国际口腔医学杂志

国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 284-287.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2017.03.007

• 牙体牙髓专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

镍钛再治疗器械去除根管充填材料的研究进展

孙晓阳, 李霞   

  1. 山西医科大学口腔医学系口腔内科教研室 太原 030001
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-12 修回日期:2017-01-29 出版日期:2017-05-01 发布日期:2017-05-01
  • 通讯作者: 李霞,副教授,硕士,Email：lixia6881@163.com
  • 作者简介:孙晓阳,硕士,Email：1060665890@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    山西省科技攻关项目（20150313010-3）

Research status of NiTi retreatment instrumentations for the removal of filling material in the root canal

Sun Xiao-yang, Li Xia.   

  1. Dept. of Stomatology, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
  • Received:2016-07-12 Revised:2017-01-29 Online:2017-05-01 Published:2017-05-01
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the Science and Technology Research Project of Shanxi(20150313010-3).

RichHTML

15

PDF (PC)

1055

摘要： 根管再治疗的首要任务即去除根管充填材料,扩通根管。镍钛再治疗器械在此过程中有极大的优势,但也同样存在一些问题。本文将针对镍钛再治疗器械去除根管充填物时存在的问题的研究现状作一综述。

关键词: 根管再治疗, 镍钛器械, 充填材料

Abstract: The primary purpose of root canal retreatment is for the removal of filling materials from and cleaning of root canals. NiTi retreatment instrumentations are useful for this procedure, but they also have some limitations. This paper will focus on the status of research focusing on these problems.

Key words: root canal retreatment, NiTi rotary instrumentation, filling material

中图分类号: 

  • R781.05
[1] 田慧颖, 冯超, 赵晶, 等. 应用显微超声技术进行根管再治疗的临床评价[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2008, 26(5):509-512.
Tian HY, Feng C, Zhao J, et al. Evaluation of dental operating microscope and ultrasonic technique in root canal retreatment[J]. West Chin J Stomatol, 2008, 26(5):509-512.
[2] 吴洪斌, 吴迪, 孙德刚. 两种镍钛根管再治疗器械与System B携热器联合应用去除根管内充填物效果评价[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2015, 8(7):423- 426.
Wu HB, Wu D, Sun DG. Effectiveness of two nic-kel-titanium instruments for root canal retreat-ment in removing filling material in root canals with or without System B heat carrier tips in vitro [J]. Chin J Pract Stomatol, 2015, 8(7):423-426.
[3] Vidal FT, Nunes E, Horta MC, et al. Evaluation of three different rotary systems during endodontic retreatment—Analysis by scanning electron micros-copy[J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2016, 8(2):e125-e129.
[4] 李凤霞, 谭红, 叶玲. 不同器械去除根管充填材料的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2010, 37(4): 457-459.
Li FX, Tan H, Ye L. Research using different in-struments to remove filling material in the root canal [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2010, 37(4):457-459.
[5] 方溢云, 林正梅, 陈巨峰. 2种镍钛再治疗器械清理根管内充填材料效果比较[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2012, 28(1):85-89.
Fang YY, Lin ZM, Chen JF. The effectiveness of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the re-treatment of root canal[J]. J Pract Stomatol, 2012, 28 (1):85-89.
[6] 童方丽, 范兵, 杨俊. 3种器械去除椭圆形根管内充填物的效果研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2009, 25(1):55- 57.
Tong FL, Fan B, Yang J. Retreatment efficiency of three instruments in oval-shaped root canals[J]. J Oral Sci Res, 2009, 25(1):55-57.
[7] Jayasenthil A, Sathish ES, Prakash P. Evaluation of manual and two-rotary NiTi retreatment systems in removing gutta-percha obturated with two root canal sealers[J]. ISRN Dent, 2012, 2012:208241.
[8] Rödig T, Reicherts P, Konietschke F, et al. Efficacy of reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments for retreatment of curved root canals assessed by micro-CT[J]. Int Endod J, 2014, 47(10):942-948.
[9] Taşdemir T, Er K, Yildirim T, et al. Efficacy of three rotary NiTi instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canals[J]. Int Endod J, 2008, 41(3):191- 196.
[10] Saad AY, Al-Hadlaq SM, Al-Katheeri NH. Efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments in the removal of Gutta-Percha during root canal retreatment[J]. J Endod, 2007, 33(1):38-41.
[11] 庄沛林, 郑美华, 韦佩伶, 等. 两种根管再治疗镍钛器械去除椭圆形弯曲根管内充填物的效果评价[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2012, 28(3):373-377.
Zhuang PL, Zheng MH, Wei PL, et al. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium instruments for root canal retreatment in removing filling material in curved oval root canals[J]. J Pract Stomatol, 2012, 28(3): 373-377.
[12] 刘莹, 李纾, 陈亮. 不同根管再治疗器械与氯仿联合使用去除根管充填材料效果的比较研究[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2013, 23(7):454-458.
Liu Y, Li S, Chen L. Evaluation of the effectiveness of different retreatment instruments for gutta-percha removal with or without chloroform in vitro [J]. Chin J Conserv Dent, 2013, 23(7):454-458.
[13] Topçuoğlu HS, Aktı A, Tuncay Ö, et al. Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment ins-truments and hand files[J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(12): 2066-2069.
[14] Kustarci A, Altunbas D, Akpinar KE. Comparative study of apically extruded debris using one manual and two rotary instrumentation techniques for endo-dontic retreatment[J]. J Dent Sci, 2012, 7(1):1-6.
[15] Huang X, Ling J, Wei X, et al. Quantitative evalua-tion of debris extruded apically by using ProTaper universal tulsa rotary system in endodontic retreat-ment[J]. J Endod, 2007, 33(9):1102-1105.
[16] Madani ZS, Simdar N, Moudi E, et al. CBCT Eva-luation of the root canal filling removal using D- RaCe, ProTaper retreatment Kit and hand files in curved canals[J]. Iran Endod J, 2015, 10(1):69-74.
[17] Rödig T, Kupis J, Konietschke F, et al. Comparison of hand and rotary instrumentation for removing gutta-percha from previously treated curved root canals: a microcomputed tomography study[J]. Int Endod J, 2014, 47(2):173-182.
[18] Royzenblat A, Goodell GG. Comparison of removal times of Thermafil plastic obturators using ProFile rotary instruments at different rotational speeds in moderately curved canals[J]. J Endod, 2007, 33(3): 256-258.
[19] 谭青松, 陶小玲, 彭彬. 镍钛再治疗器械去根管充填材料后的器械损伤评价[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2014, 24(6):346-349.
Tan QS, Tao XL, Peng B. Evaluation of retreatment instrument damage after removal of root filling materials[J]. Chin J Conserv Dent, 2014, 24(6):346- 349.
[20] 吴亚娟, 曹雪娇, 花荣, 等. 不同镍钛器械预备根管后根尖偏移的CBCT比较研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2015, 35(5):338-340.
Wu YJ, Cao XJ, Hua R, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of the apical transportation after mechanical preparation with different rotary nickel-titanium systems[J]. Stomatology, 2015, 35 (5):338-340.
[21] Aydin B, Köse T, Calişkan MK. Effectiveness of HERO 642 versus Hedström files for removing gutta-percha fillings in curved root canals: an ex vivo study[J]. Int Endod J, 2009, 42(11):1050-1056.
[22] Rödig T, Hausdörfer T, Konietschke F, et al. Efficacy of D-RaCe and ProTaper universal retreatment NiTi instruments and hand files in removing gutta-percha from curved root canals—a micro-computed tomography study[J]. Int Endod J, 2012, 45(6):580- 589.
[1] 赵苑汐,苏勤. 根管再治疗中根管充填物去除辅助技术的应用与发展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(5): 581-586.
[2] 邢桂琪,郭林溪,苏勤. 根管治疗后疾病的综合评估和治疗决策[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(5): 579-584.
[3] 李宗莉, 彭彬. HyFlex、S3、K3XF以及ProTaper在树脂模拟根管中成形能力的比较研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(3): 256-260.
[4] 蔡静静 葛久禹. 不同介质对镍钛器械疲劳抗性的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2015, 42(6): 739-743.
[5] 赵朋朋 秦宗长. 根管治疗与根管壁微裂[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2014, 41(4): 478-482.
[6] 刘昭慧 凌均棨. 三维自调节根管预备锉[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2014, 41(3): 320-323.
[7] 颜雯 李伟. 常用根管充填材料的细胞毒性和基因毒性[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2013, 40(5): 608-611.
[8] 刘思茗综述 胡涛审校. 新型镍钛器械Twisted Files的应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2013, 40(2): 185-187.
[9] 段艳艳综述 苏勤审校. 根管预备中镍钛器械的应力分布及牙根的抗力性改变[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2013, 40(2): 199-201.
[10] 王霄. 根尖手术的临床进展和意义[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(3): 281-285.
[11] 许利利综述 黄定明审校. 根管再治疗中去除牙胶后根管内残留物量的 体外评价方法[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2011, 38(4): 449-451.
[12] 李凤霞 谭红 叶玲. 201例患者根管再治疗的临床分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2011, 38(2): 134-137.
[13] 李凤霞综述 谭红，叶玲审校. 不同器械去除根管充填材料的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2010, 37(4): 457-459.
[14] 张健综述 葛久禹, 孙卫斌审校. Mtwo 镍钛器械的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2009, 36(5): 607-609.
[15] 陈晓春综述 陈新梅审校. 镍钛合金根管器械分离制造学因素的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2009, 36(3): 358-360.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张新春. 桩冠修复与无髓牙的保护[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 王昆润. 长期单侧鼻呼吸对头颅发育有不利影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] 彭国光. 颈淋巴清扫术中颈交感神经干的解剖变异[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] 杨凯. 淋巴化疗的药物运载系统及其应用现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] 康非吾. 种植义齿下部结构生物力学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] 柴枫. 可摘局部义齿用Co-Cr合金的激光焊接[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] 孟姝,吴亚菲,杨禾. 伴放线放线杆菌产生的细胞致死膨胀毒素及其与牙周病的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] 费晓露,丁一,徐屹. 牙周可疑致病菌对口腔黏膜上皮的粘附和侵入[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] 赵兴福,黄晓晶. 变形链球菌蛋白组学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] 庞莉苹,姚江武. 抛光和上釉对陶瓷表面粗糙度、挠曲强度及磨损性能的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .