国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 274-279.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2021056
摘要:
根管治疗后及时合理的冠部修复是影响患牙保存的重要因素,随着粘接技术、修复材料的不断发展,椅旁计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制作(CAD/CAM)髓腔固位冠已被越来越多地应用于根管治疗后牙齿的冠部修复。磨牙在口内主要承受压应力,具有相对较厚的颈周牙本质和宽大的髓腔,因此具备髓腔固位冠粘接修复的有利条件。本文针对磨牙根管治疗后椅旁CAD/CAM髓腔固位冠的特点、优势、生物力学变化、临床操作细节以及临床疗效等方面进行综述,为其临床应用提供参考。
中图分类号:
[1] |
Belleflamme MM, Geerts SO, Louwette MM, et al. No post-no core approach to restore severely dama-ged posterior teeth: an up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases[J]. J Dent, 2017,63:1-7.
doi: S0300-5712(17)30093-3 pmid: 28456557 |
[2] |
Fages M, Raynal J, Tramini P, et al. Chairside computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture all-ceramic crown and endocrown restorations: a 7-year survival rate study[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2017,30(6):556-560.
doi: 10.11607/ijp.5132 |
[3] |
Sedrez-Porto JA, Rosac WL, da Silva AF, et al. Endocrown restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Dent, 2016,52:8-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.005 pmid: 27421989 |
[4] |
Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years: preliminary results[J]. J Adhes Dent, 1999,1(3):255-265.
pmid: 11725673 |
[5] |
Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, et al. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature: part 1. Composition and micro-and macrostructure alterations[J]. Quintessence Int, 2007,38(9):733-743.
pmid: 17873980 |
[6] |
Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures[J]. J Endod, 1989,15(11):512-516.
doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80191-8 |
[7] |
Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Martins LR, et al. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part Ⅰ: fracture resistance and fracture mode[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2008,99(1):30-37.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60006-2 |
[8] |
Clark D, Khademi JA. Case studies in modern molar endodontic access and directed dentin conservation[J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2010,54(2):275-289.
doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2010.01.003 |
[9] |
Krishnan U, Moule A, Michael S, et al. Fractogra-phic analysis of a split tooth presenting radiographically as a horizontal root fracture in an unrestored mandibular second molar[J]. J Endod, 2018,44(2):304-311.
doi: S0099-2399(17)31190-1 pmid: 29275853 |
[10] |
Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique[J]. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent, 1995,7(5):83-94.
pmid: 7548896 |
[11] | 高学军, 岳林. 牙体牙髓病学[M]. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2013: 305-306. |
Gao XJ, Yue L. Cariology, endodontology and opera-tive dentistry[M]. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press, 2013: 305-306. | |
[12] |
Decerle N, Bessadet M, Munoz-Sanchez ML, et al. Evaluation of Cerec endocrowns: a preliminary cohort study[J]. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2014,22(2):89-95.
pmid: 25134368 |
[13] | Griffin JD Jr. CAD/CAM restorations: achieving excellence and simplicity[J]. Dent Today, 2016,35(11):96,98-100. |
[14] | Chen BW, Ma YZ, Wu KX, et al. Influence of various materials on biomechanical behavior of endocrown-restored, endodontically-treated mandibular first molar: a 3D-finite element analysis[J]. J Wuhan Univ Technol (Mater Sci Ed), 2015,30(3):643-648. |
[15] |
Skupien JA, Luz MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Ferrule effect: a meta-analysis[J]. JDR Clin Trans Res, 2016,1(1):31-39.
doi: 10.1177/2380084416636606 pmid: 30931698 |
[16] | Bindl A, Richter B, Mörmann WH. Survival of ceramic computer-aided design/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macroretention geometry[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2005,18(3):219-224. |
[17] | 翟晓阳, 张静亚, 张三柯, 等. 两种边缘设计的髓腔固位冠修复不同缺损下颌第一磨牙的有限元分析[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2019,37(5):480-484. |
Zhai XY, Zhang JY, Zhang SK, et al. Finite-element analysis of mandibular first molar with two marginal designs of endocrown for the repair of different defe-cts[J]. West China J Stomatol, 2019,37(5):480-484. | |
[18] |
Otto T. Computer-aided direct all-ceramic crowns: preliminary 1-year results of a prospective clinical study[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2004,24(5):446-455.
doi: 10.11607/prd.00.0601 |
[19] |
Otto T, Mörmann WH. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramic posterior shoulder crowns and endocrowns up to 12 years[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2015,18(2):147-161.
pmid: 26110927 |
[20] | Al-Dabbagh RA. Survival and success of endocrow-ns: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020:S0022-S3913(20)30079-2. |
[21] | Sanchez Blanco I, Sauco Marquez JJ, Montero Miralles P, et al. Endocrown, alternative to full coverage crowns: a case report[J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2017: S56-56. |
[22] | Botto EB, Barón R, Borgia JL. Endocrown: a retrospective patient series study, in a 8 to 19-year period[J]. Odontoestomatología, 2016,18(28):48-59. |
[23] | Dogui H, Abdelmalek F, Amor A, et al. Endocrown: an alternative approach for restoring endodontically treated molars with large coronal destruction[J]. Case Rep Dent, 2018,2018:1581952. |
[24] |
Tzimas K, Tsiafitsa M, Gerasimou P, et al. Endocrown restorations for extensively damaged posterior teeth: clinical performance of three cases[J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2018,43(4):e38.
doi: 10.5395/rde.2018.43.e38 |
[25] | Gonzalez Acosta L, Castelo Baz P, Bahillo Varela J, et al. Posterior tooth restoration with endocrown: a case report[J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2017: S55. |
[26] |
Zoidis P, Bakiri E, Polyzois G. Using modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as an alternative material for endocrown restorations: a short-term clinical report[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017,117(3):335-339.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.009 |
[27] |
El Ghoul W, Özcan M, Silwadi M, et al. Fracture resistance and failure modes of endocrowns manufactured with different CAD/CAM materials under axial and lateral loading[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2019,31(4):378-387.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.12486 pmid: 31067007 |
[28] |
Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture str-ength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns[J]. Oper Dent, 2012,37(2):130-136.
doi: 10.2341/11-105-L pmid: 21942234 |
[29] |
Forberger N, Göhring TN. Influence of the type of post and core on in vitro marginal continuity, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of lithia disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2008,100(4):264-273.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60205-X pmid: 18922255 |
[30] | Al shibri S, Elguindy J. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with lithium disilicate crowns retained with fiber posts compared to lithium disilicate and cerasmart endocrowns: in vitro study[J]. Dentistry, 2017,7(12):1-9. |
[31] |
Dejak B, Młotkowski A. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation[J]. Dent Mater, 2013,29(12):e309-e317.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.09.014 |
[32] |
Helal MA, Wang ZG. Biomechanical assessment of restored mandibular molar by endocrown in comparison to a glass fiber post-retained conventional crown: 3D finite element analysis[J]. J Prosthodont, 2019,28(9):988-996.
doi: 10.1111/jopr.v28.9 |
[33] | Hasan I, Frentzen M, Utz KH, et al. Finite element analysis of adhesive endo-crowns of molars at different height levels of buccally applied load[J]. J Dent Biomech, 2012,3:1758736012455421. |
[34] |
Hayes A, Duvall N, Wajdowicz M, et al. Effect of endocrown pulp chamber extension depth on molar fracture resistance[J]. Oper Dent, 2017,42(3):327-334.
doi: 10.2341/16-097-L pmid: 28467258 |
[35] |
Dartora NR, de Conto Ferreira MB, Moris ICM, et al. Effect of intracoronal depth of teeth restored with endocrowns on fracture resistance: in vitro and 3-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. J Endod, 2018,44(7):1179-1185.
doi: S0099-2399(18)30246-2 pmid: 29866407 |
[36] |
Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Madruga CFL, et al. Endocrown restorations: influence of dental remnant and restorative material on stress distribution[J]. Dent Mater, 2018,34(10):1466-1473.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.06.012 |
[37] |
Shin Y, Park S, Park JW, et al. Evaluation of the marginal and internal discrepancies of CAD-CAM endocrowns with different cavity depths: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017,117(1):109-115.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.025 |
[38] |
Gaintantzopoulou MD, El-Damanhoury HM. Effect of preparation depth on the marginal and internal adaptation of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture endocrowns[J]. Oper Dent, 2016,41(6):607-616.
pmid: 27379835 |
[39] | Tribst JPM, dal Piva AMDO, Madruga CFL, et al. The impact of restorative material and ceramic thickness on CAD\CAM endocrowns[J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2019,11(11):e969-e977. |
[40] |
da Cunha LF, Gonzaga CC, Pissaia JF, et al. Lithium silicate endocrown fabricated with a CAD-CAM system: a functional and esthetic protocol[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017,118(2):131-134.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.006 |
[41] |
Kim JH, Cho BH, Lee JH, et al. Influence of preparation design on fit and ceramic thickness of CEREC 3 partial ceramic crowns after cementation[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 2015,73(2):107-113.
doi: 10.3109/00016357.2014.956145 |
[42] | Fages M, Bennasar B. The endocrown: a different ty-pe of all-ceramic reconstruction for molars[J]. J Can Dent Assoc, 2013,79:d140. |
[43] |
Zhu JX, Wang DM, Rong QG, et al. Effect of central retainer shape and abduction angle during preparation of teeth on dentin and cement layer stress distributions in endocrown-restored mandibular molars[J]. Dent Mater J, 2020,39(3):464-470.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-050 |
[44] |
Einhorn M, DuVall N, Wajdowicz M, et al. Preparation ferrule design effect on endocrown failure resistance[J]. J Prosthodont, 2019,28(1):e237-e242.
doi: 10.1111/jopr.12671 |
[45] |
Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM. Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic[J]. Dent Mater, 2016,32(7):908-914.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.013 |
[46] |
El Ghoul W, Özcan M, Silwadi M, et al. Fracture resistance and failure modes of endocrowns manufactured with different CAD/CAM materials under axial and lateral loading[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2019,31(4):378-387.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.12486 pmid: 31067007 |
[47] |
Zhu JX, Rong QG, Wang XY, et al. Influence of remaining tooth structure and restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxi-llary premolars: a finite element analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017,117(5):646-655.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.023 |
[48] |
El-Damanhoury HM, Haj-Ali RN, Platt JA. Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CAD-CAM blocks[J]. Oper Dent, 2015,40(2):201-210.
doi: 10.2341/13-143-L |
[49] |
Dartora G, Rocha Pereira GK, Varella de Carvalho R, et al. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated cera-mic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2019,100:103401.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103401 |
[50] |
Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Cengiz E, Ongun S, et al. The effect of surface treatments on the mechanical and optical behaviors of CAD/CAM restorative materials[J]. J Prosthodont, 2019,28(2):e496-e503.
doi: 10.1111/jopr.12749 pmid: WOS:000458904300025 |
[1] | 高宇天,苏勤. 酸性氧化电位水在根管治疗中的研究与应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(4): 401-406. |
[2] | 汪牡丹,宋东哲,黄定明. 开髓洞型对患牙根管治疗术后抗折性能影响的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(2): 186-194. |
[3] | 王璐璇,侯本祥. 根管内氢氧化钙残留对根管治疗的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(3): 367-372. |
[4] | 戢晓,景钫淇,李雅,薛晶. 根管预备顺序的数据模拟优化研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(1): 37-47. |
[5] | 何蓉,刘学军,周宇琨. 光子引导的光声流效应在根管荡洗中应用的系统评价[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(6): 644-655. |
[6] | 邢桂琪,郭林溪,苏勤. 根管治疗后疾病的综合评估和治疗决策[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(5): 579-584. |
[7] | 彭玮琪,高原,徐欣. 髓腔通路设计的微创理念及其研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(4): 433-438. |
[8] | 谭凯璇,李帆,张利娟,李姗姗,卢洁,张颖,杨芳. 根管再治疗并发皮下气肿1例[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(5): 563-566. |
[9] | 唐蓓,赵文俊,王虎,郑广宁,游梦. 根管超填导致下牙槽神经损伤2例[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(3): 293-296. |
[10] | 许庆安,樊明文. 非器械根管治疗与多声波超洁净系统[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2019, 46(5): 522-525. |
[11] | 黄丽东, 宫玮玉, 董艳梅. 根管冲洗的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(4): 465-472. |
[12] | 马艳群, 李红, 侯本祥. 根尖周膜新附着的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(3): 331-334. |
[13] | 黄晓想, 张茹, 侯本祥. 恒牙根尖区解剖结构对根管治疗的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(3): 261-266. |
[14] | 李儒煌,王霄. 根尖手术预后影响因素的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2016, 43(6): 721-724. |
[15] | 梁继超 王芬 张凤英 张正华 侯梅娟 庞富生 周锋. Digora及Propex测量根管工作长度准确性的比较研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2016, 43(5): 515-518. |
|