Inter J Stomatol ›› 2016, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 159-164.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2016.02.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of clinical effects in ultrasonic system and periodontal flap surgery in a short time

Liu Qiong1, Xie Hao2, Sun Jiang1   

  1. 1. Dept. of Periodontics and Oral Mucosa, Stomatological Hospital of Dalian, Dalian 116021, China; 2. The Fifth Policlinic, Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)
  • Received:2015-08-10 Revised:2015-12-20 Online:2016-03-01 Published:2016-03-01

Abstract: Objective This study aims to compare the clinical effects of therapy with vector ultrasonic system and periodontal flap surgery in patients with chronic periodontitis in a short time. Methods A total of 30 patients with chronic periodontitis were selected. The patients had deep pockets from 5 mm to 7 mm in both single-rooted teeth and multirooted teeth at 3 months after initial therapy. All patients were randomly divided into three groups. Each group had 10 patients. The patients were treated with vector ultrasonic system, periodontal flap surgery, and scaling and root planning, respectively. Patients were asked to report their perceived pain after 1 day of treatment by using a visual analog scale. The clinical parameters of bleeding on probing(BOP), probing depth(PD), gingival recession(GR), and clinical attachment loss(CAL) were recorded by Florida electronic probe at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Differences were analyzed by SPSS 11.5. Results The three groups had differences in pain perception 1 day after the treatment. The vector ultrasonic system treatment group had the least pain reported, and the periodontal flap surgery group had the worst pain reported. For the study of the single-rooted teeth, the three groups had differences in PD, GR, and BOP after treatment in 3, 6, and 12 months compared with the baseline(P<0.01). After 1 year, the vector ultrasonic system treatment group and periodontal flap surgery group showed similar improvement in PD; however, the former had the lowest GR and CAL. For multi-rooted teeth, the three groups improved in PD at 3 and 6 months after treatment. CAL decreased in the vector ultrasonic system treatment group and the periodontal flap surgery group. CAL and PD decreased in the periodontal flap surgery group(P<0.05) 12 months after treatment. GR increased in three groups at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment (P<0.01). In addition, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment, the BOP positive rate decreased in the periodontal flap surgery group (P<0.01). The other two groups had no difference 12 months after treatment(P>0.05). Conclusion The vector ultrasonic system achieved better curative effect on single-rooted teeth than periodontal flap surgery 1 year after treatment. In multi-rooted teeth, the effect of the periodontal flap surgery was the most stable, whereas the other two treatments were unstable.

Key words: Vector ultrasonic system, periodontal flap surgery, chronic periodontitis, Vector ultrasonic system, periodontal flap surgery, chronic periodontitis

CLC Number: 

  • R 782

TrendMD: 
[1] Schwarz F, Bieling K, Venghaus S, et al. Influence of fluorescence-controlled Er:YAG laser radiation, the Vector system and hand instruments on periodontally diseased root surfaces in vivo[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2006, 33(3):200-208.
[2] Slot DE, Koster TJ, Paraskevas S, et al. The effect of the Vector scaler system on human teeth: a systematic review[J]. Int J Dent Hyg, 2008, 6(3):154-165.
[3] Kahl M, Haase E, Kocher T, et al. Clinical effects after subgingival polishing with a non-aggressive ultrasonic device in initial therapy[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2007, 34(4):318-324.
[4] Kocher T, Fangh?nel J, Schwahn C, et al. A new ultrasonic device in maintenance therapy: perception of pain and clinical efficacy[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32(4):425-429.
[5] Guentsch A, Preshaw PM. The use of a linear oscillating device in periodontal treatment: a review [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2008, 35(6):514-524.
[6] Kawashima H, Sato S, Kishida M, et al. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo[J]. J Periodont Res, 2007, 42(1):90-95.
[7] Kawashima H, Sato S, Kishida M, et al. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo[J]. J Periodontal Res, 2007, 42(1):90-95.
[8] Pretzl B, Kaltschmitt J, Kim TS, et al. Tooth loss after active periodontal therapy. 2: tooth-related factors[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2008, 35(2):175-182.
[9] Zandbergen D, Slot DE, Cobb CM, et al. The clinical effect of scaling and root planing and the concomitant administration of systemic amoxicillin and metronidazole: a systematic review[J]. J Periodontol, 2013, 84(3):332-351.
[1] Qi Xiaoling,Gan Tingbin,Huang Jiao. Research progress on the relationship between chronic periodontitis and chronic kidney disease [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(1): 18-22.
[2] Yuan Zhenying,Guan Cuiqiang,Nan Xinrong. Research progress on DNA methylation and oral disease [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2019, 46(4): 437-441.
[3] Huang Haixia, Lan Yuyan, Zhang Hao, Pan Lanlan, Guo Ling, Liu Min. Changes on periodontal index and inflammatory factor levels in gingival crevicular fluid after implant restoration in patients with chronic periodontitis [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(4): 396-402.
[4] Li Lin, Wang Dan, Zhao Manzhu, Tang Ming. Research progress on the correlation between chronic periodontitis and neurodegenerative diseases [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(5): 514-518.
[5] Yang Chunyan, Shui Yanqing. Research progress on association between single nucleotide polymorphism and chronic periodontitis [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(4): 452-458.
[6] Zhao Hong, Wang Xinlin, Lü Zhi, Wang Dongqing, Su Jianrong. Microbiological community analysis by high-throughput sequencing of subgingival plaque in patients with chronic periodontitis before and after subgingival scaling and root planing [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(3): 294-300.
[7] Wang Cancan, Yuan Hongmei, Chen Wen. Application of periodontal endoscope and nursing in perioscopy [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2016, 43(2): 134-136.
[8] Sun Qingzhong1, Ye Honglin2. Distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of subgingival pathogenic bacteria in 68 patients with chronic periodontitis [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(6): 724-726.
[9] Lin Mu, Ren Xiuyun, Chang Le, Yue Zijie, Shi Xuexue, Sun Lili.. Detection of Porphyromonas gingivalis in SD rats with chronic periodontitis [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(5): 572-576.
[10] Miao Yu, Zhang Xiaomin, Li Li.. Relationship of Epstein-Barr virus and human herpes virus-6 to chronic periodontitis [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2012, 39(1): 117-119.
[11] YANG Heng, PAN Lun-hong, DING Yi. Research progress of matrix metalloprotease-13 [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2009, 36(5): 561-563.
[12] DENG Hui, WU Ya-fei. Association between Porphyromonas gingivalis and atherosclerosis [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2009, 36(4): 438-440.
[13] NING Yang, FU Yun, CHEN Lin. Changes of tumor necrosis factor-α levels in serum after surgical periodontal th [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2009, 36(2): 130-130~132.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .