国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 256-260.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2017.03.002

• 牙体牙髓专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

HyFlex、S3、K3XF以及ProTaper在树脂模拟根管中成形能力的比较研究

李宗莉, 彭彬   

  1. 口腔基础医学省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地和口腔生物医学教育部重点实验室,武汉大学口腔医学院 武汉 430079
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-12 修回日期:2017-01-17 出版日期:2017-05-01 发布日期:2017-05-01
  • 通讯作者: 彭彬,教授,博士,Email:phs301@vip.163.com
  • 作者简介:李宗莉,硕士,Email:zlizongli@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    湖北省自然科学基金(2014CFA059)

Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of HyFlex, S3, K3XF and ProTaper in simulated curved canals

Li Zongli, Peng Bin.   

  1. The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology(Hubei-MOST) &
    Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
  • Received:2016-08-12 Revised:2017-01-17 Online:2017-05-01 Published:2017-05-01
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province(2014CFA059).

摘要:

目的 通过树脂模拟根管比较HyFlex、S3、K3XF以及ProTaper的成形能力。方法 40个单弯树脂模拟根管随机分为4组,分别使用HyFlex、S3、K3XF以及ProTaper预备根管,数码相机采集预备前后根管的形态,采用图片处理软件Photoshop CS5将其重叠,通过分析软件AutoCAD 2010计算10个观测点的根管树脂去除量并计算中心定位能力,采用SPSS 17.0对数据进行单因素方差分析。结果 HyFlex无器械分离,其他3种器械各发生1例。在距根尖2、3 mm处HyFlex的中心定位能力最好(P<0.05),在4~6 mm处则是K3XF最好(P<0.05)。结论 4种器械预备后的树脂根管都保持着较好的根管形态,没有明显的偏移、台阶出现。HyFlex在根尖段的成形能力最好,K3XF则在根管中段更有优势。

关键词: 镍钛器械, 中心定位能力, 模拟树脂根管

Abstract:

Objective To compare the shaping ability of HyFlex, S3, K3XF and ProTaper in simulated resin canals. Methods Forty curved artificial root canals in resin blocks were divided into four groups randomly, and prepared to an apical using HyFlex, S3, K3XF and ProTaper, respectively. Images of pre- and post-instrumentation were superimposed by Photoshop CS5. Incidence of instrument fracture was recorded. The amount of resin removed by each system was measured at 10 measuring points by AutoCAD 2010. The data were analyzed by using one-way analysis of variance.Results One case of instrument fracture occurred in S3, K3XF and ProTaper respectively. The centering ability of HyFlex was the best at 2 mm to 3 mm from the apex(P<0.05). At 4 mm to 6 mm levels, K3XF showed a significantly higher centering ability(P<0.05). Conclusion The four systems could maintain the original canal morphology well without obvious canal transportation and ledging. In the apical of the root canal, the shaping ability of HyFlex was the best compared with others, whereas K3XF seemed to have more advantages in the middle.

Key words: nickel-titanium instrument, centering ability, simulated root canal

中图分类号: 

  • R781.05
[1] Kunert GG, Camargo Fontanella VR, De Moura AA, et al. Analysis of apical root transportation associated with ProTaper Universal F3 and F4 instruments by using digital subtraction radiography[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(6):1052-1055.
[2] Özer SY. Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2011, 111(2):244- 250.
[3] Bürklein S, Poschmann T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability of different nickel-titanium systems in simulated S-shaped canals with and without glide path[J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(8):1231-1234.
[4] Olivieri JG, Stöber E, García Font M, et al. In vitro comparison in a manikin model: increasing apical enlargement with K3 and K3XF rotary instru-ments[J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(9):1463-1467.
[5] Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, et al. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instru-mentation times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex instru-ments[J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(10):1638-1641.
[6] Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path[J]. J Endod, 2014, 40 (12):2053-2056.
[7] Zinelis S, Eliades T, Eliades G. A metallurgical cha-racterization of ten endodontic Ni-Ti instruments: assessing the clinical relevance of shape memory and superelastic properties of Ni-Ti endodontic ins-truments[J]. Int Endod J, 2010, 43(2):125-134.
[8] Gao Y, Gutmann JL, Wilkinson K, et al. Evaluation of the impact of raw materials on the fatigue and mechanical properties of ProFile Vortex rotary ins-truments[J]. J Endod, 2012, 38(3):398-401.
[9] Testarelli L, Plotino G, Al-Sudani D, et al. Bending properties of a new Nickel-Titanium alloy with a lower percent by weight of Nickel[J]. J Endod, 2011, 37(9):1293-1295.
[10] Peters OA, Gluskin AK, Weiss RA, et al. An in vitro assessment of the physical properties of novel Hyflex nickel-titanium rotary instruments[J]. Int Endod J, 2012, 45(11):1027-1034.
[11] Saleh AM, Vakili Gilani P, Tavanafar S, et al. Sha-ping ability of 4 different single-file systems in simulated S-shaped canals[J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(4): 548-552.
[12] 尼娜, 彭彬. TF与ProTaper在树脂根管中成形能力的比较研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2012, 28(5):453- 456.
Ni N, Peng B. Comparison of shaping-ability of twisted files and ProTaper in simulated curved canals [J]. J Oral Sci Res, 2012, 28(5):453-456.
[1] 孙晓阳, 李霞. 镍钛再治疗器械去除根管充填材料的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(3): 284-287.
[2] 蔡静静 葛久禹. 不同介质对镍钛器械疲劳抗性的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2015, 42(6): 739-743.
[3] 赵朋朋 秦宗长. 根管治疗与根管壁微裂[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2014, 41(4): 478-482.
[4] 刘昭慧 凌均棨. 三维自调节根管预备锉[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2014, 41(3): 320-323.
[5] 刘思茗综述 胡涛审校. 新型镍钛器械Twisted Files的应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2013, 40(2): 185-187.
[6] 段艳艳综述 苏勤审校. 根管预备中镍钛器械的应力分布及牙根的抗力性改变[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2013, 40(2): 199-201.
[7] 张健综述 葛久禹, 孙卫斌审校. Mtwo 镍钛器械的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2009, 36(5): 607-609.
[8] 陈晓春综述 陈新梅审校. 镍钛合金根管器械分离制造学因素的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2009, 36(3): 358-360.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张京剧. 青年期至中年期颅面复合体变化的头影测量研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 刘玲. 镍铬合金中铍对可铸造性和陶瓷金属结合力的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] 王昆润. 在种植体上制作固定义齿以后下颌骨密度的动态变化[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] 王昆润. 重型颌面部炎症死亡和康复病例的实验室检查指标比较[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] 温秀杰. 氟化物对牙本质脱矿抑制作用的体外实验研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] 杨春惠. 耳颞神经在颞颌关节周围的分布[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] 王昆润. 牙周炎加重期应选用何种抗生素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[8] 杨儒壮 孙宏晨 欧阳喈. 纳米级高分子支架材料在组织工程中的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2004, 31(02): 126 -128 .
[9] 严超然,李龙江. 肿瘤靶向药物载体系统的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] 沈末伦,华成舸. 上皮间质转化及其调控基因Twist在肿瘤侵袭转移中的作用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .