受唾液污染玻璃陶瓷修复体不同清洁方式的研究进展

doi:10.7518/gjkq.2025069

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

玻璃陶瓷具有美观、耐磨、耐腐蚀以及良好的生物相容性等优点，在临床中常被用做贴面、嵌体或全冠修复等。玻璃陶瓷修复体的长远修复效果往往受多种因素的影响，如修复体承受咬合力过大，修复体和基牙不密合，或在粘接过程中受到各种污染等，都可能会对修复体的使用寿命产生较大影响。如今许多学者研究玻璃陶瓷修复体受唾液污染后的不同清洁处理方式，结果发现这些方法对恢复粘接强度有不同效果，对临床应用具有指导意义，本文对此进行综述。

关键词: 玻璃陶瓷, 唾液污染, 清洁方式, 粘接

Abstract:

With their advantages such as aesthetics, wear resistance, corrosion resistance, and excellent biocompatibility, glass-ceramics are often used in clinical settings for veneers, inlays, or full-coverage crowns. The long-term restora-tive effectiveness of glass-ceramic prostheses is often influenced by various factors, including excessive occlusal forces, poor sealing between the restoration and abutment tooth, and various contaminants encountered during bonding. These factors can significantly affect the lifespan of the prosthesis. Many scholars investigated different cleaning methods for glass-ceramic prostheses contaminated with saliva and discovered their varying effects on restoring bonding strength. This article presents a comprehensive review of these findings, which have guiding significance for clinical applications.

Key words: glass ceramics, saliva contamination, cleaning method, bonding

中图分类号:

R783.1

杨永杰,昭日格图. 受唾液污染玻璃陶瓷修复体不同清洁方式的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2025, 52(4): 443-448.

Yongjie Yang,Rigetu Zhao. Different cleaning methods for glass ceramic restorations contaminated by saliva and its progress[J]. Int J Stomatol, 2025, 52(4): 443-448.

图/表 1

参考文献 35

1	孟虹良, 杨路, 吴欣祎, 等. 不同表面处理对二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷粗糙度及形态学的影响[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 39(7): 1052-1056.
	Meng HL, Yang L, Wu XY, et al. Effects of different surface treatments on morphology and surface roughness of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic[J]. J Nanjing Med Univ Nat Sci, 2019, 39(7): 1052-1056.
2	Del Bianco F, Mazzitelli C, Maravic T, et al. Bond strength to lithium-disilicate ceramic after different surface cleaning approaches[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2024, 26: 11-18.
3	Marfenko S, Özcan M, Attin T, et al. Treatment of surface contamination of lithium disilicate ceramic before adhesive luting[J]. Am J Dent, 2020, 33(1): 33-38.
4	Aboush YE. Removing saliva contamination from porcelain veneers before bonding[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1998, 80(6): 649-653.
5	Klosa K, Wolfart S, Lehmann F, et al. The effect of storage conditions, contamination modes and clea-ning procedures on the resin bond strength to lithium disilicate ceramic[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2009, 11(2): 127-135.
6	Aladağ A, Elter B, Çömlekoğlu E, et al. Effect of different cleaning regimens on the adhesion of resin to saliva-contaminated ceramics[J]. J Prosthodont, 2015, 24(2): 136-145.
7	Borges ALS, Posritong S, Özcan M, et al. Can cleansing regimens effectively eliminate saliva contamination from lithium disilicate ceramic surface[J]. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2017, 25(1): 9-14.
8	Chen AM, Ekambaram M, Li KC, et al. A scoping review of the influence of clinical contaminants on bond strength in direct adhesive restorative procedures[J]. J Dent, 2024, 145: 104985.
9	Nikolaus F, Wolkewitz M, Hahn P. Bond strength of composite resin to glass ceramic after saliva conta-mination[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2013, 17(3): 751-755.
10	Siqueira WL, Custodio W, McDonald EE. New insights into the composition and functions of the acquired enamel pellicle[J]. J Dent Res, 2012, 91(12): 1110-1118.
11	丁典, 王景云. 玻璃陶瓷粘接面预处理的研究进展[J]. 口腔材料器械杂志, 2022, 31(2): 122-124, 134.
	Ding D, Wang JY. Research progress of enhanced glass ceramic surface treatment[J]. Chin J Dent Mater Dev, 2022, 31(2): 122-124, 134.
12	Yoshida F, Tsujimoto A, Ishii R, et al. Influence of surface treatment of contaminated lithium disilicate and leucite glass ceramics on surface free energy and bond strength of universal adhesives[J]. Dent Mater J, 2015, 34(6): 855-862.
13	Lapinska B, Rogowski J, Nowak J, et al. Effect of surface cleaning regimen on glass ceramic bond strength[J]. Molecules, 2019, 24(3): 389.
14	高川珺. 氢氟酸浓度和酸蚀时间对IPS e.max CAD粘接性能的影响[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2018.
	Gao CJ. Effect of hydrofluoric acid concentration and etching times on the adhesive property of IPS e.max CAD[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2018.
15	Ozcan M, Allahbeickaraghi A, Dündar M. Possible hazardous effects of hydrofluoric acid and recommendations for treatment approach: a review[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2012, 16(1): 15-23.
16	陈静, 陈文川. 瓷表面处理用氢氟酸替代物四丁基双氟氢氟化铵研究进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2021, 29(9): 629-633.
	Chen J, Chen WC. Research progress on tetrabuty-lammonium dihydrogen trifluoride as a substitute for hydrofluoric acid used for porcelain surface treatment[J]. J Prev Treat Stomatol Dis, 2021, 29(9): 629-633.
17	刘婵. 酸蚀-偶联一体化底漆对国产牙科玻璃陶瓷-树脂粘接强度影响的实验研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2022.
	Liu C. Effects of the application modes of self-et-ching silane primer on the bonding strength between domestic dental glass ceramics and resin cement[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2022.
18	Cardenas AFM, Quintero-Calderon AS, Siqueira FSF, et al. Do different application modes improve the bonding performance of self-etching ceramic primer to lithium disilicate and feldspathic ceramics[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2019, 21(4): 319-327.
19	Siqueira FS, Alessi RS, Cardenas AF, et al. New single-bottle ceramic primer: 6-month case report and laboratory performance[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2016, 17(12): 1033-1039.
20	郑云. 酸蚀预处理剂的不同涂布时间及老化对CAD/CAM陶瓷粘接强度的影响[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2022.
	Zheng Y. The effect of different coating time of self-etching ceramic primer and aging on the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM ceramic materia[D]. Chang-chun: Jilin University, 2022.
21	Yoshida K. Influence of cleaning methods on resin bonding to saliva-contaminated zirconia[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2018, 30(3): 259-264.
22	Komagata Y, Ikeda H, Fujio Y, et al. Effect of phosphoric acid and sodium hydroxide on cleaning and bonding of saliva-contaminated feldspar porcelain[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2023, 67(1): 132-137.
23	Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Disinfection and sterilization in health care facilities: an overview and current issues[J]. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 2016, 30(3): 609-637.
24	Demir N, Genc O, Akkese IB, et al. Bonding effectiveness of saliva-contaminated monolithic zirconia ceramics using different decontamination protocols[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2024, 2024: 6670159.
25	Yoshida K. Influence of cleaning methods on the bond strength of resin cement to saliva-contamina-ted lithium disilicate ceramic[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2020, 24(6): 2091-2097.
26	Cinel Sahin S, Celik E. The effect of different clea-ning agents and resin cement materials on the bond strength of contaminated zirconia[J]. Microsc Res Tech, 2022, 85(3): 840-847.
27	Marchioro RR, Pini N, Kelmer VF, et al. Influence of fit-checking material and cleaning protocols on the bond strength of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics[J]. Oper Dent, 2022, 47(6): E264-E272.
28	Fagan J, Vesselovcz J, Puppin-Rontani J, et al. Eva-luation of cleaning methods on lithium disilicate glass ceramic surfaces after organic contamination[J]. Oper Dent, 2022, 47(2): E81-E90.
29	Rk R, Hegde D, Mc J, et al. A study to evaluate the effect of cleaning solutions on shear bond strength of resin cement to saliva-contaminated lithium disilicate (LDS) ceramic[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(8): e44389.
30	Spencer HR, Ike V, Brennan PA. Review: the use of sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: potential complications and their management[J]. Br Dent J, 2007, 202(9): 555-559.
31	Del Carpio-Perochena AE, Bramante CM, Duarte MAH, et al. Biofilm dissolution and cleaning ability of different irrigant solutions on intraorally infected dentin[J]. J Endod, 2011, 37(8): 1134-1138.
32	张司晨, 张琛. 清洁方法对唾液污染氧化锆陶瓷粘接强度的影响[J]. 北京口腔医学, 2021, 29(5): 287-290.
	Zhang SC, Zhang C. Effect of cleaning methods on the bonding strength of saliva-contaminated zirconia ceramics[J]. Beijing J Stomatol, 2021, 29(5): 287-290.
33	Tabari K, Hosseinpour S, Mohammad-Rahimi H. The impact of plasma treatment of cercon® zirconia ceramics on adhesion to resin composite cements and surface properties[J]. J Lasers Med Sci, 2017, 8(): S56-S61.
34	焦纪兰, 叶心仪, 邓璐, 等. 不同清洁方法对高透氧化锆粘接强度和表面润湿性的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(1): 36-39.
	Jiao JL, Ye XY, Deng L, et al. Effect of different cleaning methods on bond strength and surface wettability of high translucency zirconia[J]. Shanghai J Stomatol, 2024, 33(1): 36-39.
35	Wu XQ, Liu K, Luo R, et al. Atmospheric plasma treatment: an alternative of HF etching in lithium disilicate glass-ceramic cementation[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2023, 11: 1259707.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	姚雪敏,王华,王璐,赵彬. 口腔半透明氧化锆陶瓷粘接效果的影响因素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2024, 51(4): 450-455.
[2]	吴礼安. 部分断冠粘接术在儿童恒前牙复杂冠根折中的初步应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(6): 623-631.
[3]	薛晶, 杨静. 基于循证实践的Ⅱ类洞复合树脂修复的操作要点[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(4): 375-387.
[4]	丁景瑜,田子璐,王惠敏,朱轩言,杨宇斌,朱松. 即刻牙本质封闭的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(1): 121-124.
[5]	王剑. 浅谈嵌体和高嵌体修复的临床应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(5): 497-505.
[6]	刘昱晨,田敏,牛丽娜,方明. 粘接固定桥存留率的影响因素及提高对策[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(5): 585-591.
[7]	黎敏,华成舸,蒋丽. 提高氧化锆陶瓷粘接性能新技术的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(4): 485-490.
[8]	钮晔,曾芸婷,曾悦翔,张泽宇,肖立伟. 数字化技术在直丝弓托槽间接粘接中的应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(4): 491-496.
[9]	沈冬妮,施莹,傅柏平. 后牙牙合贴面修复的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(3): 287-291.
[10]	刘敏,张宽收,刘青梅. 激光蚀刻牙体组织在直接粘接技术中的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(3): 292-296.
[11]	刘恩言,李明云. 茶多酚类化合物在牙本质粘接中应用的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(6): 732-738.
[12]	韩雨亭,吴燕茹. 应用龈壁提升术修复牙体缺损的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2019, 46(3): 349-355.
[13]	秦娇娇,焦珊,王成坤. Er:YAG和Nd:YAG激光对牙本质与瓷修复体粘接面粘接强度影响的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2019, 46(3): 361-366.
[14]	侯晔坡,高杰. Er:YAG激光照射对牙科陶瓷材料粘接影响的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2019, 46(1): 68-72.
[15]	谭欣,于海洋. 模拟髓腔压力在牙本质粘接强度研究中的应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(6): 723-727.