Int J Stomatol

Inter J Stomatol ›› 2016, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 338-342.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2016.03.019

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research progress on the permeability of resin-dentine bonds and bonding durability

Sun Qiurong, Mai Sui   

  1. Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guangzhou 510055, China) This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81100743), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China(2014A030313068) and Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province of China(2013B051000031).
  • Received:2015-04-08 Revised:2016-01-28 Online:2016-05-01 Published:2016-05-01

RichHTML

8

PDF (PC)

598

Abstract: The permeability of resin-dentine bonds is closely related to the mechanical stability of resin-dentine bonds and bonding durability. Water from dentinal tubules, contained in the adhesives or remained after etching and rinsing, together with water from the outside environment are sources of water in the areas of nanoleakage, which leads to decreased resin-dentine bonds. Two aspects related to permeability are thought to improve the mechanical stability of resindentine bonds. One aspect is the reduction of permeability in the dentinal tubules, and the other is the improvement of resin infiltration to the hybrid layer. This review includes the permeability of dentine, infiltration of adhesives in the hybrid layer, and strategies concerning permeability and infiltration to create stable resin-dentine bonds.

Key words: permeability, water-trees, bonding durability, permeability, water-trees, bonding durability

CLC Number: 

  • R 783.1

TrendMD: 
[1] Sauro S, Mannocci F, Toledano M, et al. Influence of the hydrostatic pulpal pressure on droplets formation in current etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives: a video rate/TSM microscopy and fluid filtration study[J]. Dent Mater, 2009, 25(11):1392-1402.
[2] Pereira JC, Segala AD, Gillam DG. Effect of desensitizing agents on the hydraulic conductance of human dentin subjected to different surface pretreatments—an in vitro study[J]. Dent Mater, 2005, 21(2):129-138.
[3] Sidhu SK, Agee KA, Waller JL, et al. In vitro evaporative vs. convective water flux across human dentin before and after conditioning and placement of glass-ionomer cements[J]. Am J Dent, 2004, 17(3):211-215.
[4] Pashley DH, Matthews WG, Zhang Y, et al. Fluid shifts across human dentine in vitro in response to hydrodynamic stimuli[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 1996, 41(11):1065-1072.
[5] Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, et al. Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer[J]. Oper Dent, 1995, 20(1):18-25.
[6] Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yoshiyama M. Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives[J]. J Dent Res, 2002, 81(7):472-476.
[7] Sauro S, Pashley DH, Montanari M, et al. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin permeability and adhesion of self-etch adhesives[J]. Dent Mater, 2007, 23(6):705-713.
[8] Nishitani Y, Yoshiyama M, Hosaka K, et al. Use of Hoy’s solubility parameters to predict water sorption/ solubility of experimental primers and adhesives[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2007, 115(1):81-86.
[9] Nogueira P, Ramírez C, Torres A, et al. Effect of water sorption on the structure and mechanical properties of an epoxy resin system[J]. J Appl Polym Sci, 2001, 80(1):71-80.
[10] Bertassoni LE, Orgel JP, Antipova O, et al. The dentin organic matrix-limitations of restorative dentistry hidden on the nanometer scale[J]. Acta Biomater, 2012, 8(7):2419-2433.
[11] Takahashi M, Nakajima M, Tagami J, et al. The importance of size-exclusion characteristics of type 1 collagen in bonding to dentin matrices[J]. Acta Biomater, 2013, 9(12):9522-9528.
[12] Sadek FT, Castellan CS, Braga RR, et al. One-year stability of resin-dentin bonds created with a hy drophobic ethanol-wet bonding technique[J]. Dent Mater, 2010, 26(4):380-386.
[13] Shafiei F, Memarpour M, Doozandeh M. Effect of oxalate desensitizer on the bonding durability of adhesive resin cements to dentin[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2012, 56(3):187-193.
[14] Pei D, Liu S, Huang C, et al. Effect of pretreatment with calcium-containing desensitizer on the dentine bonding of mild self-etch adhesives[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2013, 121(3 Pt 1):204-210.
[15] Torkabadi S, Nakajima M, Ikeda M, et al. Influence of bonded enamel margins on dentin bonding stability of one-step self-etching adhesives[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2009, 11(5):347-353.
[16] Silva SM, Malacarne-Zanon J, Carvalho RM, et al. Effects of potassium oxalate on knoop hardness of etch-and-rinse adhesives[J]. Oper Dent, 2012, 37(4):356-362.
[17] Yousry MM. Effect of re-etching oxalate-occluded dentin and enamel on bonding effectiveness of etchand-rinse adhesives[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2012, 14(1):31-38.
[18] Stawarczyk B, Hartmann R, Hartmann L, et al. The effect of dentin desensitizer on shear bond strength of conventional and self-adhesive resin luting cements after aging[J]. Oper Dent, 2011, 36(5):492-501.
[19] Ravikumar N, Shankar P, Indira R. Shear bond strengths of two dentin bonding agents with two desensitizers: an in vitro study[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2011, 14(3):247-251.
[20] Jose P, Sakhamuri S, Sampath V, et al. Degree of conversion of two dentin bonding agents with and without a desensitizing agent using fourier transform infrared spectroscopy: an in vitro study[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2011, 14(3):302-305.
[21] Portillo M, Lorenzo MC, Moreno P, et al. Influence of Er:YAG and Ti: sapphire laser irradiation on the microtensile bond strength of several adhesives to dentin[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2015, 30(2):483-492.
[22] Can-Karabulut DC. Influence of a dentin desensitizer and a red-wavelength diode laser application on bond strength of composite to dentin in vitro[J]. Photomed Laser Surg, 2010, 28(Suppl 2):S19-S24.
[23] Shafiei F, Memarpour M. Effect of surface pretreatment with two desensitizer techniques on the microleakage of resin composite restorations[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2013, 28(1):247-251.
[24] Ye Q, Park J, Topp E, et al. Effect of photoinitiators on the in vitro performance of a dentin adhesive exposed to simulated oral environment[J]. Dent Mater, 2009, 25(4):452-458.
[25] Finer Y, Jaffer F, Santerre JP. Mutual influence of cholesterol esterase and pseudocholinesterase on the biodegradation of dental composites[J]. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(10):1787-1793.
[26] Park J, Ye Q, Topp EM, et al. Effect of photoinitiator system and water content on dynamic mechanical properties of a light-cured bisGMA/HEMA dental resin[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2010, 93(4):1245-1251.
[27] Cadenaro M, Antoniolli F, Codan B, et al. Influence of different initiators on the degree of conversion of experimental adhesive blends in relation to their hydrophilicity and solvent content[J]. Dent Mater, 2010, 26(4):288-294.
[28] Ikemura K, Ichizawa K, Fuchigami K, et al. Design of a new dental adhesive—effect of a water-soluble sodium acylphosphine oxide with crown ether on adhesion to dental hard tissues[J]. Dent Mater J, 2009, 28(3):267-276.
[29] Fang M, Liu R, Xiao Y, et al. Biomodification to dentin by a natural crosslinker improved the resindentin bonds[J]. J Dent, 2012, 40(6):458-466.
[30] Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Mutluay MM, Agee KA, et al. Carbodiimide cross-linking inactivates soluble and matrix-bound MMPs, in vitro[J]. J Dent Res, 2012, 91(2):192-196.
[31] Fawzy AS, Nitisusanta LI, Iqbal K, et al. Riboflavin as a dentin crosslinking agent: ultraviolet A versus blue light[J]. Dent Mater, 2012, 28(12):1284-1291.
[32] Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives[J]. Dent Mater, 2011, 27(1):1-16.
（本文采编 王晴）
[1] Liao Wenting, Li Yan.. Influence of cysteine cathepsins on dentin bonding durability [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(3): 340-343.
[2] Lin Yihua1, Song Xiaomeng2, Zhang Wei3. Study of bonding property among 3 kinds of resin-reinforced glass ionomer and zirconia ceramics [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(3): 305-308.
[3] XIA Song-xin, LIN Zhengmei.. Research progress of the bonding durability of resin-based root canal sealers [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2010, 37(6): 681-684.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2004, 31(02): 126 -128 .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .