国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 142-148.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2019011

• 系统评价 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同翻瓣设计对下颌第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛的影响:系统评价与Meta分析

潘韦霖,曹钰彬,刘畅,刘济远,李春洁,潘剑,华成舸()   

  1. 口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心 四川大学华西口腔医院口腔颌面外科 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-17 修回日期:2018-12-03 出版日期:2019-03-01 发布日期:2019-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 华成舸
  • 作者简介:潘韦霖,硕士,Email: panvelin@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    四川省重点研发项目(2018SZ0181)

Flap design associated pain after the extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

Weilin Pan,Yubin Cao,Chang Liu,Jiyuan Liu,Chunjie Li,Jian Pan,Chengge Hua()   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2018-09-17 Revised:2018-12-03 Online:2019-03-01 Published:2019-03-15
  • Contact: Chengge Hua
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by Key Research Project of Sichuan Province(2018SZ0181)

摘要:

目的 评价不同翻瓣设计对下颌第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛的影响。方法 对9个常用数据库进行电子检索,检索时间截至2018年6月29日;并对纳入研究参考文献进行手检。研究质量由2位评价者独立使用Cochrane协作网推荐的标准进行评价并提取数据。应用Review Manager 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果 共纳入17项RCT研究,纳入受试者合计1 033人,纳入牙数合计1 421颗。17项研究中,1项高偏倚风险,其他16项偏倚风险不确定。封套瓣的术后疼痛轻于标准三角瓣,差异有统计学意义;封套瓣与Szmyd瓣之间差异无统计学意义。结论 Szmyd瓣或封套瓣术后疼痛较标准三角瓣轻,考虑到封套瓣操作的便利性,实际应用中可能优于其他翻瓣设计。

关键词: 第三磨牙, 拔牙, Meta分析, 疼痛, 翻瓣术

Abstract:

Objective This review aimed to assess the effects of flap design on pain after the extraction of mandibular third molars. Methods Nine databases were searched electronically on 29 June 2018. A manual search of reference lists of included studies was conducted. Two reviewers performed quality assessment independently with tools suggested by Cochrane’s handbook, and then, they extracted data. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Results Seventeen studies with 1 033 participants and 1 421 teeth were included. Among these studies, one was at high risk of bias, whereas the risk in the other 16 was unclear. The postoperative pain of envelope flap was milder than that of standard triangular flap, and the difference was statistically significant. No significant difference was found in postoperative pain between envelope flap and Szmyd flap. Conclusion Envelope flap and Szmyd flap can be more effective in reducing the postoperative pain of patients than standard triangular flap.

Key words: third molar, tooth extraction, Meta-analysis, pain, surgical flaps

中图分类号: 

  • R782.1

表 1

纳入研究特征表"

研究 方法 纳入人数(牙数) 评估人数(牙数) 干预措施 结局指标VAS
研究类型 地区
Abandansari和Foroughi[6] 口内自身对照RCT 伊朗 20(40) 20(40) 标准封套瓣;标准三角瓣 第2天VAS,没有标准差*
Baqain等[11] 口内自身对照RCT 约旦 20(40) 19(38) 标准封套瓣;Szmyd瓣 第2天VAS
Erdogan等[12] 口内自身对照RCT 土耳其 20(40) 20(40) 标准封套瓣;标准三角瓣 第3天VAS
Goldsmith等[9] 口内自身对照RCT 新西兰 57(114) 42(84) 蒂状瓣;标准封套瓣 第1~4天平均VAS*
何锦泉等[13] 平行对照RCT 中国 400(400) 372(372) 线形瓣;Szmyd瓣 第3天VAS
Kim等[14] 口内自身对照RCT 韩国 30(60) 27(54) Kruger封套瓣;无翻瓣设计 第2天VAS
Kirk等[15] 口内自身对照RCT 新西兰 35(70) 32(64) 标准封套瓣;Szmyd瓣 第2天VAS
Korkmaz等[16] 口内自身对照RCT 土耳其 28(56) 28(56) 标准封套瓣;标准三角瓣 第2天VAS
Koyuncu等[17] 平行对照RCT 土耳其 80(80) 80(80) 标准封套瓣;Szmyd瓣 第2天VAS
Koyuncu等[18] 口内自身对照RCT 土耳其 40(80) 36(72) 刺刀形瓣;Szmyd瓣 第2天VAS
Mobilio等[10] 平行对照RCT 意大利 25(25) 25(25) 标准封套瓣;标准三角瓣 最大VAS*
Nageshwar[7] 平行对照RCT 印度 100(100) 100(100) 逗号形瓣;标准封套瓣 第3天VAS,没有标准差*
乔峰和朱东望[19] 口内自身对照RCT 中国 60(120) 52(104) 标准封套瓣;Szmyd瓣 第2天VAS
Roode和Bütow[8] 口内自身对照RCT 南非 36(72) 33(66) 线形瓣;Szmyd瓣 第2天VAS,没有标准差*
Sandhu等[5] 口内自身对照RCT 印度 20(40) 20(40) 刺刀形瓣;标准封套瓣 VAS的等级资料*
Tareen等[20] 平行对照RCT 巴基斯坦 40(40) 40(40) Kruger封套瓣;标准三角瓣 第2天VAS
Yolcu和Acar[21] 口内自身对照RCT 土耳其 22(44) 22(44) 舌向瓣;Szmyd瓣 第2天VAS

表 2

偏倚风险总结表"

研究 随机方法 分配隐藏 实施盲法 测量盲法 数据完整 报道偏倚 其他偏倚 整体评价
Abandansari和Foroughi[6] 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1
Baqain等[11] 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1
Erdogan等[12] 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 1
Goldsmith等[9] 1 1 1 1 0 2 2 0
何锦泉等[13] 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1
Kim等[14] 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1
Kirk等[15] 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1
Korkmaz等[16] 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1
Koyuncu等[17] 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1
Koyuncu等[18] 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1
Mobilio等[10] 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1
Nageshwar[7] 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1
乔峰和朱东望[19] 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1
Roode和Bütow[8] 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1
Sandhu等[5] 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1
Tareen等[20] 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1
Yolcu和Acar[21] 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1

图 1

封套瓣与其他翻瓣设计的比较===*高位智齿,暴露较多,手术难度较低。"

图 2

Szmyd瓣与非封套瓣设计的比较"

图 3

翻瓣示意图===A:标准三角瓣;B:Szmyd瓣;C:逗号形瓣;D:刺刀形瓣;E:标准封套瓣;F:Kruger封套瓣。"

[1] Rafetto LK, Synan W . Surgical management of third molars[J]. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 2012,20(2):197-223.
doi: 10.1016/j.cxom.2012.07.002 pmid: 23021396
[2] Karaca I, Simşek S, Uğar D , et al. Review of flap design influence on the health of the periodontium after mandibular third molar surgery[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2007,104(1):18-23.
doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.049 pmid: 17448707
[3] Coulthard P, Bailey E, Esposito M , et al. Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014( 7): CD004345.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004345.pub2 pmid: 25069437
[4] Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for sys-tematic reviews of interventions[EB/OL]. , 2011-03-01.
[5] Sandhu A, Sandhu S, Kaur T . Comparison of two different flap designs in the surgical removal of bila-teral impacted mandibular third molars[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010,39(11):1091-1096.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.07.003 pmid: 20727713
[6] Abandansari AS, Foroughi R . The effect of releasing incision on the postoperative complications of man-dibular third molar surgery[J]. Int J Adv Biotechnol Res, 2016,7(S3):1144-1151.
[7] Nageshwar . Comma incision for impacted mandibu-lar third molars[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2002,60(12):1506-1509.
doi: 10.1053/joms.2002.36152 pmid: 12465020
[8] Roode GJ, Bütow K . An alternative surgical flap design for impacted third molars: a comparison of two different surgical techniques[J]. SADJ, 2010, 65(6): 246, 248-251.
pmid: 20879647
[9] Goldsmith SM, De Silva RK, Tong DC , et al. Influe-nce of a pedicle flap design on acute postoperative sequelae after lower third molar removal[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012,41(3):371-375.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.08.006 pmid: 22033341
[10] Mobilio N, Vecchiatini R, Vasquez M , et al. Effect of flap design and duration of surgery on acute post-operative symptoms and signs after extraction of lower third molars: a randomized prospective study[J]. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects, 2017,11(3):156-160.
doi: 10.15171/joddd.2017.028 pmid: 5666214
[11] Baqain ZH, Al-Shafii A, Hamdan AA , et al. Flap design and mandibular third molar surgery: a split mouth randomized clinical study[J]. Int J Oral Maxi-llofac Surg, 2012,41(8):1020-1024.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.02.011 pmid: 22424708
[12] Erdogan O, Tatlı U, Ustün Y , et al. Influence of two different flap designs on the sequelae of mandibular third molar surgery[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011,15(3):147-152.
doi: 10.1007/s10006-011-0268-7 pmid: 21484217
[13] 何锦泉, 欧阳可雄, 张清彬 , 等. 2种切开翻瓣法拔除下颌智牙的临床效果分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015,24(2):224-227.
He JQ, Ouyang KX, Zhang QB , et al. Comparison of two different flap designs in removal of impacted wisdom tooth[J]. Shanghai J Stomatol, 2015,24(2):224-227.
[14] Kim HR, Choi BH, Engelke W , et al. A comparative study on the extractions of partially impacted mandi-bular third molars with or without a buccal flap: a prospective study[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011,69(4):966-970.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.025 pmid: 20678841
[15] Kirk DG, Liston PN, Tong DC , et al. Influence of two different flap designs on incidence of pain, swelling, trismus, and alveolar osteitis in the week following third molar surgery[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2007,104(1):e1-e6.
doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(07)00420-9
[16] Korkmaz YT, Mollaoglu N, Ozmeriç N . Does late-rally rotated flap design influence the short-term periodontal status of second molars and postopera-tive discomfort after partially impacted third molar surgery[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015,73(6):1031-1041.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.01.005 pmid: 25872465
[17] Koyuncu Bö, Cetingül E . Short-term clinical out-comes of two different flap techniques in impacted mandibular third molar surgery[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2013,116(3):e179-e184.
doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.12.023 pmid: 22921446
[18] Koyuncu Bö, ZeytİnoĞlu M, ÇetİngÜl E . Compa-rison of 2 different flap techniques in the surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars[J]. Turk J Med Sci, 2013,43(6):891-898.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.07.003 pmid: 20727713
[19] 乔峰, 朱东望 . 封套瓣与三角瓣对下颌第三磨牙拔除术后并发症的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2015,43(1):78-81.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9896.2015.01.02
Qiao F, Zhu DW . The influence of the envelope flap and triangular flap designs on postoperative com-plications after mandibular third molar removal[J]. Tianjin Med J, 2015,43(1):78-81.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9896.2015.01.02
[20] Tareen MK, Hamad J, Saleem SM , et al. To compare the triangular flap to envelop flap for the removal of impacted mandibular last molar[J]. Pakistan J Med Health Sci, 2015,9(1):434-436.
[21] Yolcu Ü, Acar AH . Comparison of a new flap design with the routinely used triangular flap design in third molar surgery[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015,44(11):1390-1397.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.07.007 pmid: 26254819
[22] Briguglio F, Zenobio EG, Isola G , et al. Complica-tions in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars in relation to flap design: clinical and statistical evaluations[J]. Quintessence Int, 2011,42(6):445-453.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318213a0a2 pmid: 21519580
[23] Laskin DM . Indications and contraindications for removal of impacted third molars[J]. Dent Clin North Am, 1969,13(4):919-928.
doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(69)90262-3 pmid: 5258215
[24] Saravana KB, Sarumathi T, Veerabahu M , et al. To compare standard incision and comma shaped inci-sion and its influence on post-operative complications in surgical removal of impacted third molars[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2013,7(7):1514-1518.
doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6200.3135 pmid: 23998110
[25] Szmyd L . Impacted teeth[J]. Dent Clin North Am, 1971,15(2):299-318.
[26] Rai A, Rai M . Lingual based four cornered flap for third molar surgery[J]. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2017,16(2):258-259.
doi: 10.1007/s12663-016-0909-3
[27] 华成舸 . 微创拔牙的刚体力学分析[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017,35(2):119-123.
doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2017.02.002
Hua CG . Geostatics in minimally invasive surgical exodontias[J]. West Chin J Stomatol, 2017,35(2):119-123.
doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2017.02.002
[1] 韩冲,何东宁,余飞燕,吴东潮. 口腔种植术后疼痛机制及治疗的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2024, 51(1): 99-106.
[2] 柴安,雷荣昌,蒋智升,曲彬彬,郭锦材,李鹤,邵奇. 评估下颌第三磨牙拔除难度分类方法的概述[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(6): 718-722.
[3] 廖洪林,方仲瀚,张艳艳,刘飞,沈颉飞. 牙种植术后三叉神经创伤性神经病理性疼痛的诊断与防治[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(6): 729-738.
[4] 龚佳明,赵瑞敏,潘宏伟,郎鑫,余占海,李健学. 动态导航与静态导航对种植体准确性的Meta分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(5): 538-551.
[5] 王仁义,赵呈智,潘剑. 拔牙围手术期预防性使用抗生素对术后并发症影响的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(5): 558-565.
[6] 刘云通,刘畅,高丽钞,罗瑜雪,曹钰彬,华成舸. 术后下牙槽神经功能障碍的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(4): 479-484.
[7] 李转转,格根塔娜. 牙髓血运重建术和根尖诱导成形术疗效对比的Meta分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(2): 177-185.
[8] 任海霞,刘颍凤,梁慧敏,李家勇,温春琴,王春梅. 虚拟现实技术在儿童深龋治疗中对牙科畏惧的干预效果研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(5): 529-536.
[9] 龚佳明,赵瑞敏,李婉昕,苏琳涵,余占海,李健学. 根盾技术对即刻种植临床效果的影响:基于随机对照研究的Meta分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(5): 537-547.
[10] 张珊,葛晓磊,李杰,谢新宇,常维维,马文盛. 上颌前方牵引矫治对颌骨生长发育长期影响的Meta分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(5): 548-555.
[11] 尹茂运,张祎,胡敏. 正畸拔牙矫治对上气道影响的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(5): 607-613.
[12] 庞瑜,刘显,王了. 数字化导板在埋伏多生牙拔除中的应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(4): 448-452.
[13] 马玉,左玉,张鑫. 光动力疗法辅助治疗牙周炎治疗效果的Meta分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(3): 305-316.
[14] 刘程程, 丁一. 妊娠期常见口腔感染性疾病的临床诊疗和管理策略[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(6): 621-628.
[15] 周万航,李嫣斐,许日聪,万启军. 牙周非手术治疗对慢性肾脏病危险因素及全身炎症水平影响的Meta分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(5): 528-535.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王昆润. 二甲亚砜和双氯芬酸并用治疗根尖周炎[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 汤庆奋,王学侠. 17β-雌二醇对人类阴道和口腔颊粘膜的渗透性[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] 潘劲松. 颈总动脉指压和颈内动脉球囊阻断试验在大脑血液动力学中的不同影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] 王昆润. 后牙冠根斜形牙折的治疗[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] 杨锦波. 嵌合体防龋疫苗的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] 王昆润. 下颔骨成形术用网状钛板固定植骨块[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] 汪月月,郭莉莉. 口腔机能与老化—痴呆危险因素流行病学研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[8] 丁刚. 应用硬组织代用品种植体行丰颏术[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[9] 田磊. 局部应用脂多糖后结合上皮反应性增生的变化[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[10] 戴青. 口腔念珠菌病的新分类[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .