in skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusions[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2017, 152(2): 193-203.
41 Yu HJ, Cho SR, Kim MJ, et al. Automated skeletal classification with lateral cephalometry based on artificial intelligence[J]. J Dent Res, 2020, 99(3): 249-256.
42 Mahto RK, Kafle D, Giri A, et al. Evaluation of fully automated cephalometric measurements obtained from web-based artificial intelligence driven platform[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2022, 22(1): 132.
43 Rousseau M, Retrouvey JM. Machine learning in orthodontics: automated facial analysis of vertical dimension for increased precision and efficiency[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2022, 161(3): 445-450.
44 Choi JW, Park H, Kim B S IH, et al. Surgery-first orthognathic approach to correct facial asymmetry: artificial intelligence-based cephalometric analysis[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2022, 149(3): 496e-499e.
45 Allareddy V, Rengasamy Venugopalan S, Nalliah RP, et al. Orthodontics in the era of big data analy-tics[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2019, 22(): 8-13.
46 Wang SY, Pershing S, Lee AY, et al. Big data requirements for artificial intelligence[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2020, 31(5): 318-323.
47 Grischke J, Johannsmeier L, Eich L, et al. Dentronics: towards robotics and artificial intelligence in dentistry[J]. Dent Mater, 2020, 36(6): 765-778.
48 Bzdok D, Altman N, Krzywinski M. Statistics versus machine learning[J]. Nat Methods, 2018, 15(4): 233-234.
49 Auconi P, Gili T, Capuani S, et al. The validity of machine learning procedures in orthodontics: what is still missing[J]. J Pers Med, 2022, 12(6): 957.
[1] 石佳鑫,王淳艺,李精韬. Pierre Robin序列征患者腭裂临床治疗的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(2): 237-242.
[2] 李佩桐,时彬冕,许春梅,谢旭东,王骏. Gli1阳性间充质干细胞在牙及牙周组织中的分布及作用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(1): 37-42.
[3] 张宇宁,曾妮,张焙,石冰,郑谦. 咽后壁瓣咽成形术对腭裂术后患者颌面部生长影响的初步研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(1): 66-71.
[4] 张珊,葛晓磊,李杰,谢新宇,常维维,马文盛. 上颌前方牵引矫治对颌骨生长发育长期影响的Meta分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(5): 548-555.
[5] 黎静文,周力. 颈椎成熟法评估下颌骨骨龄的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(3): 337-342.
[6] 杨赟琪,林阳阳,侯敏. 手术优先模式颌骨稳定性及影响因素研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(2): 227-232.
[7] 刘嘉程,孟昭松,李宏捷,隋磊. 卵泡抑素在口腔颌面部发育中的作用及其治疗应用前景[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(5): 556-562.
[8] 刘玲,龚仁国,董秀华,刘入梦. 正畸联合双颌手术治疗前牙区严重骨性开长期稳定性的Meta分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(2): 173-179.
[9] 金作林. 颅面部生长发育与早期生长改良[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(1): 7-11.
[10] 田青鹭,赵志河. 微型种植体在口腔正畸中稳定性的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(2): 212-218.
[11] 曾婷艳, 黄生高. 种植体支抗稳定性的三维有限元分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(1): 112-118.
[12] 曹聪聪, 李精韬, 郑谦. 腭隐裂患者颅颌面生长发育的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(4): 390-392.
[13] 刘茜旸，陈振琦. 唇腭裂患者的颅底结构研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2015, 42(5): 525-527.
[14] 鲁颖娟 常少海. 微种植体初期稳定性的影响因素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2013, 40(3): 403-405.
[15] 韶青华 陈振琦. 牙槽突裂植骨与颌骨生长发育的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2013, 40(1): 132-134.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张京剧. 青年期至中年期颅面复合体变化的头影测量研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 刘玲. 镍铬合金中铍对可铸造性和陶瓷金属结合力的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] 王昆润. 在种植体上制作固定义齿以后下颌骨密度的动态变化[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] 陆加梅. 不可复性关节盘移位患者术前张口度与关节镜术后疗效的相关性[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] 王昆润. 重型颌面部炎症死亡和康复病例的实验室检查指标比较[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[6] 王昆润. 二甲亚砜和双氯芬酸并用治疗根尖周炎[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[7] 汤庆奋,王学侠. 17β-雌二醇对人类阴道和口腔颊粘膜的渗透性[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[8] 王昆润. 咀嚼口香糖对牙周组织微循环的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[9] 宋红. 青少年牙周炎外周血分叶核粒细胞的趋化功能[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[10] 高卫民,李幸红. 发达国家牙医学院口腔种植学教学现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .