Int J Stomatol ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 319-325.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2024050

• ·Reviews· • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing of prefabricated personalized allografts in bone augmentation surgery

Yuxin Zhong(),Haiyang Yu()   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Prosthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2023-08-25 Revised:2024-01-16 Online:2024-05-01 Published:2024-05-06
  • Contact: Haiyang Yu E-mail:1024477290@qq.com;yhyang6812@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    Sichuan Province Science and Technology Plan Project(2020YFS0040)

Abstract:

Computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing and molding technology can preform the target bone block, which is suitable for the recipient area. It is often used in complex alveolar ridge augmentation surgery. The digital design and production of personalized allogeneic bone block can prevent the traditional step of chair-side bone block forming, increase the efficiency of clinical operation, improve the precision of graft adaptation, and facilitate the vascularization and osseointegration of the graft. This technology shows clinical application potential in bone augmentation. Therefore, this article reviews the current application status of customized allogenous bone blocks in implant bone augmentation surgery and further discusses its existing problems and challenges.

Key words: computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing, alveolar ridge augmentation, allogenic bone block

CLC Number: 

  • R782.13

TrendMD: 
1 Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Simion M. Clinical outcomes of vertical bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: a systematic review[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2008, 35(8 ): 203-215.
2 Barone A, Varanini P, Orlando B, et al. Deep-frozen allogeneic onlay bone grafts for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary alveolar ridges: a preliminary study[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 67(6): 1300-1306.
3 Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, et al. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(): 1-21.
4 Carlsson GE, Persson G. Morphologic changes of the mandible after extraction and wearing of dentures. A longitudinal, clinical, and X-ray cephalome-tric study covering 5 years[J]. Odontol Revy, 1967, 18(1): 27-54.
5 Cordaro L, Terheyden H. 口腔种植的牙槽嵴骨增量程序:分阶段方案[M]. 7版. 宿玉成, 译. 沈阳: 辽宁科学技术出版社, 2016.
Cordaro L, Terheyden H. Ridge augmentation procedures in implant patients: a staged approach[M]. 7th ed. Su YC, trans. Shenyang: Liaoning Science and Technology Press, 2016.
6 McAllister BS, Haghighat K. Bone augmentation techniques[J]. J Periodontol, 2007, 78(3): 377-396.
7 Jacotti M, Barausse C, Felice P. Posterior atrophic mandible rehabilitation with onlay allograft created with CAD-CAM procedure: a case report[J]. Implant Dent, 2014, 23(1): 22-28.
8 Jacotti M. Simplified onlay grafting with a 3-dimensional block technique: a technical note[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2006, 21(4): 635-639.
9 Felice P, Pistilli R, Lizio G, et al. Inlay versus onlay iliac bone grafting in atrophic posterior mandible: a prospective controlled clinical trial for the comparison of two techniques[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2009, 11(): e69-e82.
10 Chaushu G, Mardinger O, Peleg M, et al. Analysis of complications following augmentation with cancellous block allografts[J]. J Periodontol, 2010, 81(12): 1759-1764.
11 Motamedian SR, Khojaste M, Khojasteh A. Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: a systematic literature review[J]. Ann Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 6(1): 78-90.
12 Sheikh Z, Sima C, Glogauer M. Bone replacement materials and techniques used for achieving vertical alveolar bone augmentation[J]. Materials (Basel), 2015, 8(6): 2953-2993.
13 Misch CM. Autogenous bone: is it still the gold standard[J]. Implant Dent, 2010, 19(5): 361.
14 Gazdag AR, Lane JM, Glaser D, et al. Alternatives to autogenous bone graft: efficacy and indications[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 1995, 3(1): 1-8.
15 Jacotti M, Wang HL, Fu JH, et al. Ridge augmentation with mineralized block allografts: clinical and histological evaluation of 8 cases treated with the 3-dimensional block technique[J]. Implant Dent, 2012, 21(6): 444-448.
16 Jensen SS, Terheyden H. Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24(): 218-236.
17 Misch CM. Maxillary autogenous bone grafting[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 2011, 23(2): 229-238.
18 Cricchio G, Lundgren S. Donor site morbidity in two different approaches to anterior iliac crest bone harvesting[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2003, 5(3): 161-169.
19 Sbordone C, Toti P, Guidetti F, et al. Volume chan-ges of autogenous bone after sinus lifting and graf-ting procedures: a 6-year computerized tomographic follow-up[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2013, 41(3): 235-241.
20 Boogaard Maarten J, Romanos Georgios E. Allograft customized bone blocks for ridge reconstruction: a case report and radiological analysis[J]. Appl Sci, 2021, 11(21): 10413.
21 Nkenke E, Weisbach V, Winckler E, et al. Morbidity of harvesting of bone grafts from the iliac crest for preprosthetic augmentation procedures: a prospective study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004, 33(2): 157-163.
22 Summers BN, Eisenstein SM. Donor site pain from the ilium. A complication of lumbar spine fusion[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1989, 71(4): 677-680.
23 Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(): 113-123.
24 Lima RG, Lima TG, Francischone CE, et al. Bone volume dynamics and implant placement torque in horizontal bone defects reconstructed with autologous or xenogeneic block bone: a randomized, controlled, split-mouth, prospective clinical trial[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018, 33(4): 888-894.
25 Li J, Xuan F, Choi BH, et al. Minimally invasive ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone blocks in an atrophied posterior mandible: a clinical and histological study[J]. Implant Dent, 2013, 22(2): 112-116.
26 Romanos GE. Severe atrophy of the posterior mandible and inferior alveolar nerve transposition[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2021, 41(5): e199-e204.
27 Virolainen P, Heikkilä J, Hirn M, et al. 30 years of bone banking at Turku bone bank[J]. Cell Tissue Bank, 2003, 4(1): 43-48.
28 Aho AJ, Eskola J, Ekfors T, et al. Immune responses and clinical outcome of massive human osteoarticular allografts[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998(346): 196-206.
29 Pfaffeneder-Mantai F, Meller O, Schneider B, et al. Specially designed and CAD/CAM manufactured allogeneic bone blocks using for augmentation of a highly atrophic maxilla show a stable base for an all-on-six treatment concept: a case report[J]. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg, 2022, 44(1): 21.
30 Schlee M, Rothamel D. Ridge augmentation using customized allogenic bone blocks: proof of concept and histological findings[J]. Implant Dent, 2013, 22(3): 212-218.
31 Blume O, Back M, Born T, et al. Treatment of a bilaterally severely resorbed posterior mandible due to early tooth loss by Guided Bone Regeneration u-sing customized allogeneic bone blocks: a case report with 24 months follow-up data[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2018, 30(6): 474-479.
32 Blume O, Donkiewicz P, Back M, et al. Bilateral maxillary augmentation using CAD/CAM manufactured allogenic bone blocks for restoration of congenitally missing teeth: a case report[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2019, 31(3): 171-178.
33 Kloss FR, Offermanns V, Donkiewicz P, et al. Customized allogeneic bone grafts for maxillary horizontal augmentation: a 5-year follow-up radiogra-phic and histologic evaluation[J]. Clin Case Rep, 2020, 8(5): 886-893.
34 Landsberg C, Moses O. Ridge augmentation using customized allogeneic bone block: a 3-year follow-up of two case reports[J]. Int J Periodontics Resto-rative Dent, 2020, 40(6): 881-889.
35 Blume O, Back M, Martin K, et al. A customized allogenic bone block for alveolar reconstruction quantitated by a 3D matching technique: a case report[J]. Clin Case Rep, 2021, 9(9): e04771.
36 Ambrosio F, Azimi K, López-Torres A, et al. Custom allogeneic block graft for ridge augmentation: case series[J]. Clin Adv Periodontics, 2023, 13(2): 94-101.
37 Monje A, O’Valle F, Monje-Gil F, et al. Cellular, vascular, and histomorphometric outcomes of solvent-dehydrated vs freeze-dried allogeneic graft for ma-xillary sinus augmentation: a randomized case series[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2017, 32(1): 121-127.
38 Browning ES, Mealey BL, Mellonig JT. Evaluation of a mineralized cancellous bone allograft for the treatment of periodontal osseous defects: 6-month surgical reentry[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2009, 29(1): 41-47.
39 Simion M, Jovanovic SA, Tinti C, et al. Long-term evaluation of osseointegrated implants inserted at the time or after vertical ridge augmentation. A re-trospective study on 123 implants with 1-5 year follow-up[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2001, 12(1): 35-45.
40 Christensen DK, Karoussis IK, Joss A, et al. Simultaneous or staged installation with guided bone augmentation of transmucosal titanium implants. A 3-year prospective cohort study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2003, 14(6): 680-686.
41 Schlee M, Dehner JF, Baukloh K, et al. Esthetic outcome of implant-based reconstructions in augmen-ted bone: comparison of autologous and allogeneic bone block grafting with the pink esthetic score (PES)[J]. Head Face Med, 2014, 10: 21.
42 Kloss FR, Offermanns V, Kloss-Brandstätter A. Comparison of allogeneic and autogenous bone grafts for augmentation of alveolar ridge defects-a 12-month retrospective radiographic evaluation[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29(11): 1163-1175.
43 Kim SJ, Shin HS, Shin SW. Effect of bone block graft with rhBMP-2 on vertical bone augmentation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010, 39(9): 883-888.
44 Troeltzsch M, Troeltzsch M, Kauffmann P, et al. Clinical efficacy of grafting materials in alveolar ridge augmentation: a systematic review[J]. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 44(10): 1618-1629.
45 Laino L, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, et al. Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with sandwich technique: bone block from the chin area versus corticocancellous bone block allograft: clinical and histological prospective randomized controlled study[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 2014: 982104.
[1] Li Ruyi,Luo Feng,Wan Qianbing. Principle and application progress of real-time mandibular motion recording system [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(2): 182-189.
[2] Xue Du,Fang Qu,Weicai Liu. Establishment of a three-dimensional virtual dental patient and its application in esthetic restoration [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(6): 695-702.
[3] Zhan Danting, Zhang Fan, Zheng Lige. Application and research progress on virtual articulator [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(2): 228-232.
[4] Wan Qianbing. Several problems on monolithic zirconia crowns [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(1): 9-13.
[5] Chen Chunxiu, Wen Xuejin.. Nursing cooperation for computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing of zirconia ceramic restoration system [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(2): 140-142.
[6] Lei Wenlong1, Shi Bin1,2.. Effects of platelet-derived growth factor on dental implants [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(2): 199-203.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 461 -462 .
[10] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2004, 31(02): 132 -134 .