Int J Stomatol

Int J Stomatol ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 329-328.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2021031

• Reviews • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influencing factors of the clinical application effect of ultrashort implant

Lu Boyao(),Yang Dawei,Liu Weiqing,Liang Xing()   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Prosthodontics Ⅱ, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2020-08-10 Revised:2020-11-13 Online:2021-05-01 Published:2021-05-14
  • Contact: Xing Liang E-mail:jnlby11@163.com;xingliangdent@vip.163.com
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81900967)

RichHTML

30

PDF (PC)

736

Abstract:

During implant restoration, the clinician often faces insufficient residual alveolar bone for implant due to severe resorption, which adversely affects implant implantation. In recent years, more short and ultrashort implants are used in the clinic to solve this problem. However, the length, diameter, surface morphology, and treatment of implants as well as the patient’s bone condition, implant site, and prosthesis design influence the practical application of ultrashort implants. Thus, the clinical effect is not always satisfactory. Studying the factors influencing the clinical effect of ultrashort implants can effectively improve the survival rate, reduce the occurrence of complications, and achieve a more perfect implant treatment. This study reviews the factors related to the clinical application effect of ultrashort implants.

Key words: ultrashort implant, clinical effect, implant design, implant ?restoration

CLC Number: 

  • R783.2

TrendMD: 
[1] Slotte C, Grønningsaeter A, Halmøy AM, et al. Four-millimeter-long posterior-mandible implants: 5-year outcomes of a prospective multicenter study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015,17(Suppl 2):e385-e395.
doi: 10.1111/cid.12252
[2] Mezzomo LA, Miller R, Triches D, et al. Meta-analysis of single crowns supported by short (10 mm) implants in the posterior region[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2014,41(2):191-213.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12180
[3] Thoma DS, Zeltner M, Hüsler J, et al. EAO Supplement Working Group 4-EAO CC 2015 Short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015,26(Suppl 11):154-169.
[4] Jung RE, Al-Nawas B, Araujo M, et al. Group 1 ITI consensus report: the influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient-reported outcomes[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018,29(Suppl 16):69-77.
[5] Srinivasan M, Vazquez L, Rieder P, et al. Efficacy and predictability of short dental implants (<8 mm): a critical appraisal of the recent literature[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2012,27(6):1429-1437
pmid: 23189293
[6] Nisand D, Renouard F. Short implant in limited bone volume[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2014,66(1):72-96.
doi: 10.1111/prd.2014.66.issue-1
[7] Lombardo G, Marincola M, Signoriello A, et al. Single-crown, short and ultra-short implants, in association with simultaneous internal sinus lift in the atrophic posterior maxilla: a three-year retrospective study[J]. Materials(Basel), 2020,13(9):E2208.
[8] Malchiodi L, Caricasulo R, Cucchi A, et al. Evaluation of ultrashort and longer implants with microrough surfaces: results of a 24- to 36-month prospective study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2017,32(1):171-179.
doi: 10.11607/jomi.4648 pmid: 28095521
[9] Papaspyridakos P, De Souza A, Vazouras K, et al. Survival rates of short dental implants (≤6 mm) compared with implants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: a Meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018,29(Suppl 16):8-20.
[10] Xu XX, Hu B, Xu Y, et al. Short versus standard implants for single-crown restorations in the posterior region: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020,124(5):530-538.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.030
[11] Vazouras K, de Souza AB, Gholami H, et al. Effect of time in function on the predictability of short dental implants (≤6 mm): a Meta-analysis[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2020,47(3):403-415.
doi: 10.1111/joor.v47.3
[12] Rameh S, Menhall A, Younes R. Key factors influencing short implant success[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020,24(3):263-275.
doi: 10.1007/s10006-020-00841-y
[13] Ravidà A, Wang IC, Barootchi S, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing clinical and patient-reported outcomes between extra-short (≤6 mm) and longer (≥10 mm) implants[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2019,46(1):118-142.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.2019.46.issue-1
[14] Neldam CA, Pinholt EM. State of the art of short dental implants: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2012,14(4):622-632.
doi: 10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-4
[15] Lombardo G, Pighi J, Marincola M, et al. Cumulative success rate of short and ultrashort implants supporting single crowns in the posterior maxilla: a 3-year retrospective study[J]. Int J Dent, 2017,2017:8434281.
doi: 10.1155/2017/8434281 pmid: 28751913
[16] Araki H, Nakano T, Ono S, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of extra short implants focusing on implant designs and materials[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2020,6(1):5.
doi: 10.1186/s40729-019-0202-6
[17] Markose J, Eshwar S, Srinivas S, et al. Clinical outcomes of ultrashort sloping shoulder implant design: a survival analysis[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018,20(4):646-652.
doi: 10.1111/cid.12608 pmid: 29671933
[18] Mijiritsky E, Mazor Z, Lorean A, et al. Implant diameter and length influence on survival: interim results during the first 2 years of function of implants by a single manufacturer[J]. Implant Dent, 2013,22(4):394-398.
doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31829afac0 pmid: 23811719
[19] Hasanoglu Erbasar GN, Hocaoğlu TP, Erbasar RC. Risk factors associated with short dental implant success: a long-term retrospective evaluation of patients followed up for up to 9 years[J]. Braz Oral Res, 2019,33:e030.
doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0030
[20] Calvo-Guirado JL, Morales-Meléndez H, Pérez-Albacete Martínez C, et al. Evaluation of the surrounding ring of two different extra-short implant designs in crestal bone maintanence: a histologic study in dogs[J]. Materials(Basel), 2018,11(9):E1630.
[21] Lopez Torres JA, Gehrke SA, Calvo Guirado JL, et al. Evaluation of four designs of short implants placed in atrophic areas with reduced bone height: a three-year, retrospective, clinical and radiographic study[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017,55(7):703-708.
doi: S0266-4356(17)30183-3 pmid: 28629832
[22] Guljé FL, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, et al. Single crown restorations supported by 6-mm implants in the resorbed posterior mandible: a five-year prospective case series[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019,21(5):1017-1022.
doi: 10.1111/cid.v21.5
[23] Jain N, Gulati M, Garg M, et al. Short implants: new horizon in implant dentistry[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2016,10(9):ZE14-ZE17.
[24] Amine M, Guelzim Y, Benfaida S, et al. Short implants (5-8 mm) vs. long implants in augmented bone and their impact on peri-implant bone in maxilla and/or mandible: systematic review[J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019,120(2):133-142.
doi: S2468-7855(18)30259-3 pmid: 30472460
[25] Piccinini M, Cugnoni J, Botsis J, et al. Numerical prediction of peri-implant bone adaptation: comparison of mechanical stimuli and sensitivity to modeling parameters[J]. Med Eng Phys, 2016,38(11):1348-1359.
doi: S1350-4533(16)30185-0 pmid: 27641659
[26] Malchiodi L, Giacomazzi E, Cucchi A, et al. Relationship between crestal bone levels and crown-to-implant ratio of ultra-short implants with a microrough surface: a prospective study with 48 months of follow-up[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2019,45(1):18-28.
doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00204 pmid: 30040018
[27] Meijer HJA, Boven C, Delli K, et al. Is there an effect of crown-to-implant ratio on implant treatment outcomes? A systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018,29(Suppl 18):243-252.
[28] Malchiodi L, Ricciardi G, Salandini A, et al. Influence of crown-implant ratio on implant success rate of ultra-short dental implants: results of a 8- to 10-year retrospective study[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2020,24(9):3213-3222.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03195-7 pmid: 32681422
[29] Malchiodi L, Cucchi A, Ghensi P, et al. Influence of crown-implant ratio on implant success rates and crestal bone levels: a 36-month follow-up prospective study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2014,25(2):240-251.
doi: 10.1111/clr.12105 pmid: 23402530
[30] Garaicoa-Pazmiño C, Suárez-López del Amo F, Monje A, et al. Influence of crown/implant ratio on marginal bone loss: a systematic review[J]. J Periodontol, 2014,85(9):1214-1221.
doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.130615
[31] Rokni S, Todescan R, Watson P, et al. An assessment of crown-to-root ratios with short sintered porous-surfaced implants supporting prostheses in partially edentulous patients[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2005,20(1):69-76.
doi: 10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80708-8
[32] Elias DM, Valerio CS, de Oliveira DD, et al. Evaluation of different heights of prosthetic crowns supported by an ultra-short implant using three-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2020,33(1):81-90.
doi: 10.11607/ijp.6247
[33] Toniollo MB, Macedo AP, Pupim D, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis surface stress distribution on regular and short morse taper implants generated by splinted and nonsplinted prostheses in the rehabilitation of various bony ridges[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2016,27(3):e276-e280.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002520
[34] Ravidà A, Barootchi S, Askar H, et al. Long-term effectiveness of extra-short (≤ 6 mm) dental implants: a systematic review[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2019,34(1):68-84.
[35] Meimandi M, Talebi Ardakani MR, Amid R, et al. Comparison of stress and strain distribution around splinted and nonsplinted 6-mm short implants in posterior mandible: a finite element analysis study[J]. Implant Dent, 2018,27(1):74-80.
doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000709 pmid: 29334509
[36] Tang YM, Yu HJ, Wang J, et al. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic designs on the clinical conditions of short implants in posterior regions: a 4-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2020,22(1):119-127.
doi: 10.1111/cid.2020.v22.1
[37] Hingsammer L, Watzek G, Pommer B. The influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone levels around splinted short dental implants: a radiological and clincial short term analysis[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2017,19(6):1090-1098.
doi: 10.1111/cid.12546 pmid: 29024303
[38] Pommer B, Frantal S, Willer J, et al. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a Meta-analysis of observational studies[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2011,38(9):856-863.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.2011.38.issue-9
[39] Simons WF, De Smit M, Duyck J, et al. The proportion of cancellous bone as predictive factor for early marginal bone loss around implants in the posterior part of the mandible[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015,26(9):1051-1059.
doi: 10.1111/clr.2015.26.issue-9
[40] Villarinho EA, Triches DF, Alonso FR, et al. Risk factors for single crowns supported by short (6-mm) implants in the posterior region: a prospective clinical and radiographic study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2017,19(4):671-680.
doi: 10.1111/cid.12494 pmid: 28493384
[41] Lemos CA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, et al. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Dent, 2016,47:8-17.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.005
[1] Wang Shiqi,Chang Yaqin,Chen Bin,Tan Baochun,Ni Yanhong. Comparison of clinical outcomes between using bone graft alone and the combination of bone graft with membrane for periodontal regeneration therapy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(6): 644-651.
[2] Liu Lin,Zhou Jieyu,Wu Yafei,Zhao Lei. Application of probiotic ecological regulation in prevention and treatment of periodontal diseases [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(2): 131-137.
[3] Zheng Yanliang1, Zhang Zuoji2, Chen Jie3. Self-efficacy intervention in orthodontic treatments [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(2): 161-164.
[4] Zhao Qian, Liu Yan. Comparative study on the clinical effects of two types of nonmetallic post core in defected upper anterior teeth restoration [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2016, 43(4): 383-386.
[5] Wu Xingchen， Shu Chenbin.. The efficiency and application of pit and fissure sealant technique in clinical pediatric dentistry [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(4): 467-470.
[6] Liang Yifu.. Clinical evaluation of combination indirect and direct resin restoration in defective of endodontical treated molars [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2012, 39(3): 301-304.
[7] WANG Pei-zhi, XU Xiao-hui, XIA Lu, HU Jian.. Application of IPS e.max Press laminate veneers in cosmetic prosthodontics of anterior teeth [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2010, 37(6): 641-643.
[8] LUO Ying, DING Yi, WANG Meng, YANG Heng, ZHU Zhu. A study on the effects of Xipayiguyinye on oral bacteria and gingivitis in vitro [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2009, 36(4): 394-397.
[9] GUO Yu-feng1, MEI Yu-xin2. Three-year clinical application of light cure Beautifil flowable polymeric restor [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2009, 36(1): 27-27～29.
[10] GUO Xue -song, TIAN Yu. Application and understanding of the effectiveness of Huaxi unilateral cleft lip [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2009, 36(1): 4-4～5.
[11] NIU Chun- ming, CUI Shao- xia.. Experience of one-appointment root-canal therapy for the crown fracture of anterior teeth caused by injury [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2007, 34(05): 320-321.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .