Inter J Stomatol ›› 2016, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 528-532.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2016.05.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of patients from public hospitals and private clinics about their selection and satisfaction with crown and bridge prosthesis

Chen Song, Huang Senyuan, Wang Peiqi, Zhang Enhong, Qiu Yu, Wang Jian   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2016-01-22 Revised:2016-05-11 Online:2016-09-01 Published:2016-09-01

Abstract: Objective This study aimed to investigate the potential difference between patients from public hospitals and private clinics about their selection and satisfaction with fixed crown and bridge prosthesis. Methods A total of 187 patients who received crown and bridge restoration were investigated via questionnaire. Two questionnaires, A and B, were developed. Questionnaire A was designed for the patients who received crown and bridge restoration for the first time. This questionnaire focused on how the participants valued the aesthetics, strength, and other characteristics of their restorations. Questionnaire B was used for the participants who had previously undergone crown and bridge restoration; the aim of this questionnaire was to investigate their satisfaction about their prostheses. Data were analyzed by SPSS 21.0. Results Significant differences were found in the patients’ income level, their safety considerations, and prices of the prostheses. However, patients who had previously undergone crown and bridge treatment shared the same degrees of satisfaction regardless of where they were treated. Conclusion Patients with higher income are more willing to have crown and bridge treatment in public hospitals because of their consideration of their safety. They can accept prostheses with higher prices. Private dental clinics in Chengdu are well developed and provide remarkable restoration techniques. To reduce doctor patient conflicts, doctors in public hospitals should focus on communication with patients to underst and their essentialdemands. The doctors should not neglect to inform patients about basic knowledge of crown and bridge restoration.

Key words: public hospital, private clinic, crown and bridge prosthesis, selection, satisfaction

CLC Number: 

  • R 78

TrendMD: 
[1] Tang Xiaojuan, Liu Xiaojing, Sun Yongheng, Zhang Jingxia. Efficacy of narrow-spectrum intense pulsed light in the treatment of scar after surgery of primary unilateral cleft lip [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(4): 433-437.
[2] Zhang Anxiang, Liu Manli, Zheng Yingcheng, Xu Fangqing.. Nurse-patient communication skills in orthodontics [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2016, 43(6): 739-742.
[3] Zhang Xingle, Li Le, Wang Peng, Huo Feng, Xu Yingying. Influence of psychological health education on the effect of maxillofacial prosthesis [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(3): 299-301.
[4] Ge Yanping, Chen Xiwen, Zhu Zhimin. Relative factors affecting patient satisfaction with removable partial denture [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(2): 194-198.
[5] Lei Chang 1,Jiang Tao 1,2 .. Clinical application of digital dental shade selection technology [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(2): 212-215.
[6] Wang Yushan1,2, Jia Anqi1.. Study on the questionaire of patients’satisfaction with porcelain -fused -to -metal restorations [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2012, 39(5): 582-585.
[7] Shi Yahong, Wang Ge.. Factors influencing patients’satisfaction on the esthetics of anterior restorations and their clinic implications [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2011, 38(5): 603-606.
[8] CHEN Shenyuan1, CHAO Yong-lie1, DENG Yong-mei2, CHEN Chao3, LI Yuan1, ZHANG Shu-yuan1.. Survey on elderly people in Chengdu about the effect of using removable partial denture [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2010, 37(4): 396-399.
[9] CHEN Bing. Clinical application of easy resilient attachment denture [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2010, 37(3): 265-265~267.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .