国际口腔医学杂志

国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 159-164.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2016.02.010

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

超声系统治疗与牙周翻瓣术的短期疗效比较

刘琼1,谢昊2,孙江1   

  1. 1.大连市口腔医院牙周黏膜科 大连 116021；2. 武汉大学口腔医院第五门诊部 武汉 430079
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-10 修回日期:2015-12-20 出版日期:2016-03-01 发布日期:2016-03-01
  • 通讯作者: 孙江，主任医师，硕士，Email：sunjiang129@sina.com
  • 作者简介:刘琼，副主任医师，硕士，Email：liuqiong713@163.com

Comparison of clinical effects in ultrasonic system and periodontal flap surgery in a short time

Liu Qiong1, Xie Hao2, Sun Jiang1   

  1. 1. Dept. of Periodontics and Oral Mucosa, Stomatological Hospital of Dalian, Dalian 116021, China; 2. The Fifth Policlinic, Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)
  • Received:2015-08-10 Revised:2015-12-20 Online:2016-03-01 Published:2016-03-01

RichHTML

7

PDF (PC)

668

被引次数

8

摘要： 目的 比较Vector超声系统治疗和牙周翻瓣术治疗慢性牙周炎的1年临床疗效。方法 选取牙周基础治疗3个月后，30例慢性牙周炎患者，其口内的单根牙及多根牙都存在牙周探诊深度5~7 mm的位点，随机分为3组各10例患者，Vector超声系统治疗组进行Vector超声治疗、牙周翻瓣术组进行改良Widman翻瓣术、常规龈下刮治和根面平整组进行龈下刮治和根面平整术，记录治疗结束1 d后的疼痛程度，并在治疗前，治疗后3、6、12个月，采用Florida探针系统检查记录探诊出血（BOP）、探诊深度（PD）、牙龈退缩（GR）、临床附着丧失（CAL），并比较分析。结果 3组治疗后1 d的疼痛程度评价，Vector超声系统治疗组最低2.2，牙周翻瓣术组最高为6.4，组间差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。对于单根牙，3组在治疗后的3、6、12个月PD、GR、BOP与治疗前比较都有显著改善（P<0.01)；治疗后的第12个月，Vector超声系统治疗组和牙周翻瓣术组PD改善相同，且该组的GR和CAL低于牙周翻瓣术组和常规龈下刮治和根面平整组。对于多根牙，治疗后3、6个月，3组PD较治疗前有改善，GR较治疗前明显增加（P<0.01)，翻瓣术组和Vector超声系统治疗组的CAL值较治疗前减少（P<0.05)；治疗后12个月只有翻瓣术组的PD、CAL值较治疗前减少（P<0.05)，3组的GR较治疗前明显增加（P<0.01)；3组的BOP阳性率在治疗后的3、6、12个月，翻瓣术组与治疗前比较显著下降（P<0.01)，另两组则在治疗后的12个月与治疗前差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 对于基础治疗后3个月，仍存在5~7 mm牙周袋位点的单根牙，采用Vector超声系统进行治疗的患者，1年后的疗效优于牙周翻瓣术；而对于多根牙，Vector超声系统治疗的效果不及牙周翻瓣手术的效果。

关键词: Vector 超声系统, 翻瓣术, 慢性牙周炎, Vector 超声系统, 翻瓣术, 慢性牙周炎

Abstract: Objective This study aims to compare the clinical effects of therapy with vector ultrasonic system and periodontal flap surgery in patients with chronic periodontitis in a short time. Methods A total of 30 patients with chronic periodontitis were selected. The patients had deep pockets from 5 mm to 7 mm in both single-rooted teeth and multirooted teeth at 3 months after initial therapy. All patients were randomly divided into three groups. Each group had 10 patients. The patients were treated with vector ultrasonic system, periodontal flap surgery, and scaling and root planning, respectively. Patients were asked to report their perceived pain after 1 day of treatment by using a visual analog scale. The clinical parameters of bleeding on probing(BOP), probing depth(PD), gingival recession(GR), and clinical attachment loss(CAL) were recorded by Florida electronic probe at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Differences were analyzed by SPSS 11.5. Results The three groups had differences in pain perception 1 day after the treatment. The vector ultrasonic system treatment group had the least pain reported, and the periodontal flap surgery group had the worst pain reported. For the study of the single-rooted teeth, the three groups had differences in PD, GR, and BOP after treatment in 3, 6, and 12 months compared with the baseline(P<0.01). After 1 year, the vector ultrasonic system treatment group and periodontal flap surgery group showed similar improvement in PD; however, the former had the lowest GR and CAL. For multi-rooted teeth, the three groups improved in PD at 3 and 6 months after treatment. CAL decreased in the vector ultrasonic system treatment group and the periodontal flap surgery group. CAL and PD decreased in the periodontal flap surgery group(P<0.05) 12 months after treatment. GR increased in three groups at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment (P<0.01). In addition, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment, the BOP positive rate decreased in the periodontal flap surgery group (P<0.01). The other two groups had no difference 12 months after treatment(P>0.05). Conclusion The vector ultrasonic system achieved better curative effect on single-rooted teeth than periodontal flap surgery 1 year after treatment. In multi-rooted teeth, the effect of the periodontal flap surgery was the most stable, whereas the other two treatments were unstable.

Key words: Vector ultrasonic system, periodontal flap surgery, chronic periodontitis, Vector ultrasonic system, periodontal flap surgery, chronic periodontitis

中图分类号: 

  • R 782
[1] Schwarz F, Bieling K, Venghaus S, et al. Influence of fluorescence-controlled Er:YAG laser radiation, the Vector system and hand instruments on periodontally diseased root surfaces in vivo[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2006, 33(3):200-208.
[2] Slot DE, Koster TJ, Paraskevas S, et al. The effect of the Vector scaler system on human teeth: a systematic review[J]. Int J Dent Hyg, 2008, 6(3):154-165.
[3] Kahl M, Haase E, Kocher T, et al. Clinical effects after subgingival polishing with a non-aggressive ultrasonic device in initial therapy[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2007, 34(4):318-324.
[4] Kocher T, Fangh?nel J, Schwahn C, et al. A new ultrasonic device in maintenance therapy: perception of pain and clinical efficacy[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32(4):425-429.
[5] Guentsch A, Preshaw PM. The use of a linear oscillating device in periodontal treatment: a review [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2008, 35(6):514-524.
[6] Kawashima H, Sato S, Kishida M, et al. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo[J]. J Periodont Res, 2007, 42(1):90-95.
[7] Kawashima H, Sato S, Kishida M, et al. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo[J]. J Periodontal Res, 2007, 42(1):90-95.
[8] Pretzl B, Kaltschmitt J, Kim TS, et al. Tooth loss after active periodontal therapy. 2: tooth-related factors[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2008, 35(2):175-182.
[9] Zandbergen D, Slot DE, Cobb CM, et al. The clinical effect of scaling and root planing and the concomitant administration of systemic amoxicillin and metronidazole: a systematic review[J]. J Periodontol, 2013, 84(3):332-351.
[1] 原振英,管翠强,南欣荣. DNA甲基化与口腔疾病的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2019, 46(4): 437-441.
[2] 潘韦霖,曹钰彬,刘畅,刘济远,李春洁,潘剑,华成舸. 不同翻瓣设计对下颌第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛的影响：系统评价与Meta分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2019, 46(2): 142-148.
[3] 黄海霞, 兰玉燕, 张昊, 潘兰兰, 郭玲, 刘敏. 慢性牙周炎患者种植修复后种植体牙周指数及龈沟液炎性因子水平的变化研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(4): 396-402.
[4] 李琳, 王丹, 赵曼竹, 唐明. 慢性牙周炎与神经退行性疾病相关性的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(5): 514-518.
[5] 杨春艳, 税艳青. 单核苷酸多态性与慢性牙周炎相关关系的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(4): 452-458.
[6] 赵红, 王新林, 吕治, 王冬青, 苏建荣. 基于高通量测序技术研究慢性牙周炎患者龈下刮治和根面平整术治疗前后龈下菌群的变化[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(3): 294-300.
[7] 王璨粲,袁红梅,陈文. Perioscopy牙周内窥镜的应用及护理配合[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2016, 43(2): 134-136.
[8] 孙庆忠1 叶宏林2. 68例慢性牙周炎患者龈下菌斑致病菌的分布及耐药性分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2013, 40(6): 724-726.
[9] 林牧 任秀云 常乐 岳姿洁 石学雪 孙丽莉. 大鼠慢性牙周炎模型中牙龈卟啉单胞菌的检测[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2013, 40(5): 572-576.
[10] 缪羽 张晓敏综述 李利审校. 慢性牙周炎与爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒和人疱疹病毒6 型的相关性[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(1): 117-119.
[11] 杨恒, 潘伦弘综述 丁一审校. 基质金属蛋白酶-13 的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2009, 36(5): 561-563.
[12] 邓辉综述 吴亚菲审校. 牙龈卟啉单胞菌与动脉粥样硬化发病的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2009, 36(4): 438-440.
[13] 宁杨，付云，陈琳. 慢性牙周炎患者牙周手术治疗后血清肿瘤坏死因子-α 水平的变化[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2009, 36(2): 130-130～132.
[14] 彭国光,赵继刚,夏炜,熊坤,. 不翻瓣技术牙种植的临床观察[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2006, 33(05): 407-409.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王昆润. 修补颌骨缺损的新型生物学相容材料[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 陆加梅. 不可复性关节盘移位患者术前张口度与关节镜术后疗效的相关性[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] 王昆润. 咀嚼口香糖对牙周组织微循环的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] 宋红. 青少年牙周炎外周血分叶核粒细胞的趋化功能[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] 高卫民,李幸红. 发达国家牙医学院口腔种植学教学现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[6] 侯锐. 正畸患者釉白斑损害的纵向激光荧光研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[7] 轩东英. 不同赋形剂对氢氧化钙抗菌效果的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[8] 房兵. 唇腭裂新生儿前颌骨矫正方法及对上颌骨生长发育的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[9] 杨美祥. 前牙厚度在预测上下颌牙量协调性中的作用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[10] 赵艳丽. 手术刀、电凝、CO_2和KTP激光对大鼠舌部创口的作用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .