Int J Stomatol

Inter J Stomatol ›› 2012, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 301-304.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5749.2012.03.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical evaluation of combination indirect and direct resin restoration in defective of endodontical treated molars

Liang Yifu.   

  1. Dept. of Stomatology, Dongguan City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dongguan 523000, China
  • Received:2011-02-22 Revised:2012-02-20 Online:2012-05-01 Published:2012-05-01

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

1027

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate clinical effect of combination indirect and direct resin restorations in the defective of endodontical treated molars. Methods A total of 212 endodontical treated molars were selected and randomly divided into two groups. Group A was restored with the indirect resin blocks and dual cure resin filled bonding, group B was restored with the traditional composite fillings. All the restorations were evaluated with United States Public Health Service criterions after 6 months and 18 months treatment. Results After 6 months, the two groups’successful rates of restorations were no significant difference（P＞0.05）. After 18 months, the successful rate of group A and group B were 88.7%（86/97） and 75.0%（72/96） respectively. There was significant difference（ P＜0.05）. Conclusion The indirect restoration was able to avoid adverse factors of resin direct filling, and improve the effect of resin restoration and suited to defects of endodontical treated molars.

Key words: filling, resin, non-pulp tooth, clinical effect


TrendMD: 
[1] Zhao Yuanxi,Su Qin.. Application and development of supplementary techniques in removing the remaining filling materials of root canal retreatment [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(5): 581-586.
[2] Xue Jing, Yang Jing.. Key points of evidence-based practice for the Class Ⅱ cavity composite resin restoration [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(4): 375-387.
[3] Wang Gang,Chen Zhuo.. Reduction of the risk of caries after interproximal enamel reduction [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(4): 395-400.
[4] Dong Xu,Xu Xin.. Research progress on evaluation of root-end filling in vitro [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(6): 670-677.
[5] Wang Qiqiu,Zhi Qinghui.. Research progress on treatments of enamel white spot lesions [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(6): 717-723.
[6] Yan Yujia,Zou Ling.. Reseach progress on bioceramic root canal sealer [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(5): 578-585.
[7] Wang Luming,Cao Xiao,Wu Linyue,Li Yuncong,Lei Bo,Niu Lin. Effect of Zn-doped bioactive glass nanoparticles on the mechanical properties of modified composite resin [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(4): 404-411.
[8] Zhang Jingyi,Li Danwei,Sun Yu,Lei Yayan,Liu Tao,Gong Yu. In vitro cytotoxicity of composite resin and compomer and effect on osteogenic differentiation of osteoblasts [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(4): 412-419.
[9] Liu Yuchen,Tian Min,Niu Lina,Fang Ming. Factors influencing the survival rates of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures and improvement measures [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(5): 585-591.
[10] Meng Xiuping,Hou Jianhua,Li Yiran,Sun Mengyao. Research progress on the selection and design of base materials in deep margin elevation [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(3): 280-286.
[11] Lu Boyao,Yang Dawei,Liu Weiqing,Liang Xing. Influencing factors of the clinical application effect of ultrashort implant [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(3): 329-328.
[12] Xue Jing. Development and clinical application of proximal matrix system [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(6): 621-626.
[13] Wang Shiqi,Chang Yaqin,Chen Bin,Tan Baochun,Ni Yanhong. Comparison of clinical outcomes between using bone graft alone and the combination of bone graft with membrane for periodontal regeneration therapy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(6): 644-651.
[14] Ning Chenxi,Li Xia. Research progress on the effect of root canal sealers on root fracture resistance [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(6): 711-716.
[15] Zhang Jingting,Pan Xudong,Zhang Wenyun. Effect of opaque-shade resin layer thickness on the color of polyetheretherketone-Crea.lign restoration [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(4): 418-423.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .