Int J Stomatol ›› 2020, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 286-292.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2020062

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of polarization characteristics of human monocyte cell- and peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived macrophages

Liu Ye1,2,Hong Rundan2,Wang Zhiguo3,Liu Hanyun4,Meng Chenda2,Wang Ru2,Xu Quanchen1()   

  1. 1.Dept. of Oral Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China;
    2.School of Stomatology, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China;
    3.Dept. of Burn and Plastic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China;
    4.Dept. of Infectious Diseases, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China
  • Received:2019-09-17 Revised:2019-11-22 Online:2020-05-01 Published:2020-05-08
  • Contact: Quanchen Xu E-mail:qyfyxqc@126.com
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81500849);Shandong Province Key Research Plan(2018GSF118150);Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation(ZR2017MH083)

Abstract:

Objective Obtained from successfully established polarization models, the polarization characteristics of macrophages (Mφ) from different sources were compared to provide an experimental basis for biological treatments. Methods Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated through density gradient centrifugation and magnetic cell sorting and were cultured in vitro. PBMC Mφ was induced by human recombinant macrophage colony-stimulating factor. The human monocyte cell line THP-1 was differentiated into THP-1 Mφ under the induction of 100 nmol·L-1 phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate. Morphology, polarization marker expression (CD86 and CD206), and cytokine secretion levels of the two groups were compared under the condition of M1 or M2 polarization factors. M1 polarization factors was 50 ng·mL-1 lipopolysaccharides and 20 ng·mL-1 interferon-γ, and M2 polarization factors was 20 ng·mL-1 interleukin-4. Results After M1 polarization, the mRNA levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) were markedly upregulated, the expression of CD86 was enhanced, and the secretions of IL-1β and TNF-α in THP-1 Mφ were higher than those in PBMC Mφ. After M2 polarization, the mRNA levels of mannose receptor C-type 1 and interleukin-10 increased, and the expression of CD206 was upregulated in PBMC Mφ. However, no difference was observed in THP Mφ. Conclusion THP-1 is appropriate for M1 polarization, and PBMC is appropriate for M2 polarization.

Key words: macrophage polarization, human monocyte cell, peripheral blood mononuclear cell

CLC Number: 

  • Q25

TrendMD: 

Fig 1

Liquid was divided into three layers in density gradient centri-fugation"

Tab 1

Primer sequences of qRT-PCR analysis"

基因名称 引物序列(5’—3’)
IL-1β 正向:TGGCTTATTACAGTGGCAATGAGGATG
反向:TGTAGTGGTGGTCGGAGATTCGTAG
TNF-α 正向:AGCTGGTGGTGCCATCAGAGG
反向:TGGTAGGAGACGGCGATGCG
MRC1 正向:TTGGACGGATGGACGAGGAGTC
反向:CGGATCGTGTCTGGCATATGTAGC
IL-10 正向:GCCAAGCCTTGTCTGAGATGATCC
反向:GCTCCACGGCCTTGCTCTTG
GAPDH 正向:TGCACCACCAACTGCTTAGC
反向:GGCATGGACTGTGGTCATGAG

Fig 2

Morphological changes of Mφ from two cells sources inverted microscope"

Fig 3

Relative expression level of cytokine mRNA after Mφ polarization from two resources of cells"

Fig 4

The expression of polarization markers CD86 and CD206 from Mφ"

Tab 2

The expression levels of cytokines in Mφ supernatant from two resources of cells pg·mL-1"

细胞因子 对照组(静息状态) LPS+IFN-γ刺激 IL-4刺激
THP-1 PBMC THP-1 PBMC THP-1 PBMC
IL-1β 58.43±1.83 56.25±1.74 591.35±5.67 551.73±8.51 62.58±1.97 60.72±1.81
TNF-α 41.57±2.35 39.16±2.27 436.91±10.72 338±13.51 45.37±2.48 41.42±2.71
IL-6 28.73±1.98 47.39±2.31 307.59±9.53 429.86±11.62 36.26±1.76 49.98±2.74
[1] Martinez FO, Gordon S . The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment[J]. F1000Prime Rep, 2014,6:13.
doi: 10.12703/P6-13 pmid: 24669294
[2] van Ginderachter J, Liu YQ, Devoogdt N , et al. Classical and alternative activation of macrophages: different pathways of macrophage-mediated tumor promotion[M]// Kaiser HE, Nasir A. Selected aspects of cancer progression: metastasis, apoptosis and immune response. Dordrecht: Springer Nether-lands, 2008: 139-156.
[3] Inoue T, Ishikawa M, Sumiya Y , et al. Establishment of a macrophage-activating factor assay system using the human monocytic cell line THP-1[J]. Anticancer Res, 2015,35(8):4441-4445.
pmid: 26168484
[4] Rőszer T . Understanding the mysterious M2 macro-phage through activation markers and effector me-chanisms[J]. Mediators Inflamm, 2015,2015:816460.
[5] Geissmann F, Manz MG, Jung S , et al. Development of monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells[J]. Science, 2010,327(5966):656-661.
doi: 10.1126/science.1178331 pmid: 20133564
[6] Daigneault M, Preston JA, Marriott HM , et al. The identification of markers of macrophage differenti- ation in PMA-stimulated THP-1 cells and monocyte-derived macrophages[J]. PLoS One, 2010,5(1):e8668.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008668 pmid: 20084270
[7] Grotenhuis N, Bayon Y, Lange JF , et al. A culture model to analyze the acute biomaterial-dependent reaction of human primary macrophages[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2013,433(1):115-120.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.02.054 pmid: 23485466
[8] Gordon S, Plüddemann A, Martinez Estrada F . Ma-crophage heterogeneity in tissues: phenotypic diversity and functions[J]. Immunol Rev, 2014,262(1):36-55.
[9] Chanput W, Mes JJ, Wichers HJ . THP-1 cell line: an in vitro cell model for immune modulation approach[J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2014,23(1):37-45.
doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2014.08.002 pmid: 25130606
[10] Shiratori H, Feinweber C, Luckhardt S , et al. THP-1 and human peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived macrophages differ in their capacity to po-larize in vitro[J]. Mol Immunol, 2017,88:58-68.
doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2017.05.027 pmid: 28600970
[11] Forrester MA, Wassall HJ, Hall LS , et al. Similarities and differences in surface receptor expression by THP-1 monocytes and differentiated macrophages polarized using seven different conditioning regi-mens[J]. Cell Immunol, 2018,332:58-76.
doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2018.07.008 pmid: 30077333
[12] Knowles LM, Kagiri D, Bernard M , et al. Macro-phage polarization is deregulated in haemophilia[J]. Thromb Haemost, 2019,119(2):234-245.
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676796 pmid: 30650445
[13] Kohro T, Tanaka T, Murakami T , et al. A comparison of differences in the gene expression profiles of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate differentiated THP-1 cells and human monocyte-derived macrophage[J]. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2004,11(2):88-97.
doi: 10.5551/jat.11.88 pmid: 15153668
[14] Lund ME, To J, O’Brien BA , et al. The choice of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate differentiation pro-tocol influences the response of THP-1 macrophages to a pro-inflammatory stimulus[J]. J Immunol Methods, 2016,430:64-70.
doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2016.01.012 pmid: 26826276
[15] Pawełczyk A, Kubisa N, Jabłońska J , et al. Detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) negative strand RNA and NS3 protein in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC): CD3+, CD14+ and CD19+[J]. Virol J, 2013,10:346.
doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-10-346 pmid: 24279719
[16] 林炜明, 戴爱玲, 尹会方 , 等. 人外周血巨噬细胞培养及功能鉴定[J]. 中国免疫学杂志, 2015,31(1):86-89.
Lin WM, Dai AL, Yin HF , et al. Culture and func-tional identification of macrophages from human peripheral blood[J]. Chin J Immunol, 2015,31(1):86-89.
[17] Mae MB, Wittig B, Cignarella A , et al. Reduced PMA enhances the responsiveness of transfected THP-1 macrophages to polarizing stimuli[J]. J Im-munol Methods, 2014,402(1/2):76-81.
doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2013.11.006 pmid: 24269601
[18] Chanput W, Mes JJ, Wichers HJ . THP-1 cell line: an in vitro cell model for immune modulation approach[J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2014,23(1):37-45.
doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2014.08.002 pmid: 25130606
[19] Li LM, Hou DX, Guo YL , et al. Role of microRNA-214-targeting phosphatase and tensin homolog in advanced glycation end product-induced apoptosis delay in monocytes[J]. J Immunol, 2011,186(4):2552-2560.
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001633 pmid: 21228352
[1] Zhao Yujie,Guan Xiaoyan,Li Xiaolan,Chen Qijun,Wang Qian,Liu Jianguo. Research progress on macrophage polarization involved in the regulation of orthodontic tooth movement [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(4): 478-483.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .