Inter J Stomatol ›› 2012, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 20-24.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5749.2012.01.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on clinical application of self -drilled microscrew implant anchorage to patients with maxillary protrusion

Luo Xiaoan1, Zheng Xiaodan2.   

  1. 1. Dept. of Orthodontics, Xiamen Dentistry Hospital, Xiamen 361003, China; 2. Dept. of Stomatology, Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen 361008, China
  • Received:2011-06-23 Revised:2011-11-29 Online:2012-01-01 Published:2012-01-01

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the treatment results of patients with maxillary protrusion by using self-drilled microscrew implant as strong anchorage. Methods The study comprised 50 patients with maxillary protrusion. All patients were treated with maxillary first premolar extraction by using self-drilled microscrew implant anchorage. Self-drilled microscrew implants were inserted into the bilateral buccal alveolar bone between maxillary second premolar and first molar. 0.98 N force each side was added to the microscrews and retracted anterior teeth until the extraction spaces were closed entirely. The cephalometric films before and after treatment were measured and compared. Results 1)All microscrew implants remained steady throughout the orthodontic treatment. 2)The extraction spaces were closed entirely and the dentition arch protrusions improved greatly. The edges of maxillary incisors were retracted by 7.57 mm at average. The angle between the axis of incisor and SN decreased 13.40° at average. The angle between the axis of incisor and NA decreased 12.82° at average. The back angle between the axis of upper incisor and lower incisor increased 20.56° at average. The anterior overjet decreased 7.94 mm at average. The linear distance between the conflict point of upper lip and aesthetic plane decreased 5.52 mm at average. The differences of upper incisors before and after treatment were statistically significant. Upper first molars moved mesially by 0.01 mm and vertically by 0.09 mm at average. There were no significant changes in anteroposterior and vertical directions for upper first molars. 3)All patients’facial profile were improved greatly. They all set up correct overbite and overjet and good molar relationship. Conclusion Self -drilled microscrew implants were stable,comfortable and efficient and could provide good anchorage control in the maxillary protrusion treatment with no loss of molar anchorage. The maxillary anterior teeth were retracted together effectively by using self-drilled microscrews as strong anchorage and the maxillary protrusions were corrected effectively.

Key words: self -drilled microscrew implant an - chorage, maxillary protrusion, orthodontics


TrendMD: 
[1] Song Wenpeng,Gong Beiwen,Li Dan,Zeng Jianyu,Qiu Lingling. Research progress on the application of mechanotherapy in orthodontic treatment [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(5): 603-612.
[2] Jiang Qingsong,Lai Wenli,Wang Yan.. Research progress on bone augmentation technique in orthodontics [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(2): 243-250.
[3] Zhao Zhihe.. Difficulty assessment of invisible orthodontic treatment based on treatment plan and tooth movement pattern [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(4): 373-379.
[4] Guo Ziyuan,Chang Xiao,Han Kaifang,Zhang Xizhong. Low-level laser therapy for acceleration of fixed orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(2): 163-172.
[5] Zhou Mengqi,Chen Xuepeng,Fu Baiping. Strategies for preventing alveolar-bone dehiscence and fenestration during orthodontic treatment [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(5): 600-608.
[6] Zhao Zhihe. Comparison of anterior tooth torque design in digital orthodontics [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(1): 1-6.
[7] Yang Hong,Jin Yu,Lai Wenli. Randomized cross-control trial of placebo in the regulation of orthodontic tooth movement pain [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(4): 424-430.
[8] Li Hanyue,Xia Lulu,Hua Xianming. Clinical advances of periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(2): 206-211.
[9] Song Shaohua,Mo Shuixue. Orthodontic treatment in sequential treatment of cleft lip and palate [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2019, 46(6): 740-744.
[10] Mengyuan Zhao,Sijia Li,Yunzi Bai,Zhen Tian,Ding Bai. Patients’ concerns and preferences for orthodontic treatment: a questionnaire study [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2019, 46(3): 287-291.
[11] Tiancheng Li,Kai Xia,Shujuan Zou,Jun Liu. Effect of tooth extraction for the orthodontic treatment of the upper airway: a systematic review [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2019, 46(2): 156-165.
[12] Xu Zhang,Yanxi Li,Hanshi Li,Jieya Wei,Xinyu Yan,Wei Zheng,Yu Li. Research progress on the prediction of the changes in soft tissue profile in orthodontic treatment [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2019, 46(1): 105-111.
[13] Jing Xuan, Wu Xiuping, Wang Jun. Clinical research progress on lingual orthodontic techniques [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(1): 100-105.
[14] Xie Yijia, Zou Xunming, Xu Xiaomei, Lin Fuwei, Zhao Qing. Research progress on esthetics of buccal corridor [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(1): 106-111.
[15] Zheng Wei, Li Yu. New development in the comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment of gummy smile [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(5): 509-513.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[10] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .