Int J Stomatol

Int J Stomatol ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 657-662.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2022088

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analgesic effects of local anesthesia after cleft lip and palate repair

Pei Ling1(),Zeng Ni1(),Yang Chao1,Wang Yan1,He Miao1,Luo Qiang2,Shi Bing1   

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases ＆ National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases ＆ Dept. of Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
    2.State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases ＆ National Clinical Research Center for Oral Disea-ses ＆ Dept. of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2022-03-07 Revised:2022-06-22 Online:2022-11-01 Published:2022-11-03
  • Contact: Ni Zeng E-mail:2770310864@qq.com;zengnihx@sina.com

RichHTML

11

PDF (PC)

168

Abstract:

Objective This study aimed to compare the effect of different local anesthesia during general anesthesia on postoperative pain relief after cleft lip and palate (CLP) surgery. Methods A total of 92 CLP children at the age ran-ging from 2 months to 6 years, who were admitted to the hospital from June 2021 to January 2022, were selected as objects. All patients were divided into three groups as follows: control group, local injection of normal saline preoperative; infiltration group: local infiltration anesthesia preoperative; and block group, bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block preoperative. All patients received sufentanil for general analgesia and acetaminophen 2 h postoperative. The admi-nistration of sevoflurane and sufentanil during general anesthesia was recorded. Hemodynamic changes in patients 10 min before surgery, 5 min before surgery, at the beginning of surgery, and 30 min after the beginning of surgery were collec-ted. FLACC scores were also recorded from the time of transferring to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) to 24 h after surgery. The number of children with mode-rate and severe pain at each observation time was recor-ded. Results No significant difference was found in the dosage of sevoflurane and sufentanil [(0.34±0.09) μg·kg-1] among all groups. No significant difference was also found in blood pressure and heart rate at continuous time points among all groups. A statistical difference in FLACC score was observed between the control group and the infiltration group at 3 h after transferring to PACU. A statistical difference was also found in the number of patients with moderate and severe pain between the block group and the infiltration group at 4 h after transferring to PACU. The FLACC score and the number of patients with moderate and severe pain increased in the infiltration group and the block group 8-16 h after transferring to PACU, whereas the control group showed a continuous downtrend during this period. Conclusion Under the condition of conventional dose of sufentanil [(0.34±0.09) μg·kg-1] combined with oral analgesics, local anesthetics showed no obvious advantage in postoperative analgesia.

Key words: cleft lip and palate repair, postoperative analgesia, local anesthesia, maxillary nerve block, rebound pain

CLC Number: 

  • R 782.2

TrendMD: 

Tab 1

Basic information of all groups x±SD"

项目对照组浸润组阻滞组P值
麻醉分级（Ⅱ）3130311.000
性别（男/女）18/1320/1021/100.685
年龄/月15.5±16.712.2±13.216.6±18.40.642
手术方式（唇/腭）15/1614/1615/160.988
舒芬太尼/（μg·kg-1）0.36±0.770.34±0.120.32±0.730.295
七氟烷/（mL·kg-1）4.40±2.054.18±1.484.65±1.790.590

Fig 1

Comparison of blood pressure and heart rate change among all groups"

Tab 2

Comparison of FLACC scores and the number of patients with moderate to severe pain among all groups x±SD"

测量项目0 h0.5 h1 h1.5 h2 h2.5 h3 h3.5 h4 h8 h12 h16 h20 h24 h

FLACC

评分

对照组5.2±2.43.5±3.22.5±2.13.2±2.42.6±2.32.1±1.51.7±1.41.2±1.41.2±1.30.8±1.51.0±1.40.4±0.70.2±0.40.1±0.3
浸润组5.5±2.53.9±3.93.3±3.42.9±3.42.7±2.71.9±1.90.8±1.00.9±1.20.9±1.11.4±1.51.4±1.90.9±1.50.3±0.80.1±0.3
阻滞组5.4±2.73.5±2.13.2±2.22.5±1.91.6±1.71.4±1.61.2±1.61.2±1.61.4±1.90.8±1.31.1±1.90.9±1.40.3±0.70.1±0.3
P值0.6070.7770.5690.4670.2720.2130.021*0.6010.5950.0820.4620.2120.8660.998
中重度疼痛人数对照组281613149432222000
浸润组251511119800034210
阻滞组23151294434624400
P值0.2480.9690.9140.4250.2130.2680.2150.1280.025*0.8360.6270.1230.3561

Fig 2

Comparison of FLACC scores (left) and the number of patients with moderate to severe pain (right) among all groups"

1 Rodkey EN, Pillai Riddell R. The infancy of infant pain research: the experimental origins of infant pain denial[J]. J Pain, 2013, 14(4): 338-350.
2 Perry M, Tan ZW, Chen J, et al. Neonatal pain: perceptions and current practice[J]. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am, 2018, 30(4): 549-561.
3 龚彩霞, 严苗, 蒋菲, 等. 学龄前唇腭裂患儿术后疼痛的护理干预效果评价[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2014, 32(3): 263-266.
Gong CX, Yan M, Jiang F, et al. Nursing intervention and evaluation of postoperative pain in preschool children with cleft lip and palate[J]. West China J Stomatol, 2014, 32(3): 263-266.
4 Prabhu KP, Wig J, Grewal S. Bilateral infraorbital nerve block is superior to peri-incisional infiltration for analgesia after repair of cleft lip[J]. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg, 1999, 33(1): 83-87.
5 Chiono J, Raux O, Bringuier S, et al. Bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block for cleft palate repair in children: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study versus placebo[J]. Anesthesiology, 2014, 120(6): 1362-1369.
6 Mostafa MF, Herdan R, Elshazly M. Comparative study of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for bila-teral maxillary nerve block during pediatric primary cleft palate surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled study[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2018, 71(2): 135-140.
7 Abu Elyazed MM, Mostafa SF. Bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block versus palatal block for cleft palate repair in children: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Egypt J Anaesth, 2018, 34(3): 83-88.
8 Echaniz G, De Miguel M, Merritt G, et al. Bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve blocks vs. infraorbital and palatine nerve blocks in cleft lip and palate repair: a double-blind, randomised study[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2019, 36(1): 40-47.
9 孙绕, 赵文宇, 郝泉水, 等. 中文儿科临床试验疼痛评价量表使用情况调查[J]. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2013, 8(3): 186-191.
Sun R, Zhao WY, Hao QS, et al. Frequency and use of pain assessment scales in Chinese clinical trials in pediatric population[J]. Chin J Evid Based Pe-diatr, 2013, 8(3): 186-191.
10 Nilsson S, Finnström B, Kokinsky E. The FLACC behavioral scale for procedural pain assessment in children aged 5-16 years[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2008, 18(8): 767-774.
11 Crellin DJ, Harrison D, Santamaria N, et al. The psychometric properties of the FLACC scale used to assess procedural pain[J]. J Pain, 2018, 19(8): 862-872.
12 Crellin D, Harrison D, Santamaria N, et al. Comparison of the psychometric properties of the FLACC scale, the MBPS and the observer applied visual a-nalogue scale used to assess procedural pain[J]. J Pain Res, 2021, 14: 881-892.
13 Mesnil M, Dadure C, Captier G, et al. A new approach for peri-operative analgesia of cleft palate repair in infants: the bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2010, 20(4): 343-349.
14 张原源. 婴幼儿疼痛评估方法及其影响因素的临床研究[D]. 开封: 河南大学, 2020.
Zhang YY. A clinical research about infant pain assessment tools and influencing factors[D]. Kaifeng: Henan University, 2020.
15 王会芹. 舒芬太尼的药理学及临床应用现状[J]. 医学信息, 2016, 29(31): 26-27.
Wang HQ. Current situation of pharmacology and clinical application of sufentanil[J]. Med Inf, 2016, 29(31): 26-27.
16 张小艳, 李刚, 王令平. 不同剂量舒芬太尼对脊柱手术患者全麻诱导期血流动力学及血浆皮质醇的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(6): 76-79.
Zhang XY, Li G, Wang LP. Effects of different do-sages of Sufentanil in induced general anesthesia period on blood rheology cortisol in spinal operations[J]. J Shandong Univ (Heal Sci), 2009, 47(6): 76-79.
17 Zhang J, Chen L, Sun YY, et al. Comparative effects of fentanyl versus sufentanil on cerebral oxygen sa-turation and postoperative cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing open surgery[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2019, 31(12): 1791-1800.
18 阳婷婷, 唐轶洋, 张兴安. 舒芬太尼与瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉用于神经外科手术效果与安全性的系统评价[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2013, 13(12): 1492-1499.
Yang TT, Tang YY, Zhang XA. Efectiveness and safety of sufentanil-propofol versus remifentanil-propofol during total intravenous anesthesia for neurosurgery: a systematic review[J]. Chin J Evid Based Med, 2013, 13(12): 1492-1499.
19 Muñoz-Leyva F, Cubillos J, Chin KJ. Managing rebound pain after regional anesthesia[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2020, 73(5): 372-383.
20 Sunderland S, Yarnold CH, Head SJ, et al. Regional versus general anesthesia and the incidence of unplanned health care resource utilization for postope-rative pain after wrist fracture surgery: results from a retrospective quality improvement project[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2016, 41(1): 22-27.
21 Sort R, Brorson S, Gögenur I, et al. Rebound pain following peripheral nerve block anaesthesia in acute ankle fracture surgery: an exploratory pilot study[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2019, 63(3): 396-402.
[1] Fan Lin,Sun Jiang.. Application of microneedles in stomatology [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(4): 472-478.
[2] Zhao Jihong. Novel concepts of dental local anesthesia [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(4): 373-379.
[3] Yang Tengyu, Su Naichuan, Pan Jian, Zheng Liwei. Research progress on intraosseous local anesthesia in dental treatment [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(5): 559-562.
[4] Liu Yanmei, Liu Nan, Li Xin. . Application of computer -controlled local anesthetic delivery [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(4): 451-453.
[5] Pan Jian, Zhang Zhuang.. Complications of oral local anesthesia and their preventive treatments [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2012, 39(2): 141-144.
[6] WANG Zhenglun, FANG Wen-jing, ZHONG Qiu, TONG Qing-hua, HU Ling-jie, SHAO Zhuo-na, SU Shan-shan, YANG Ming-yan. A clinical research on upper mandible tooth extraction without anesthetizing pala [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(6): 624-624～626.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2004, 31(02): 126 -128 .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .