国际口腔医学杂志

国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 648-656.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2022076

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

内蒙古地区蒙古族和汉族成人面部软组织侧貌角度对比研究

樊永杰(),董婷婷   

  1. 内蒙古医科大学第四附属医院口腔科 包头 014030
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-06 修回日期:2022-07-12 出版日期:2022-11-01 发布日期:2022-11-03
  • 通讯作者: 樊永杰
  • 作者简介:樊永杰，主任医师，硕士，Email：13947240089@163.com

Comparative study of facial soft tissue angle between Mongolian and Han adults in Inner Mongolia

Fan Yongjie(),Dong Tingting.   

  1. Dept. of Stomatology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Baotou 014030, China
  • Received:2022-03-06 Revised:2022-07-12 Online:2022-11-01 Published:2022-11-03
  • Contact: Yongjie Fan

RichHTML

17

PDF (PC)

96

摘要：

目的 对内蒙古地区个别正常𬌗蒙古族和汉族成人面部软组织用三维立体摄影技术进行测量研究，得出该民族面部软组织角度测量数据值，建立该地区蒙古族和汉族正常𬌗成人面部软组织角度值数据库。 方法 从内蒙古在校学生中严格筛选出符合标准的295名正常𬌗样本，其中，汉族男性60名，汉族女性90名，蒙古族女性76名，蒙古族男性69名，采用Morpheus 3D面部扫描仪对受试者进行14个软组织标记点的确定，17个项目的角度测量，使用 SPSS 22.0 统计分析，对比面部差异。 结果 汉族男性和蒙古族男性对比中，面型角（G-Sn-Pg）、面凸角（N-Sn-Pg）、全面凸角（N-Prn-Pg）、鼻唇角（Cm-Sn-Ls）、SNPG角（Pg-N-Ls）、INPG角（Pg-N-Li）、Na角（N-T-Prn）、Mn角（Ls-T-Pg）的差异具有统计学意义。汉族女性和蒙古族女性对比中，G-Sn-Pg、N-Sn-Pg、N-Prn-Pg、Pg-N-Ls、Pg-N-Li、颏唇沟角（Pg-Sm-Li）、Mx角（Ls-T-Prn）、Ls-T-Pg、面上1/3角（Tri-T-N）、面中1/3角（N-T-Sn）的差异具有统计学意义。汉族女性和汉族男性对比中，N-Sn-Pg、鼻额角（G-N-Prn）、Cm-Sn-Ls、Pg-N-Ls、Pg-Sm-Li、SNI角（Ls-N-Li）、TV角（N-T-Pg）、Ls-T-Prn、Ls-T-Pg、Tri-T-N、N-T-Sn的差异具有统计学意义。蒙古族男性和女性的对比中，女性N-Prn-Pg、G-N-Prn、鼻尖角（N-Prn-Sn）、Tri-T-N均大于男性，男性面下1/3角（Sn-T-Me）大于女性。 结论 内蒙古地区蒙古族人群和汉族人群之间面部侧貌存在一定差异。

关键词: 三维摄影术, 蒙古族, 汉族, 面部软组织角度

Abstract:

Objective The purpose of the paper is to obtain the angle measurement data of facial soft tissues of Mongolian nationality and to establish the angle value database of human facial soft tissues of Mongolian and Han adults through studying their facial soft tissues with individual normal teeth occlusion in Inner Mongolia by using three-dimensional (3D) stereo photography technology. Methods A total of 295 normal dental occlusion samples were selected from students in Inner Mongolia, including 60 Han males, 90 Han females, 76 Mongolian females, and 69 Mongolian males. Using Morpheus 3D facial scanner, 14 soft tissue markers were identified, and 17 items were angled. SPSS 22.0 was used for statistical analysis and the comparisons of facial differences. Results Statistically significant differences were observed in facial shape angle (G-Sn-Pg), facial convex angle (N-Sn-Pg), total convex angle (N-Prn-Pg), nasolabial angle (Cm-Sn-Ls), SNPG angle (Pg-N-Ls), INPG angle (Pg-N-Li), Na angle (N-T-Prn), and Mn angle (Ls-T-Pg) between Han and Mongolian males. Statistically significant differences were noted in G-Sn-Pg, N-Sn-Pg, N-Prn-Pg, Pg-N-Ls, Pg-N-Li, mentolabial sulcus angle (Pg-Sm-Li), Mx angle (Ls-T-Pg), Ls-T-Pg, 1/3 of the face angle (Tri-T-N), and 1/3 of the middle face angle (N-T-Sn) between Han and Mongolian females. Statistically significant differences were observed in N-Sn-Pg, nasofrontal angle (G-N-Prn), Cm-Sn-Ls, Pg-N-Ls, Pg-Sm-Li, SNI angle (Ls-N-Li), TV angle (N-T-Pg), Ls-T-Prn, Ls-T-Pg, Tri-T-N, and N-T-Sn between Han females and Han males. In the Mongolian male-female comparison, the female’s N-Prn-Pg, G-N-Prn, nasal tip angle (N-Prn-Sn), and Tri-T-N are all larger than the male’s, whereas the male’s Sn-T-Me is larger than the female’s. Conclusion Some differences exist in the facial profile between Mongolian and Han populations in Inner Mongolia.

Key words: three-dimensional photography, Mongolian nationality, Han nationality, facial soft tissue angle

中图分类号: 

  • R 783.5

图1

TVL线测量"

表 1

汉族男性和蒙古族男性面部软组织角度的比较"

测量指标汉族男性（n=60）蒙古族男性（n=69）P值
x±s95%置信区间x±s95%置信区间
G-Sn-Pg164.54±5.05163.23~165.84166.74±5.62165.39~168.090.022*
N-Sn-Pg160.88±4.98159.59~162.17163.60±5.75162.22~164.980.005*
N-Prn-Pg134.14±5.29132.77~135.50136.13±4.39135.07~137.180.021*
G-N-Prn143.19±7.81141.17~145.20143.78±7.13142.07~145.500.651
N-Prn-Sn119.21±5.96117.67~120.75117.92±6.16116.44~119.400.232
Cm-Sn-Ls103.05±2.91102.30~103.80101.62±2.88101.36~103.620.006*
Pg-N-Ls10.65±2.3510.04~11.259.28±2.558.67~9.890.002*
Pg-N-Li4.65±1.734.20~5.103.41±1.603.03~3.800.000*
Pg-Sm-Li142.97±11.32140.04~145.89144.61±9.53142.32~146.900.371
Ls-N-Li6.03±1.895.54~6.515.90±2.105.39~6.400.718
N-T-Prn19.04±1.7618.59~19.4919.69±1.3719.36~20.010.02*
N-T-Pg47.35±2.6046.68~48.0247.20±2.6546.56~47.840.75
Ls-T-Prn12.50±1.3412.16~12.8512.26±1.1111.99~12.530.266
Ls-T-Pg17.21±1.6216.79~17.6316.58±1.5816.20~16.960.026*
Tri-T-N31.58±3.2130.75~32.4130.59±3.3929.77~31.400.093
N-T-Sn27.35±2.0926.81~27.8927.51±1.5927.12~27.890.625
Sn-T-Me26.82±2.3026.23~27.4126.68±2.0326.19~27.160.705

表 2

汉族女性和蒙古族女性面部软组织角度的比较"

测量指标汉族女性（n=90）蒙古族女性（n=76）P值
x±s95%置信区间x±s95%置信区间
G-Sn-Pg166.27±5.75165.06~167.47168.20±4.36167.20~169.190.017*
N-Sn-Pg162.91±6.15161.62~164.19165.17±4.35164.18~166.160.008*
N-Prn-Pg135.43±4.47134.5~136.37137.77±3.77136.91~138.630.000*
G-N-Prn145.79±6.90144.34~147.23147.09±5.57145.82~148.370.186
N-Prn-Sn120.89±7.17119.39~122.40120.75±6.33119.30~122.190.891
Cm-Sn-Ls101.86±2.87101.25~102.46101.38±3.03100.69~102.070.303
Pg-N-Ls9.45±2.378.95~9.948.55±1.958.11~9.000.009*
Pg-N-Li4.65±2.464.13~5.163.24±1.372.92~3.550.000*
Pg-Sm-Li149.23±11.04146.91~151.54144.34±8.75142.34~146.340.002*
Ls-N-Li5.08±1.664.73~5.425.36±1.664.98~5.740.276
N-T-Prn19.76±2.4419.25~20.2719.25±1.5618.89~19.600.115
N-T-Pg48.76±2.8748.16~49.3651.84±44.9541.57~62.110.517
Ls-T-Prn14.05±4.6013.08~15.0112.28±1.1612.02~12.550.001*
Ls-T-Pg18.75±4.6017.79~19.7116.31±1.4015.99~16.630.000*
Tri-T-N34.11±3.7933.32~34.9032.34±3.0131.65~33.030.001*
N-T-Sn28.73±2.0528.30~29.1627.41±1.6427.04~27.790.000*
Sn-T-Me26.3±2.6225.76~26.8525.96±1.7425.56~26.360.326

表 3

汉族女性和汉族男性面部软组织角度的对比"

测量指标汉族女性（n=90）汉族男性（n=60）P值
x±s95%置信区间x±s95%置信区间
G-Sn-Pg166.27±5.75165.06~167.47164.54±5.05163.23~165.840.060
N-Sn-Pg162.91±6.15161.62~164.19160.88±4.98159.59~162.170.035*
N-Prn-Pg135.43±4.47134.50~136.37134.14±5.29132.77~135.500.108
G-N-Prn145.79±6.90144.34~147.23143.19±7.81141.17~145.200.034*
N-Prn-Sn120.89±7.17119.39~122.40119.21±5.96117.67~120.750.135
Cm-Sn-Ls101.86±2.87101.25~102.46103.05±2.91102.30~103.800.014*
Pg-N-Ls9.45±2.378.95~9.9410.65±2.3510.04~11.250.003*
Pg-N-Li4.65±2.464.13~5.164.65±1.734.20~5.100.994
Pg-Sm-Li149.23±11.04146.91~151.54142.97±11.32140.04~145.890.001*
Ls-N-Li5.08±1.664.73~5.426.03±1.895.54~6.510.001*
N-T-Prn19.76±2.4419.25~20.2719.04±1.7618.59~19.490.050
N-T-Pg48.76±2.8748.16~49.3647.35±2.6046.68~48.020.003*
Ls-T-Prn14.05±4.6013.08~15.0112.50±1.3412.16~12.850.013*
Ls-T-Pg18.75±4.6017.79~19.7117.21±1.6216.79~17.630.014*
Tri-T-N34.11±3.7933.32~34.9031.58±3.2130.75~32.410.000*
N-T-Sn28.73±2.0528.30~29.1627.35±2.0926.81~27.890.000*
Sn-T-Me26.30±2.6225.76~26.8526.82±2.3026.23~27.410.217

表 4

蒙古族女性和蒙古族男性面部软组织角度的对比"

测量指标蒙古族男性（n=69）蒙古族女性（n=76）P值
x±s95%置信区间x±s95%置信区间
G-Sn-Pg166.74±5.62165.39~168.09168.20±4.36167.20~169.190.081
N-Sn-Pg163.60±5.75162.22~164.98165.17±4.35164.18~166.160.064
N-Prn-Pg136.13±4.39135.07~137.18137.77±3.77136.91~138.630.017*
G-N-Prn143.78±7.13142.07~145.50147.09±5.57145.82~148.370.002*
N-Prn-Sn117.92±6.16116.44~119.40120.75±6.33119.30~122.190.007*
Cm-Sn-Ls101.62±2.88101.36~103.62101.38±3.03100.69~102.070.089
Pg-N-Ls9.28±2.558.67~9.898.55±1.958.11~9.000.055
Pg-N-Li3.41±1.603.03~3.803.24±1.372.92~3.550.477
Pg-Sm-Li144.61±9.53142.32~146.90144.34±8.75142.34~146.340.856
Ls-N-Li5.90±2.105.39~6.405.36±1.664.98~5.740.086
N-T-Prn19.69±1.3719.36~20.0119.25±1.5618.89~19.600.075
N-T-Pg47.20±2.6546.56~47.8451.84±44.9541.57~62.110.394
Ls-T-Prn12.26±1.1111.99~12.5312.28±1.1612.02~12.550.919
Ls-T-Pg16.58±1.5816.20~16.9616.31±1.4015.99~16.630.283
Tri-T-N30.59±3.3929.77~31.4032.34±3.0131.65~33.030.001*
N-T-Sn27.51±1.5927.12~27.8927.41±1.6427.04~27.790.731
Sn-T-Me26.68±2.0326.19~27.1625.96±1.7425.56~26.360.023*

图2

有特征性的蒙古族男性、汉族男性、汉族女性、蒙古族女性侧貌A：蒙古族男性；B：汉族男性；C：汉族女性；D：蒙古族女性。"

1 刘畅, 刘莹, 彭慧敏, 等. 中国北方正常年轻成人自然头位下软组织侧貌角度测量及分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2016, 42(6): 1157-1162.
Liu C, Liu Y, Peng HM, et al. Measurement and analysis of soft tissue facial profile of northern Chinese young adults under natural head position[J]. J Jilin Univ (Med Ed), 2016, 42(6): 1157-1162.
2 杨秀梅, 邓锋, 王华桥, 等. 尼泊尔正常𬌗成人面部软组织侧貌头影测量分析[J]. 重庆医科大学学报, 2011, 36(3): 344-347.
Yang XM, Deng F, Wang HQ, et al. The study of cephalometry of soft tissue profile in Nepalese adults with normal occlusion[J]. J Chongqing Med Univ, 2011, 36(3): 344-347.
3 Chiarella S, Simona B, Alessandro L, et al. Three-dimensional soft-tissue facial morphometry in Caucasian obese adults[J]. Pesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria E Clínica Integrada, 2019, 19(1): 1-12.
4 董瑜, 秦晨, 白石柱, 等. 自然头位正面记录方法及其可重复性的初步研究[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2014, 30(4): 234-236.
Dong Y, Qin C, Bai SZ, et al. The preliminary validation of a new method to achieve frontal facial photographs of natural head position[J]. J Clin Stomatol, 2014, 30(4): 234-236.
5 赵一姣, 熊玉雪, 杨慧芳, 等. 2种三维颜面部扫描仪测量精度的定量评价[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2016, 32(1): 37-42.
Zhao YJ, Xiong YX, Yang HF, et al. Quantitative evaluation of the measurement accuracy of 2 three-dimensional facial scanners[J]. J Pract Stomatol, 2016, 32(1): 37-42.
6 Farkas LG, Posnick JC. Growth and development of regional units in the head and face based on anthropometric measurements[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofacial J, 1992, 29(4): 301-302.
7 刘畅, 李新青, 刘莹, 等. 中国北方正常年轻成人自然头位下软组织侧貌的线性测量和分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2016, 42(1): 109-114.
Liu C, Li XQ, Liu Y, et al. Linear measurement and analysis of soft tissue facial profile of Northern Chinese young adult under nature head position[J]. J Jilin Univ (Med Ed), 2016, 42(1): 109-114.
8 周坤玥, 欧平花, 余明珠, 等. 湖南汉族正常𬌗成人面部软组织侧貌头影测量分析[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2015, 40(4): 398-405.
Zhou KY, Ou PH, Yu MZ, et al. Cephalometric analysis of facial soft tissue profile of normal dental synthetic human of Han nationality in Hunan[J]. J Centr South Univ (Med Sci), 2015, 40(4): 398-405.
9 关慧娟, 王青青, 曹正飞, 等. 中国正常𬌗人群面部软组织侧貌性别差异的Meta分析[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2019, 12(5): 279-284, 290.
Guan HJ, Wang QQ, Cao ZF, et al. Gender differences in facial soft-tissue in normal occlusion population in China: a Meta analysis[J]. Chin J Pract Stomatol, 2019, 12(5): 279-284, 290.
10 Bergman RT. Cephalometric soft tissue facial analysis[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1999, 116(4): 373-389.
11 孙兆霞, 梁丽. 中国青年女性软组织侧貌特征研究[J]. 中国整形美容外科杂志, 2014, 25(11): 670-673.
Sun ZX, Liang L. Study on soft tissue lateral features of Chinese young women[J]. Chin J Plast Aesthet Surg, 2014, 25(11): 670-673.
12 蔡意达, 蔡中, 俞立英. 上海地区汉族女性软组织侧貌的X线头影测量研究[J]. 中国临床医学, 2009, 16(1): 157-159.
Cai YD, Cai Z, Yu LY. Cephalometric analysis of soft-tissue profile of females with Han nationality in Shanghai[J]. Chin J Clin Med, 2009, 16(1): 157-159.
13 樊永杰, 阿荣高娃. 三维摄影术测量蒙古族正常𬌗成人面部软组织的研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(3): 291-294.
Fan YJ, A R. Stereophotogrammetry-based facial soft tissue measurement of Mongolian adults with normal occlusion[J]. Int J Stomatol, 2018, 45(3): 291-294.
14 吴皓, 吴昕. 郑州地区100名成年人正常𬌗软组织侧貌X线头影测量研究[J]. 郑州大学学报(医学版), 2003, 38(3): 404-406.
Wu H, Wu X. Measurements of soft tissue profile of head roentgenogram for adults with normal occlusion in Zhengzhou area[J]. J Henan Med Univ, 2003, 38(3): 404-406.
15 Burstone CJ. The integumental profice[J]. Am J Orthod, 1978, 44(1): 1.
16 虞菲, 房兵. 切牙内收与唇部位置变化相关研究[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2018, 11(8): 495-497.
Yu F, Fang B. Relationship between lip position response and incisor retraction[J]. Chin J Pract Stomatol, 2018, 11(8): 495-497.
17 Garcia C, Olivi P. Nasolabial angle and orthognathic surgery[J]. Int Orthod, 2015, 13(1): 43-60.
18 Shmuly T, Chaushu G, Allon DM. Does maxillary advancement influence the nasolabial angle[J]. J Craniofacial Surg, 2019, 30(5): e408-e411.
19 Lines PA, Lines RR, Lines CA. Profilemetrics and facial esthetics[J]. Am J Orthod, 1978, 73(6): 648-657.
20 孙惠, 冯雪, 林珠. 西安地区陕西籍正常成人软组织X线头影测量研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2005, 21(4): 537-539.
Sun H, Feng X, Lin Z. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis of adults in Xi’an area with normal occlusion[J]. J Pract Stomatol, 2005, 21(4): 537-539.
21 孙兆霞, 程辉, 吴德野. 山东淄博高校青年大学生不同体型反映面侧貌轮廓特点[J]. 解剖学报, 2019, 50(1): 111-118.
Sun ZX, Cheng H, Wu DY. Soft tissue facial profile of Han nationality young students for different somatotypes in Zibo Shandong[J]. Acta Anat Sin, 2019, 50(1): 111-118.
22 涂春景, 江崇民, 蔡睿. 新疆克拉玛依市维吾尔族和汉族成年人体部体质特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(3): 370-379.
Tu CJ, Jiang CM, Cai R. Physical characteristics of uygur and Han adults in Karamay, the Xinjiang uygur autonomous region[J]. Acta Anthropol Sin, 2017, 36(3): 370-379.
23 Ramsey TC, Sorin MS, Hart TC, et al. Comparison of dentofacial morphology in monozygotic twin pairs with their siblings using LISREL[J]. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 1992, 16(3): 178-182.
24 李咏兰, 刘璐. 中国蒙古族头面部的体质人类学特征[J]. 解剖学报, 2019, 50(1): 98-106.
Li YL, Liu L. Physical anthropological characteristics of Mongolian head and face in China[J]. Acta Anat Sin, 2019, 50(1): 98-106.
[1] 樊永杰, 阿荣高娃. 三维摄影术测量蒙古族正常成人面部软组织的研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(3): 291-294.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张新春. 桩冠修复与无髓牙的保护[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 王昆润. 长期单侧鼻呼吸对头颅发育有不利影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] 彭国光. 颈淋巴清扫术中颈交感神经干的解剖变异[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] 杨凯. 淋巴化疗的药物运载系统及其应用现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] 康非吾. 种植义齿下部结构生物力学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] 柴枫. 可摘局部义齿用Co-Cr合金的激光焊接[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] 孟姝,吴亚菲,杨禾. 伴放线放线杆菌产生的细胞致死膨胀毒素及其与牙周病的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] 费晓露,丁一,徐屹. 牙周可疑致病菌对口腔黏膜上皮的粘附和侵入[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] 赵兴福,黄晓晶. 变形链球菌蛋白组学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] 庞莉苹,姚江武. 抛光和上釉对陶瓷表面粗糙度、挠曲强度及磨损性能的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .