Int J Stomatol

Inter J Stomatol ›› 2012, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 190-193.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5749.2012.02.015

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Alveolar distraction osteogenesis vs. vertical guided bone regeneration for the correction of vertical bone deficiency

Zhang Xiaodan, Hu Danqing, Ping Feiyun.   

  1. Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, China
  • Received:2010-09-01 Revised:2011-10-21 Online:2012-03-01 Published:2012-03-01

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

840

Abstract:

Numerous surgical procedures concerning vertical and horizontal bone augmentation emerge with the rapid development of dental implant surgery. Many patients have the problem of vertical bone deficiency, however, compared to horizontal bone augmentation, vertical bone augmentation is more complex and unpredictable and induces more complications. Therefore, vertical bone augmentation gains increased attention in both clinical and basic research field. Distraction osteogenesis and guided membrane regeneration are two commonly conducted vertical bone augmentation surgical procedures under intensive investigation. In this review, we evaluated these two procedures in a clinical perspective and evaluated them according to their augmentation efficiency, bone resorption and implantation success.

Key words: vertical bone augmentation, guided membrane regeneration, distraction osteogenesis


TrendMD: 
[1] Luo Qixian, Liu Changgeng. Distraction osteogenesis of periodontal ligament and dentoalveolar bone acceleration in orthodontic tooth movement [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(3): 309-313.
[2] Huang Wu, Zeng Rongsheng.
Research progress on ultrasound applied to distraction osteogenesis
[J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(2): 188-191.
[3] Wang Jinjuan, Chen Jun. . Complications and preventation of distraction osteogenesis in oral and maxillofacial surgery [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2012, 39(6): 818-823.
[4] Yu Ruixue1, Wang Dawei1, Chen Yiyang2.. Research progress on distraction osteogenesis in treatment of cleft palate deformities [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2012, 39(2): 180-183.
[5] Hu Xinyi, Pan Xiaogang.. Clinical and research progress on the treatment effect and the long term stability of cleft lip and palate patients with maxillary hypoplasia during prepuberty [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2011, 38(5): 584-588.
[6] Wang Rongjie, Zeng Rongsheng.. Research progress on jaw distractors [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2011, 38(4): 463-466.
[7] YAN Baoyong1, DONG Fu-sheng2,3, DONG Yu-ying2,3, HAO Fu-liang2,3, ZHANG Yang2,3, CHEN Ai-zhe3.. Effect of Chinese tradition medicine on the quality of new bone and expression of osteocalcin [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2011, 38(2): 159-164.
[8] SONG Ji-chuan, ZHOU Nuo.. Current status of transport distraction osteogenesis for the reconstruction of craniomaxillofacial skeletal defect [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2011, 38(1): 102-105.
[9] YIN Lin-ling, FANG Bing. Research progress on application of distraction osteogenesis in orthodontic tooth [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2010, 37(02): 229-229～232.
[10] NIU Gang, ZHENG Jie, WU Ye.. Effects of collagen sponge on mandibular distraction osteogenesis [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2010, 37(02): 138-138～140,145.
[11] ZHOU Guang- ying, ZHAO Hua- qiang

. Association between per iosteum and distr action osteogenesis [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(3): 335-335～337.
[12] XIE Hong- jun, WANG Yin- long, ZHOU Jian. Research development of low- intensity pulsed ultrasound to accelerate the new bo [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(2): 186-188.
[13] HUANG Li, YANG Si- wei. Application of distr action osteogenesis in or thodontic ar ea [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(1): 91-93.
[14] ZHANG Rui, LU Xiao- feng.. Effect of distraction osteogenesis on development of mandible [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2007, 34(06): 458-460.
[15] WANG Cheng, ZENG Rong- sheng.. Advance of low- intensity pulsed ultrasound in distraction osteogenesis [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2007, 34(05): 374-377.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .