Int J Stomatol

Inter J Stomatol ›› 2017, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 55-58.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2017.01.011

• ·Original Articles· • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A study of maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness of different population in Xinjiang region using cone-beam CT

Luo Zhiqiang1, 2, Ye Zhongtai3   

  1. 1. Dept. of Maxillofacial Surgery, Suzhou Stomatological Hospital, Suzhou 215000, China;
    2. Dept. of Maxillofacial Surgery, People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830000, China;;
    3. Dept. of Stomatology, Shenzhen Eighth People’s Hospital, Shenzhen 518100, China
  • Received:2016-04-01 Online:2017-01-01 Published:2017-01-01

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

308

Abstract: Objective To evaluate maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness of different population by using cone-beam computed tomography(CBCT), in order to provide anatomical basis for operation guidance, preoperative risk assessment and surgical risk in operation which is closely related with the maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness. Methods Using Planmeca Romexis 3.1.0.R software to evaluate the 3D image data in all 331 samples which maxillary sinus lateral wall was taken from 15、16、17、25、26、27 in radiology department of People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Urgur Autonomous Region from April 2013 to October 2014. The data was analyzed with SPSS 17.0 software package. Results Male or female, Han people or Uyghur people, different age groups and presence or absence of tooth the maximum thickness of lateral wall were all almost located at 16 or 26. The minimum thickness of lateral wall was 0.5 mm, located at the second molar. The maximum thickness of lateral wall was 10.92 mm, located at the first molar. In the same location, between different gender, races, age groups and presence or absence of tooth, there were no significant differences(P<0.05), except the left second molar between male and female. Conclusion CBCT can precisely measure maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness. Age, gender, race and presence or absence of tooth have little influence on the thickness of lateral wall, however, there are large differences in the thickness of lateral wall between different location and individual.

Key words: cone-beam computed tomography, maxillary sinus lateral wall, bone thickness

CLC Number: 

  • R782

TrendMD: 
[1] Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, et al. A sys-tematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2008, 35(8 Suppl):216-240.
[2] Ella B, Noble Rda C, Lauverjat Y, et al. Septa within the sinus: effect on elevation of the sinus floor[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2008,46(6):464-467.
[3] Lagravère MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, et al. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography ima-ges[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008, 134 (1):112-116.
[4] Panou E, Motro M, Ates M, et al. Dimensional chan-ges of maxillary sinuses and pharyngeal airway in Class Ⅲ patients undergoing bimaxillary orthogna-thic surgery [J]. Angle Orthod, 2013, 83(5):824-831.
[5] Jung YH, Cho BH. Assessment of the relationship between the maxillary molars and adjacent structures using cone beam computed tomography[J]. Imaging Sci Dent, 2012, 42(4):219-224.
[6] Yang SM, Park SI, Kye SB, et al. Computed tomo-graphic assessment of maxillary sinus wall thickness in edentulous patients[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2012, 39 (6):421-428.
[7] 李俊, 周芷萱, 袁华, 等. 江苏汉族人群上颌窦外侧骨壁厚度的锥形束CT研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2013, 22(5):537-541. Li J, Zhou ZX, Yuan H, et al. A study of maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness of Han population in Jiangsu region using cone-beam CT[J]. Shanghai J Stomatol, 2013, 22(5):537-541.
[8] Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2008, 23(1):48-56.
[9] Yang HM, Bae HE, Won SY, et al. The buccofacial wall of maxillary sinus: an anatomical consideration for sinus augmentation[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2009, 11(Suppl 1):e2-e6.
[1] Wu Wenzhi,Feng Da-xing,Chen Chuizhuang,Zhou Lijuan.. Incidence and related factors of middle mesial canals in mandibular first molars in Haikou [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(4): 420-425.
[2] Tian Haonan,Lin Min,Xie Congman,Ren Aishu. Association between ponticulus posticus and maxillary palatally impacted canine: a cone-beam computed tomography study [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(5): 536-540.
[3] Ding Zhangfan,Guo Zhiyong,Miao Cheng,Li Chunjie,Xuan Ming,Wang Xiaoyi,Zhang Zhuang. Application of the cone-beam computed tomography-based three-dimensional visualization technology in the surgery of the jaw cystic lesion [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(2): 180-186.
[4] Zhu Hualing,Yan Yujia,Zou Ling. Research progress on the root canal morphology of maxillary permanent molars by using cone-beam computed tomography [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(6): 699-705.
[5] Zhu Chenyou, Deng Jia, Gan Zhoujie, Liu Liu, Wang Tianlu, Cao Cong, Qu Yili. The application of cone-beam computed tomography in implant surgery of maxillary anterior teeth area [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(1): 59-63.
[6] Ren Hongyu, Chen Xin. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with different voxel resolutions and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated apical root resorption [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(5): 514-517.
[7] Xie Yufei, Lu Peijun, Hu Zheng, Feng Jing, Shen Gang. Cone beam computed tomography analysis on the cortical bone thickness of infrazygomatic crest [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(3): 281-285.
[8] Luo Houzhuo, Jia Lihui, Li Chengri, Zhang Wenjun, Zhang Xiaodong.. Comparison of general angle magnitudes measured using two kinds of cephalometric measuring software [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(5): 592-594.
[9] Liu Taiqi, Zhou Li, Wang Yanmin.. Current situation and progress of evaluating mesiodistal root angulation by panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomograph [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(1): 102-104.
[10] Xu Ziqing, Feng Jing.. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography in oral maxillofacial linear measurements [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2012, 39(4): 557-560.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .