Inter J Stomatol ›› 2018, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 723-727.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2018.06.017

• Reviews • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of simulated pulpal pressure in dentine-bonding research

Xin Tan,Haiyang Yu()   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Prosthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2018-01-08 Revised:2018-06-20 Online:2018-11-01 Published:2018-11-15
  • Contact: Haiyang Yu E-mail:yhyang6812@scu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(81571006)

Abstract:

As a new and practical method for dentine-bonding research, simulated pulpal pressure method is an effective tool for dental researchers to evaluate the natural degradation of the bond between dentine and adhesives. Dentine-bonding has become crucial to the wide use of resin fillings and inlays, crowns, and post-and-core restorations. However, conclusions for changing the dentine bonding and its mechanism under simulated pulpal pressure remain controversial. This article contains a brief review of factors influencing dentine bonding under simulated pulpal pressure, and how they corporately act on the bond interface. Moreover, this article discusses the measures to reduce the detrimental effects of simulated pulpal pressure on dentine bonding.

Key words: dentine, bond strength, simulated pulpal pressure

CLC Number: 

  • R318.01

TrendMD: 

Fig 1

Schematic of the device for simulated pulp pressure"

[1] Hashimoto M, Tay FR, Svizero NR , et al. The effects of common errors on sealing ability of total-etch adhesives[J]. Dent Mater, 2006,22(6):560-568.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.06.004 pmid: 16289724
[2] Bacchi A, Abuna G, Consani RL , et al. Effects of simulated pulpal pressure, mechanical and thermo-cycling challenge on the microtensile bond strength of resin luting cements[J]. Int J Adhes Adhes, 2015,60:69-74.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.03.009
[3] van Landuyt KL, de Munck J, Mine A , et al. Filler debonding & subhybrid-layer failures in self-etch adhesives[J]. J Dent Res, 2010,89(10):1045-1050.
doi: 10.1177/0022034510375285
[4] van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y , et al. State of the art of self-etch adhesives[J]. Dent Mater, 2011,27(1):17-28.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023 pmid: 21109301
[5] Pashley DH, Carvalho RM . Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion[J]. J Dent, 1997,25(5):355-372.
doi: 10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00057-7 pmid: 9241954
[6] Bacchi A, Abuna G, Babbar A , et al. Influence of 3- month simulated pulpal pressure on the microtensile bond strength of simplified resin luting systems[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2015,17(3):265-271.
doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a34414 pmid: 26159130
[7] Pereira PN, Sano H, Ogata M , et al. Effect of region and dentin perfusion on bond strengths of resin-modified glass ionomer cements[J]. J Dent, 2000,28(5):347-354.
doi: 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00017-8 pmid: 10785301
[8] Perdigão J . Dentin bonding—variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment[J]. Dent Mater, 2010,26(2):e24-e37.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.149 pmid: 20005565
[9] Tjäderhane L, Nascimento FD, Breschi L , et al. Optimizing dentin bond durability: control of collagen degradation by matrix metalloproteinases and cys-teine cathepsins[J]. Dent Mater, 2013,29(1):116-135.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.004 pmid: 22901826
[10] Delaviz Y, Finer Y, Santerre JP . Biodegradation of resin composites and adhesives by oral bacteria and saliva: a rationale for new material designs that consider the clinical environment and treatment chal-lenges[J]. Dent Mater, 2014,30(1):16-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.08.201 pmid: 24113132
[11] Sartori N, Peruchi LD, Phark JH , et al. The influence of intrinsic water permeation on different dentin bon-ded interfaces formation[J]. J Dent, 2016,48:46-54.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.03.005 pmid: 26976554
[12] Pucci CR, Gu LS, Zeng C , et al. Susceptibility of contemporary single-bottle self-etch dentine adhesives to intrinsic water permeation[J]. J Dent, 2017,66:52-61.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.08.010
[13] Hebling J, Castro FL, Costa CA . Adhesive perfor-mance of dentin bonding agents applied in vivo and in vitro. Effect of intrapulpal pressure and dentin depth[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2007,83(2):295-303.
[14] Heyeraas KJ . Pulpal hemodynamics and interstitial fluid pressure: balance of transmicrovascular fluid transport[J]. J Endod, 1989,15(10):468-472.
doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80026-3 pmid: 2639938
[15] Sartori N, Peruchi LD, Phark JH , et al. Permeation of intrinsic water into ethanol- and water-saturated, monomer-infiltrated dentin bond interfaces[J]. Dent Mater, 2015,31(11):1385-1395.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.159 pmid: 26411647
[16] Feitosa V, Watson T, Vitti R , et al. Prolonged curing time reduces the effects of simulated pulpal pressure on the bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives[J]. Oper Dent, 2013,38(5):545-554.
doi: 10.2341/12-180-L pmid: 23215642
[17] Tay FR, Pashley DH . Water treeing—a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives[J]. Am J Dent, 2003,16(1):6-12.
doi: 10.1007/s0701-002-1041-3 pmid: 12744405
[18] Silva TM, Gonçalves LL, Fonseca BM , et al. Influence of Nd: YAG laser on intrapulpal temperature and bond strength of human dentin under simulated pulpal pressure[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2016,31(1):49-56.
doi: 10.1007/s10103-015-1827-1 pmid: 26510575
[19] Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Holz J , et al. Dentinal fluid dynamics in human teeth, in vitro[J]. J Endod, 1995,21(4):191-194.
doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80564-9 pmid: 7673819
[20] Feitosa VP, Gotti VB, Grohmann CV , et al. Two methods to simulate intrapulpal pressure: effects upon bonding performance of self-etch adhesives[J]. Int Endod J, 2014,47(9):819-826.
doi: 10.1111/iej.12222 pmid: 24298904
[21] de Alexandre R, Santana V, Kasaz A , et al. Effect of long-term simulated pulpal pressure on the bond strength and nanoleakage of resin-luting agents with different bonding strategies[J]. Oper Dent, 2014,39(5):508-520.
doi: 10.2341/13-078 pmid: 24502755
[22] Prati C, Pashley DH, Montanari G . Hydrostatic intra-pulpal pressure and bond strength of bonding systems[J]. Dent Mater, 1991,7(1):54-58.
doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(91)90028-W pmid: 1901813
[23] Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Schneider H , et al. Effect of intrapulpal pressure simulation in vitro on shear bond strengths and hybrid layer formation[J]. Am J Dent, 2001,14(5):319-323.
doi: 10.1080/000163501750541200 pmid: 11803998
[24] Özok AR , Wu MK, de Gee AJ, et al. Effect of dentin perfusion on the sealing ability and microtensile bond strengths of a total-etch versus an all-in-one adhesive[J]. Dent Mater, 2004,20(5):479-486.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.07.004 pmid: 15081555
[25] Sauro S, Pashley DH, Montanari M , et al. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin permeability and adhesion of self-etch adhesives[J]. Dent Mater, 2007,23(6):705-713.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.010 pmid: 16904175
[26] Cardoso MV, Moretto SG, Carvalho RC , et al. In-fluence of intrapulpal pressure simulation on the bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin[J]. Braz Oral Res, 2008,22(2):170-175.
doi: 10.1590/S1806-83242008000200013 pmid: 18622488
[27] Feitosa VP, Leme AA, Sauro S , et al. Hydrolytic degradation of the resin-dentine interface induced by the simulated pulpal pressure, direct and indirect water ageing[J]. J Dent, 2012,40(12):1134-1143.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.09.011
[28] Campos EA, Correr GM, Leonardi DP , et al. Chlor-hexidine diminishes the loss of bond strength over time under simulated pulpal pressure and thermo-mechanical stressing[J]. J Dent, 2009,37(2):108-114.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.10.003 pmid: 19022552
[29] Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Yamauti M , et al. Bonding durability of a self-etching primer system to normal and caries-affected dentin under hydrostatic pulpal pressure in vitro[J]. Am J Dent, 2006,19(3):147-150.
doi: 10.1080/00016350600573191 pmid: 16838477
[30] Hosaka K, Nakajima M, Takahashi M , et al. Re-lationship between mechanical properties of one-step self-etch adhesives and water sorption[J]. Dent Mater, 2010,26(4):360-367.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.12.007 pmid: 20053432
[31] Manso AP, Bedran-Russo AK, Suh B , et al. Me-chanical stability of adhesives under water storage[J]. Dent Mater, 2009,25(6):744-749.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.12.006 pmid: 19200591
[32] Kim RJ, Choi NS, Ferracane J , et al. Acoustic emis-sion analysis of the effect of simulated pulpal pre-ssure and cavity type on the tooth-composite inter-facial de-bonding[J]. Dent Mater, 2014,30(8):876-883.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.027
[33] Feitosa VP, Correr AB, Correr-Sobrinho L , et al. Effect of a new method to simulate pulpal pressure on bond strength and nanoleakage of dental adhe-sives to dentin[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2012,14(6):517-524.
[34] Augustin C, Paul SJ, Lüthy H , et al. Perfusing den-tine with horse serum or physiologic saline: its effect on adhesion of dentine bonding agents[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 1998,25(8):596-602.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00276.x pmid: 9781862
[35] Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J , et al. Origin of interfacial droplets with one-step adhesives[J]. J Dent Res, 2007,86(8):739-744.
doi: 10.1177/154405910708600810 pmid: 17652202
[36] Sauro S, Mannocci F, Toledano M , et al. Influence of the hydrostatic pulpal pressure on droplets forma-tion in current etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives: a video rate/TSM microscopy and fluid filtration study[J]. Dent Mater, 2009,25(11):1392-1402.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.010
[37] Hosaka K, Nakajima M, Monticelli F , et al. Influence of hydrostatic pulpal pressure on the microtensile bond strength of all-in-one self-etching adhesives[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2007,9(5):437-442.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.01.025 pmid: 18297824
[38] de Andrade e Silva SM, Carrilho MR, Marquezini Junior L , et al. Effect of an additional hydrophilic versus hydrophobic coat on the quality of dentinal sealing provided by two-step etch-and-rinse adhe-sives[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2009,17(3):184-189.
doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572009000300010 pmid: 4399529
[39] Santana VB, de Alexandre RS, Rodrigues JA , et al. Effects of immediate dentin sealing and pulpal pre-ssure on resin cement bond strength and nanoleakage[J]. Oper Dent, 2016,41(2):189-199.
doi: 10.2341/15-150-L pmid: 26449591
[1] Lei Bin,Chen Ke. Classification and treatment of dentin dysplasia type[J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(3): 332-336.
[2] Ding Jingyu,Tian Zilu,Wang Huimin,Zhu Xuanyan,Yang Yubin,Zhu Song. Advancement of immediate dentin sealing [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(1): 121-124.
[3] Jiaojiao Qin,Shan Jiao,Chengkun Wang. Advances in research on the effects of Er:YAG and Nd:YAG lasers on the bonding strength of the bonding surface between dentine and porcelain prosthesis [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2019, 46(3): 361-366.
[4] Ding Hong, Chen Jifen, Wu Jianyong. Influence of different adhesive materials on the shear bond strength of metal brackets to porcelain surface [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(4): 430-432.
[5] Ma Zhiling1, Liu Jie2. Effects of different surface treatments on the bonding strength of titanium and resin [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(1): 45-49.
[6] Yuan Xiaohui, Liu Jie.. Research progress on the effect of micro-arc oxidation on the bonding strength between pure titanium and porcelain [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2016, 43(6): 695-699.
[7] Du Qiao, Niu Guangliang. Surface roughening zirconia and modification [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(1): 97-101.
[8] Li Liyun, Wei Wenjia, Meng Xiangfeng.. The effect of long-term water storage on the resin adhesive interface between dentine and glass ceramic [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(4): 436-439.
[9] Gao Yu1, Wu Zhan’ao1, Feng Weizhong1, Ding Yan1, Zhang Deyun2, Jiang Tao1.. Effect of silicate solution in different concentrations on bonding strength of porcelain and pure titanium by liquid-phase deposition technology [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(4): 440-443.
[10] Jing Ye, Meng Xiangfeng. The research on the bond durability between self -adhesive cements and zirconia ceramic [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(3): 301-304.
[11] Lin Yihua1, Song Xiaomeng2, Zhang Wei3. Study of bonding property among 3 kinds of resin-reinforced glass ionomer and zirconia ceramics [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(3): 305-308.
[12] Weng Jiahua, Mai Lixiang, Wang Dawei.. Effect of tooth bleaching on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(1): 105-108.
[13] Pan Wenting, Wu Yao, Xie Xialoli. . Enterococcus faecalis and its detection and identification in dentine tubular [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2012, 39(6): 778-781.
[14] Zhang Zhenliang, Fu Baiping.. Factors in testing the micro-tensile bond strength [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2012, 39(5): 620-623.
[15] Zhong Qun, Shen Qingyi, Wu Xueying, Li Guoqiang.. Shear bond strengths of different types of adhesive resin agents to glass infiltrated alumina oxide ceramic [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2012, 39(1): 16-19.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[10] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .