Int J Stomatol

Inter J Stomatol ›› 2015, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 22-23.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2015.01.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of different treatment durations between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in the extraction cases

Liu Juan1, Li Meile2, Fang Shanbao2, Du Xi2.   

  1. 1. Dept. of Stomatology, The North Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People’s Hospital, Urumq 830054, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Dept. of Orthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Online:2015-01-01 Published:2015-01-01

RichHTML

10

PDF (PC)

1134

Abstract:

Objective To compare the different treatment durations between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in extraction cases. Methods Sixty extraction cases were collected and randomly divided into two groups(n=30), namely, experimental and control. The experimental group was treated with Damon Q self-ligating brackets. The control group was treated with conventional straight brackets. The durations of the treatments were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results The experimental group finished the treatment at an average of 640 d, where as the control group finished at an average of 686 d. However, no significant difference in treatment duration was found between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion The self-ligating brackets did not reduce the duration of the treatment compared with the conventional brackets.

Key words: self-ligating bracket, conventional straight bracket, duration


TrendMD: 
[1] Wang Bo1, Zhang Guixiang2, Shi Jing3, Peng Hui3, Zhang Ying3.. Three-dimensional finite element analyses of stress distribution on upper lateral incisor and periodontal in early treatment by self-ligating brackets [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(4): 406-410.
[2] Shi Jing1，2, Peng Hui1.. Clinical application status and prospects of self-ligating and conventional brackets on periodontal environments [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2012, 39(6): 824-827.
[3] Duan Peipei1，2, Zhang Lin1, Zhao Qing1, Mei Li1.. Research progress on the biomechanics of self -ligating bracket systems [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2012, 39(5): 661-663.
[4] Tian Jialing, Yang Caixia, Ge Zhenlin.. Clinical research progress on self-ligating brackets in orthodontic treatment [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2011, 38(6): 700-703.
[5] WANG Ya-ting, WANG Jun.. Clinical comparison of self-ligating bracket and traditional bracket [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2010, 37(4): 492-495.
[6] YE Liang, ZHU Shuang-lin. Research progress of lingual self-ligating bracket orthodontic treatment [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2009, 36(5): 616-618.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2004, 31(02): 126 -128 .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .