国际口腔医学杂志

国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 621-626.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2020105

• 专家笔谈 •    下一篇

邻面成形系统的发展和临床应用

薛晶()   

  1. 口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心 四川大学华西口腔医院牙体牙髓病科 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-20 修回日期:2020-08-07 出版日期:2020-11-01 发布日期:2020-11-06
  • 通讯作者: 薛晶
  • 作者简介:薛晶,口腔医学博士,副主任医师。担任四川省口腔医学会牙体牙髓专业委员会委员,四川省口腔医学会口腔美学专业委员会常务委员。在牙体牙髓病学领域一直致力于医、教、研工作,对牙髓病的诊治和龋病有较深入的研究和丰富的临床经验。致力于牙体牙髓疾病的基础与临床研究,口腔微生物菌群研究及牙体硬组织早期病变的修复研究。已在国内外相关牙体牙髓专业学术刊物发表论著20余篇,参编牙体牙髓专业相关专著7部,主译专著《流动复合树脂修复》和《牙髓病诊疗原理与实践（第5版）》。

Development and clinical application of proximal matrix system

Xue Jing()   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Cariology and Endodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2020-06-20 Revised:2020-08-07 Online:2020-11-01 Published:2020-11-06
  • Contact: Jing Xue

RichHTML

601

PDF (PC)

2861

摘要：

邻面成形系统是一套在进行邻面洞型充填修复时,用于代替缺失的牙体侧壁,形成邻面生理外形以达到良好的邻牙接触关系的工具,主要包括成形片、形片夹、分牙环及楔子。邻面成形系统的诞生和发展提高了邻面充填修复的成功率,更好地适应了复合树脂修复材料的进步,并逐步衍生出了两大类,环周式邻面成形系统和分段式邻面成形系统。本文从邻面成形系统的历史发展出发,对目前临床上主要的几类邻面成形系统的设计及使用进行梳理,简述其适应证及主要的优势与不足,并对其未来的发展方向做出展望。

关键词: 邻面成形系统, 分段式邻面成形系统, 环周式邻面成形系统, 复合树脂, 邻接触

Abstract:

The proximal matrix system is a set of tools used in replacing the side wall of missing teeth and forming the physiological shape of interproximal teeth for the purpose of achieving good contact relationship. These tools mainly include a shaping sheet, retainer, split ring, and interproximal wedge. The creation and development of the proximal matrix system increased the successful rate of adjacent surface filling and restoration and facilitated the progress of composite resin repair materials. It is gradually derived into two categories: the sectional matrix and circumferential matrix systems. Starting from the historical development of the proximal matrix system, this paper describes the design and application of several kinds of proximal matrix systems that are mainly used in clinics, their indications, and main advantages and disadvantages and makes a prospect for the future.

Key words: proximal matrix system, sectional matrix system, circumferential matrix system, resin filling, proximal contact

中图分类号: 

  • R781.05
[1] 李卓仑, 武峰, 李琳琳, 等. 邻接紧密型食物嵌塞的发病机制与诊疗技术研究进展[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2019,54(4):278-281.
Li ZL, Wu F, Li LL, et al. Etiology and clinical te-chnology of the food impaction with tight proximal contacts[J]. Chin J Stomatol, 2019,54(4):278-281.
[2] 李可冰, 王晓红, 胡万宁. 固定义齿修复后食物嵌塞的原因分析及扩隙树脂修复治疗[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2016,34(4):395-397.
Li KB, Wang XH, Hu WN. Cause of food impaction after fixed denture restoration and therapeutic effect of gap expansion and resin repair[J]. West China J Stomatol, 2016,34(4):395-397.
[3] Chuang SF, Su KC, Wang CH, et al. Morphological analysis of proximal contacts in class Ⅱ direct resto-rations with 3D image reconstruction[J]. J Dent, 2011,39(6):448-456.
pmid: 21504778
[4] Bauer JG, Crispin BJ. Evolution of the matrix for Class 2 restorations[J]. Oper Dent, 1986,Suppl(4):1-37.
[5] Saber MH, El-Badrawy W, Loomans BA, et al. Creating tight proximal contacts for MOD resin composite restorations[J]. Oper Dent, 2011,36(3):304-310.
pmid: 21740239
[6] Ilić DV, Zagradjanin D. Creative work of Greene vardiman black[J]. Srp Arh Celok Lek, 2011,139(5/ 6):409-414.
[7] Strauss K. A matrix band retainer incorporating two interdental wedges[J]. Br Dent J, 1949,87(5):126.
pmid: 18134615
[8] Millstein PL, Mowry RC. Benjamin franklin toffle-mire (1896—1983)[J]. Quintessence Int, 1985,16(11):791-795.
pmid: 3909205
[9] Brackett MG, Contreras S, Contreras R, et al. Resto-ration of proximal contact in direct Class Ⅱ resin composites[J]. Oper Dent, 2006,31(1):155-156.
pmid: 16536208
[10] Wirsching E, Loomans BA, Klaiber B, et al. In-luence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightf-ness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restora-tions in vivo[J]. J Dent, 2011,39(5):386-390.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.03.001 pmid: 21414384
[11] Wolff D, Hahn P, Ding P, et al. Proximal contact tightness between direct-composite additions in the posterior dentition: an in vitro investigation[J]. Oper Dent, 2012,37(3):272-280.
pmid: 22313273
[12] Politi I, McHugh LEJ, Al-Fodeh RS, et al. Modifica-tion of the restoration protocol for resin-based com-posite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth[J]. Dent Mater, 2018,34(9):1271-1277.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.05.010 pmid: 29857989
[13] de Assis FS, Lima SN, Tonetto MR, et al. Evaluation of bond strength, marginal integrity, and fracture strength of bulk- vs incrementally-filled restorations[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2016,18(4):317-323.
doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a36516 pmid: 27419244
[14] Kalmowicz J, Phebus JG, Owens BM, et al. Micro-leakage of Class Ⅰ and Ⅱ composite resin restora-tions using a sonic-resin placement system[J]. Oper Dent, 2015,40(6):653-661.
pmid: 26237636
[15] Veloso SRM, Lemos CAA, de Moraes SLD, et al. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a sys-tematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2019,23(1):221-233.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2429-7 pmid: 29594349
[16] Fabianelli A, Sgarra A, Goracci C, et al. Microlea-kage in Class Ⅱ restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique[J]. Oper Dent, 2010,35(3):308-313.
doi: 10.2341/09-128-L pmid: 20533631
[17] El-Shamy H, Saber MH, Dörfer CE, et al. Influence of volumetric shrinkage and curing light intensity on proximal contact tightness of Class Ⅱ resin composite restorations: in vitro study[J]. Oper Dent, 2012,37(2):205-210.
doi: 10.2341/11-269-L pmid: 22313267
[18] El-Shamy H, Sonbul H, Alturkestani N, et al. Proximal contact tightness of class Ⅱ bulk-fill composite resin restorations: an in vitro study[J]. Dent Mater J, 2019,38(1):96-100.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2017-279 pmid: 30381630
[19] Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters JF, et al. Influence of composite resin consistency and placement technique on proximal contact tightness of Class Ⅱ restorations[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2006,8(5):305-310.
pmid: 17080878
[20] Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, et al. Com-parison of proximal contacts of Class Ⅱ resin com-posite restorations in vitro[J]. Oper Dent, 2006,31(6):688-693.
pmid: 17153978
[21] Durr-E-Sadaf, Ahmad MZ, Gaikwad RN, et al. Com-parison of two different matrix band systems in re-storing two surface cavities in posterior teeth done by senior undergraduate students at Qassim University, Saudi Arabia: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Indian J Dent Res, 2018,29(4):459-464.
doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_26_17 pmid: 30127197
[22] Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, et al. Restora-tion techniques and marginal overhang in Class Ⅱ composite resin restorations[J]. J Dent, 2009,37(9):712-717.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.025 pmid: 19524348
[23] Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, et al. Proximal marginal overhang of composite restorations in re-lation to placement technique of separation rings[J]. Oper Dent, 2012,37(1):21-27.
doi: 10.2341/10-286-L pmid: 21942287
[24] Bittar DG, Murakami C, Hesse D, et al. Efficacy of two methods for restorative materials’ removal in primary teeth[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2011,12(5):372-378.
pmid: 22269199
[25] Demarco FF, Cenci MS, Lima FG, et al. Class Ⅱ composite restorations with metallic and translucent matrices: 2-year follow-up findings[J]. J Dent, 2007,35(3):231-237.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.07.011 pmid: 17034926
[26] Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Pereira CL, et al. One-year comparison of metallic and translucent matrices in Class Ⅱ composite resin restorations[J]. Am J Dent, 2007,20(1):41-45.
pmid: 17380807
[27] Graham DA, Daniels JA, Kahl EA, et al. Pre-con-toured matrix bands for Class Ⅱ amalgam restora-tions[J]. Gen Dent, 1980,28(3):52-57.
pmid: 6936329
[28] Arhun N, Cehreli SB. Do adhesive systems leave resin coats on the surfaces of the metal matrix bands? An adhesive remnant characterization[J]. Int J Perio-dontics Restorative Dent, 2013,33(2):e43-e50.
[29] Farah RI, Al-Harbi KS. The use of sectional matrix in direct restoration of a structurally compromised posterior tooth: a clinical technique[J]. Quintessence Int, 2019,50(9):680-684.
pmid: 31463481
[30] Kampouropoulos D, Paximada C, Loukidis M, et al. The influence of matrix type on the proximal contact in Class Ⅱ resin composite restorations[J]. Oper Dent, 2010,35(4):454-462.
doi: 10.2341/09-272-L pmid: 20672731
[31] Liebenberg WH. The proximal precinct in direct posterior composite restorations: interproximal inte-grity[J]. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent, 2002,14(7):587-594, 596.
pmid: 12373946
[32] Patras M, Doukoudakis S. Class Ⅱ composite re-storations and proximal concavities: clinical im-plications and management[J]. Oper Dent, 2013,38(2):119-124.
pmid: 22788722
[33] González-López S, Bolaños-Carmona MV, Navajas-Rodríguez de Mondelo JM. Individualized wedge[J]. Oper Dent, 2006,31(3):390-393.
doi: 10.2341/05-58 pmid: 16802649
[34] Sherwood IA, Rathakrishnan M, Savadamaoorthi KS, et al. Modified putty index matrix technique with mylar strip and a new classification for selecting the type of matrix in anterior proximal/incisal com-posite restorations[J]. Clin Case Rep, 2017,5(7):1141-1146.
doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1006 pmid: 28680613
[35] Kwon SR, Oyoyo U, Li Y. Influence of application techniques on contact formation and voids in anterior resin composite restorations[J]. Oper Dent, 2014,39(2):213-220.
pmid: 23875789
[36] Brackett MG, Ryan JM, Haddock FJ, et al. Use of a modified matrix band technique to restore subgin-gival root caries[J]. Oper Dent, 2018,43(5):467-471.
pmid: 29570028
[37] Bailey O, O’Connor C. Papilla management in sub-gingival, interproximal, direct composite restoration: a key step to success[J]. Br Dent J, 2019,226(12):933-937.
pmid: 31253910
[1] 薛晶, 杨静. 基于循证实践的Ⅱ类洞复合树脂修复的操作要点[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(4): 375-387.
[2] 王路明,曹潇,仵琳悦,李蕴聪,雷波,牛林. 掺锌生物活性玻璃纳米颗粒对复合树脂力学性能影响的实验研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(4): 404-411.
[3] 张静怡,李丹薇,孙宇,雷雅燕,刘涛,龚瑜. 复合树脂及复合体对成骨细胞毒性及成骨向分化的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(4): 412-419.
[4] 肖雨晗,于海洋. 种植义齿邻接触丧失的研究现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(2): 202-205.
[5] 梁继超, 王芬, 张正华, 庞富升, 侯梅娟, 张凤英. 正畸分牙辅助邻面龋充填治疗的临床疗效观察[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(4): 440-444.
[6] 姚陈敏, 周丽群, 黄翠. 前牙磨耗牙色修复材料的选择[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(3): 363-367.
[7] 武芳艳,李明菲,孟翔峰. 铸瓷全冠修复体树脂粘接效果的3年临床评估[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2016, 43(6): 658-660.
[8] 方力 刘源 杨燃 邹静. 树脂充填前后唾液中变异链球菌的变化[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2015, 42(1): 28-30.
[9] 王东杰1 吴兵2 陈晓红1. 光固化复合树脂前牙微创美学修复的临床体会[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2014, 41(2): 137-139.
[10] 王素苹 程磊 周学东. 复合树脂纳米抗菌成分的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2013, 40(6): 750-753.
[11] 邱海燕1 张倩2. 纤维增强复合树脂粘接桥的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2013, 40(3): 395-398.
[12] 叶韵瑶综述 林正梅审校. 低聚合收缩复合树脂的性能及其应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(4): 506-509.
[13] 苏伟珠1 王浙君1 撒悦1综述 王贻宁1，2审校. 漂白剂对复合树脂的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(4): 537-539.
[14] 侯乾乾综述 高益鸣审校. 预成纤维桩的临床应用研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(4): 554-556.
[15] 张丽丽邢文忠梁珊珊综述蒋滔审校. 复合树脂外源性染色的影响因素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(2): 198-201.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张新春. 桩冠修复与无髓牙的保护[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 王昆润. 长期单侧鼻呼吸对头颅发育有不利影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] 彭国光. 颈淋巴清扫术中颈交感神经干的解剖变异[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] 杨凯. 淋巴化疗的药物运载系统及其应用现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] 康非吾. 种植义齿下部结构生物力学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] 柴枫. 可摘局部义齿用Co-Cr合金的激光焊接[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] 孟姝,吴亚菲,杨禾. 伴放线放线杆菌产生的细胞致死膨胀毒素及其与牙周病的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] 费晓露,丁一,徐屹. 牙周可疑致病菌对口腔黏膜上皮的粘附和侵入[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] 赵兴福,黄晓晶. 变形链球菌蛋白组学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] 庞莉苹,姚江武. 抛光和上釉对陶瓷表面粗糙度、挠曲强度及磨损性能的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .