Int J Stomatol

Inter J Stomatol ›› 2019, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 234-237.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2019005

• Reviews • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Measurement methods and relevant factors of the soft tissue thickness in the palatal masticatory mucosa of maxillary

Lingling Liu,Shutai Liu()   

  1. Dept. of Periodontics, Yantai Stomatological Hospital, Yantai 264000, China
  • Received:2018-05-15 Revised:2018-10-07 Online:2019-03-01 Published:2019-03-15
  • Contact: Shutai Liu E-mail:dentistliu@163.com

RichHTML

11

PDF (PC)

358

Abstract:

Palatal connective tissue is the main donor site of soft tissue in periodontal and implant surgery. The surgical success of soft tissue grafts is closely associated with graft thickness. Accordingly, the assessment of the thickness of palatal mucosa of maxillary plays an important role in treatment programs and prognosis, as well as optimal areas for clinical doctors. The measurement methods and relevant factors of the soft thickness in the maxillary are reviewed.

Key words: palatal, soft tissue thickness, measurement, relevant factors, connective tissue graft

CLC Number: 

  • R78

TrendMD: 
[1] Gupta P, Jan SM, Behal R , et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computerized tomography in determining the thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa[J]. J Indian Soc Periodontol, 2015,19(4):396-400.
doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.156876 pmid: 4555796
[2] Schacher B, Bürklin T, Horodko M , et al. Direct thickness measurements of the hard palate mucosa[J]. Quintessence Int, 2010,41(8):e149-e156.
doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.041 pmid: 20657848
[3] Studer SP, Allen EP, Rees TC , et al. The thickness of masticatory mucosa in the human hard palate and tuberosity as potential donor sites for ridge augmen-tation procedures[J]. J Periodontol, 1997,68(2):145-151.
doi: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.2.145 pmid: 9058332
[4] Kydd WL, Daly CH , Wheeler JB 3rd. The thickness measurement of masticatory mucosa in vivo[J]. Int Dent J, 1971,21(4):430-441.
[5] Müller HP, Schaller N, Eger T , et al. Thickness of masticatory mucosa[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2000,27(6):431-436.
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027006431.x
[6] Eger T, Müller HP, Heinecke A . Ultrasonic determi-nation of gingival thickness. Subject variation and influence of tooth type and clinical features[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 1996,23(9):839-845.
doi: 10.1111/cpe.1996.23.issue-9
[7] Müller HP, Schaller N, Eger T . Ultrasonic determina-tion of thickness of masticatory mucosa: a methodo-logic study[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 1999,88(2):248-253.
doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70123-X pmid: 10468471
[8] Müller HP, Schaller N, Eger T , et al. Thickness of masticatory mucosa[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2000,27(6):431-436.
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027006431.x
[9] Song JE, Um YJ, Kim CS , et al. Thickness of poste-rior palatal masticatory mucosa: the use of compu-terized tomography[J]. J Periodontol, 2008,79(3):406-412.
doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070302 pmid: 18315422
[10] Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P . Clinical applica-tions of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice[J]. J Can Dent Assoc, 2006,72(1):75-80.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.018 pmid: 16480609
[11] Januário AL, Barriviera M, Duarte WR . Soft tissue cone-beam computed tomography: a novel method for the measurement of gingival tissue and the dimensions of the dentogingival unit[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2008,20(6):366-374.
doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00211.x
[12] Barriviera M, Duarte WR, Januário AL , et al. A new method to assess and measure palatal masticatory mucosa by cone-beam computerized tomography[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2009,36(7):564-568.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01422.x pmid: 19538329
[13] Yilmaz HG, Boke F, Ayali A . Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of the soft tissue thickness and greater palatine foramen location in the palate[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2015,42(5):458-461.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12390 pmid: 25817728
[14] Kuriakose A, Raju S . Assessment of thickness of palatal mucosal donor site and its association with age and gender[J]. J Indian Soc Periodontol, 2012,16(3):370-374.
doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.100913 pmid: 3498706
[15] Wara-aswapati N, Pitiphat W, Chandrapho N , et al. Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa associated with age[J]. J Periodontol, 2001,72(10):1407-1412.
doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1407 pmid: 11699483
[16] Stipetić J, Hrala Z, Celebić A . Thickness of mastica-tory mucosa in the human hard palate and tuberosity dependent on gender and body mass index[J]. Coll Antropol, 2005,29(1):243-247.
doi: 10.1525/aeq.2005.36.2.182 pmid: 16117330
[17] Kolliyavar B, Setty S, Thakur SL . Determination of thickness of palatal mucosa[J]. J Indian Soc Perio- dontol, 2012,16(1):80-83.
doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.94610 pmid: 22628968
[18] Gupta N, Hungund S, Astekar MS , et al. Evaluation of palatal mucosal thickness and its association with age and gender[J]. Biotech Histochem, 2014,89(7):481-487.
doi: 10.3109/10520295.2014.893586 pmid: 24665938
[19] östlund SG . The effect of complete dentures on the gum tissue: a histological and histopathological in-vestigation[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 1958,16(1):1-41.
doi: 10.3109/00016355809028181
[20] Yaman D, Aksu S, Dişçi R , et al. Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa and its relationship with different parameters in Turkish subjects[J]. Int J Med Sci, 2014,11(10):1009-1014.
doi: 10.7150/ijms.9112 pmid: 25076847
[21] Reiser GM, Bruno JF, Mahan PE , et al. The subepi-thelial connective tissue graft palatal donor site: ana-tomic considerations for surgeons[J]. Int J Periodon-tics Restorative Dent, 1996,16(2):130-137.
[22] Barriviera M, Duarte WR, Januário AL , et al. A new method to assess and measure palatal masticatory mucosa by cone-beam computerized tomography[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2009,36(7):564-568.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01422.x pmid: 19538329
[23] Ueno D, Sekiguchi R, Morita M , et al. Palatal mucosal measurements in a Japanese population using cone-beam computed tomography[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2014,26(1):48-58.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.12053 pmid: 24548316
[24] Esfahrood ZR, Kadkhodazadeh M, Talebi Ardakani MR . Gingival biotype: a review[J]. Gen Dent, 2013,61(4):14-17.
[25] Fu JH, Yeh CY, Chan HL , et al. Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology[J]. J Periodontol, 2010,81(4):569-574.
doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090591 pmid: 20367099
[26] Anuradha BR, Shankar BS, John B , et al. Assessment of palatal masticatory mucosa: a cross-sectional study[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2013,14(3):536-543.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1358 pmid: 24172003
[1] Zhu Qiuyan,Wu Daomin,Bao Jibo,Xie Zhigang.. Research progress on the influence of bucco-palatal sinus width and angle on sinus augmentation [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(2): 159-165.
[2] Zhao Zhe,Wang Fu,Zheng Xiuli,An Na,Chen Jihua.. Research progress on measuring methods of tooth movement under functional load [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(3): 362-366.
[3] Wu Min,Li Chenghao,Li Yang,Gong Caixia,Shi Bing. Effect of preoperative width of cleft palate on fistula formation after Sommerlad-Furlow technique [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(6): 640-643.
[4] Tian Haonan,Lin Min,Xie Congman,Ren Aishu. Association between ponticulus posticus and maxillary palatally impacted canine: a cone-beam computed tomography study [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(5): 536-540.
[5] Shi Danni,Yang Xin,Wu Jianyong. Research progress of reference coordinate system for three-dimensional cephalometric based on cone beam computed tomography [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(4): 398-404.
[6] Liu Yi,Liu Yi. Research progress on the correlation between impacted canines and palatal morphology [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(2): 243-248.
[7] Liu Jiamei,Wu Yanmin. Application of periodontal plastic surgery in the preservation and reconstruction of gingival papilla [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(3): 318-327.
[8] Wang Yahong,Li Chenghao,Shi Bing. Research progress on the mechanism of palatal shelf elevation [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2019, 46(5): 546-551.
[9] Li Yeping,Zheng Qian,Yin Heng,Guo Chunli,Shi Bing,Li Chenghao. Exploration on nasal objective measurements affecting subjective evaluation of the secondary reconstruction of unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2019, 46(4): 407-412.
[10] Fangfang Fang,Yaqin Chang,Yingchun Dong,Shasha Qin,Bin Chen. Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus autogenous connective tissue graft in periodontal soft tissue augmentation: a systematic review and Meta-analysis [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2019, 46(2): 135-141.
[11] Manying Huang,Yun Fu. Gingival biotype and assessment methods [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2019, 46(2): 171-176.
[12] Tingting Zhang,Juanjuan Zong. Research progress on connective tissue graft [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2019, 46(1): 89-93.
[13] Cong Wenwen, Zhang Daizun, Xiao Wenlin, Xue Lingfa, Xu Yaoxiang. Expression changes of platelet-derived growth factor receptor α in the process of palatal suspension culture of the C57BL/6J mouse in vitro [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(3): 313-318.
[14] Wan Shuangquan, Deng Feilong. Clinical applications of subepithelial connective tissue grafting in soft tissue deficiencies of dental implantation [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(1): 68-73.
[15] Zhu Chenyou, Deng Jia, Gan Zhoujie, Liu Liu, Wang Tianlu, Cao Cong, Qu Yili. The application of cone-beam computed tomography in implant surgery of maxillary anterior teeth area [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(1): 59-63.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[10] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .