Inter J Stomatol ›› 2016, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 391-396.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2016.04.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative study of the radiopacity of four root canal fiber posts

Hao Zhichao, Liu Jiajun, Lin Shuhong, Meng Yukun   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Dept. of Prosthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 2. Dept. of Stomatology, The People’s Hospital of Shenzhen, Senzhen 518020, China
  • Online:2016-07-01 Published:2016-07-01

Abstract: Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiopacity of 4 commercially available fiber posts. Methods Three commercially available fiber post systems: RelyX? Fiber Post(RelyX), PARAPOST? FIBER LUX(Parapost), and D.T. Light-Post Illusion X-RO(DT) with a new fiber post Macro-Lock Illusion X-RO(ML) were selected. After endodontic treatment of 20 extracted premolars, the teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups. Then the root canal was prepared using the specific drills according to the manufactures’ instructions. The 4 groups of fiber posts were bonded to the root substrate using the Parabond and luting cement ParaCore. Five cylindrical specimens 2 mm thick were cut from each of 4 groups of fiber posts. Radiographic images of all the specimens along with a standard aluminum step wedge were obtained on an occlusal film. Radiodensity levels were subsequently calculated as equivalents of aluminum thickness. The visual examination of the cross-sectional post surfaces were performed with a scanning electron microscope. Results The new fiber post ML group showed greater radiopacity than other 3 groups, followed by RelyX and DT group. However, the Parapost group demonstrated the lowest optical density. Conclusion Radiopacity of the new ML quartz fiber post is greater than those of the other fiber posts selected.

Key words: fiber post, radiopacity, barium sulfate


TrendMD: 
[1] Cai Pingping,Zhuo Yingying,Lin Jie,Zheng Zhi-qiang.. Application of computer-aided technology in fiber post removal [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(6): 731-736.
[2] Lu Zhiyue. Fracture resistance of post-core restored root [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(2): 125-129.
[3] Liu Disheng, Zhai Shaocheng, Tang Liang.. Effects of resin adhesives on bonding effect of fiber posts [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(2): 180-183.
[4] Hou Qianqian, Gao Yiming.. Advances in clinical research of prefabricated fiber posts [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2012, 39(4): 554-556.
[5] LIU Rui-jie.. Clinical effects on injury caused dental pulp exposure with root canal filling in one time and fiber post immediate restoration [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2011, 38(1): 34-35.
[6] PAN Xiao-bo, ZENG Peng, PENG Li-hui, REN Yue, ZHONG Ai-xi, HONG Li, MA Long-bai, YANG Zheng. Influence of thermocycling on the microtensile bond strength of three composite r [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2010, 37(3): 268-268~271.
[7] ZHANG Yi-lin, ZHANG Fu-qiang. Research progress on adhesion between fiber post and resin core [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2010, 37(02): 225-225~228.
[8] SU Ji-cheng. Observation for clinical effects of glass fiber post and metal post in anterior t [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2009, 36(5): 519-520.
[9] CHENG Shao-hua, ZHAO Ke. In vitro studies on retentive ability of fiber posts: A methodology review [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2009, 36(5): 600-603.
[10] CHEN Qiang1, WEI Su-hua2. General studies about coronal microleakage of fiber post restorations [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(6): 709-709~711.
[11] HOU Yong- fu, ZHU Zhi- min. Progr esses on the study of r etention of fiber post and r esin cor e [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(5): 585-585~587.
[12] ZHANG Zhi-wen, SU Jian-sheng.. Surface treatments of fiber posts [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2007, 34(05): 384-386.
[13] WANG Zhi- gang, ZHANG Fu- qiang.. Mechanical Proper ties and Adhesion of Fiber Posts [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2007, 34(03): 223-225.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2004, 31(02): 126 -128 .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .