anterior implant, esthetic outcome, evaluation method,"/> Impact factors and evaluation methods of the esthetic outcomes for the anterior implant restorations
Int J Stomatol

Inter J Stomatol ›› 2009, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 482-484.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5749.2009.04.032

• Reviews • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Impact factors and evaluation methods of the esthetic outcomes for the anterior implant restorations

WO Hao-zhongping, CHENG Xiang-rong   

  1. Dept. of Prosthodontics, Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan
    4300
  • Received:2008-12-28 Revised:2009-05-26 Online:2009-07-20 Published:2009-07-20
  • Contact: CHENG Xiang-rong

RichHTML

8

PDF (PC)

1278

Abstract:

Dental implants have been widely used in clinical practice. Because their survival and success rate are getting higher, a lot of patients would choose the implant-supported restorations to replace their missed teeth. As people are aspiring after beauty, more and more patients and their dentists would focus on the esthetic outcomes of implant-supported restorations in anterior region. But for the affecting factors and assessment of the esthetic outcomes of the implant-supported restorations, the consensus has not been reached yet. Therefore, it was the purpose of this article to review some affecting factors and methods for evaluating esthetic outcomes, which was being used in clinical study.

Key words: anterior implant')">anterior implant, esthetic outcome, evaluation method


TrendMD: 
[1] GAO Xiu - fang, ZHANG Lian - yun, LI Chang- yi. Mechanism and evaluation method of dental mater ials abr asion [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(1): 83-84.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .