国际口腔医学杂志

国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (2): 157-163.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2024015

• 解剖学专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

邻面接触区检测及恢复方法的研究进展

王红艳1(),孙玉春2,陈虎2,武峰1()   

  1. 1.山西医科大学口腔医学院 山西医科大学口腔医院修复科 太原 030001
    2.北京大学口腔医院口腔医学数字化研究中心;北京大学口腔医学院口腔修复教研室 国家口腔医学中心;国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心 口腔生物材料和数字诊疗装备国家工程研究中心;国家卫生健康委口腔数字医学重点实验室 口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室;中国医学科学院口腔数字医学重点实验室 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-30 修回日期:2023-12-07 出版日期:2024-03-01 发布日期:2024-03-11
  • 通讯作者: 武峰
  • 作者简介:王红艳，医师，硕士，Email：whongyan813@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山西省重点研发计划(201903D321120)

Progress in research into the detection and recovery methods of interproximal contact area

Hongyan Wang1(),Yuchun Sun2,Hu Chen2,Feng Wu1()   

  1. 1.Dept. of Prosthodontics, Shanxi Medical University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Taiyuan 030001, China
    2.Center of Digital Dentistry, Faculty of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2023-06-30 Revised:2023-12-07 Online:2024-03-01 Published:2024-03-11
  • Contact: Feng Wu
  • Supported by:
    Key R&D Program of Shanxi Province(201903D321120)

RichHTML

10

PDF (PC)

172

摘要：

邻面接触区是一个受多种因素影响的生理实体，对于维持牙弓稳定、保护口腔软硬组织具有重要意义。借助松紧度、位置、形状、面积等参数对邻面接触区进行量化评估是临床常用手段。松紧度测量由牙线或金属片完成；位置、形状、面积的测量逐步从一维、二维、三维层面入手。临床修复治疗时往往涉及邻面接触丧失的恢复，明确恢复标准和方法对于确保修复体质量尤为关键。本文就邻面接触区的检测方法、恢复标准和方法等内容的研究进展作一综述。

关键词: 邻面接触区, 检测方法, 恢复标准, 恢复方法

Abstract:

The interproximal contact area is a physiological entity affected by various factors and is of great significance for maintaining the stability of the dental arch and protecting the soft and hard tissues of the oral cavity. The quantitative assessment of interproximal contact areas on the basis of tightness, position, shape, area, and other parameters is a common clinical method. Tightness is measured using dental floss or metal strips. One-, two- and three-dimensional positions, shapes, and areas are measured successively. Clinical restoration often involves the recovery of interproximal contact loss. Clarifying the criteria and methods for restoration is particularly critical for ensuring the quality of prostheses. The review briefly summarizes progress in research into detection methods, recovery standards and methods for the interproximal contact area.

Key words: interproximal contact area, detection method, recovery standard, recovery method

中图分类号: 

  • R783.4
1 The glossary of prosthodontic terms: ninth edition[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(5S): e1-e105.
2 黄敏, 罗云, 王敏. 相邻牙间的邻面接触与食物嵌塞的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2016, 43(3): 303-308.
Huang M, Luo Y, Wang M. Relationship between the interproximal interface of adjacent teeth and food impaction[J]. Int J Stomatol, 2016, 43(3): 303-308.
3 Jung YG, Peterson IM, Kim DK, et al. Lifetime-limi-ting strength degradation from contact fatigue in dental ceramics[J]. J Dent Res, 2000, 79(2): 722-731.
4 Dörfer CE, von Bethlenfalvy ER, Staehle HJ, et al. Factors influencing proximal dental contact streng-ths[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2000, 108(5): 368-377.
5 Vardimon AD, Matsaev E, Lieberman M, et al. Tightness of dental contact points in spaced and non-spaced permanent dentitions[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2001, 23(3): 305-314.
6 Naveh GR, Lev-Tov Chattah N, Zaslansky P, et al. Tooth-PDL-bone complex: response to compressive loads encountered during mastication-a review[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2012, 57(12): 1575-1584.
7 Jong TD, Bakker AD, Everts V, et al. The intricate anatomy of the periodontal ligament and its development: lessons for periodontal regeneration[J]. J Pe-riodontal Res, 2017, 52(6): 965-974.
8 Pei DD, Hu XY, Jin CX, et al. Energy storage and dissipation of human periodontal ligament during mastication movement[J]. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2018, 4(12): 4028-4035.
9 Black GV. G.V. Black ’ s work on operative dentistry: with which his special dental pathology is combined[M]. Chicago: Medico-dental Publishing Company, 1936.
10 Bompolaki D, Edmondson SA, Katancik JA. Interproximal contact loss between implant-supported restorations and adjacent natural teeth: a retrospective cross-sectional study of 83 restorations with an up to 10-year follow-up[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2022, 127(3): 418-424.
11 Teich ST, Joseph J, Sartori N, et al. Dental floss selection and its impact on evaluation of interproximal contacts in licensure exams[J]. J Dent Educ, 2014, 78(6): 921-926.
12 Deinhammer C, Wallinger C, Brandner M, et al. A measurement device for the comparative evaluation of proximal teeth contact strengths[C]//2011 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Tech-nology Conference. Hangzhou: IEEE, 2011.
13 Chang WJ, Chang YH, Wang H, et al. Comparison of proximal in vitro tooth contacts in class Ⅱ restorations with different restorative materials and cavity sizes using a new measurement device[J]. J Mech Med Biol, 2015, 15(4): 1550057.
14 Hansen PA, Atwood A, Shanahan M, et al. The accuracy of clinician evaluation of interproximal contacts using different methods[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020, 123(2): 284-289.
15 Wong AT, Wat PY, Pow EH, et al. Proximal contact loss between implant-supported prostheses and adjacent natural teeth: a retrospective study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(4): e68-e71.
16 Cerdán F, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV. Quality of approximal surfaces of posterior restorations in primary molars[J]. J Oral Sci, 2021, 63(4): 347-351.
17 Fuhrmann R, Grave C, Diedrich P. In vitro evaluation of a measurement method to analyze the interdental, mesially directed force[J]. J Orofac Orthop, 1998, 59(6): 362-370.
18 Kim HS, Na HJ, Kim HJ, et al. Evaluation of proximal contact strength by postural changes[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2009, 1(3): 118-123.
19 Alqahtani NM, Alqahtani AF, Zarbah MA, et al. Assessment of PCL between dental implant prosthesis and natural teeth using a digital force analyzer[J]. Technol Health Care, 2022, 30(6): 1435-1442.
20 Aarthi J, Muthu MS, Kirthiga M, et al. Modified OXIS classification for primary canines[J]. Wellcome Open Res, 2022, 7: 130.
21 王茂夏, 戴冠宇, 孟玉坤. 垂直型食物嵌塞的机制探究[J].国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(2): 245-248.
Wang MX, Dai GY, Meng YK. Mechanism of vertical food impaction[J]. Int J Stomatol, 2018, 45(2): 245-248.
22 Sarig R, Lianopoulos NV, Hershkovitz I, et al. The arrangement of the interproximal interfaces in the human permanent dentition[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2013, 17(3): 731-738.
23 Kasahara K, Miura H, Kuriyama M, et al. Observations of interproximal contact relations during clenching[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2000, 13(4): 289-294.
24 Stappert CF, Tarnow DP, Tan JH, et al. Proximal co-ntact areas of the maxillary anterior dentition[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2010, 30(5): 471-477.
25 Sghaireen MG, Al-Zarea BK, Al-Shorman HM, et al. Clinical measurement of the height of the interproximal contact area in maxillary anterior teeth[J]. Int J Health Sci (Qassim), 2013, 7(3): 325-330.
26 Sghaireen MG, Albhiran HM, Alzoubi IA, et al. Intraoral versus extraoral measurement of the height of the interproximal contact area in maxillary ante-rior teeth[J]. Med Princ Pract, 2015, 24(2): 136-141.
27 王月. 量化调治疗垂直型食物嵌塞临床相关参数的CBCT研究[D]. 太原: 山西医科大学, 2016.
Wang Y. CBCT study treatment vertical food impaction clinically relevant parameters to quantify occlusal adjustment[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi Medical University, 2016.
28 Cheng YT, Wang ZJ, Shi Y, et al. Research on the characteristics of food impaction with tight proximal contacts based on deep learning[J]. Comput Math Methods Med, 2021, 2021: 1000820.
29 Sarig R, Vardimon AD, Sussan C, et al. Pattern of maxillary and mandibular proximal enamel thickness at the contact area of the permanent dentition from first molar to first molar[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2015, 147(4): 435-444.
30 边媛媛, 雷建锋, 侯静怡, 等. 182颗恒牙邻面牙釉质厚度的测量研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志, 2020, 55(7): 488-493.
Bian YY, Lei JF, Hou JY, et al. Measurement of proximal enamel thickness of 182 permanent teeth[J]. Chin J Stomatol, 2020, 55(7): 488-493.
31 Peumans M, Venuti P, Politano G, et al. Effective protocol for daily high-quality direct posterior composite restorations. the interdental anatomy of the class-2 composite restoration[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2021, 23(1): 21-34.
32 Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, et al. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples[J]. Clin Oral Invest, 2010, 14(4): 349-366.
33 陈智. 牙修复体的临床评价标准[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2019, 54(9): 612-617.
Chen Z. Clinical criteria for the assessment of dental restoration[J]. Chin J Stomatol, 2019, 54(9): 612-617.
34 杨洋, 谭建国. 一步一步做好牙体缺损修复后食物嵌塞的预防和治疗[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2021, 56(8): 821-825.
Yang Y, Tan JG. Prevention and treatment of food impaction after full crown restoration: step by step[J]. Chin J Stomatol, 2021, 56(8): 821-825.
35 Marquillier T, Doméjean S, Le Clerc J, et al. The use of FDI criteria in clinical trials on direct dental restorations: a scoping review[J]. J Dent, 2018, 68: 1-9.
36 Wirsching E, Loomans BA, Klaiber B, et al. Inf-luence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo [J]. J Dent, 2011, 39(5): 386-390.
37 张莉丽, 张志宏, 陈佳, 等. 种植体轴向相关并发症及其研究进展[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2022, 57(9): 969-972.
Zhang LL, Zhang ZH, Chen J, et al. Complications related to axial orientation of implants and their research progress[J]. Chin J Stomatol, 2022, 57(9): 969-972.
38 Pang NS, Suh CS, Kim KD, et al. Prevalence of proximal contact loss between implant-supported fixed prostheses and adjacent natural teeth and its associated factors: a 7-year prospective study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(12): 1501-1508.
39 Saber A, Chakar C, Mokbel N, et al. Prevalence of interproximal contact loss between implant-suppor-ted fixed prostheses and adjacent teeth and its impact on marginal bone loss: a retrospective study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2020, 35(3): 625-630.
40 Zhao R, Zhao W, Huang J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of peri-implant disease: a retrospective case-control study in Western China[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(19): 12667.
41 French D, Naito M, Linke B. Interproximal contact loss in a retrospective cross-sectional study of 4 325 implants: distribution and incidence and the effect on bone loss and peri-implant soft tissue[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019, 122(2): 108-114.
42 Latimer JM, Gharpure AS, Kahng HJ, et al. Interproximal open contacts between implant restorations and adjacent natural teeth as a risk-indicator for peri-implant disease-a cross-sectional study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2021, 32(5): 598-607.
43 Yen JY, Kang L, Chou IC, et al. Risk assessment of interproximal contact loss between implant-suppor-ted fixed prostheses and adjacent teeth: a retrospective radiographic study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2022, 127(1): 86-92.
44 Darós P, Carneiro VC, Siqueira AP, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 4 intraoral radiographic techniques for misfit detection at the implant abutment joint[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018, 120(1): 57-64.
45 Liang CH, Nien CY, Liang HL, et al. Recurrence rate of proximal contact loss between implant restorations and adjacent teeth after proximal contact repair: a retrospective study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2022, 37(3): 579-585.
46 Ren SX, Lin Y, Hu XL, et al. Changes in proximal contact tightness between fixed implant prostheses and adjacent teeth: a 1-year prospective study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 115(4): 437-440.
47 Greenstein G, Carpentieri J, Cavallaro J. Open contacts adjacent to dental implant restorations: etiology, incidence, consequences, and correction[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2016, 147(1): 28-34.
48 Liu XQ, Liu JZ, Zhou JF, et al. Closing open contacts adjacent to an implant-supported restoration[J]. J Dent Sci, 2019, 14(2): 216-218.
49 宋光保, 陈祈月, 卢委英. 一种可调人工牙冠、种植牙以及人工牙冠的修复方法[P]. 广东: CN1071-26274A, 2017-09-05.
Song GB, Chen QY, Lu WY.A restoration method of adjustable artificial crown, dental implant and artificial crown[P]. Guangdong: CN107126274A, 2017-09-05.
50 Chen QY, Shi Y, Zhang ZQ, et al. Erratum: a single-center study of a resin inlay dental implant-fixed prosthesis for closing proximal contact loss in 89 patients who underwent 3-year follow-up[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2021, 27: e935528.
51 Varthis S, Tarnow DP, Randi A. Interproximal open contacts between implant restorations and adjacent teeth. Prevalence-Causes-Possible Solutions[J]. J Prosthodont, 2019, 28(2): e806-e810.
52 Kandathilparambil MR, Nelluri VV, Vayadadi BC, et al. Evaluation of biological changes at the proximal contacts between single-tooth implant-suppor-ted prosthesis and the adjacent natural teeth-an in vivo study[J]. J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 2020, 20(4): 378-386.
53 余姣, 朱晓密, 赵雅君. 压膜保持器对改善58例种植修复体邻接触丧失的效果评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(1): 63-67.
Yu J, Zhu XM, Zhao YJ. The effect of film retainer to improve loss of adjacent contact between implant restorations in 58 consecutive cases[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2022, 20(1): 63-67.
[1] 王茂夏, 戴冠宇, 孟玉坤. 垂直型食物嵌塞的机制探究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(2): 245-248.
[2] 黄敏,罗云,王敏. 相邻牙间的邻面接触与食物嵌塞的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2016, 43(3): 303-308.
[3] 程谷综述 李祖兵审校. 骨组织工程中的检测方法及其效果评估展望[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2010, 37(5): 593-596.
[4] 郭传瑸. 骨骼系统的细胞凋亡研究现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): -.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘玲. 镍铬合金中铍对可铸造性和陶瓷金属结合力的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 王昆润. 修补颌骨缺损的新型生物学相容材料[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] 王昆润. 咀嚼口香糖对牙周组织微循环的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] 宋红. 青少年牙周炎外周血分叶核粒细胞的趋化功能[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] 张新春. 桩冠修复与无髓牙的保护[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[6] 侯锐. 正畸患者釉白斑损害的纵向激光荧光研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[7] 逄键梁. 两例外胚层发育不良儿童骨内植入种植体后牙槽骨生长情况[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[8] 轩东英. 不同赋形剂对氢氧化钙抗菌效果的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[9] 杨锦波. 嵌合体防龋疫苗的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[10] 柴枫. 可摘局部义齿用Co-Cr合金的激光焊接[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .