国际口腔医学杂志

国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 227-232.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2022014

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

手术优先模式颌骨稳定性及影响因素研究进展

杨赟琪1,2(),林阳阳1,2,侯敏1,2()   

  1. 1.天津市口腔医院正颌外科 南开大学医学院 天津 300041
    2.天津市口腔功能重建重点实验室 天津 300041
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-26 修回日期:2021-09-11 出版日期:2022-03-01 发布日期:2022-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 侯敏
  • 作者简介:杨赟琪,硕士,Email： waoyangyunqi@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    天津市临床医学重点学科（口腔医学-口腔颌面外科学）专项基金(HWZX007);天津市口腔医院博硕士青年项目(2019BSQN04)

Research advances on jaw stability and influencing factors in surgery-first approach

Yang Yunqi1,2(),Lin Yangyang1,2,Hou Min1,2()   

  1. 1. Dept. of Orthognathic Surgery, Tianjin Stomatological Hospital, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300041, China
    2. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Oral Function Reconstruction, Tianjin 300041, China
  • Received:2021-05-26 Revised:2021-09-11 Online:2022-03-01 Published:2022-03-15
  • Contact: Min Hou
  • Supported by:
    Tianjin Key Discipline of Clinical Medicine (Stomatology-Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery) Special Fund(HWZX007);Tianjin Stomatological Hospital Doctoral Master Program(2019BSQN04)

RichHTML

51

PDF (PC)

686

摘要：

目前主流的正畸-正颌联合治疗模式,包括“术前正畸-正颌手术-术后正畸”3部分,但存在治疗周期长,术前正畸期间患者咀嚼功能及侧貌恶化等问题。近年来,有学者在传统主流模式的基础上进行创新,选择部分合适病例缩短或省略术前正畸,形成了先行正颌手术,再行术后正畸的治疗模式,称为手术优先模式。国内外也报道了许多该模式治疗的病例,相较于传统主流模式,手术优先模式缩短了整体治疗时间,术后即刻改善面容,更符合成年正颌患者的治疗需求。但是,手术优先模式正颌术后患者的颌骨稳定性如何,有哪些影响因素,如何确立适应证,又有哪些不足之处,都是临床应用中需要考虑的问题。本文就手术优先模式下的颌骨稳定性及其与过渡性咬合、手术设计、正畸治疗之间的关系进行综述。

关键词: 手术优先, 颌骨稳定性, 过渡性咬合, 正畸-正颌联合治疗

Abstract:

As the current mainstream mode, the traditional orthognathic surgical treatment model includes three perio-ds: presurgical orthodontic preparation, orthognathic surgery and postsurgical orthodontic procedure. However, this model has the problems of long treatment time, deterioration of the patient’s masticatory function and lateral appearance during the preoperative orthodontic period and so on. In recent years, many case studies have been reported at home and abroad, which shortens or omits presurgical orthodontic time. This new treatment is called surgery-first approach (SFA). Compared with the conventional treatment mode, SFA shortens the overall treatment time and improves facial aesthetics immediately after surgery. Therefore, SFA is more in line with the treatment needs of adult orthognathic patients. Meanwhile, the bone and teeth moved after surgery are more conducive to the movement of teeth. However, the jaw stability of patients after orthognathic surgery and the influencing factors are the main issues that need to be considered in clinical applications of surgery-first approach. This article reviews the jaw stability and its relationship to transitional occlusion, surgical design and orthodontic treatment under surgery-first approach.

Key words: surgery-first approach, jaw stability, combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment, transitional occlusion

中图分类号: 

  • R783.5
[1] Huang CS, Hsu SS, Chen YR. Systematic review of the surgery-first approach in orthognathic surgery[J]. Biomed J, 2014, 37(4): 184-190.
doi: 10.4103/2319-4170.126863
[2] Sharma VK, Yadav K, Tandon P. An overview of surgery-first approach: recent advances in orthognathic surgery[J]. J Orthod Sci, 2015, 4(1): 9-12.
doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.149609 pmid: 25657986
[3] Huang XQ, Cen X, Sun WT, et al. The impact of surgery-first approach on the oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2019, 19(1): 136.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0842-1
[4] Choi JW, Lee JY, Yang SJ, et al. The reliability of a surgery-first orthognathic approach without presurgical orthodontic treatment for skeletal class Ⅲ dentofacial deformity[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2015, 74(3): 333-341.
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318295dcce
[5] Nagasaka H, Sugawara J, Kawamura H, et al. “Surgery first” skeletal classⅢcorrection using the ske-letal anchorage system[J]. J Clin Orthod, 2009, 43(2): 97-105.
[6] Park JK, Choi JY, Yang IH, et al. Patient’s satisfaction in skeletal classⅢcases treated with two-jaw surgery using orthognathic quality of life questionnaire: conventional three-stage method versus surgery-first approach[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2015, 26(7): 2086-2093.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001972
[7] Park KH, Sandor GK, Kim YD. Skeletal stability of surgery-first bimaxillary orthognathic surgery for ske-letal classⅢmalocclusion, using standardized criteria[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 45(1): 35-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.09.015
[8] 杨斌, 王怀良, 丁榆德, 等. 手术优先模式治疗Angle Ⅲ类牙颌畸形185例临床回顾分析[J]. 中华整形外科杂志, 2018, 34(6): 422-431.
Yang B, Wang HL, Ding YD, et al. Surgery-first approach for Angle classⅢmalocclusion: clinical retrospective analysis of 185 cases[J]. Chin J Plast Surg, 2018, 34(6): 422-431.
[9] Kim JY, Park JH, Jung HD, et al. Factors affecting total treatment time in patients treated with orthognathic surgery using the surgery-first approach: multivariable analysis using 3D CT and scanned dental casts[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(3): E641.
[10] Liou EJ, Chen PH, Wang YC, et al. Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: orthodontic guidelin-es and setup for model surgery[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 69(3): 771-780.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.011
[11] Alencar DS, Cunha Almeida RC, Maues Casagrande CP, et al. Orthodontic-surgical treatment for a patient with classⅡmalocclusion and inadequate maxillary incisor inclination[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2020, 157(5): 690-703.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.01.030
[12] Ince-Bingol S, Arman-Ozcirpici A. Treatment of an adult skeletal classⅡpatient with a modified surge-ry-first approach[J]. Int Orthod, 2020, 18(3): 569-575.
doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.03.004
[13] Hwang DS, Seo JS, Choi HS. Skeletal stability after 2-jaw surgery via surgery-first approach in facial asy-mmetry patients using CBCT[J]. Maxillofac Pla-st Reconstr Surg, 2020, 42(1): 11.
[14] Song JY, Yang H, He X, et al. Surgery-first for a patient with mild hemifacial microsomia: a case report and review of literature[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2021, 9(1): 148-162.
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i1.148
[15] Behrman SJ, Behrman DA. Oral surgeons’ conside-rations in surgical orthodontic treatment[J]. Dent C-lin North Am, 1988, 32(3): 481-507.
[16] Ko EW, Hsu SS, Hsieh HY, et al. Comparison of progressive cephalometric changes and postsurgical stability of skeletal classⅢcorrection with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 69(5): 1469-1477.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.022
[17] Peiró-Guijarro MA, Guijarro-Martínez R, Hernán-dez-Alfaro F. Surgery first in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2016, 149(4): 448-462.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.022
[18] Hoang TA, Lee KC, Chuang SK. The surgery-first approach to orthognathic surgery[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2021, 32(2): e153-e156.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006942
[19] Jeong WS, Lee JY, Choi JW. Large-scale study of long-term vertical skeletal stability in a surgery-first orthognathic approach without presurgical orthodontic treatment: part Ⅱ[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2018, 29(4): 953-958.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004433 pmid: 29521747
[20] Yang L, Xiao YD, Liang YJ, et al. Does the surgery-first approach produce better outcomes in orthognathic surgery? A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 75(11): 2422-2429.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.06.002
[21] Kim CS, Lee SC, Kyung HM, et al. Stability of mandibular setback surgery with and without presurgical orthodontics[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014, 72(4): 779-787.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.09.033
[22] Wei HP, Liu ZX, Zang JJ, et al. Surgery-first/early-orthognathic approach may yield poorer postoperative stability than conventional orthodontics-first approach: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2018, 126(2): 107-116.
doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.02.018
[23] Pelo S, Saponaro G, Patini R, et al. Risks in surgery-first orthognathic approach: complications of segmental osteotomies of the jaws. A systematic review[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2017, 21(1): 4-12.
[24] Liao YF, Lo SH. Surgical occlusion setup in correction of skeletal classⅢdeformity using surgery-first approach: guidelines, characteristics and accuracy[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 11673.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30124-2
[25] Baek SH, Ahn HW, Kwon YH, et al. Surgery-first approach in skeletal classⅢmalocclusion treated wi-th 2-jaw surgery: evaluation of surgical movement and postoperative orthodontic treatment[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2010, 21(2): 332-338.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cf5fd4
[26] Ko EW, Lin SC, Chen YR, et al. Skeletal and dental variables related to the stability of orthognathic surgery in skeletal classⅢmalocclusion with a surgery-first approach[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2013, 71(5): e215-e223.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.12.025
[27] Liao YF, Chiu YT, Huang CS, et al. Presurgical orthodontics versus no presurgical orthodontics: treatment outcome of surgical-orthodontic correction for skeletal classⅢopen bite[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2010, 126(6): 2074-2083.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f52710
[28] Gandedkar NH, Chng CK, Tan W. Surgery-first orthognathic approach case series: salient features and guidelines[J]. J Orthod Sci, 2016, 5(1): 35-42.
doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.176657 pmid: 26998476
[29] López DF, Aristizábal JF, Martínez-Smit R. Condylectomy and “surgery first” approach: an expedited treatment for condylar hyperplasia in a patient with facial asymmetry[J]. Dental Press J Orthod, 2017, 22(4): 86-96.
[30] Janakiraman N, Feinberg M, Vishwanath M, et al. Integration of 3-dimensional surgical and orthodontic technologies with orthognathic “surgery-first” approach in the management of unilateral condylar hyperplasia[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2015, 148(6): 1054-1066.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.08.012
[31] Badiali G, Costabile E, Lovero E, et al. Virtual orthodontic surgical planning to improve the accuracy of the surgery-first approach: a prospective evaluation[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019, 77(10): 2104-2115.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.04.017
[32] 商洪涛, 史雨林, 白石柱, 等. 骨性Ⅲ类面形患者数字化正颌外科治疗[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志, 2016, 27(12): 713-716.
Shang HT, Shi YL, Bai SZ, et al. Digital orthognathic surgery in the treatment of skeletal class Ⅲ type patients[J]. Chin J Aesthet Plast Surg, 2016, 27(12): 713-716.
[33] 范娟, 林阳阳. 双颌手术中数字化导板辅助定位技术的研究进展[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志, 2019, 30(12): 725-727.
Fan J, Lin YY. Research progress of digital guide assisted localization technology in bimaxillary surgery[J]. Chin J Aesthet Plast Surg, 2019, 30(12): 725-727.
[34] Zhou Y, Zhou YH, Wang XX, et al. Minimal presurgical orthodontics for a skeletal class Ⅲ patient with mandibular asymmetry[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2016, 149(1): 99-113.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.039
[35] Liao YF, Chen YF, Yao CF, et al. Long-term outcomes of bimaxillary surgery for treatment of asymmetric skeletal class Ⅲ deformity using surgery-first approach[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2019, 23(4): 1685-1693.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2603-y
[36] 王怀良, 杨斌. “手术优先”模式治疗成人安氏Ⅲ类𬌗畸形的研究进展[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志, 2017, 28(4): 235-237.
Wang HL, Yang B. Research progress of “surgery-first” model in the treatment of adult Angle classⅢmalocclusion[J]. Chin J Aesthet Plast Surg, 2017, 28(4): 235-237.
[37] Min BK, Choi JY, Baek SH. Comparison of treatment duration between conventional three-stage me-thod and surgery-first approach in patients with skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2014, 25(5): 1752-1756.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001002
[38] Frost HM. The regional acceleratory phenomenon: a review[J]. Henry Ford Hosp Med J, 1983, 31(1): 3-9.
pmid: 6345475
[39] Liou EJ, Chen PH, Wang YC, et al. Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: postoperative rapid orthodontic tooth movement[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 69(3): 781-785.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.035
[40] Salazar AG, Waite PD, Kau CH. Enhancing the orthognathic surgery experience: treatment in 10 weeks “surgery first” approach[J]. Ann Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 10(1): 227-231.
doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_203_19
[41] Lee NK, Kim YK, Yun PY, et al. Evaluation of post-surgical relapse after mandibular setback surgery with minimal orthodontic preparation[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2013, 41(1): 47-51.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.05.010
[42] Hu J, Jiang Y, Wang D, et al. Comparison of cost-effectiveness and benefits of surgery-first versus orthodontics-first orthognathic correction of skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021, 50(3): 367-372.
[43] Pelo S, Gasparini G, Garagiola U, et al. Surgery-first orthognathic approach vs traditional orthognathic approach: oral health-related quality of life assessed with 2 questionnaires[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2017, 152(2): 250-254.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.12.022
[44] Saghafi H, Benington P, Ayoub A. Impact of orthognathic surgery on quality of life: a comparison between orthodontics-first and surgery-first approaches[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 58(3): 341-347.
doi: S0266-4356(20)30007-3 pmid: 31992457
[45] Feu D, de Oliveira BH, Palomares NB, et al. Oral health-related quality of life changes in patients wi-th severe classⅢmalocclusion treated with the 2-jaw surgery-first approach[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2017, 151(6): 1048-1057.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.10.034
[46] 王涛. 外科优先序列治疗——正颌外科的发展热点之一及其误区[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(5): 497-505.
Wang T. Surgery first approach: one of the hotspots in orthognathic surgery and common problems[J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(5): 497-505.
[47] Oh MH, Hwang HS, Lee KM, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation on the condylar displacement following sagittal split ramus osteotomy in asymmetric setback patients: comparison between conventional approach and surgery-first approach[J]. Angle Orthod, 2017, 87(5): 733-738.
doi: 10.2319/122316-925.1
[48] He XT, He JY, Yuan H, et al. Surgery-first and orthodontic-first approaches produce similar patterns of condylar displacement and remodeling in patients with skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019, 77(7): 1446-1456.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.01.061
[1] 郭培珠 冯云霞 任娟. 手术优先治疗骨性错牙合畸形的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2016, 43(1): 43-.
[2] 谭俭琴 唐正龙. 手术优先治疗牙颌面畸形的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2016, 43(1): 99-.
[3] 王宏伟 齐素青. 下颌后退术对咽腔及其周围解剖结构影响的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2013, 40(3): 409-411.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王昆润. 修补颌骨缺损的新型生物学相容材料[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 陆加梅. 不可复性关节盘移位患者术前张口度与关节镜术后疗效的相关性[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] 王昆润. 咀嚼口香糖对牙周组织微循环的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] 宋红. 青少年牙周炎外周血分叶核粒细胞的趋化功能[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] 高卫民,李幸红. 发达国家牙医学院口腔种植学教学现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[6] 侯锐. 正畸患者釉白斑损害的纵向激光荧光研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[7] 轩东英. 不同赋形剂对氢氧化钙抗菌效果的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[8] 房兵. 唇腭裂新生儿前颌骨矫正方法及对上颌骨生长发育的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[9] 杨美祥. 前牙厚度在预测上下颌牙量协调性中的作用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[10] 赵艳丽. 手术刀、电凝、CO_2和KTP激光对大鼠舌部创口的作用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .