国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 640-649.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2019105

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

岭南地区广府民系人群下颌第二恒磨牙牙根和根管形态的锥形束CT研究

黎祺1,2,黄少宏1()   

  1. 1. 南方医科大学口腔医院特诊中心 广州 510280
    2. 肇庆医学高等专科学校口腔医学系 肇庆 526020
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-22 修回日期:2019-06-04 出版日期:2019-11-01 发布日期:2019-11-14
  • 通讯作者: 黄少宏
  • 作者简介:黎祺,副教授,硕士,Email: <email>Licy113@163.com</email>
  • 基金资助:
    广东省教育厅自然科学特色创新类项目(2017KTSCX03-6);广东省教育厅高水平大学建设经费南方医科大学临床研究项目(LC2017PY001)

Cone beam computed tomography study on root and root canal morphology of mandibular second permanent molars in Guangfu population in Lingnan area

Li Qi1,2,Huang Shaohong1()   

  1. 1. Special Dental Center, Stomatological Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China
    2. Dept. of Stomatology, Zhaoqing Medical College, Zhaoqing 526020, China
  • Received:2019-03-22 Revised:2019-06-04 Online:2019-11-01 Published:2019-11-14
  • Contact: Shaohong Huang
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by Natural Science Innovation Project of Guangdong Education Department(2017KTSCX03-6);Construction Funds for High Level Universities of Guangdong Provincial Department of Education—Clinical Research Project of Southern Medical University(LC2017PY001)

摘要: 目的 研究岭南地区广府民系人群下颌第二恒磨牙的牙根和根管形态。 方法 收集广府民系患者815份锥形束CT(CBCT)影像学资料共1 279颗下颌第二恒磨牙,观察和统计牙根和根管形态,并与近年的国内外同类研究进行比较和分析。 结果 下颌第二恒磨牙双根型占57.16%、C形根型占32.84%、锥形融合根型占9.77%、三根型占0.23%,其中双根型检出率男性高于女性(P<0.05),C形根型检出率女性高于男性(P<0.05),女性中不同年龄段的双根型和C形根型检出率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);双根型的近中根的根管形态主要为Ⅳ型(2-2)38.58%、Ⅱ型(2-1)28.73%和Ⅰ型(1-1)22.98%,其中Ⅰ型(1-1)根管检出率女性明显高于男性(P<0.01),Ⅳ型(2-2)根管检出率男性明显高于女性(P<0.01),双根型的远中根以Ⅰ型(1-1)根管为主,占81.67%,近中根和远中根各个根管形态检出率的差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);C形根管检出率女性高于男性(P<0.05),各种根管形态检出率在根管不同部位的差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);锥形融合根型的C形根管型62.40%、多根管型20.00%、单根管型17.60%,其中多根管型检出率男性明显高于女性(P<0.01);双侧牙根形态对称68.10%,双侧牙根和根管形态完全对称62.93%。 结论 岭南地区广府民系人群下颌第二恒磨牙牙根及根管形态复杂多样,与国内外其他地区和种族有一定差异性。

关键词: 下颌第二恒磨牙, 牙根, 根管, 锥形束CT, 广府民系

Abstract: Objective To research the root and root canal morphology of mandibular second permanent molars in Guangfu population of Lingnan area.Methods A total of 1 279 mandibular second permanent molars were collected from the 815 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of Guangfu population. The root and root canal morphology were observed and counted. The results are compared and analyzed with similar studies at home and abroad in recent years. Results The double roots type, C-shaped root type, conical fusion root type, and three roots type of mandibular second permanent molar accounted for 57.16%, 32.84%, 9.77% and 0.23%, respectively. The detection rate of double roots type in males was higher than that in females (P<0.05), but that of C-shaped root type was on the contrary. There were significant differences in the detection rate of double roots type among different age groups in women, and so was that of C-shaped root type (P<0.01). The root canal morphology in mesial root of the double roots type was 38.58% in type Ⅳ (2-2), 28.73% in type Ⅱ (2-1) and 22.98% in type Ⅰ (1-1), and the detection rate of type Ⅰ (1-1) root canals in females was significantly higher than that in males (P<0.01), but that of typeⅣ (2-2) root canals was the opposite. Type Ⅰ (1-1) root canals were the main type of distal root, accounting for 81.67%, and the difference among the root canal morphology detection rate of distal and mesial roots had statistical significance (P<0.01). The detection rate of C-shaped root canals in females was higher than that in males (P<0.05), and the detection rates of various root canal morphology in different parts of root canal had statistical significance (P<0.01). Among conical fusion root types, C-shaped root canal type was 62.40%, multiple root canal type was 20.00%, single root canal type was 17.60%, and the detection rate of multiple root canal type in males was significantly higher than that in females (P<0.01). The morphological symmetry of bilateral root was 68.10%, and that of bilateral root and root canal was 62.93%. Conclusion The root and root canal morphology of mandibular second permanent molars in Guangfu population of Lingnan region is complex and diverse, which is different from other regions and races at home and abroad.

Key words: mandibular second permanent molar, tooth root, root canal, cone beam computed tomography, Guangfu population

中图分类号: 

  • R322.4 +1

"

表 1

1 279颗下颌第二恒磨牙的牙根形态"

牙根形态 总计 性别 男性组 女性组
18~35岁 36~55岁 ≥56岁 18~35岁 36~55岁 ≥56岁
双根型 731 365 366 144 120 101 112 110 144
C形根型 420 179 241 80 56 43 101 82 58
锥形融合根型 125 53 72 13 25 15 30 23 19
三根型 3 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 0
合计 1 279 600 679 237 203 160 243 215 221

表 2

双根型下颌第二恒磨牙近中根的根管形态"

根管形态 总计 性别 男性组 女性组
18~35岁 36~55岁 ≥56岁 18~35岁 36~55岁 ≥56岁
Ⅰ型(1-1) 168 66 102 23 25 18 36 32 34
Ⅱ型(2-1) 210 108 102 49 33 26 29 38 35
Ⅲ型(1-2-1) 32 32 16 7 3 6 6 1 9
Ⅳ型(2-2) 282 159 123 59 54 46 35 33 55
Ⅴ型(1-2) 28 9 19 2 2 5 5 3 11
Ⅵ型(2-1-2) 3 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0
Ⅶ型(1-2-1-2) 8 4 4 3 1 0 1 3 0
Ⅷ型(3-3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
合计 731 365 366 144 120 101 112 110 144

表 3

双根型下颌第二恒磨牙的根管形态"

牙根 Ⅰ型(1-1) Ⅱ型(2-1) Ⅲ型(1-2-1) Ⅳ型(2-2) Ⅴ型(1-2) Ⅵ型(2-1-2) Ⅶ型(1-2-1-2) Ⅷ型(3-3) 合计
近中根 168 210 32 282 28 3 8 0 731
远中根 597 17 31 43 43 0 0 0 731

"

表 4

420颗C形根型下颌第二恒磨牙的根管形态"

根管部位 C1型 C2型 C3型 C4型 C5型 合计
根管口 181 165 74 0 0 420
根中部 78 172 159 11 0 420
根尖部 15 68 274 61 2 420
合计 274 405 507 72 2 -

"

表 5

锥形融合根型下颌第二恒磨牙的根管形态"

根管形态 总计 性别 男性组 女性组
18~35岁 36~55岁 ≥56岁 18~35岁 36~55岁 ≥56岁
C形根管型 78 26 52 5 13 8 23 18 11
多根管型 25 18 7 5 8 5 2 2 3
单根管型 22 9 13 3 4 2 5 3 5
合计 125 53 72 13 25 15 30 23 19

表 6

25颗锥形融合根型下颌第二恒磨牙多根管型的根管形态"

根管 Ⅰ型(1-1) Ⅱ型(2-1) Ⅲ型(1-2-1) Ⅳ型(2-2) Ⅴ型(1-2) Ⅵ型(2-1-2) Ⅶ型 (1-2-1-2) Ⅷ型(3-3) 合计
近中方向根管 10 5 1 8 1 0 0 0 25
远中方向根管 19 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 25

图 4

下颌第二恒磨牙牙根和根管形态的对称性 A:双侧牙根和根管形态对称(双根型);B:双侧牙根和根管形态对称(锥形融合根型);C:双侧牙根形态不对称;D:双侧牙根形态对称而根管形态不对称。"

[1] 黄少宏 . 广东省口腔健康30年趋势研究[M]. 广州: 广东科技出版社, 2019: 25-64.
Huang SH. A 30-year trend study on oral health in Guangdong province[M]. Guangzhou: Guangdong Science and Technology Press, 2019: 25-64.
[2] von Zuben M, Martins JNR, Berti L , et al. Worldwide prevalence of mandibular second molar C- shaped morphologies evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography[J]. J Endod, 2017,43(9):1442-1447.
[3] Kashyap RR, Beedubail SP, Kini R , et al. Assessment of the number of root canals in the maxillary and mandibular molars: a radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2017,20(5):288-291.
[4] Patel S, Durack C, Abella F , et al. Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics—a review[J]. Int Endod J, 2015,48(1):3-15.
[5] Hillson S. Tooth development in human evolution and bioarchaeology[M]. London: Cambridge Uni-versity Press, 2014: 1-307.
[6] 广东省统计局, 国家统计局广东调查总队. 广东统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2018: 24-25.
Guangdong Statistical Bureau, Guangdong Investigation Team of the National Bureau of Statistics. Guangdong statistical yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistical Press, 2018: 24-25.
[7] 黄淑娉 . 广东族群与区域文化研究[M]. 广州: 广东高等教育出版社, 1999: 50-75.
Huang SP. Study on ethnic groups and regional culture in Guangdong[M]. Guangzhou: Guangdong Higher Education Press, 1999: 50-75.
[8] 翟丹然 . 专家论证广府文化发祥地[N]. 南方日报, 2012-02-11(9).
Zhai DR . Experts demonstrate the birthplace of Guangfu culture[N]. Nanfang Daily, 2012-02-11(9).
[9] Vertucci FJ . Root canal anatomy of the human per-manent teeth[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1984,58(5):589-599.
[10] Melton DC, Krell KV, Fuller MW . Anatomical and histological features of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars[J]. J Endod, 1991,17(8):384-388.
[11] 吴汝康, 吴新智, 张振标 . 人体测量方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1984: 12-13.
Wu RK, Wu XZ, Zhang ZB. Anthropometric mea-surement[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1984: 12-13.
[12] Pérez-Heredia M, Ferrer-Luque CM, Bravo M , et al. Cone-beam computed tomographic study of root anatomy and canal configuration of molars in a Spanish population[J]. J Endod, 2017,43(9):1511-1516.
[13] Madani ZS, Mehraban N, Moudi E , et al. Root and canal morphology of mandibular molars in a selected Iranian population using cone-beam computed tomo-graphy[J]. Iran Endod J, 2017,12(2):143-148.
[14] Pawar AM, Pawar M, Kfir A , et al. Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molar teeth of an Indian population: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2017,21(9):2801-2809.
[15] Kim SY, Kim BS, Kim Y . Mandibular second molar root canal morphology and variants in a Korean subpopulation[J]. Int Endod J, 2016,49(2):136-144.
[16] 谢霓, 王九龙, 朱友家 . 下颌第二磨牙牙根及根管形态学研究[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2015,31(7):415-417.
Xie N, Wang JL, Zhu YJ . The research on mandibular second molars morphology[J]. J Clin Stomatol, 2015,31(7):415-417.
[17] 程倩, 黄巍, 王昊 . 下颌第二恒磨牙牙根及根管形态的锥形束CT研究[J]. 北京口腔医学, 2017,25(5):284-286.
Cheng Q, Huang W, Wang H . Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of mandibular second permanent molars using cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Beijing J Stomatol, 2017,25(5):284-286.
[18] Martins JNR, Marques D, Mata A , et al. Root and root canal morphology of the permanent dentition in a Caucasian population: a cone-beam computed tomography study[J]. Int Endod J, 2017,50(11):1013-1026.
[19] Torres A, Jacobs R, Lambrechts P , et al. Characterization of mandibular molar root and canal morphology using cone beam computed tomography and its variability in Belgian and Chilean population samples[J]. Imaging Sci Dent, 2015,45(2):95-101.
[20] Pan JYY, Parolia A, Chuah SR , et al. Root canal morphology of permanent teeth in a Malaysian sub-population using cone-beam computed tomogra-phy[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2019,19(1):14.
[21] 张博森, 吴家媛 . 下颌磨牙近中中根管研究进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2018,26(4):258-262.
Zhang BS, Wu JY . Research progress on the middle mesial root canal in the mandibular molar[J]. J Prev Treat Stomatol Dis, 2018,26(4):258-262.
[22] Tahmasbi M, Jalali P, Nair MK , et al. Prevalence of middle mesial canals and isthmi in the mesial root of mandibular molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomographic study[J]. J Endod, 2017,43(7):1080-1083.
[23] 史志芸, 胡楠, 石校伟 , 等. 应用锥形束CT对187例患者下颌第二磨牙根管形态的研究[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2018,39(5):437-440.
Shi ZY, Hu N, Shi XW , et al. Root and canal morphology of mandibular second molars: a cone-beam computed tomography analysis[J]. Acad J Chin PLA Med Sch, 2018,39(5):437-440.
[24] 殷铭, 王俊, 刘青梅 . C形根管系统的研究进展[J]. 全科口腔医学杂志, 2016,3(18):14-18.
Yin M, Wang J, Liu QM . The research situation of C-shaped canal system[J]. General J Stomatol, 2016,3(18):14-18.
[25] Janani M, Rahimi S, Jafari F , et al. Anatomic features of C-shaped mandibular second molars in a selected Iranian population using CBCT[J]. Iran Endod J, 2018,13(1):120-125.
[26] Wadhwani S, Singh MP, Agarwal M , et al. Prevalence of C-shaped canals in mandibular second and third molars in a central India population: a cone beam computed tomography analysis[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2017,20(5):351-354.
[27] Vaz de Azevedo KR, Lopes CB, Andrade RHTLR , et al. C-shaped canals in first and second mandibular molars from Brazilian individuals: a prevalence study using cone-beam computed tomography[J]. PLoS One, 2019,14(2):e0211948.
[28] Alfawaz H, Alqedairi A, Alkhayyal AK , et al. Prevalence of C-shaped canal system in mandibular first and second molars in a Saudi population assessed via cone beam computed tomography: a retrospective study[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2019,23(1):107-112.
[29] 刘佼佼, 王晨, 杨勇 . 辽宁地区汉族人下颌第二恒磨牙牙根和根管数目的锥形束CT研究[J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2013,14(6):337-340.
Liu JJ, Wang C, Yang Y . Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate the number of roots and canals of mandibular second permanent molars in Han people of Liaoning province[J]. J Chin Prosthodont, 2013,14(6):337-340.
[30] 周涛, 赵长铭, 柴治国 , 等. 下颌第二恒磨牙牙根及根管系统的显微CT观察[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2014,24(8):469-472, 480.
Zhou T, Zhao CM, Chai ZG , et al. A micro-CT analysis of the root and root canal systems of permanent mandibular second molars[J]. Chin J Conserv Dent, 2014,24(8):469-472, 480.
[31] Wang Y, Guo J, Yang HB , et al. Incidence of C- shaped root canal systems in mandibular second molars in the native Chinese population by analysis of clinical methods[J]. Int J Oral Sci, 2012,4(3):161-165.
[32] 梁学萍, 张洋洋, 孙玉亮 , 等. 锥体束CT对维吾尔族成人下颌第二磨牙C形根管的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016,32(3):294-296.
Liang XP, Zhang YY, Sun YL , et al. Evaluation of C-shaped root canals in mandibular second molars in Uyghur adults by cone-beam computed tomography[J]. J Oral Sci Res, 2016,32(3):294-296.
[33] 李斌, 王娟, 杨静 , 等. 宁夏回族人群下颌第二磨牙C形根管发生率及形态变化的研究[J]. 宁夏医学杂志, 2018,40(4):314-316.
Li B, Wang J, Yang J , et al. Study the incidence and morphological changes of the mandibular second molars with C-shaped canal among Hui nationality in Ningxia[J]. Ningxia Med J, 2018,40(4):314-316.
[34] Zheng Q, Zhang L, Zhou X , et al. C-shaped root canal system in mandibular second molars in a Chinese population evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Int Endod J, 2011,44(9):857-862.
[35] 邓岚, 朱友家 . 下颌磨牙融合根的根管系统研究[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2015,31(2):71-73.
Deng L, Zhu YJ . Study of pupl canal system about mandibular molars’ fusional roots[J]. J Clin Stomatol, 2015,31(2):71-73.
[36] 陈筑苏, 盘荣剑, 李晓敏 . 应用锥形束CT研究下颌第二磨牙根管数目和构型[J]. 广东牙病防治, 2013,21(10):521-523.
Chen ZS, Pan RJ, Li XM . Cone-beam CT study of the morphology of canals in mandibular second molars[J]. J Dent Prev Treat, 2013,21(10):521-523.
[37] Parashar SR, Kowsky RD, Natanasabapathy V . Mandibular second molar exhibiting a unique “Y-” and “J-” “shaped” root canal anatomy diagnosed using cone-beam computed tomographic scanning: a case report[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2017,20(1):50-53.
[38] 张治勇, 孙洁 . 牙科数字成像系统、锥形束CT及透明牙对离体第一恒磨牙根管系统诊断价值的对比性研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2013,31(5):441-447.
Zhang ZY, Sun J . Comparative study of the diagnostic values of radio visio graphy, cone-beam computed tomography, and transparent teeth in the in vitro diagnosis of the first molar root canal system[J]. West China J Stomatol, 2013,31(5):441-447.
[39] Felsypremila G, Vinothkumar TS, Kandaswamy D . Anatomic symmetry of root and root canal morphology of posterior teeth in Indian subpopulation using cone beam computed tomography: a retrospective study[J]. Eur J Dent, 2015,9(4):500-507.
[40] Kim HS, Jung D, Lee H , et al. C-shaped root canals of mandibular second molars in a Korean population: a CBCT analysis[J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2018,43(4):e42.
[41] 刘武, 邢松, 张银运 . 中国直立人牙齿特征变异及其演化意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2015,34(4):425-441.
Liu W, Xing S, Zhang YY . Dental morphological variation and evolutionary implications of Homo erectus in China[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2015,34(4):425-441.
[1] 黄昕,许晓杰,张荣华,赵媛. 牙髓钙化及其治疗方法的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2024, 51(1): 82-90.
[2] 王京楠,邓淑丽. 牙根发育异常疾病概述[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(6): 639-645.
[3] 赵苑汐,苏勤. 根管再治疗中根管充填物去除辅助技术的应用与发展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(5): 581-586.
[4] 高宇天,苏勤. 酸性氧化电位水在根管治疗中的研究与应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(4): 401-406.
[5] 杨雨楠,刘鹏,王虎,游梦. 上颌窦黏膜增厚的锥形束CT影像分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(3): 302-307.
[6] 汪牡丹,宋东哲,黄定明. 开髓洞型对患牙根管治疗术后抗折性能影响的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(2): 186-194.
[7] 霍帜远,岳林,邹晓英. 声波根管冲洗的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(1): 91-99.
[8] 曾杨林,谭学莲,宋东哲,黄定明. 牙根内吸收临床诊治方法的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(5): 561-568.
[9] 李转转,格根塔娜. 牙髓血运重建术根管冲洗消毒药物的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(5): 569-577.
[10] 颜愈佳,邹玲. 生物陶瓷类根管封闭剂的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(5): 578-585.
[11] 吴文智,冯达兴,陈垂壮,周丽鹃. 海口地区下颌第一恒磨牙近中中央根管发生率及相关因素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(4): 420-425.
[12] 朱嘉妮,苏勤. 难治性根尖周炎根管内及根尖外菌群的研究现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(3): 283-289.
[13] 王璐璇,侯本祥. 根管内氢氧化钙残留对根管治疗的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(3): 367-372.
[14] 叶泽林,刘璐,龙虎,游梦. 弯曲前牙的影像评价及治疗的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(2): 173-181.
[15] 戢晓,景钫淇,李雅,薛晶. 根管预备顺序的数据模拟优化研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(1): 37-47.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张新春. 桩冠修复与无髓牙的保护[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 王昆润. 长期单侧鼻呼吸对头颅发育有不利影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] 彭国光. 颈淋巴清扫术中颈交感神经干的解剖变异[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] 杨凯. 淋巴化疗的药物运载系统及其应用现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] 康非吾. 种植义齿下部结构生物力学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] 柴枫. 可摘局部义齿用Co-Cr合金的激光焊接[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] 孟姝,吴亚菲,杨禾. 伴放线放线杆菌产生的细胞致死膨胀毒素及其与牙周病的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] 费晓露,丁一,徐屹. 牙周可疑致病菌对口腔黏膜上皮的粘附和侵入[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] 赵兴福,黄晓晶. 变形链球菌蛋白组学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] 庞莉苹,姚江武. 抛光和上釉对陶瓷表面粗糙度、挠曲强度及磨损性能的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .