Int J Stomatol

Inter J Stomatol ›› 2018, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 9-13.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2018.01.002

• Expert Q & A • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Several problems on monolithic zirconia crowns

Wan Qianbing   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Prosthodontics 1, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2017-03-27 Revised:2017-10-11 Online:2018-01-01 Published:2018-01-01
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by Science &Technology Program of Sichuan Province (2015SZ0078).

RichHTML

24

PDF (PC)

1047

Abstract: Zirconia restorations have been rapidly used in dentistry for the past few years, owing to their biocompatibility and advantageous mechanical properties. The improvement of computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology has enabled the rapid, accurate fabrication of monolithic zirconia crowns. These crowns eliminate the need of the veneering ceramic layer, have superior fracture strength and significantly reduces the occlusal space requirements. It seems reasonable that monolithic zirconia crowns have the potential to be a dominant restorative choice in the posterior tooth region where esthetic concerns are less acute in the future. However, scientific evidence is required to support the application of monolithic zirconia crowns for clinical use. This article reviewed the research progress on mechanical properties, wear behaviors, surface roughness, low temperature degradation, esthetic aspects and short-term clinical researches of monolithic zirconia crowns.

Key words: full-contour monolithic zirconia crown, computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing, fixed prosthesis

CLC Number: 

  • R783.4

TrendMD: 
[1]Raigrodski AJ, Hillstead MB, Meng GK, et al. Sur-vival and complications of zirconia-based fixed den-tal prostheses: a systematic review[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2012, 107(3):170-177.
[2]Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications[J]. J Dent, 2007, 35(11):819- 826.
[3]Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Gueth JF, et al. In vitro performance of full-contour zirconia single crowns [J]. Dent Mater, 2012, 28(4):449-456.
[4]Sun T, Zhou S, Lai R, et al. Load-bearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2014, 35:93-101.
[5]Lan TH, Liu PH, Chou MM, et al. Fracture resis-tance of monolithic zirconia crowns with different occlusal thicknesses in implant prostheses[J]. J Pros-thet Dent, 2016, 115(1):76-83.
[6]de Kok P, Kleverlaan CJ, de Jager N, et al. Mechanical performance of implant-supported posterior crowns [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 114(1):59-66.
[7]Seghi RR, Rosenstiel SF, Bauer P. Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro [J]. J Dent Res, 1991, 70(3):221-225.
[8]Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C. Wear of human ena-mel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014, 112(5):1141-1150.
[9]Kim MJ, Oh SH, Kim JH, et al. Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains[J]. J Dent, 2012, 40 (11):979-988.
[10]Janyavula S, Lawson N, Lawson N, et al. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2013, 109(1):22-29.
[11]Amer R, Kürklü D, Kateeb E, et al. Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing treatments[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014, 112(5):1151-1155.
[12]Alghazzawi TF, Lemons J, Liu PR, et al. Influence of low-temperature environmental exposure on the mechanical properties and structural stability of dental zirconia[J]. J Prosthodont, 2012, 21(5):363- 369.
[13]Nakamura K, Harada A, Kanno T, et al. The influence of low-temperature degradation and cyclic loading on the fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia mo-lar crowns[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2015, 47:49-56.
[14]Harianawala HH, Kheur MG, Apte SK, et al. Com-parative analysis of transmittance for different types of commercially available zirconia and lithium disi-licate materials[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2014, 6(6): 456-461.
[15]Ilie N, Stawarczyk B. Quantification of the amount of blue light passing through monolithic zirconia with respect to thickness and polymerization condi-tions[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 113(2):114-121.
[16]Malkondu O, Tinastepe N, Kazazoglu E. Influence of type of cement on the color and translucency of monolithic zirconia[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 116 (6):902-908.
[17]Kim HK, Kim SH, Lee JB, et al. Effect of polishing and glazing on the color and spectral distribution of monolithic zirconia[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2013, 5 (3):296-304.
[18]Mundhe K, Jain V, Pruthi G, et al. Clinical study to evaluate the wear of natural enamel antagonist to zirconia and metal ceramic crowns[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 114(3):358-363.
[19]Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, et al. Fracture rate of monolithic zirconia restorations up to 5 years: a dental laboratory survey[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 116(3):436-439.
[20]Batson ER, Cooper LF, Duqum I, et al. Clinical out-comes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014, 112(4): 770-777.
[21]Cheng CW, Chien CH, Chen CJ, et al. Complete-mouth implant rehabilitation with modified mono-lithic zirconia implant-supported fixed dental pros-theses and an immediate-loading protocol: a clinical report[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2013, 109(6):347-352.
[22]Altarawneh S, Limmer B, Reside GJ, et al. Dual jaw treatment of edentulism using implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2015, 27(2):63-70.
[23]Rojas-Vizcaya F. Full zirconia fixed detachable im-plant-retained restorations manufactured from mono-lithic zirconia: clinical report after two years in ser-vice[J]. J Prosthodont, 2011, 20(7):570-576.
[24]Sadid-Zadeh R, Liu PR, Aponte-Wesson R, et al. Maxillary cement retained implant supported mono-lithic zirconia prosthesis in a full mouth rehabilita-tion: a clinical report[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2013, 5 (2):209-217.
[25]Limmer B, Sanders AE, Reside G, et al. Complica-tions and patient-centered outcomes with an implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental pros-thesis: 1 year results[J]. J Prosthodont, 2014, 23(4): 267-275.
[26]Moscovitch M. Consecutive case series of monolithic and minimally veneered zirconia restorations on teeth and implants: up to 68 months[J]. Int J Perio-dontics Restorative Dent, 2015, 35(3):315-323.
[27]Thalji GN, Cooper LF. Implant-supported fixed dental rehabilitation with monolithic zirconia: a clinical case report[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2014, 26(2):88-96.
[28]Mehra M, Vahidi F. Complete mouth implant reha-bilitation with a zirconia ceramic system: a clinical report[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014, 112(1):1-4.
[29]Abdulmajeed AA, Lim KG, Närhi TO, et al. Com-plete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 115(6):672-677.
[30]Yoon HI, Han JS. Prosthetic rehabilitation with an implant-supported fixed prosthesis using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing dental technology for a patient with a mandibulec-tomy: a clinical report[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 115 (2):133-136.
[31]Venezia P, Torsello F, Cavalcanti R, et al. Retrospec-tive analysis of 26 complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses with feldspathic por-celain veneering limited to the facial surface[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 114(4):506-512.
[32]Brandt J, Lauer HC, Peter T, et al. Digital process for an implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: A clinical report[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 114(4):469- 473.
[1] Li Ruyi,Luo Feng,Wan Qianbing. Principle and application progress of real-time mandibular motion recording system [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(2): 182-189.
[2] Zeng Fang,Wang Jian. Influencing factors of aesthetic prosthesis performance of monolithic zirconia crowns [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(2): 233-238.
[3] Yang Guangmei,Wang Jian. Mechanical properties of monolithic zirconia crowns and its relationship with clinical application [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(1): 79-84.
[4] Xue Du,Fang Qu,Weicai Liu. Establishment of a three-dimensional virtual dental patient and its application in esthetic restoration [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(6): 695-702.
[5] Zhan Danting, Zhang Fan, Zheng Lige. Application and research progress on virtual articulator [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(2): 228-232.
[6] Li Xuesheng, Li Hongbo. Research progress on adaptation evaluation methods for fixed prosthesis [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(6): 726-730.
[7] Liu Yang, Zhao Hanchi. Rehabilitation of worn dentition complicated by clicking joint [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(1): 11-18.
[8] Chen Chunxiu, Wen Xuejin.. Nursing cooperation for computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing of zirconia ceramic restoration system [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(2): 140-142.
[9] Xu Xiaohua1, Cao Xiaoma2, Li Quanli1.. Development of gingival retraction technology [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2012, 39(4): 540-542.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .