国际口腔医学杂志

国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 182-188.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2020050

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

300例不同年龄段有牙颌人群上唇软组织侧貌的锥形束CT三维测量分析

章婷婷,胡常红,彭燕,周文翘,张慧聪,刘蝶()   

  1. 重庆医科大学附属口腔医院全口义齿诊疗室 口腔疾病与生物医学重庆市重点实验室重庆市高校市级口腔生物医学工程重点实验室 重庆 401147
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-15 修回日期:2019-10-22 出版日期:2020-03-01 发布日期:2020-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 刘蝶
  • 作者简介:章婷婷,硕士,Email： 2017110876@stu.cqmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    重庆医科大学附属口腔医院重点科研培育项目(PYZD2016-03);2016年重庆市高校创新团队建设计划资助项目(CXTDG201602006)

Analysis of upper lip profile features in 300 dentate subjects of different ages via three-dimensional measurement of cone beam computed tomography

Zhang Tingting,Hu Changhong,Peng Yan,Zhou Wenqiao,Zhang Huicong,Liu Die()   

  1. Complete Denture Clinic, Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Higher Education, Chongqing 401147, China
  • Received:2019-06-15 Revised:2019-10-22 Online:2020-03-01 Published:2020-03-12
  • Contact: Die Liu
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by The Key Research Cultivating Project of Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University(PYZD2016-03);Program for Innovation Team Building at Institutions of Higher Education in Chongqing in 2016(CXTDG201602006)

RichHTML

19

PDF (PC)

1038

摘要：

目的 通过锥形束CT（CBCT）进行三维测量,分析不同年龄段有牙颌人群上唇软组织侧貌特征,为无牙颌患者的全口义齿修复提供面部美学的客观参考依据。方法 选择300例有牙颌人群的CBCT影像资料进行研究,按照患者年龄分为青年组（20~39岁）、中年组（40~59岁）、老年组（60岁及以上）,对上唇长度、厚度等相关指标进行测量,对上唇皮肤段侧面轮廓进行形态学分析。结果 上唇长度、厚度测量指标结果显示,随着年龄增加,上唇长度逐渐变大,唇红暴露量及唇红厚度逐渐减少,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。青年组、中年组和老年组上唇下缘到上中切牙切点的距离分别为（1.962 2±1.107 1）、（0.835 3±1.206 6）、（0.014 1±1.225 6）mm,上唇红部厚度分别为（12.355 8±1.950 3）、（10.634 2±1.782 4）、（9.924 9±1.951 4）mm。归纳上唇侧面轮廓表现为4种形态：凹形、直形、波浪形、凸形,不同年龄段人群的侧面轮廓表现特点有明显差异,青年组凹形比例（68%）最大,中年组凹形和直形比例（80%）最大,而老年组波浪形与凸形比例（67%）最大。结论 为老年无牙颌患者进行全口义齿修复时,应充分考虑与其衰老相关的上唇侧貌特征,人工牙排列应注意上唇下缘到中切牙切缘的距离与患者年龄相符合,上唇丰满度的恢复也应考虑与同年龄有牙颌侧貌轮廓形态表现相符合。

关键词: 老年, 上唇, 侧貌, 锥形束CT, 无牙颌, 美学修复

Abstract:

Objective To measure and analyze upper lip profile features in dentate subjects among different age groups using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to provide an objective reference for facial esthetics in complete denture restoration. Methods A total of 300 CBCT images were selected and divided into one of the following three groups accor-ding to age: youth group (20-39 years), middle-aged group (40-59 years), and elderly group (more than 60 years). The length and thickness of the upper lip of each image were measured, and a morphological analysis of the upper lip profile was performed. Results The upper lip lengthened with aging. Moreover, the exposure of lip vermilion and the thickness of lip vermilion gradually decreased. The distance from the edge of the upper incisor to the edge the upper lip in three groups equated to (1.962 2±1.107 1), (0.835 3±1.206 6), and (0.014 1±1.225 6) mm. Moreover, the thicknesses of the lip vermilion were (12.355 8±1.950 3), (10.634 2±1.782 4), and (9.924 9±1.951 4) mm. According to the morphological analysis of the upper lip profile, the upper lip profile was presented in the following four shapes: concave, straight, wavy, and convex. Furthermore, differences were noted between groups; that is, the young group showed the largest proportion of concave upper lip profiles (68%), the middle-aged group showed the largest proportion of concave and straight upper lip profiles (80%), and the elderly group showed the largest proportion of wavy and convex upper lip profiles (67%). Conclusion Results indicated that the upper lip changes related to aging should be fully considered when complete denture restoration is performed for edentulous patients. When arranging the artificial anterior teeth, we should pay attention to the distance from the edge of the upper incisor to the edge of the upper lip while considering patients’ ages. When plumping up the upper lip using a complete denture, we should try to make the effect consistent with that observed among dentate people of the same age.

Key words: the elderly, upper lip, profile, cone beam computed tomography, edentulous, esthetic restoration

中图分类号: 

  • R783.4

表 1

3组患者的基本资料"

组别 例数 年龄/岁 平均年龄/岁 男性 女性
青年 100 20~39 30.04±4.97 49 51
中年 100 40~59 49.04±5.16 48 52
老年 100 ≥60 72.04±5.58 50 50

图 1

测量参考标志点及参考线 1：Sn;2：Ls;3：Sm;4：Sto;5：ANS;6：A;7：UP;8：Hm;9：US;10：UI;11：Sn-Ls。"

表 2

上唇长度、厚度的线距测量项目"

测量项目 定义 测量方法
UI-US* 上唇下缘到上中切牙切点的距离 US到UI连线长度
Sn-Sto 上唇总长度 Sn到Sto连线长度
Sn-Ls 上唇皮肤长度 Sn到Ls连线长度
Ls-Sto 上唇红长度 Ls到Sto连线长度
ANS-UI 前鼻棘点到上中切牙切点的距离 ANS到UI连线长度
Sn-A 上唇基部厚度 Sn到A连线长度
Sm-Hm 上唇中部厚度 Sm到Hm连线长度
Ls-UP 上唇红部厚度 Ls到UP连线长度

表 3

上唇长度、厚度各测量项目间的比值"

测量项目 定义
Ls-Sto/Sn-Ls 上唇红长度与上唇皮肤长度的比值
Ls-Sto/Sn-Sto 上唇红长度与上唇总长度的比值
Ls-Sto/ANS-UI 上唇红长度与前鼻棘点到上中切牙切点距离的比值
Sn-Ls/ANS-UI 上唇皮肤长度与前鼻棘点到上中切牙切点距离的比值
Sn-Sto/ANS-UI 上唇总长度与前鼻棘点到上中切牙切点距离的比值
Ls-UP/Sn-A 上唇红部厚度与上唇基部厚度的比值
Sm-Hm/Sn-A 上唇中部厚度与上唇基部厚度的比值

图 2

上唇皮肤段侧面轮廓形态 A：凹形;B：直形;C：波浪形;D：凸形。"

表 4

3组上唇及上唇红长度各指标的测量结果"

测量项目 青年组 中年组 老年组
UI-US/mm 1.962 2±1.107 1 0.835 3±1.206 6 0.014 1±1.225 6
Sn-Ls/ANS-UI 0.478 3±0.063 3 0.528 7±0.066 4 0.558 1±0.062 7
Sn-Sto/ANS-UI 0.749 1±0.068 6 0.773 6±0.062 5 0.772 9±0.060 1
Ls-Sto/Sn-Ls 0.755 4±0.164 7 0.615 5±0.140 8 0.483 0±0.115 5
Ls-Sto/Sn-Sto 0.473 7±0.068 6 0.413 1±0.060 1 0.343 2±0.059 0
Ls-Sto/ANS-UI 0.354 3±0.056 6 0.319 0±0.049 9 0.264 7±0.046 6

表 5

3组上唇厚度各指标的测量结果"

测量项目 青年组 中年组 老年组
Ls-UP/mm 12.355 8±1.950 3 10.634 2±1.782 4 9.924 9±1.951 4
Ls-UP/Sn-A 0.962 8±0.132 8 0.891 2±0.135 4 0.840 5±0.145 0
Sm-Hm/Sn-A 0.898 2±0.081 4 0.883 2±0.092 5 0.873 6±0.092 4

表 6

3组患者上唇皮肤段侧面轮廓形态分型的比例"

组别 凹形 直形 波浪形 凸形 合计
青年 68 28 4 0 100
中年 49 31 11 9 100
老年 12 21 33 34 100

表 7

老年组各年龄段上唇皮肤段侧面轮廓形态分型的比例"

年龄/岁 凹形 直形 波浪形 凸形 合计
60~69 21.2 36.4 30.3 12.1 100
70~79 11.8 17.6 44.1 26.4 100
80~89 3.0 9.1 24.2 63.6 100
[1] Ellis JS, Thomason JM, McAndrew R . A pilot study examining the effects of enhanced aesthetics on oral health related quality of life and patient’s satisfaction with complete dentures[J]. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2010,18(3):116-122.
[2] McCunniff M, Liu W, Dawson D , et al. Patients’ es- thetic expectations and satisfaction with complete dentures[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017,118(2):159-165.
[3] Marachlioglou CR, Dos Santos JF, Cunha VP , et al. Expectations and final evaluation of complete den-tures by patients, dentist and dental technician[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2010,37(7):518-524.
[4] Waliszewski M . Restoring dentate appearance: a literature review for modern complete denture es-thetics[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2005,93(4):386-394.
[5] Krajicek DD . Guides for natural facial appearance as related to complete denture construction[J]. J Pros-thet Dent, 1969,21(6):654-662.
[6] Patras M, Kourtis S, Sykaras N . Creating natural-looking removable prostheses: combining art and science to imitate nature[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2012,24(3):160-168.
[7] Dai N, Yu XL, Sun YC . Gingival morphology-controlled design of the complete denture baseplate[J]. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng, 2018,34(2). doi: 10.1002/cnm.2911.
[8] Barão VA, Ogawa ES, Moreno A , et al. Long-term clinical evaluation of the color stability and stainabi-lity of acrylic resin denture teeth[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015,113(6):628-635.
[9] Kamashita Y, Kamada Y, Kawahata N , et al. Influence of lip support on the soft-tissue profile of complete denture wearers[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2006,33(2):102-109.
[10] Gu Y, McNamara JA, Sigler LM , et al. Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2011,33(2):205-211.
[11] Shindoi JM, Matsumoto Y, Sato Y , et al. Soft tissue cephalometric norms for orthognathic and cosmetic surgery[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2013,71(1):e24-e30.
[12] Hwang HS, Kim WS, KMcNamaraim JA . Ethnic diffe-rences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and Euro-pean-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces[J]. Angle Orthod, 2002,72(1):72-80.
[13] Penna V, Stark GB, Eisenhardt SU , et al. The aging lip: a comparative histological analysis of age-related changes in the upper lip complex[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2009,124(2):624-628.
[14] Iblher N, Kloepper J, Penna V , et al. Changes in the aging upper lip: a photomorphometric and MRI-based study (on a quest to find the right rejuvenation ap-proach)[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2008,61(10):1170-1176.
[15] Fujimura T, Haketa K, Hotta M , et al. Loss of skin elasticity precedes to rapid increase of wrinkle levels[J]. J Dermatol Sci, 2007,47(3):233-239.
[16] Drummond S, Capelli J Jr . Incisor display during speech and smile: age and gender correlations[J]. Angle Orthod, 2016,86(4):631-637.
[17] Formby WA, Nanda RS, Currier GF . Longitudinal changes in the adult facial profile[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1994,105(5):464-476.
[18] Vig RG, Brundo GC . The kinetics of anterior tooth display[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1978,39(5):502-504.
[19] Wulf HC, Sandby-Møller J, Kobayasi T , et al. Skin aging and natural photoprotection[J]. Micron, 2004,35(3):185-191.
[20] Penna V, Stark GB, Voigt M , et al. Classification of the aging lips: a foundation for an integrated appr-oach to perioral rejuvenation[J]. Aesth Plast Surg, 2015,39(1):1-7.
[21] Wohlert AB . Reflex responses of lip muscles in young and older women[J]. J Speech Hear Res, 1996,39(3):578-589.
[22] Shaw RB Jr, Katzel EB, Koltz PF , et al. Facial bone density: effects of aging and impact on facial re-juvenation[J]. Aesthet Surg J, 2012,32(8):937-942.
[23] Shaw RB Jr, Katzel EB, Koltz PF , et al. Aging of the facial skeleton: aesthetic implications and rejuvena-tion strategies[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2011,127(1):374-383.
[1] 汤春波. 无牙颌患者种植治疗修复空间与修复方式的选择策略[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2024, 51(1): 1-9.
[2] 杨雨楠,刘鹏,王虎,游梦. 上颌窦黏膜增厚的锥形束CT影像分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(3): 302-307.
[3] 吴文智,冯达兴,陈垂壮,周丽鹃. 海口地区下颌第一恒磨牙近中中央根管发生率及相关因素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(4): 420-425.
[4] 雒琪玥,柳叶语,罗依麟,满毅. 以正中关系为中心、面部美学及修复为导向的数字化无牙颌种植修复1例[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(4): 426-431.
[5] 叶泽林,刘璐,龙虎,游梦. 弯曲前牙的影像评价及治疗的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(2): 173-181.
[6] 曾芳,王剑. 全锆冠美学修复效果的影响因素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(2): 233-238.
[7] 田浩楠,林敏,谢丛蔓,任嫒姝. 上颌腭侧阻生尖牙与寰椎后桥相关性的锥形束CT研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(5): 536-540.
[8] 施丹妮,杨鑫,吴建勇. 锥形束CT三维头影测量参考坐标系的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(4): 398-404.
[9] 丁张帆,郭陟永,苗诚,李春洁,宣鸣,王晓毅,张壮. 基于锥形束CT的三维可视化技术在颌骨囊性病变手术中的应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(2): 180-186.
[10] 王奔,许喆桢,韦曦. 数字化微创技术在牙髓根尖周病学中的应用与进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(1): 110-118.
[11] 唐蓓,赵文俊,王虎,郑广宁,游梦. 根管超填导致下牙槽神经损伤2例[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(3): 293-296.
[12] 王剑,张鑫. 种植盾构术修复前牙外伤1例[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(1): 10-16.
[13] 王春林,刘从华,宋思吟,周丽淑,林丽佳. 运用锥形束CT诊断上下颌横向发育不调的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(1): 121-124.
[14] 黎祺, 黄少宏. 岭南地区广府民系人群下颌第二恒磨牙牙根和根管形态的锥形束CT研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2019, 46(6): 640-649.
[15] 曹焜,李家锋,孙玉华,鲍强,卢秋宁,唐巍. 下颌下窝的锥形束CT影像分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2019, 46(2): 209-212.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张新春. 桩冠修复与无髓牙的保护[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 王昆润. 长期单侧鼻呼吸对头颅发育有不利影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] 彭国光. 颈淋巴清扫术中颈交感神经干的解剖变异[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] 杨凯. 淋巴化疗的药物运载系统及其应用现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] 康非吾. 种植义齿下部结构生物力学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] 柴枫. 可摘局部义齿用Co-Cr合金的激光焊接[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] 孟姝,吴亚菲,杨禾. 伴放线放线杆菌产生的细胞致死膨胀毒素及其与牙周病的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] 费晓露,丁一,徐屹. 牙周可疑致病菌对口腔黏膜上皮的粘附和侵入[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] 赵兴福,黄晓晶. 变形链球菌蛋白组学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] 庞莉苹,姚江武. 抛光和上釉对陶瓷表面粗糙度、挠曲强度及磨损性能的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .