Int J Stomatol ›› 2020, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 297-303.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2020041
• Case Reports • Previous Articles Next Articles
Lu Yuqing,Min Jie,Chen Xin,Liu Chunxu,Dong Bo,Yue Li,Yu Haiyang()
CLC Number:
[1] |
Lee WT, Koak JY, Lim YJ , et al. Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly-ether-ether-ketone dental im-plants[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2012,100(4):1044-1052.
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.32669 pmid: 22331553 |
[2] |
Hallab NJ, McAllister K, Brady M , et al. Macro-phage reactivity to different polymers demonstrates particle size- and material-specific reactivity: PEEK-OPTIMA® particles versus UHMWPE particles in the submicron, micron, and 10 micron size ranges[J]. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater, 2012,100(2):480-492.
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31974 pmid: 22102421 |
[3] |
Webster TJ, Patel AA, Rahaman MN , et al. Anti-infective and osteointegration properties of silicon nitride, poly(ether ether ketone), and titanium im-plants[J]. Acta Biomater, 2012,8(12):4447-4454.
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.07.038 pmid: 22863905 |
[4] |
Zoidis P, Papathanasiou I, Polyzois G . The use of a modified poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) as an alter-native framework material for removable dental pros- theses. A clinical report[J]. J Prosthodont, 2016,25(7):580-584.
doi: 10.1111/jopr.12325 pmid: 26216668 |
[5] |
Hahnel S, Scherl C, Rosentritt M . Interim rehabili-tation of occlusal vertical dimension using a double-crown-retained removable dental prosjournal with polyetheretherketone framework[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018,119(3):315-318.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.02.017 pmid: 28641822 |
[6] |
Tannous F, Steiner M, Shahin R , et al. Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps[J]. Dent Mater, 2012,28(3):273-278.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.016 pmid: 22130464 |
[7] |
Zoidis P, Bakiri E, Polyzois G . Using modified pol-yetheretherketone (PEEK) as an alternative material for endocrown restorations: a short-term clinical report[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017,117(3):335-339.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.009 pmid: 27692583 |
[8] |
Tada Y, Hayakawa T, Nakamura Y . Load-deflection and friction properties of PEEK wires as alternative orthodontic wires[J]. Materials (Basel), 2017,10(8):E914.
doi: 10.3390/ma10080914 pmid: 28792437 |
[9] |
Harb IE, Abdel-Khalek EA, Hegazy SA . CAD/CAM constructed poly(etheretherketone) (PEEK) frame-work of Kennedy ClassⅠremovable partial denture: a clinical report[J]. J Prosthodont, 2019,28(2):e595-e598.
doi: 10.1111/jopr.12968 pmid: 30345575 |
[10] | 李景辉, 宋培智, 陈官辉 , 等. 铸造义齿中网状支架的设计[J]. 上海口腔医学, 1995,4(3):159-161. |
Li JH, Song PZ, Chen GH , et al. Design of mesh support in cast dentures[J]. Shanghai J Stomatol, 1995,4(3):159-161. | |
[11] | 任贤云, 管玉堂, 张伶 . 上前牙覆盖义齿与常规可摘义齿人工牙脱落基托折断的比较[J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2000, 1(3): 151, 176. |
Ren XY, Guan YT, Zhang L . Comparison of broken artificial teeth and base of upper anterior overdenture and conventional removable denture[J]. Chin J Pros-thodont, 2000, 1(3): 151, 176. | |
[12] | 祝海霆, 吴琳 . 可摘局部义齿卡环疲劳的影响因素[J]. 口腔医学, 2012,32(3):184-186. |
Zhu HT, Wu L . Factors affecting fatigue of clasps in removable partial denture[J]. Stomatology, 2012,32(3):184-186. | |
[13] |
Sadek SA . Comparative study clarifying the usage of PEEK as suitable material to be used as partial den-ture attachment and framework[J]. Open Access Maced J Med Sci, 2019,7(7):1193-1197.
doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.287 pmid: 31049106 |
[14] |
Al-Rabab’ah M, Hamadneh W, Alsalem I , et al. Use of high performance polymers as dental implant abutments and frameworks: a case series report[J]. J Prosthodont, 2019,28(4):365-372.
doi: 10.1111/jopr.12639 pmid: 28513977 |
[15] |
Zok FW, Miserez A . Property maps for abrasion resistance of materials[J]. Acta Mater, 2007,55(18):6365-6371.
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.042 |
[16] |
Abdullah AO, Tsitrou EA, Pollington S . Comparative in vitro evaluation of CAD/CAM vs conventional provisional crowns[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2016,24(3):258-263.
doi: 10.1590/1678-775720150451 pmid: 27383707 |
[17] |
Kern M, Lehmann F . Influence of surface condi-tioning on bonding to polyetheretherketon (PEEK)[J]. Dent Mater, 2012,28(12):1280-1283.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.09.010 pmid: 23036863 |
[18] |
Stawarczyk B, Thrun H, Eichberger M , et al. Effect of different surface pretreatments and adhesives on the load-bearing capacity of veneered 3-unit PEEK FDPs[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015,114(5):666-673.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.006 pmid: 26344191 |