Int J Stomatol

Inter J Stomatol ›› 2014, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 146-148.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2014.02.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Differences in the occlusional grinding among various methods of jaw relationship recording in complete denture replacement

Sun Xuewu, Liu Zhonghao, Zhu Xiangkui, Yang Liu.   

  1. Dept. of Prosthodontics, Yantai Dental Hospital, Yantai 264001, China
  • Received:2013-10-11 Revised:2014-01-05 Online:2014-03-01 Published:2014-03-01

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

622

Abstract:

Objective The differences in the occlusional grinding among various methods of jaw relationship recording in complete denture replacement were compared to determine the most reliable method to provide references for clinical practice. Methods With the use of randomized self-controlled trial, 20 patients were selected and subjected to complete denture replacement. Three methods of jaw relationship recording were used for each patient: direct interocclusal records, gothic arch tracing, and gothic arch tracing combined with face-bow. Subsequently, the overbite and the overjet of the complete dentures under the three methods were compared before and after occlusion grinding. Results Data from gothic arch tracing combined with face-bow were significantly smaller than those from direct interocclusal records or gothic arch tracing(P<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between direct interocclusal records and gothic arch tracing(P>0.05). Conclusion Jaw relationship recording by gothic arch tracing and gothic arch tracing combined with face-bow were more in line with physiological function and considered as the most reliable methods in complete denture replacement. These methods could improve the working efficiency of dentists and increase patient satisfaction.

Key words: complete denture, overbite, overjet, gothic arch tracing, face-bow

CLC Number: 

  • R 783.4

TrendMD: 
[1] Sun Shuzhen,Yang Yadong,Yang Jian. Research progress on complete denture with neutral zone technology [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2019, 46(6): 735-739.
[2] Chang-hong Hu. A concept of returning to the therapeutic nature in treatment and restoration of the edentulous cases [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(6): 621-627.
[3] Sun Xuewu, Liu Zhonghao, Zhu Xiangkui, Yang Liu. Evaluation on the masticatory efficiency of patients by different methods of jaw relationship recording in replacing complete dentures [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(3): 286-288.
[4] Sun Huiqiang1,2, Liu Jin2. Introduction on the progress of impression techniques of complete denture [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(6): 701-705.
[5] Peng Dezhi1, Chang Xin2.. Common methods of bite-opening in clinical treatment of deep overbite [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(4): 503-507.
[6] Wang Wanwei 1,Wei Yufang 2,Li Jun 1,Zhang Tingting 1 .. The effect of doctor-patient communication on complete denture restoration [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(2): 160-161.
[7] Shao Qi1, Sun Huiqiang1，2, Deng Yannan1, Wan Haoyuan1.. Application of neutral zone technique in denture making [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2012, 39(2): 174-176.
[8] Lu Shijun1, Wang Lin2, Wang Zhendong2.. Progress of anterior teeth intrusion in deep overbite treatment [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2011, 38(6): 674-676.
[9] Sun Xuewu, Liu Zhonghao.. Jaw relationship recording for patients who need complete denture again [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2011, 38(5): 614-616.
[10] WANG Jing, GUO Tianwen．. The new advances in dental prostheses for children with ectodermal dysplasia [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2010, 37(6): 727-731.
[11] MA Hui-fen , LI Yu-chao , LIN Xue-fen , XU Long-bo , JI Ping . The analysis of occlusion in the treatment of youth bruxism with deep overbite us [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2009, 36(4): 387-390.
[12] REN Wei-hong1，Eleni Roumanas2. The lingualized occlusion of complete denture [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(5): 499-499～501.
[13] ZHANG Feng1, LI Xi- ting2, WEI Su- hua1.. Progress in the study of denture adhesive [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2007, 34(06): 464-466.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2004, 31(02): 126 -128 .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .