Inter J Stomatol ›› 2010, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (02): 128-132.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5749.2010.02.002

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research about the safe zones of microscrews for orthodontic anchorage positionin

WEI Xing, ZHAO Li-xing, XU Zhen-rui, TANG Na, ZHAO Zhi-he.   

  1. Dept. of Orthodontics, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Che
  • Received:2009-06-03 Revised:2009-12-16 Online:2010-03-20 Published:2010-03-20
  • Contact: ZHAO Zhi-he

Abstract:

Objective To study the anatomical characteristics of Chinese alveolar bone to determine the safe zones of microscrews placement which are used for orthodontic anchorage. Methods Twenty-one normal Chinese jaws were scanned and reconstructed with helical CT technology. The mesiodistal and the buccolingual parameters were measured at the 3, 5, 7 and 9 mm from the alveolar crest. Results 1)In the anterior area of maxilla, the widest mesiodistal distance between roots was between the lateral incisor and the canine, the narrowest mesiodistal distance between roots was between the central incisor and the lateral incisor; in the posterior area of maxilla, the widest mesiodistal distance between roots was between the second premolar and the first molar, the narrowest mesiodistal distance between roots was between the first molar and the second molar. In the buccolingual dimension, the greatest bone thickness was between the first molar and the second molar, the least bone thickness was between the central incisor and the lateral incisor. 2)In the mandible, the widest mesiodistal distance between roots was between the first molar and the second molar, the narrowest mesiodistal distance between roots was between the central incisor and the lateral incisor. In the buccolingual dimension, the greatest bone thickness was between the first molar and the second molar, the least bone thickness was between the central incisors. Conclusion The reconstructed images of helical CT were high qualitative, which could fully identify the relationship of alveolar bone and the space between roots. Therefore, we provided the reference and indications for a safe application of the microscrews in the Chinese alvelar bone.

Key words: microscrews, applicational anatomy, safe zones, anchorage, helical CT

CLC Number: 

  • R

TrendMD: 
[1] Zhu Yeling,Wang Xi,Sun Tiantong,Wang Lina,He Xiaoming,Li Jiazhi. Improved application of a novel device that could achieve dental arch mesialization [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(1): 82-90.
[2] Zhang Shizhen,Lai Wenli. Research progress on maxillary protraction methods and auxiliary maxillary expansion for skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(3): 354-361.
[3] Tian Qinglu,Zhao Zhihe. Research progress on stability of mini-implants in orthodontic treatments [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(2): 212-218.
[4] Yan Dan,Zhang Xizhong,Wang Jianguo. 3D finite element analysis for influence of microimplant thread depth on microimplant and mandible [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2019, 46(4): 387-392.
[5] Yanli Liu,Wei Zhao,Biying Zhang,Xiaoli An. Research progress on maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage in growing patients with Class Ⅲ malocclusion [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2019, 46(1): 112-118.
[6] Zeng Tingyan, Huang Shenggao. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for stability of mini-implant anchorage [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(1): 112-118.
[7] Zhao Jingzi1, Zhang Wenjun2, Zhang Xiaodong2. . Safe region of micro-implant used for orthodontic anchorage positioning in the posterior maxillary alveolar bone [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(6): 659-663.
[8] Yan Dan, Zhang Xizhong, Wang Zengquan, Wang Jianguo, Guan Zejian. Three-dimensional finite element analysis for the influence of micro-implant pitch on micro-implant-bone interface [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(5): 557-561.
[9] Wang Qiaojing, Huang Zhenxian, Xiao Liwei. Research progress on mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(5): 572-574.
[10] Wen Xingtao1, Ren Bolin1, Bao Lina2, Li Dongjian1. Clinical study of traction preservation of maxillary anterior teeth residual root with microscrew anchorage [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(4): 426-429.
[11] Xie Yufei, Lu Peijun, Hu Zheng, Feng Jing, Shen Gang. Cone beam computed tomography analysis on the cortical bone thickness of infrazygomatic crest [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(3): 281-285.
[12] He Han, He Hong.. Clinical application of implant anchorage for vertical control in orthodontics [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(5): 648-652.
[13] Li Xue, Feng Xiaoxia, Zhao Zhihe.. The negative effects of miniscrew anchorage in clinical application [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(4): 493-495.
[14] Li Jianhua, Feng Xiaoxia, Yang Pu. Research progress on the bone-anchored maxillary protraction [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(3): 416-418.
[15] Wang Yanan, Yang Siwei..
The clinical and basic research of mini -implant anchorage for the anterior teeth intrusion
[J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(2): 221-223.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[10] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .