国际口腔医学杂志

国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 280-286.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2021049

• 口腔修复专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

龈壁提升术材料选择及边缘设计的研究进展

孟秀萍1(),侯建华2,李怡然1,孙梦瑶1   

  1. 1.吉林大学口腔医院牙体牙髓科 长春 130021
    2.吉林大学口腔医院正畸科 长春 130021
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-12 修回日期:2021-02-10 出版日期:2021-05-01 发布日期:2021-05-14
  • 通讯作者: 孟秀萍
  • 作者简介:孟秀萍,副主任医师,博士,Email： mxp208408@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    吉林省科技发展计划项目(20190303184SF)

Research progress on the selection and design of base materials in deep margin elevation

Meng Xiuping1(),Hou Jianhua2,Li Yiran1,Sun Mengyao1   

  1. 1. Dept. of Cariology and Endodontics, Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
    2. Dept. of Orthodontics, Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
  • Received:2020-09-12 Revised:2021-02-10 Online:2021-05-01 Published:2021-05-14
  • Contact: Xiuping Meng
  • Supported by:
    Program for Development of Science and Technology of Jilin Province(20190303184SF)

RichHTML

39

PDF (PC)

1125

摘要：

牙齿大面积缺损,尤其是延伸至釉牙骨质界（CEJ）下的缺损,是一种非常常见的临床情况。龈壁提升术是目前针对累及CEJ下缺损提出的一种微创修复技术,然而龈壁提升后牙齿、提升材料和瓷修复体之间粘接界面的微渗漏,修复体和牙体的抗折裂性能以及牙龈组织健康情况受龈壁提升的材料选择、提升高度、提升边缘设计的影响。目前,尚无统一、规范的设计原则和临床操作流程可供参考。本文对龈壁提升术材料选择、提升高度、龈壁边缘形态设计以及应力分布的相关研究进展作一综述。

关键词: 龈壁提升, 树脂材料, 微渗漏, 边缘适应性, 应力分布

Abstract:

Large posterior defects, especially those extending below the cemento-enamel junction, are common. Deep margin elevation (DME) has become a less invasive technique for restoring these defects. However, critical factors, such as the type, height, and form of the base materials, could affect the marginal quality, fracture resistance of restorations, and the periodontal health. At present, a unified and standardized design principle and clinical operation procedure of DME for reference are lacking. This review summarizes the research progress on material selection, lifting height, and gingival wall edge shape design and stress distribution in DME.

Key words: cervical margin relocation, composite resin material, microleakage, marginal adaptation, stress distribution

中图分类号: 

  • R781.05
[1] Kielbassa AM, Philipp F. Restoring proximal cavities of molars using the proximal box elevation technique: systematic review and report of a case[J]. Quintessence Int, 2015,46(9):751-764.
doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a34459 pmid: 26159213
[2] Juneja R, Duhan J, Tewari S, et al. Effect of blood contamination and decontamination protocols on a-cetone-based and ethanol-based total etch adhesive systems[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2014,26(6):403-416.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.12089 pmid: 24417739
[3] Pilalas I, Tsalikis L, Tatakis DN. Pre-restorative crown lengthening surgery outcomes: a systematic review[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2016,43(12):1094-1108.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.2016.43.issue-12
[4] Pham HT, Nguyen PA, Pham TAV. Periodontal status of anterior teeth following clinical crown leng-thening by minimally traumatic controlled surgical extrusion[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2018,34(6):455-463.
doi: 10.1111/edt.2018.34.issue-6
[5] Juloski J, Köken S, Ferrari M. Cervical margin relocation in indirect adhesive restorations: a literature review[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2018,62(3):273-280.
doi: S1883-1958(17)30110-X pmid: 29153552
[6] Magne P, Spreafico RC. Deep margin elevation: a paradigm shift[J]. Am J Esthet Dent, 2012,2:86-96.
[7] Bresser RA, Gerdolle D, van den Heijkant IA, et al. Up to 12 years clinical evaluation of 197 partial indirect restorations with deep margin elevation in the posterior region[J]. J Dent, 2019,91:103227.
doi: S0300-5712(19)30229-5 pmid: 31697971
[8] Cardoso MV, de Almeida Neves A, Mine A, et al. Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry[J]. Aust Dent J, 2011,56(Sup-pl 1):31-44.
doi: 10.1111/adj.2011.56.issue-s1
[9] Masarwa N, Mohamed A, Abou-Rabii I, et al. Longevity of self-etch dentin bonding adhesives compared to etch-and-rinse dentin bonding adhesives: a systematic review[J]. J Evid Based Dent Pract, 2016,16(2):96-106.
doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2016.03.003 pmid: 27449836
[10] Dias AGA, Magno MB, Delbem ACB, et al. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in ClassⅡrestorations in primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Dent, 2018,73:1-13.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.004
[11] da Rocha DM, Tribst JPM, Ausiello P, et al. Effect of the restorative technique on load-bearing capacity, cusp deflection, and stress distribution of endo-dontically-treated premolars with MOD restoration[J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2019,44(3):e33.
doi: 10.5395/rde.2019.44.e33
[12] 李琴, 于博涵, 刘伟才. 邻面边缘提升术的研究进展和临床应用[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2019,35(3):453-456.
Li Q, Yu BH, Liu WC. Research progress and clinical application of cervical margin relocation[J]. J Pract Stomatol, 2019,35(3):453-456.
[13] Rosales-Leal JI, Castillo-Salmerón RD, Molino-Serrano MA, et al. Effect of hygroscopic expansion of resin filling on interfacial gap and sealing: a confocal microscopy study[J]. J Adhesive Dent, 2013,15(5):423-430.
[14] Campos EA, Ardu S, Lefever D, et al. Marginal a-daptation of Class Ⅱ cavities restored with bulk-fill composites[J]. J Dent, 2014,42(5):575-581.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.007 pmid: 24561041
[15] 聂杰, 王晓燕, 高学军. 不同牙体修复材料与Ⅱ类洞龈壁适合性的显微CT 观察[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015,47(2):317-320.
Nie J, Wang XY, Gao XJ. Micro-CT observations of the adaptation at gingival wall in ClassⅡrestorations with different dental restorative materials[J]. J Peking Univ (Heal Sci), 2015,47(2):317-320.
[16] Van Ende A, De Munck J, Lise DP, et al. Bulk-fill composites: a review of the current literature[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2017,19(2):95-109.
[17] Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. PartⅠ. Historical perspectives and clinical rationale for a biosubstitutive approach[J]. Int J Esthet Dent, 2015,10(2):210-227.
pmid: 25874270
[18] Frankenberger R, Hehn J, Hajtó J, et al. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2013,17(1):177-183.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0677-5 pmid: 22358378
[19] Müller V, Friedl KH, Friedl K, et al. Influence of proximal box elevation technique on marginal inte-grity of adhesively luted Cerec inlays[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2017,21(2):607-612.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1927-8
[20] Soares CJ, Faria-E-Silva AL, Rodrigues MP, et al. Polymerization shrinkage stress of composite resins and resin cements‒what do we need to know[J]. Braz Oral Res, 2017,31(suppl 1):e62.
[21] Lefever D, Gregor L, Bortolotto T, et al. Supragingival relocation of subgingivally located margins for adhesive inlays/onlays with different materials[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2012,14(6):561-567.
doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a27795 pmid: 22724114
[22] Zavattini A, Mancini M, Higginson J, et al. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of microleakage of Class Ⅱ composite restorations: an in vitro study[J]. Eur J Dent, 2018,12(3):369-374.
doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_28_18 pmid: 30147401
[23] Grubbs TD, Vargas M, Kolker J, et al. Efficacy of direct restorative materials in proximal box elevation on the margin quality and fracture resistance of molars restored with CAD/CAM onlays[J]. Oper Dent, 2020,45(1):52-61.
doi: 10.2341/18-098-L pmid: 31084532
[24] Köken S, Juloski J, Sorrentino R, et al. Marginal sealing of relocated cervical margins of mesio-occluso-distal overlays[J]. J Oral Sci, 2018,60(3):460-468.
doi: 10.2334/josnusd.17-0331
[25] Sandoval MJ, Rocca GT, Krejci I, et al. In vitro eva-luation of marginal and internal adaptation of Class Ⅱ CAD/CAM ceramic restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2015,19(9):2167-2177.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1449-9 pmid: 25877233
[26] Spencer P, Ye Q, Song L, et al. Threats to adhesive/dentin interfacial integrity and next generation bio-enabled multifunctional adhesives[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2019,107(8):2673-2683.
doi: 10.1002/jbm.v107.8
[27] Zhang Z, Beitzel D, Mutluay M, et al. On the durability of resin-dentin bonds: identifying the weakest links[J]. Dent Mater, 2015,31(9):1109-1118.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.011
[28] Zaruba M, Göhring TN, Wegehaupt FJ, et al. Influen-ce of a proximal margin elevation technique on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 2013,71(2):317-324.
doi: 10.3109/00016357.2012.680905
[29] Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, de Melo RM, et al. Short communication: influence of restorative material and cement on the stress distribution of poste-rior resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses: 3D finite element analysis[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2019,96:279-284.
doi: S1751-6161(19)30462-X pmid: 31077955
[30] 佘雅鹄, 张一祎, 刘雨萱, 等. 牙尖覆盖厚度对全瓷高嵌体修复前磨牙应力分布影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2019,37(6):636-641.
She YH, Zhang YY, Liu YX, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of cuspal-coverage thickness influence on the stress distribution of all-ceramic on-lay-restored premolars[J]. West China J Stomatol, 2019,37(6):636-641.
[31] Yang H, Park C, Shin JH, et al. Stress distribution in premolars restored with inlays or onlays: 3D finite element analysis[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2018,10(3):184-190.
doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.3.184
[32] Saridag S, Sari T, Ozyesil AG, et al. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with ceramic inlays and different base materials[J]. Dent Mater J, 2015,34(2):175-180.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2014-069 pmid: 25740162
[33] 李冰玉, 杜启涛, 许颖. 龈壁设计对应用嵌体修复后牙体组织应力改变的影响[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2007,11(2):216-218.
Li BY, Du QT, Xu Y. Influence of gingival wall de-sign on the stress of tooth tissue after inlay restora-tion[J]. J Clin Rehabilitative Tissue Eng Res, 2007,11(2):216-218.
[34] Da Silva Gonçalves D, Cura M, Ceballos L, et al. Influence of proximal box elevation on bond strength of composite inlays[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2017,21(1):247-254.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1782-7 pmid: 26969499
[35] Durand LB, Guimarães JC, Monteiro Junior S, et al. Effect of ceramic thickness and composite bases on stress distribution of inlays: a finite element analysis[J]. Braz Dent J, 2015,26(2):146-151.
doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201300258
[36] Kraus D, Wolfgarten M, Enkling N, et al. In-vitro cytocompatibility of dental resin monomers on osteoblast-like cells[J]. J Dent, 2017,65:76-82.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.008
[37] Gociu M, Pǎtroi D, Prejmerean C, et al. Biology and cytotoxicity of dental materials: an in vitro study[J]. Romanian J Morphol Embryol, 2013,54(2):261-265.
[38] Schätzle M, Land NP, Anerud A, et al. The influence of margins of restorations of the periodontal tissues over 26 years[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2001,28(1):57-64.
pmid: 11142668
[39] Gitalis R, Zhou L, Marashdeh MQ, et al. Human neutrophils degrade methacrylate resin composites and tooth dentin[J]. Acta Biomater, 2019,88:325-331.
doi: S1742-7061(19)30146-1 pmid: 30807874
[40] Bertoldi C, Monari E, Cortellini P, et al. Clinical and histological reaction of periodontal tissues to subgingival resin composite restorations[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2020,24(2):1001-1011.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02998-7 pmid: 31286261
[41] Ferrari M, Koken S, Grandini S, et al. Influence of cervical margin relocation (CMR) on periodontal health: 12-month results of a controlled trial[J]. J Dent, 2018,69:70-76.
doi: S0300-5712(17)30260-9 pmid: 29061380
[1] 董栩,徐欣. 根尖倒充填封闭性的体外评价研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(6): 670-677.
[2] 韩雨亭,吴燕茹. 应用龈壁提升术修复牙体缺损的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2019, 46(3): 349-355.
[3] 苟敏 蔡潇潇. 种植体—基台微间隙对种植体颈部周围骨的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2015, 42(6): 733-738.
[4] 曲烁 战德松. 1/3 根管充填即刻桩道预备的根尖微渗漏情况[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2011, 38(6): 649-651.
[5] 李蜀鄂综述 程祥荣审校. 桩腔预备对根尖封闭性的影响及检测方法的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2011, 38(6): 681-683.
[6] 王密 尹仕海 唐寅 刘佳. 钴铬合金嵌体修复磨牙髓室底穿孔的体外研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2011, 38(3): 261-264.
[7] 郭玲，张晶婷，陈晨峰，朱智敏. 不同粘接剂对冠修复体循环加载后边缘微渗漏的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2010, 37(6): 651-655.
[8] 赖光云综述 李鸣宇审校. 继发龋的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2010, 37(01): 113-113～115,119.
[9] 汪黎明, 张洁. 比较2 种根管充填糊剂对根尖封闭性的作用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2009, 36(6): 655-656，660.
[10] 潘悦萍,夏文薇. 窝洞预备对树脂微渗漏的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): -.
[11] 陈强1综述 魏素华2审校. 纤维桩修复的冠向微渗漏研究概况[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(6): 709-709～711.
[12] 危薇综述 陈作良审校. 根管微渗漏实验方法的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(4): 372-372～374.
[13] 傅翔综述 陈文霞审校. 树脂根管充填材料ResilonTMsup>[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(2): 173-175.
[14] 米方林1，周燕玲1，黄志澎2,张杨1. 支抗力作用下上颌第一磨牙牙周膜应力的三维有限元分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(1): 7-9.
[15] 张凌琳,刘天佳,李伟,. 复合树脂嵌体技术的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2007, 34(05): 369-371.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张新春. 桩冠修复与无髓牙的保护[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 王昆润. 长期单侧鼻呼吸对头颅发育有不利影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] 彭国光. 颈淋巴清扫术中颈交感神经干的解剖变异[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] 杨凯. 淋巴化疗的药物运载系统及其应用现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] 康非吾. 种植义齿下部结构生物力学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] 柴枫. 可摘局部义齿用Co-Cr合金的激光焊接[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] 孟姝,吴亚菲,杨禾. 伴放线放线杆菌产生的细胞致死膨胀毒素及其与牙周病的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] 费晓露,丁一,徐屹. 牙周可疑致病菌对口腔黏膜上皮的粘附和侵入[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] 赵兴福,黄晓晶. 变形链球菌蛋白组学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] 庞莉苹,姚江武. 抛光和上釉对陶瓷表面粗糙度、挠曲强度及磨损性能的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .