国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 663-669.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2022097
Zhang Qilin1(),Li Jun2,Li Shuhui3(
)
摘要:
根管预备机用镍钛锉的出现是根管治疗中的一大里程碑,根管预备的安全性和效率得到了很大提升。近年来,镍钛锉的设计经历了一系列的变化和改进以适应临床中的需求,每一设计有其各自的特点。临床工作中了解和熟悉镍钛锉的性能及特点,选择合适的器械是根管治疗的前提和保障。本文从根管预备机用镍钛锉的发展入手,对镍钛锉晶相结构变化、外部结构改进、安全性和效率的改变作一综述,以期为临床工作中根管预备选择合适的器械提供一定的参考。
中图分类号:
1 | Kuzekanani M. Nickel-titanium rotary instruments: development of the single-file systems[J]. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 2018, 8(5): 386-390. |
2 | Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, et al. Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments[J]. J Endod, 2008, 34(11): 1406-1409. |
3 | Shen Y, Zhou HM, Zheng YF, et al. Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments[J]. J Endod, 2013, 39(2): 163-172. |
4 | 何子淑. 镍钛合金疲劳性能研究[J]. 湖北农机化, 2021(10): 116-117. |
He ZS. Study on fatigue properties of nickeltitanium alloy[J]. Hubei Nongjihua, 2021(10): 116-117. | |
5 | Pereira ES, Gomes RO, Leroy AM, et al. Mechanical behavior of M-Wire and conventional NiTi wire used to manufacture rotary endodontic instruments[J]. Dent Mater, 2013, 29(12): e318-e324. |
6 | Campbell F, Cunliffe J, Darcey J. Current technology in endodontic instrumentation: advances in me-tallurgy and manufacture[J]. Br Dent J, 2021, 231(1): 49-57. |
7 | Kuhn G, Jordan L. Fatigue and mechanical properties of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments[J]. J Endod, 2002, 28(10): 716-720. |
8 | 梁宇红, 岳林. 根管治疗技术之根管机械预备(二):根管预备技术和镍钛锉的发展[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2019, 54(10): 717-720. |
Liang YH, Yue L. Root canal treatment: key steps in root canal instrumentation and improvement of nic-keltitanium endodontic instruments[J]. Chin J Stomatol, 2019, 54(10): 717-720. | |
9 | Topçuoğlu HS, Topçuoğlu G, Kafdağ Ö, et al. Effect of two different temperatures on resistance to cyclic fatigue of one Curve, EdgeFile, HyFlex CM and ProTaper next files[J]. Aust Endod J, 2020, 46(1): 68-72. |
10 | Gavini G, Santos MD, Caldeira CL, et al. Nickel-titanium instruments in endodontics: a concise review of the state of the art[J]. Braz Oral Res, 2018, 32(): e67. |
11 | Zupanc J, Vahdat-Pajouh N, Schäfer E. New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys-a review[J]. Int Endod J, 2018, 51(10): 1088-1103. |
12 | Inan U, Keskin C, Sivas Yilmaz Ö, et al. Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc Blue and Reciproc instruments exposed to intracanal temperature in simulated severe apical curvature[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2019, 23(5): 2077-2082. |
13 | Keskin C, Inan U, Demiral M, et al. Cyclic fatigue resistance of reciproc blue, reciproc, and WaveOne gold reciprocating instruments[J]. J Endod, 2017, 43(8): 1360-1363. |
14 | Silva EJNL, Vieira VTL, Hecksher F, et al. Cyclic fatigue using severely curved canals and torsional resistance of thermally treated reciprocating instruments[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2018, 22(7): 2633-2638. |
15 | Xavier SR, de Lima CO, Marceliano-Alves MFV, et al. Shaping ability of two root canal instrumentation systems in oval-shaped canals: a microcomputed tomography study[J]. Aust Endod J, 2021, 47(2): 252-259. |
16 | Karkehabadi H, Siahvashi Z, Shokri A, et al. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of apical transportation and centering ratio of ProTaper and XP-endo Shaper NiTi rotary systems in curved canals: an in vitro study[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2021, 21(1): 277-285. |
17 | Cheung GS, Shen Y, Darvell BW. Does electropo-lishing improve the low-cycle fatigue behavior of a nickel-titanium rotary instrument in hypochlorite[J]. J Endod, 2007, 33(10): 1217-1221. |
18 | Chuste-Guillot MP, Badet C, Peli JF, et al. Effect of three nickel-titanium rotary file techniques on infec-ted root dentin reduction[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2006, 102(2): 254-258. |
19 | Kılıç Y, Karataşlıoğlu E, Kaval ME. The effect of root canal preparation size and taper of middle me-sial canals on fracture resistance of the mandibular molar teeth: an in vitro study[J]. J Endod, 2021, 47(9): 1467-1471. |
20 | Sabeti M, Kazem M, Dianat O, et al. Impact of access cavity design and root canal taper on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: an ex vivo investigation[J]. J Endod, 2018, 44(9): 1402-1406. |
21 | Krikeli E, Mikrogeorgis G, Lyroudia K. In vitro comparative study of the influence of instrument taper on the fracture resistance of endodontically trea-ted teeth: an integrative approach-based analysis[J]. J Endod, 2018, 44(9): 1407-1411. |
22 | 葛久禹. 镍钛根管预备器械[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2014, 7(1): 2-9. |
Ge JY. Nickel-titanium instruments for root canal preparation[J]. Chin J Pract Stomatol, 2014, 7(1): 2-9. | |
23 | Mustafa R, Al Omari T, Al-Nasrawi S, et al. Evalua-ting in vitro performance of novel nickel-titanium rotary system (TruNatomy) based on debris extrusion and preparation time from severely curved canals[J]. J Endod, 2021, 47(6): 976-981. |
24 | 柳振坤, 张杰, 岳林. 根管预备中碎屑从根尖推出量的比较研究[J]. 中华老年口腔医学杂志, 2020, 18(1): 1-5. |
Liu ZK, Zhang J, Yue L. A comparative study on the amount of debris extruded from the apex during root canal preparation[J]. Chin J Geriatr Dent, 2020, 18(1): 1-5. | |
25 | di Nardo D, Gambarini G, Seracchiani M. Influence of different cross-section on cyclic fatigue resistance of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments with same heat treatment: an in vitro study[J]. Saudi Endod J, 2020, 10(3): 221-225. |
26 | Koch K, Brave D. Real world endo: design features of rotary files and how they affect clinical performance[J]. Oral Health, 2002, 92: 39-49. |
27 | Plotino G, Nagendrababu V, Bukiet F, et al. In-fluence of negotiation, glide path, and preflaring procedures on root canal shaping-terminology, basic concepts, and a systematic review[J]. J Endod, 2020, 46(6): 707-729. |
28 | Capar ID, Kaval ME, Ertas H, et al. Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of 5 different rotary pathfinding instruments made of conventional nic-kel-titanium wire, M-wire, and controlled memory wire[J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(4): 535-538. |
29 | Topçuoğlu HS, Topçuoğlu G, Düzgün S. Resistance to cyclic fatigue of PathFile, ScoutRaCe and ProGlider glide path files in an S-shaped canal[J]. Int Endod J, 2018, 51(5): 509-514. |
30 | Paleker F, van der Vyver PJ. Glide path enlargement of mandibular molar canals by using K-files, the ProGlider file, and G-files: a comparative study of the preparation times[J]. J Endod, 2017, 43(4): 609-612. |
31 | 韩怡, 白雨豪, 侯晓玫. 机用镍钛通畅锉在模拟根管中成形能力的对比研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(2): 121-124. |
Han Y, Bai YH, Hou XM. Glide path management of rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals[J]. J Oral Sci Res, 2018, 34(2): 121-124. | |
32 | Uslu G, Özyürek T, İnan U. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProGlider and one G glide path files[J]. J Endod, 2016, 42(10): 1555-1558. |
33 | Keskin C, İnan U, Demiral M, et al. Cyclic fatigue resistance of R-Pilot, WaveOne Gold Glider, and ProGlider glide path instruments[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2018, 22(9): 3007-3012. |
34 | 于江利, 谭瑶, 侯晓玫, 等. 机用镍钛通畅锉用于S形根管成形能力的体外研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(8): 781-785. |
Yu JL, Tan Y, Hou XM, et al. Shaping ability of instrumental nickel-titanium endodontic files in S-shaped resin simulated root canal[J]. J Oral Sci Res, 2020, 36(8): 781-785. | |
35 | Han Y, Hou XM. Glide path enlargement of curved molar canals using HyFlex EDM glide path file versus PathFile: a comparative study of preparation time and postoperative pain[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2021, 21(1): 150. |
36 | Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations[J]. Int Endod J, 2008, 41(4): 339-344. |
37 |
Živković S, Popović-Bajić M, Jovanović-Medojević M, et al. Single-file endodontic treatment-a perspective endodontic concept[J]. Vojnosanitets Pregl, 2021. doi: doi.org/10.2298/VSP210524078Z .
doi: doi.org/10.2298/VSP210524078Z |
38 | Boonchoo K, Leelataweewud P, Yanpiset K, et al. Simplify pulpectomy in primary molars with a single-file reciprocating system: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2020, 24(8): 2683-2689. |
39 | Karataş E, Arslan H, Alsancak M, et al. Incidence of dentinal cracks after root canal preparation with twisted file adaptive instruments using different kinematics[J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(7): 1130-1133. |
40 | Alsofi L, Al Harbi M, Stauber M, et al. Analysis of the morpho-geometrical changes of the root canal system produced by TF adaptive vs. BioRace: a micro-computed tomography study[J]. Materials (Basel), 2021, 14(3): 531. |
41 | Donnermeyer D, Viedenz A, Schäfer E, et al. Impact of new cross-sectional designs on the shaping ability of rotary NiTi instruments in S-shaped canals[J]. Odontology, 2020, 108(2): 174-179. |
42 | Noguchi I, Suzuki K, Yoshida T, et al. Development of innovative contra-angle handpiece device with piston movement for root canal preparation[J]. J Endod, 2021, 47(4): 641-647. |
[1] | 戢晓,景钫淇,李雅,薛晶. 根管预备顺序的数据模拟优化研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(1): 37-47. |
[2] | 张雪雯,李聪,徐小茵,高静,申静. 混合光源系统用于活髓牙漂白的临床研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(6): 683-689. |
[3] | 王宏媛,何露,张茹,郑德强,李红. 热处理连续旋转镍钛锉对重度弯曲根管成形能力的比较研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(3): 297-304. |
[4] | 赵金,赖光云,汪俊. 全身麻醉下儿童口腔疾病治疗家长接受度现况的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(6): 739-744. |
[5] | 贾卓群, 杨路. 影响根管消毒剂氢氧化钙清除效率的因素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(4): 439-443. |
[6] | 张汝斌,曾晓娟,李雅娟,林伟远. 修复前后患者咀嚼能力和生活质量主客观评价的相关性研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2016, 43(6): 651-653. |
[7] | 宋韬,王冏珂,文静,陈谦明,曾昕. 沙利度胺在口腔黏膜病临床治疗实践中的安全性分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2016, 43(3): 366-370. |
[8] | 朱玉婷 刘江峰 黄江勇 徐妍 李艳利 李晓星 陈秉勋. 控制记忆型镍钛锉HyFlex CM根管预备的临床效果分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2014, 41(5): 521-525. |
[9] | 孙学武 柳忠豪 朱详奎 杨柳. 不同颌位记录方法对全口义齿再修复患者咀嚼效率的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2014, 41(3): 286-288. |
[10] | 李桦综述 胡敏审校. 含镍合金在正畸治疗中生物安全性的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(2): 233-236. |
[11] | 蒋玉清综述 黄定明审校. 新型树脂根管充填材料Resilon/Epiphany 的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2010, 37(3): 348-348~350. |
[12] | 黄雪莲, 范国书综述 李继遥审校. 常用细胞毒性实验在口腔局部用药安全性评价中的应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2009, 36(4): 413-415,419. |
[13] | 刘剑,张晓玲,高宁. 铬合金修复材料的生物安全性[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): -. |
[14] | 杨亚萍综述 樊明文审校. 壳聚糖介导基因转染效率影响因素的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(5): 540-540~542. |
[15] | 徐瑛, 任志伟. 手用ProTaper 镍钛锉与不锈钢H 锉根管预备的临床疗效[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(1): 10-12. |
|