Int J Stomatol ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (5): 558-564.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2024066

• Cariology and Endodontics • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influence of minimally invasive access cavity on root canal therapy

Yinfei Ji(),Lan Zhang,Dingming Huang()   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Cariology and Endodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2023-12-18 Revised:2024-05-20 Online:2024-09-01 Published:2024-09-14
  • Contact: Dingming Huang E-mail:475822605@qq.com;dingminghuang@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Key Research and Development Program of Sichuan Province(2021YFS0031)

Abstract:

Endodontic diseases are common in clinical practice, and root canal therapy is the most effective treatment for these illnesses. Access cavity preparation is the first step in endodontic treatment and has an important impact on the success of root canal therapy. With the continuous development of minimally invasive endodontics, minimally invasive modifications to the traditional access cavity design were proposed to preserve as much healthy tooth tissue as possible to improve the fracture resistance of the tooth. However, the design of minimally invasive access cavity also has an impact on the entire endodontic treatment process and may complicate the various steps of root canal therapy. Evidence on the pros and cons of this minimally invasive trend for endodontic treatment is still lacking. Hence, this research reviews the impact of minimally invasive access cavity on root canal therapy.

Key words: minimally invasive endodontics, root canal therapy, access cavity preparation

CLC Number: 

  • R781.3

TrendMD: 
1 American Association of Endodontists. Glossary of endodontic terms[M]. 10th ed. Chicago: American Association of Endodontists, 2020.
2 Patel S, Rhodes J. A practical guide to endodontic access cavity preparation in molar teeth[J]. Br Dent J, 2007, 203(3): 133-140.
3 Hargreaves KM, Cohen S, Berman LH. Cohen’s pathways of the pulp[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2011: 767-768.
4 Clark D, Khademi J. Modern molar endodontic access and directed dentin conservation[J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2010, 54(2): 249-273.
5 Clark D, Khademi JA. Case studies in modern molar endodontic access and directed dentin conservation[J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2010, 54(2): 275-289.
6 Gutmann JL. Minimally invasive dentistry (endodontics)[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2013, 16(4): 282-283.
7 Isufi A, Plotino G, Grande NM, et al. Standardization of endodontic access cavities based on 3-dimensional quantitative analysis of dentin and enamel removed[J]. J Endod, 2020, 46(10): 1495-1500.
8 Shabbir J, Zehra T, Najmi N, et al. Access cavity preparations: classification and literature review of traditional and minimally invasive endodontic access cavity designs[J]. J Endod, 2021, 47(8): 1229-1244.
9 Silva EJNL, De-Deus G, Souza EM, et al. Present status and future directions—minimal endodontic access cavities[J]. Int Endod J, 2022, 55(): 531-587.
10 Silva EJNL, Pinto KP, Ferreira CM, et al. Current status on minimal access cavity preparations: a critical analysis and a proposal for a universal nomenclature[J]. Int Endod J, 2020, 53(12): 1618-1635.
11 Baruwa AO, Martins JNR, Meirinhos J, et al. The influence of missed canals on the prevalence of periapical lesions in endodontically treated teeth: a cross-sectional study[J]. J Endod, 2020, 46(1): 34-39.e1.
12 do Carmo WD, Verner FS, Aguiar LM, et al. Missed canals in endodontically treated maxillary molars of a Brazilian subpopulation: prevalence and association with periapical lesion using cone-beam compu-ted tomography[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2021, 25(4): 2317-2323.
13 Rover G, Belladonna FG, Bortoluzzi EA, et al. Influence of access cavity design on root canal detection, instrumentation efficacy, and fracture resistance assessed in maxillary molars[J]. J Endod, 2017, 43(10): 1657-1662.
14 Mendes EB, Soares AJ, Martins JNR, et al. In-fluence of access cavity design and use of operating microscope and ultrasonic troughing to detect middle mesial canals in extracted mandibular first molars[J]. Int Endod J, 2020, 53(10): 1430-1437.
15 Saygili G, Uysal B, Omar B, et al. Evaluation of relationship between endodontic access cavity types and secondary mesiobuccal canal detection[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2018, 18(1): 121.
16 Rover G, de Lima CO, Belladonna FG, et al. In-fluence of minimally invasive endodontic access cavi-ties on root canal shaping and filling ability, pulp chamber cleaning and fracture resistance of extrac-ted human mandibular incisors[J]. Int Endod J, 2020, 53(11): 1530-1539.
17 Lima CO, Barbosa AFA, Ferreira CM, et al. In-fluence of ultraconservative access cavities on instrumentation efficacy with XP-endo Shaper and Reci-proc, filling ability and load capacity of mandibular molars subjected to thermomechanical cycling[J]. Int Endod J, 2021, 54(8): 1383-1393.
18 De-Deus G, Marins J, Neves ADEA, et al. Asses-sing accumulated hard-tissue debris using micro-computed tomography and free software for image processing and analysis[J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(2): 271-276.
19 Silva AA, Belladonna FG, Rover G, et al. Does ultraconservative access affect the efficacy of root canal treatment and the fracture resistance of two-roo-ted maxillary premolars[J]. Int Endod J, 2020, 53(2): 265-275.
20 Tüfenkçi P, Yılmaz K, Adigüzel M. Effects of the endodontic access cavity on apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using different single-file systems[J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2020, 45(3): e33.
21 Neelakantan P, Khan K, Hei Ng GP, et al. Does the orifice-directed dentin conservation access design debride pulp chamber and mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars similar to a traditional access design[J]. J Endod, 2018, 44(2): 274-279.
22 Barbosa AFA, Silva EJNL, Coelho BP, et al. The influence of endodontic access cavity design on the efficacy of canal instrumentation, microbial reduction, root canal filling and fracture resistance in mandibular molars[J]. Int Endod J, 2020, 53(12): 1666-1679.
23 Tüfenkçi P, Yılmaz K. The effects of different endodontic access cavity design and using XP-endo fi-nisher on the reduction of enterococcus faecalis in the root canal system[J]. J Endod, 2020, 46(3): 419-424.
24 Vieira GCS, Pérez AR, Alves FRF, et al. Impact of contracted endodontic cavities on root canal disinfection and shaping[J]. J Endod, 2020, 46(5): 655-661.
25 张萦雪. 微创牙髓治疗对根管内细菌清理效果的体外研究[D]. 天津: 天津医科大学, 2019.
Zhang YX. The effect of minimally invasive endo-dontics treatment on bacterial clearance in root canal: an in vitro study[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin Medical University, 2019.
26 van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, et al. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature[J]. Int Endod J, 2007, 40(6): 415-426.
27 Peters OA, Bardsley S, Fong J, et al. Disinfection of root canals with photon-initiated photoacoustic strea-ming[J]. J Endod, 2011, 37(7): 1008-1012.
28 Martins JNR, Silva EJNL, Marques D, et al. Design, metallurgical features, mechanical performance and canal preparation of six reciprocating instruments[J]. Int Endod J, 2021, 54(9): 1623-1637.
29 Gambill JM, Alder M, del Rio CE. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography[J]. J Endod, 1996, 22(7): 369-375.
30 Pereira RD, Leoni GB, Silva-Sousa YT, et al. Impact of conservative endodontic cavities on root canal preparation and biomechanical behavior of upper premolars restored with different materials[J]. J Endod, 2021, 47(6): 989-999.
31 Xia J, Wang WD, Li ZM, et al. Impacts of contrac-ted endodontic cavities compared to traditional en-dodontic cavities in premolars[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2020, 20(1): 250.
32 Freitas GR, Ribeiro TM, Vilella FSG, et al. In-fluence of endodontic cavity access on curved root canal preparation with ProDesign Logic rotary instruments[J]. Clin Oral Invest, 2021, 25(2): 469-475.
33 Augusto CM, Barbosa AFA, Guimarães CC, et al. A laboratory study of the impact of ultraconservative access cavities and minimal root canal tapers on the ability to shape canals in extracted mandibular molars and their fracture resistance[J]. Int Endod J, 2020, 53(11): 1516-1529.
34 Krishan R, Paqué F, Ossareh A, et al. Impacts of conservative endodontic cavity on root canal instrumentation efficacy and resistance to fracture asses-sed in incisors, premolars, and molars[J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(8): 1160-1166.
35 Reddy N, Naga S, Manoj Kumar MG, et al. In-fluence of access cavity design on the fracture resistance and root canal filling efficacy in simulated young permanent molars using cone-beam compu-ted tomography: an in vitro study[J]. Endodontology, 2020, 32(3): 130.
36 Tronstad L, Asbjørnsen K, Døving L, et al. In-fluence of coronal restorations on the periapical health of endodontically treated teeth[J]. Endod Dent Traumatol, 2000, 16(5): 218-221.
37 Silva EJNL, Oliveira VB, Silva AA, et al. Effect of access cavity design on gaps and void formation in resin composite restorations following root canal treatment on extracted teeth[J]. Int Endod J, 2020, 53(11): 1540-1548.
38 Welch-Phillips A, Gibbons D, Ahern DP, et al. What is finite element analysis[J]. Clin Spine Surg A Spine Publ, 2020, 33(8): 323-324.
39 高羽轩, 张岚, 周学东, 等. 直线通路微创开髓洞型对上颌第一前磨牙力学性能影响的有限元分析[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2022, 57(1): 52-59.
Gao YX, Zhang L, Zhou XD, et al. Effect of straight-line minimally invasive access cavity on the mechanical properties of maxillary first premolars: a finite element analysis[J]. Chin J Stomatol, 2022, 57(1): 52-59.
40 Jiang QZ, Huang YT, Tu XR, et al. Biomechanical properties of first maxillary molars with different endodontic cavities: a finite element analysis[J]. J Endod, 2018, 44(8): 1283-1288.
41 Fu YJ, Zhang L, Gao Y, et al. A comparison of vo-lume of tissue removed and biomechanical analysis of different access cavity designs in 2-rooted mandibular first molars: a multisample 3-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. J Endod, 2022, 48(3): 362-369.
42 Allen C, Meyer CA, Yoo E, et al. Stress distribution in a tooth treated through minimally invasive access compared to one treated through traditional access: a finite element analysis study[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2018, 21(5): 505-509.
43 Silva EJNL, Rover G, Belladonna FG, et al. Impact of contracted endodontic cavities on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of in vitro studies[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2018, 22(1): 109-118.
44 Silva EJNL, Attademo RS, da Silva MCD, et al. Does the type of endodontic access influence in the cyclic fatigue resistance of reciprocating instruments[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2021, 25(6): 3691-3698.
45 Spicciarelli V, Marruganti C, Marzocco D, et al. Influence of endodontic access cavity design on fracture strength of maxillary incisors and premolars and on fatigue resistance of reciprocating instruments[J]. Front Dent Med, 2020, 1: 575010.
[1] Wang Mudan,Song Dongzhe,Huang Dingming.. Research progress on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth with different endodontic access cavities [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(2): 186-194.
[2] Peng Weiqi,Gao Yuan,Xu Xin. The minimally invasive concept and research progress on access cavity design [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(4): 433-438.
[3] Ji Mengzhen,Qi Meiyao,Du Kexin,Quan Shuqi,Zhang Yuqiang,Zheng Qinghua. Three-dimensional finite element study on the effect of pulp opening cavity on the resistance of cracked teeth after full crown restoration [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(1): 41-49.
[4] Tang Bei,Zhao Wenjun,Wang Hu,Zheng Guangning,You Meng. Inferior alveolar nerve injury due to apical overfilling: two cases reports [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(3): 293-296.
[5] Ma Yanqun, Li Hong, Hou Benxiang. Research progress on the new attachment of apical periodontal ligament [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(3): 331-334.
[6] Huang Xiaoxiang, Zhang Ru, Hou Benxiang.. The effect of anatomy of apical zone of permanent teeth on root canal therapy [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(3): 261-266.
[7] Liang Jichao, Wang Fen, Zhang Fengying, Zhang Zhenghua, Hou Meijuan, Pang Fusheng, Zhou Feng. Comparison of the accuracy of Digora and Propex on the measurement of working length of root canal [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2016, 43(5): 515-518.
[8] Ju Yingxin, Liu Luchuan. Application of erbium laser to treat periapical diseases [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2016, 43(4): 473-476.
[9] Liu Yali, Li Xia. Application of cone-beam computed tomography during C-shaped root canal therapy in mandibular second molars [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(2): 181-183.
[10] Zhu Yuting, Liu Jiangfeng, Huang Jiangyong, Xu Yan, Li Yanli, Li Xiaoxing, Chen Bingxun. Clinical evaluation of HyFlex CM instruments in root canal preparation [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(5): 521-525.
[11] Zhao Pengpeng, Qin Zongchang.. Root canal therapy and microcracks of the root canal wall [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(4): 478-482.
[12] Ge Jiuyu, Hou Benxiang, Yu Qing, Huang Dingming, Peng Bin. Need remove instrument separation in root canal therapy [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(1): 7-12.
[13] Yan Wen, Li Wei.. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of dental filling materials utilized in endodontic thera [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(5): 608-611.
[14] Deng Yanhan, Huang Dingming. Research progress on diagnosis and treatment of atypical odontalgia [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(3): 320-322.
[15] Song Dengxian, Chen Xinmei, Zheng Liwei. Current opinions and new perspectives on etiology and treatment of refractory periapical periodontitis [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(3): 330-333.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[10] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .