Int J Stomatol

Inter J Stomatol ›› 2012, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 593-596.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5749.2012.05.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

An evaluation of premolar extraction and non-extraction treatment outcome on borderline cases with Angle class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion

Wu Wenwen1, Du Xi2.   

  1. 1. College of Stomatology, Xuzhou Medical School, Xuzhou 221004, China; 2. Dept. of Orthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2011-09-20 Revised:2012-07-09 Online:2012-09-01 Published:2012-09-01

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

579

Abstract:

Objective This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the clinical treatment outcomes of borderline cases with Angle class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion by using peer assessment rating（PAR） index to assess the occlusal traits of pre- and post-treatment models. Methods The subject of this study consisted of borderline patients with Angle class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion, including 83 children（26 patients with extraction and 57 patients without extraction）. PAR index was used to assess the occlusal traits of dental models before and after orthodontic treatment to evaluate the clinical treatment outcomes of these two groups. Results In borderline cases with Angle class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion, regardless of extraction or not, the weighted PAR index was decreased after treatment, the percentage reduction in weighted PAR index was more than 70%, and no significant difference exists between extraction and non-extraction group. In the evaluation of orthodontic treatment outcome, 96.39%（80/ 83） of cases improved. Conclusion Borderline cases with Angle class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion in children no matter extraction or non-extraction, both can achieve good outcomes in occlusion after treatment.

Key words: Angle class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion, borderline cases, extraction, non-extraction, peer assessment rating index


TrendMD: 
[1] Wang Renyi,Zhao Chengzhi,Pan Jian.. Research progress on the effects of prophylactic antibiotics on postoperative complications during the perioperative period of tooth extraction [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(5): 558-565.
[2] Yin Maoyun,Zhang Yi,Hu Min.. Research progress on the effect of orthodontic extraction on upper airway [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(5): 607-613.
[3] Pang Yu,Liu Xian,Wang Liao. Application of digital template in the extraction of embedded supernumerary tooth [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(4): 448-452.
[4] Hu Wenjie. Related problems in clinical practice of alveolar ridge preservation [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(3): 249-259.
[5] Chen Bin,Xu Rongrong,Zhang Jiading,Yan Fuhua. The retention of severe periodontitis-involved tooth [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(2): 125-130.
[6] Weilin Pan,Yubin Cao,Chang Liu,Jiyuan Liu,Chunjie Li,Jian Pan,Chengge Hua. Flap design associated pain after the extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and Meta-analysis [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2019, 46(2): 142-148.
[7] Tiancheng Li,Kai Xia,Shujuan Zou,Jun Liu. Effect of tooth extraction for the orthodontic treatment of the upper airway: a systematic review [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2019, 46(2): 156-165.
[8] Yuhao Wang, Dianri Wang, Jian. Pan. Lingual nerve injury in the tooth extraction [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(5): 590-596.
[9] Ma Quanquan, Cai Xiaoxiao.. Current status of immediate implant placement and provisionalization in esthetics zone [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(6): 731-736.
[10] Chen Yaqun, Xie Yijia, Hu Zhou, Zhao Qing. Research progress on the relationship between the floor of maxillary sinus and orthodontic tooth movement [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(5): 550-554.
[11] Zhang Rui1, Zhang Lingge1, Li Xihong1, Li Rui2. Influence of improved triangular flap on postoperative complications after mandibular third molar removal and its clinical application [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(2): 153-156.
[12] Hu Yidie, Zhou Li, Wang Yanmin. Relationship between extraction treatment and eruption of mandibular third molar [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(3): 367-370.
[13] Tan Xuelian, Ning Jiali, Chen Helin, He Linlin, Zhao Zhihe. Influence of extraction and non-extraction treatment on esthetic perception of frontal smile and resting profile [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(2): 147-151.
[14] Li Hongyu, Liu Zhiguo, Huang Zixian, Hou Jinsong, Tang Haikuo. Severe subcutaneous and deep cervicofacial emphysema during third molar surgery [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(1): 34-36.
[15] Ye Li, Hua Chengge, Pan Jian, Liao Xuejuan. A case of lidocaine hydrochloride allergy [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(1): 37-39.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2004, 31(02): 126 -128 .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .