国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 233-238.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2016.02.026

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同冲洗方法去除根管内氢氧化钙封药的效果比较

龙赟子,郑春艳,王祖华   

  1. 北京大学口腔医学院?口腔医院牙体牙髓病科 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-01 修回日期:2015-12-14 出版日期:2016-03-01 发布日期:2016-03-01
  • 通讯作者: 郑春艳,副主任医师,博士,Email:zhengchunyan12@sina.com
  • 作者简介:龙赟子,学士,Email:lyz844@126.com

Comparison of various irrigation methods on the removal efficacy of calcium hydroxide from root canal

Long Yunzi, Zheng Chunyan, Wang Zuhua   

  1. Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Received:2015-08-01 Revised:2015-12-14 Online:2016-03-01 Published:2016-03-01

摘要: 氢氧化钙常被用作根管内封药,但根充前残留在根管内的氢氧化钙可能会削弱根充物的封闭性,进而影响根管治疗的效果。比较针头冲洗、超声冲洗、声波冲洗、根管刷、Endovac系统、RinsEndo系统、自调节根管锉系统和激光活化冲洗法对氢氧化钙封药的去除效果,可为临床选择去除氢氧化钙的冲洗方法提供参考。

关键词: 氢氧化钙, 根管内封药, 冲洗, 氢氧化钙, 根管内封药, 冲洗

Abstract: Calcium hydroxide(CH) is widely used as intracanal treatment during root canal therapy. However, calcium hydroxide remnants left in the root canal may influence the sealing ability of root canal filling, thereby compromising the quality of root canal therapy. This article compares the efficiency of eight different techniques of removing calcium hydroxide, including needle irrigation, passive ultrasonic irrigation, sonic irrigation, canalbrush, Endovac system, RinsEndo system, self-adjusting file system, and laser-activated irrigation, and provides information for clinical selection and application of these systems to remove CH medication from root canals.

Key words: calcium hydroxide, intracanal medicament, irrigation, calcium hydroxide, intracanal medicament, irrigation

中图分类号: 

  • R 781.05
[1] 黄定明, 周学东. 感染根管的治疗难点和对策[J].华西口腔医学杂志, 2011, 29(3):225-227.
Huang DM, Zhou XD. Strategies of endodontic infection control[J]. West China J Stomatol, 2011, 29(3):225-227.
[2] Kim SK, Kim YO. Influence of calcium hydroxide intracanal medication on apical seal[J]. Int Endod J, 2002, 35(7):623-628.
[3] Barbizam JV, Trope M, Teixeira EC, et al. Effect of calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing on the bond strength of a resin-based endodontic sealer[J]. Braz Dent J, 2008, 19(3):224-227.
[4] Contardo L, De Luca M, Bevilacqua L, et al. Influence of calcium hydroxide debris on the quality of endodontic apical seal[J]. Minerva Stomatol, 2007, 56(10):509-517.
[5] 沈妍欣, 俸宇超, 任杰, 等. 影响超声对根管内氢氧化钙清除效果的相关因素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2014, 41(4):483-486.
Shen YX, Feng YC, Ren J, et al. Effect factors of the removal of the calcium hydroxide from the root canals by ultrasonic irrigation[J]. Int J Stomatol, 2014, 41(4):483-486.
[6] Lee SJ, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The effectiveness of syringe irrigation and ultrasonics to remove debris from simulated irregularities within prepared root canal walls[J]. Int Endod J, 2004, 37(10):672-678.
[7] van der Sluis LW, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The evaluation of removal of calcium hydroxide paste from an artificial standardized groove in the apical root canal using different irrigation methodologies[J]. Int Endod J, 2007, 40(1):52-57.
[8] Kaptan F, Karapinar-Kazandag M, Kayahan MB, et al. Potential of an Er:YAG laser in the removal of calcium hydroxide from root canals[J]. Photomed Laser Surg, 2012, 30(5):250-254.
[9] R?dig T, Hirschleb M, Zapf A, et al. Comparison of ultrasonic irrigation and RinsEndo for the removal of calcium hydroxide and Ledermix paste from root canals[J]. Int Endod J, 2011, 44(12):1155-1161.
[10] Arslan H, Akcay M, Capar ID, et al. An in vitro comparison of irrigation using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming, ultrasonic, sonic and needle techniques in removing calcium hydroxide[J]. Int Endod J, 2015, 48(3):246-251.
[11] Capar ID, Ozcan E, Arslan H, et al. Effect of different final irrigation methods on the removal of calcium hydroxide from an artificial standardized groove in the apical third of root canals[J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(3):451-454.
[12] Top?uo?lu HS, Düzgün S, Ceyhanl? KT, et al. Efficacy of different irrigation techniques in the removal of calcium hydroxide from a simulated internal root resorptioncavity[J]. Int Endod J, 2015, 48(4):309-316.
[13] Kenee DM, Allemang JD, Johnson JD, et al. A quantitative assessment of efficacy of various calcium hydroxide removal techniques[J]. J Endod, 2006, 32(6):563-565.
[14] Lambrianidis T, Margelos J, Beltes P. Removal efficiency of calcium hydroxide dressing from the root canal[J]. J Endod, 1999, 25(2):85-88.
[15] Ta?demir T, Celik D, Er K, et al. Efficacy of several techniques for the removal of calcium hydroxide medicament from root canals[J]. Int Endod J, 2011, 44(6):505-509.
[16] Chou K, George R, Walsh LJ. Effectiveness of different intracanal irrigation techniques in removing intracanal paste medicaments[J]. Aust Endod J, 2014, 40(1):21-25.
[17] Balvedi RP, Versiani MA, Manna FF, et al. A comparison of two techniques for the removal of calcium hydroxide from root canals[J]. Int Endod J, 2010, 43(9):763-768.
[18] Faria G, Viola KS, Kuga MC, et al. Effect of rotary instrument associated with different irrigation techniques on removing calcium hydroxide dressing[J]. Microsc Res Tech, 2014, 77(8):642-646.
[19] Gorduysus M, Yilmaz Z, Gorduysus O, et al. Effectiveness of a new canal brushing technique in removing calcium hydroxide from the root canal system: a scanning electron microscope study[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2012, 15(4):367-371.
[20] Sa?sen B, Ustün Y, Aslan T, et al. The effect of peracetic acid on removing calcium hydroxide from the root canals[J]. J Endod, 2012, 38(9):1197-1201.
[21] Ahmeto?lu F, ??m?ek N, Kele? A, et al. Efficacy of self-adjusting file and passive ultrasonic irrigation on removing calcium hydroxide from root canals[J]. Dent Mater J, 2013, 32(6):1005-1010.
[22] Yücel A?, Gürel M, Güler E, et al. Comparison of final irrigation techniques in removal of calcium hydroxide[J]. Aust Endod J, 2013, 39(3):116-121.
[23] Nandini S, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D. Removal efficiency of calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament with two calcium chelators: volumetric analysis using spiral CT, an in vitro study[J]. J Endod, 2006, 32(11):1097-1101.
[24] Wiseman A, Cox TC, Paranjpe A, et al. Efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic activation for removal of calcium hydroxide from mesial canals of mandibular molars: a microtomographicstudy[J]. J Endod, 2011, 37(2):235-238.
[25] Ma JZ, Shen Y, al-Ashaw AJ, et al. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the removal of calcium hydroxide medicament from C-shaped root canals of mandibular second molars[J]. Int Endod J, 2015, 48(4):333-341.
[26] van der Sluis LW, Gambarini G, Wu MK, et al. The influence of volume, type of irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation[J]. Int Endod J, 2006, 39(6):472-476.
[27] Jiang LM, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, et al. An evaluation of the effect of pulsed ultrasound on the cleaning efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(11):1887-1891.
[28] van der Sluis LW, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from human root canals prepared using instruments of varying taper[J]. Int Endod J, 2005, 38(10):764-768.
[29] Jiang LM, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, et al. Influence of the oscillation direction of an ultrasonic file on the cleaning efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(8):1372-1376.
[30] Malki M, Verhaagen B, Jiang LM, et al. Irrigant flow beyond the insertion depth of an ultrasonically oscillating file in straight and curved root canals: visualization and cleaning efficacy[J]. J Endod, 2012, 38(5):657-661.
[31] 李颖, 牛卫东, 史春, 等. 根管内Ca(OH)2去除效果对根尖封闭性能影响的研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2009, 25(5):677-681.
Li Y, Niu WD, Shi C, et al. The effect of calcium hydroxide removal and the seal ability of root canal using different irrigation methods[J]. J Pract Stomatol, 2009, 25(5):677-681.
[32] Jiang LM, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, et al. Evaluation of a sonic device designed to activate irrigant in the root canal[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(1):143-146.
[33] Alturaiki S, Lamphon H, Edrees H, et al. Efficacy of 3 different irrigation systems on removal of calcium hydroxide from the root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study[J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(1):97-101.
[34] 宋颖, 王茹燕, 邹玲, 等. 不同方法去除根管内氢氧化钙封药的体外研究[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2014, 24(7):407-410.
Song Y, Wang RY, Zou L, et al. Removal of calcium hydroxide from root canals by different methods: an in vitro study[J]. Chin J Conserv Dent, 2014, 24(7): 407-410.
[35] Türker SA, Ko?ak MM, Ko?ak S, et al. Comparison of calcium hydroxide removal by self-adjusting file, EndoVac, and CanalBrush agitation techniques: an in vitro study[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2013, 16(5):439-443.
[36] Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Zary R, et al. The selfadjusting file(SAF). Part 1: respecting the root canal anatomy—a new concept of endodontic files and its implementation[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(4):679-690.
[37] Matsumoto H, Yoshimine Y, Akamine A. Visualization of irrigant flow and cavitation induced by Er:YAG laser within a root canal model[J]. J Endod, 2011, 37(6):839-843.
[38] DiVito E, Peters OA, Olivi G. Effectiveness of the erbium:YAG laser and new design radial and stripped tips in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2012, 27(2):273-280.
[39] 林正梅, 方溢云, 凌均柴. 广东珠江三角洲地区人下颌第一前磨牙根管解剖形态的研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2008, 26(5):526-530.
Lin ZM, Fang YY, Ling JQ. Morphological characteristics of the mandibular first premolars in people from Pearl River Delta region in Guangdong province[J]. West China J Stomatol, 2008, 26(5): 526-530.
[40] 吴大明, 吴友农, 梁睿贞. 上颌第一前磨牙根管颊舌向弯曲情况的研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2007, 25(2):149-152.
Wu DM, Wu YN, Liang RZ. Investigation of root canal curvature of human maxillary first premolar in buccolingualdirections[J]. West China J Stomatol, 2007, 25(2):149-152.
(本文采编 王晴)
[1] 黄丽东, 宫玮玉, 董艳梅. 根管冲洗的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(4): 465-472.
[2] 贾卓群, 杨路. 影响根管消毒剂氢氧化钙清除效率的因素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(4): 439-443.
[3] 李韶容, 张茹, 侯本祥. 根管用药对牙齿力学性能的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(3): 273-278.
[4] 沈妍欣 俸宇超 任杰 梁雅婧 尹仕海. 影响超声对根管内氢氧化钙清除效果的相关因素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2014, 41(4): 483-486.
[5] 蔡雪 王晓燕. 根管超声冲洗效果的影响因素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2014, 41(1): 72-76.
[6] 毛姣姣综述 林正梅审校. 根管冲洗方法的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(5): 635-638.
[7] 史彦 杨健. 次氯酸钠溶液抗菌体积分数的测定[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(5): 590-592.
[8] 张荣德1,2 董瑞红1 段彦盛2综述 陈莉娅3审校. 根管冲洗液对粪肠球菌作用的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(4): 516-518.
[9] 付国祥1 骆鸣宇1 高倩华2 廖雪峰1 王瑛1. 不同赋形剂氢氧化钙根管消毒效果的临床研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(2): 149-152.
[10] 张然. 次氯酸钠与MTAD 联合冲洗根管去除玷污层[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(2): 208-210.
[11] 冉祝. 28 例后牙根管治疗后失败的探讨[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2011, 38(4): 378-379.
[12] 黄林, 牛卫东. 不同根管环境对Root ZX 和ProPex 准确性的影响研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2010, 37(01): 23-25,29.
[13] 史彦综述 杨健审校. 螯合剂作为根管冲洗剂的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2009, 36(6): 708-711,715.
[14] 毛海燕综述 陈亚明审校. 根管冲洗液对根管壁黏结强度影响的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2009, 36(5): 580-582.
[15] 钟素兰综述 尹仕海审校. 对氢氧化钙根管消毒作用的再认识[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2009, 36(3): 307-309.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘佳综述 凌均棨审校. 基质金属蛋白酶的活性调控与龋病[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2011, 38(5): 574 -577 .
[2] 陈勇 梁甲兴. 错牙合畸形患者对正畸治疗的配合性[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2004, 31(03): 243 -245 .
[3] 刘习强,黄洪章. 靶向纳米转基因载体在头颈肿瘤中的研究现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2004, 31(05): 368 -370 .
[4] 崔伯瑜. 4种根管封闭剂甲醛释放量的比较[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2000, 27(05): .
[5] 浩志超1综述 孟玉坤2审校. 牙科用氧化锆陶瓷的低温时效及其影响因素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(4): 494 -497 .
[6] 李卓睿1综述 柳忠豪2审校. 即刻种植种植体周围骨缺损间隙的处理[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(1): 120 -123 .
[7] 任国欣 郭伟. 紫杉类药物在头颈癌临床治疗中的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2004, 31(03): 220 -222 .
[8] 杨敏综述 刘福祥审校. 激光扫描在头面部软组织三维重建和测量中的应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2010, 37(3): 351 -351~354 .
[9] 韶青华 陈振琦. 牙槽突裂植骨与颌骨生长发育的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2013, 40(1): 132 -134 .
[10] 程林综述 何惠宇审校. 三维有限元法在牙列缺损修复中的应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(2): 230 -232 .