国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4): 438-444.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2023049

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

口腔术后聚维酮碘与氯己定控制感染效果的系统评价分析

王铝亚(),张竞心,林洁()   

  1. 口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心四川大学华西口腔医院种植科 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-05 修回日期:2023-03-02 出版日期:2023-07-01 发布日期:2023-06-21
  • 通讯作者: 林洁
  • 作者简介:王铝亚,护师,学士,Email:1905768051@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技厅科研项目(2022JDKP0085)

Postoperative infection control effect of povidone iodine and chlorhexidine: a systematic review and analysis

Wang Lüya(),Zhang Jingxin,Lin Jie.()   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Di-seases & Dept. of Implantology, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2022-09-05 Revised:2023-03-02 Online:2023-07-01 Published:2023-06-21
  • Contact: Jie. Lin
  • Supported by:
    Scientific Research Project of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province(2022JDKP0085)

摘要:

目的 通过系统评价分析口腔术后使用氯己定与聚维酮碘含漱液控制感染的效果。 方法 采用主题词与自由词结合的方式,检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、中国知网、维普数据库、万方数据库等,检索时间从建库到2022年5月,搜集并筛选口腔术后使用氯己定与聚维酮碘含漱液的相关随机对照试验,纳入文献后进行文献质量评价和提取数据,应用Review Manager 5.3软件进行Meta分析。 结果 共纳入随机对照试验12篇,偏倚风险中等,Meta分析结果显示:口腔术后氯己定与聚维酮碘的感染控制效果相近,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但使用聚维酮碘的主观感受较氯己定更好,差异有统计学意义(P<0.000 01)。 结论 口腔术后使用氯己定与聚维酮碘的感染控制效果无明显差异,而患者使用聚维酮碘的主观感受更好。

关键词: 口腔术后, 聚维酮碘, 氯己定, 感染控制, 系统性评价

Abstract:

Objective This study aimed to compare the effect of chlorhexidine and povidone iodine in controlling oral postoperative infection through systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods By combining free-word retrieval and subject retrieval, the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang were retrieved. The retrieval period was from the establishment of databases to May 2022. After literature screening, data ex-traction, and quality evaluation were independently completed, Review Manager 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis. Results A total of 12 articles were included, and the risk of bias was found to be moderate. The meta-analysis showed that the control effect of chlorhexidine and povidone iodine after oral surgery was similar, without significant difference (P>0.05). However, the subjective feeling of using povidone iodine was better than that of chlorhexidine, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.000 01). Conclusion No difference was observed in the infection control effect between chlorhexidine and povidone iodine after oral surgery. Povidone iodine had better subjective feeling than chlorhexidine.

Key words: oral postoperative, povidone iodine, chlorhexidine, the control of infection, systematic review

中图分类号: 

  • R 78

图1

文献检索流程图"

表 1

纳入文献的一般特征"

纳入文献手术类型患者数(试验/对照)性别/例(男/女)年龄药物使用方式随访时间结局指标
试验组对照组
彭根英等[5](2013)口腔颌面部外科手术647(349/298)0.12%醋酸氯己定0.1%聚维酮碘术前1 d含漱2次,术前30 min~1 h 含漱1次;术后每天2次,每次20 mL,时间1~3 min1个月,有植入物者1年
王立新等[6](2014)牙拔除术后96(48/48)7~69岁0.2%复方氯己定0.05%聚维酮碘术后含漱,每天2次7 d①③
申宝红等[7](2018)口腔癌术后60(30/30)60(37/23)17~91岁复方氯己定

0.5%聚

维酮碘

术后24 h后开始使用,每天3次,每次60 mL至拆除黏膜缝线②③
徐逢源等[8](2019)口腔种植体植入术40(20/20)0.1%复方氯己定1%聚维酮碘

氯己定:餐后漱口3次,每次10~15 mL,120 s

聚维酮碘:餐后漱口1次,每次 10~15 mL,20 s

14 d③④⑤
叶春艳[9](2019)口腔颌面外科手术250(125/125)250(125/125)11个月~87岁0.12%醋酸氯己定

0.1%聚

维酮碘

术前1 d含漱2次,术前30 min~1 h含漱1次;术后每天2次,每次20 mL,1~3 min1年
Polat等[10](2008)第三磨牙拔除术32(16/16)32(16/16)0.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定

7.5%聚

维酮碘

术后每天2次,每次1 min术后3、8、15 d
Mohanty等[11](2022)第三磨牙拔除术100(50/50)0.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定1%聚维酮碘术中冲洗,每天2次,每次2 mL2、7 d①⑤
Akbulut[12](2020)正畸支抗钉植入19(9/10)19(9/10)试验组:(18.58±1.93)岁;对照组:(18.24±1.57)岁0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定

7.5%聚

维酮碘

21 d③④
Kosutic等[13](2009)口腔颌面部外科手术60(30/30)1%葡萄糖酸氯己定1%聚维酮碘术前含漱7 d①③
Tuna等[14](2012)下颌第三磨牙拔除术24(12/12)24(9/15)0.2%氯己定

7.5%聚

维酮碘

术前,15 mL漱口1 min7 d
Managutti等[15](2017)下颌第三磨牙拔除术20(10/10)0.2%氯己定5%聚维酮碘术前,15 mL漱口1 min1、2、7 d
Jadhao等[16] (2018)下颌第三磨牙拔除术32(16/16)24~31岁0.02%葡萄糖酸氯己定

0.5%聚

维酮碘

术前冲洗7 d①⑤

表 2

纳入文献的风险偏倚评价"

纳入文献随机序列生成随机分配隐藏受试者与干预者盲法结局评价者盲法不完整的结局报告选择性报告其他偏倚分级
彭根英等[5](2013)低风险不清楚不清楚不清楚低风险低风险不清楚B
王立新等[6](2014)不清楚不清楚不清楚不清楚低风险低风险不清楚B
申宝红等[7](2018)不清楚不清楚不清楚不清楚低风险低风险不清楚B
徐逢源等[8](2019)低风险不清楚高风险不清楚低风险低风险不清楚B
叶春艳[9](2019)低风险不清楚不清楚不清楚低风险低风险不清楚B
Polat等[10](2008)低风险不清楚不清楚低风险低风险低风险不清楚B
Mohanty等[11](2022)低风险不清楚不清楚不清楚低风险低风险不清楚B
Akbulut[12](2020)不清楚不清楚不清楚不清楚低风险低风险不清楚B
Kosutic等[13](2009)不清楚不清楚低风险不清楚低风险低风险不清楚B
Tuna等[14](2012)低风险低风险低风险低风险低风险低风险不清楚A
Managutti等[15](2017)高风险不清楚不清楚不清楚低风险低风险不清楚B
Jadhao等[16] (2018)不清楚不清楚不清楚不清楚低风险低风险不清楚B

图2

口腔术后含漱氯己定与聚维酮碘的术后感染率"

图3

口腔术前含漱氯己定与聚维酮碘的术后感染率"

图4

口腔术后含漱氯己定与聚维酮碘的口腔细菌菌落数"

1 Belusic-Gobic M, Zubovic A, Predrijevac A, et al. Microbiology of wound infection after oral cancer surgery[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2020, 48(7): 700-705.
2 Blatt S, Al-Nawas B. A systematic review of latest evidence for antibiotic prophylaxis and therapy in oral and maxillofacial surgery[J]. Infection, 2019, 47(4): 519-555.
3 Shigeishi H, Rahman MZ, Ohta K, et al. Professio-nal oral health care reduces the duration of hospital stay in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery[J]. Biomed Rep, 2016, 4(1): 55-58.
4 Cho H, David MC, Lynham AJ, et al. Effectiveness of irrigation with chlorhexidine after removal of mandibular third molars: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2018, 56(1): 54-59.
5 彭根英, 闫俊杰, 钟雪美, 等. 不同护理液对减少口腔颌面外科患者手术部位感染的作用 [J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2013, 23(7): 1577-1579.
Peng GY, Yan JJ, Zhong XM, et al. Effects of diffe-rent kinds of treatment solutions on reduction of postoperative surgical site infections in oral and maxillofacial surgery patients[J]. China J Nosocomiol, 2013, 23(7): 1577-1579.
6 王立新, 李志华, 倪耀丰, 等. 不同漱口液预防拔牙后口腔感染的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2014, 24(4): 981-985.
Wang LX, Li ZH, Ni YF, et al. Clinical efficacy of different mouthwashed in prevention of oral infections after tooth extraction[J]. China J Nosocomiol, 2014, 24(4): 981-985.
7 申宝红, 郭田, 朱玉花, 等. 三种口腔护理液在口腔癌术后患者中的应用[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2018, 34(4): 107-109.
Shen BH, Guo T, Zhu YH, et al. Application effect of three kinds of oral care solutions on postoperative patients with oral cancer[J]. J Baotou Med Coll, 2018, 34(4): 107-109.
8 徐逢源, 周琳怡, 顾迎新. 3种含漱液在口腔种植术后维护口腔卫生中的效果比较[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(1): 53-57.
Xu FY, Zhou LY, Gu YX. Comparison of 3 kinds of mouth rinses after implant surgery[J]. Chin J Oral Maxillacial Surg, 2019, 17(1): 53-57.
9 叶春艳. 不同护理液在减少口腔颌面外科手术患者手术部位感染中的应用[J]. 医疗装备, 2019, 32(3): 167-168.
Ye CY. Application of different nursing solutions in reducing surgical site infection in patients under-going oral and maxillofacial surgery[J]. Med Equip, 2019, 32(3): 167-168.
10 Polat HB, Ozdemir H, Ay S. Effect of different mouth rinses on third molar surgery-related oral malodor[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008, 105(3): e1-e8.
11 Mohanty R, Jha C. Randomized study on postoperative intra-alveolar betadine irrigation versus chlor-hexidine irrigation on the incidence of occurrence of alveolar osteitis after mandibular third molar surgery[J]. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2022, 21(1): 163-167.
12 Akbulut Y. The effects of different antiseptic mouthwash on microbiota around orthodontic mini-screw[J]. Niger J Clin Pract, 2020, 23(11): 1507-1513.
13 Kosutic D, Uglesic V, Perkovic D, et al. Preoperative antiseptics in clean/contaminated maxillofacial and oral surgery: prospective randomized study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 38(2): 160-165.
14 Tuna A, Delilbasi C, Arslan A, et al. Do antibacte-rial mouthrinses affect bacteraemia in third molar surgery? A pilot study[J]. Aust Dent J, 2012, 57(4): 435-439.
15 Managutti A, Managutti SA, Patel J, et al. Evaluation of post-surgical bacteremia with use of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine during mandibular third molar surgery[J]. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2017, 16(4): 485-490.
16 Jadhao VA, Rao A, Hande P, et al. The efficiency of three irrigating solutions after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a cross-sectional study[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2018, 19(9): 1147-1151.
17 Bemardi A, Teixeira CS. The properties of chlorhe-xidine and un-desired effects of its use in endodontics[J]. Quintessence Int, 2015, 46(7): 575-582.
18 Thangavelu A, Kaspar SS, Kathirvelu RP, et al. Chlorhexidine: an elixir for periodontics[J]. J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 2020, 12(): S57-S59.
19 Tran K, Butcher R. Chlorhexidine for oral care: a review of clinical effectiveness and guidelines[R]. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, 2019.
20 Vergara-Buenaventura A, Castro-Ruiz C. Use of mouthwashes against COVID-19 in dentistry[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 58(8): 924-927.
21 Eggers M. Infectious disease management and control with povidone iodine[J]. Infect Dis Ther, 2019, 8(4): 581-593.
22 Bigliardi PL, Alsagoff SAL, El-Kafrawi HY, et al. Povidone iodine in wound healing: a review of current concepts and practices[J]. Int J Surg, 2017, 44: 260-268.
[1] 吴思佳,舒畅,王洋,王媛,邓淑丽,王慧明. 根管内感染控制对年轻恒牙牙髓再生治疗的影响及研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(4): 388-394.
[2] 林洁,刘帆. 基于多酶清洗剂控制的口腔专科器械清洗消毒模式的探索[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(3): 324-327.
[3] 王璐璇,侯本祥. 根管内氢氧化钙残留对根管治疗的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(3): 367-372.
[4] 李帆,张利娟,谭凯璇,张颖,卢洁,李姗姗,杨芳. 基于重水拉曼技术的氯己定对白色念珠菌抑菌效能的研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(1): 35-40.
[5] 易俭如,罗梦奇,尹一佳,刘治清,柳茜,石永乐,杨征,刘帆,韩向龙. 新型冠状病毒肺炎流行期降低口腔诊疗中气溶胶传播风险的策略[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(3): 362-365.
[6] 陈林, 刘磊. 氯己定预防干槽症的循证病案讨论[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2010, 37(5): 534-536.
[7] 邱瑜蕾综述 周学东审校. 玻璃离子黏固粉各成分抗菌性能的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2009, 36(6): 679-681.
[8] 曾淑蓉,张莉,王丽萍,刘治清. 加强口腔医院消毒供应中心管理控制医院感染[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): -.
[9] 章小缓综述 凌均棨审校. 口腔综合治疗台水路中的生物膜与污染控制[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(5): 546-546~549.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张京剧. 青年期至中年期颅面复合体变化的头影测量研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 刘玲. 镍铬合金中铍对可铸造性和陶瓷金属结合力的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] 王昆润. 在种植体上制作固定义齿以后下颌骨密度的动态变化[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] 王昆润. 修补颌骨缺损的新型生物学相容材料[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] 陆加梅. 不可复性关节盘移位患者术前张口度与关节镜术后疗效的相关性[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[6] 王昆润. 重型颌面部炎症死亡和康复病例的实验室检查指标比较[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[7] 王昆润. 二甲亚砜和双氯芬酸并用治疗根尖周炎[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[8] 汤庆奋,王学侠. 17β-雌二醇对人类阴道和口腔颊粘膜的渗透性[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[9] 王昆润. 咀嚼口香糖对牙周组织微循环的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[10] 宋红. 青少年牙周炎外周血分叶核粒细胞的趋化功能[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .